logo
Surprising candidate in running for top police job

Surprising candidate in running for top police job

News.com.au4 days ago
It's crunch time for the six candidates vying for a role many consider a 'poisoned chalice' – the NSW Police Commissioner.
Interviews wrapped up this week and time will soon tell whether Premier Chris Minns has opted for a 'clean skin, dependable safe bet' to calm the storm after the force's turbulent recent history.
In the running are hot favourite Mal Lanyon, as well as the current acting commissioner Peter Thurtell, Deputy Commissioner Paul Pisanos, former deputy Mick Willing and two assistant commissioners Peter Cotter and wildcard Rod Smith.
The role has brought with it in recent years intense public scrutiny and relentless media attention, and the ever-present threat of misconduct scandals or mishandled critical incidents have created a perception that the job is exceptionally difficult and carries considerable reputational risk.
Insiders have told news.com.au the very dependable and well respected Mr Thurtell has excelled in the role since he took over from the state's first female Commissioner Karen Webb, and Mr Minns would be 'wise' to let him continue to 'steady the ship'.
'Thurtell has got a taste of the top job and knows he can do it,' one senior-placed NSW police officer said.
'Nothing negative has happened under his watch. Every major incident he has taken the lead, not waited or passed it on.
'If there is a critical incident the region commander has to take control but anything he should be in the public eye for, he has been and he's smashed it.'
Mr Thurtell has appeared on television as part of a panel discussion on domestic violence and appeared in press conferences when issues arise.
He's impressed the troops on the ground with his humble approach.
'He's been a region commander, he's got his battle scars, he has had everything thrown at him and he comes out with flying colours. You can't put him on the hop, if you try to trip him up you can't.
'And what's important is that those who know him absolutely trust him.'
While Mr Thurtell might be popular among the troops, most believe Mr Lanyon is the Premier's favourite and a 'shoe in' for the job.
'He's been biding his time, networking with politicians and he's ready for his comeback,' one source said.
Mr Lanyon has a long career in the police force, including heading the state crime command, and has been involved in disaster response and recovery, including leading flood recovery efforts in the Northern Rivers region in 2022.
He missed out on the top job last time round – many say because of a night in February 2021 where he was found intoxicated, laying on the ground in Gouldburn by ambulance officers who later described him as argumentative and agitated.
Mr Lanyon acknowledged his behaviour and sought to apologise personally.
While he was publicly hauled over the coals for the incident he has since found new support in politicians and police alike, with many still saying 'he's the best one for the job'.
'You'd think the government might be worried though about the Merino incident coming up over and over again. The force has copped so much bad publicity, but a lot of cops think Mal knows what he's doing, is the most qualified, most media savvy and the best one for the job so I most think the Premier will back him and hope people have short memories.'
Mr Lanyon will again go head to head with former sparring partner and fellow deputy Mr Willing.
Both lost out to Ms Webb when Premier Dom Perrotet appointed her the state's first female commissioner.
Mr Willing says he is an even better candidate today than he was three years ago, and believes he is the best fit to refocus the culture of the NSW Police Force.
After being sacked by Ms Webb shortly after she took office, Mr Willing fought his own demons thanks to the sudden loss of identity but found a new purpose as head of Fortem Australia, a non-for-profit organisation devoted to helping first responders and their families.
Police welfare is likely to be his key platform.
Attracting fewer headlines than the other deputies is Mr Pisanos, best known for his work in regional youth crime.
He's travelled the state building rapport with troops on the ground in remote country towns, community elders and kids themselves.
He's passionate about steering them away from a life of crime and into the dozen of diversional programs, trying to give them hope of a better future – while talking tough and vowing to lock up the ones who won't cop the tip.
'Pisanos is a straight shooting kind of cop who shouldn't be underestimated,' one colleague said.
'He's a hard worker and commits to whatever he is tasked.
'History will show the favourites in the past haven't taken out the prize so he shouldn't be written-off. Webb certainly wasn't the favourite, nor was Fuller.'
In the contest to become commissioner, history indicates that the frontrunner isn't always guaranteed success. Ken Moroney, Andrew Scipione, and Mick Fuller all ascended over more favoured deputy commissioners. Ms Webb was no exception.
And lesser known assistant commissioners should not be written off.
Mr Cotter, now head of Professional Standards, was left to face the media in 2023 after the tasering of 95-year-old grandmother Clare Nowland.
Police were heavily criticised for not mentioning the 'taser' in initial media releases. Mr Cotter was the one to confirm to journalists that Ms Nowland had a serrated steak knife in a small treatment room when she moved slowly towards officers and was tasered.
'She had a walking frame but she had a knife,' he said.
Mr Cotter also acted as in the position of Commissioner of the NSW Crime Commission in 2018 and was southern region commander as well as having worked in homicide investigations and is known for his work in victims' services.
Mr Smith is the former principal of Goulburn Police Academy and heads the State Intelligence Command. His quest for the top job has surprised many.
He joined the NSW Police Force in 1989, enjoying a successful and diverse career for over 30 years.
'We're a very professional organisation where we recognise professional qualifications, experience and knowledge,' Assistant Commissioner Smith told Police Insight in 2022.
'How you present yourself, your experience, and your qualifications goes a long way in being able to convey yourself and our organisation as a professional one.'
Whoever takes the top job can expect to be thrust into the media spotlight instantaneously and how they convey themselves will be paramount to their success in one of the most challenging roles in the country.
While Ms Webb's representatives claim her resignation was voluntary, numerous police sources suggest the government actively encouraged her departure due to leaks, persistent media criticism, and concerns about her public performance.
Her supporters say she never stood a chance, with her detractors, including Mr Lanyon and Mr Willing working against her from day one.
'Whoever gets the job they can expect to be watched closely from day one and if they misstep it won't go unnoticed,' an officer said.
What's not lost on the rank and file is the fact there is not a female candidate in sight.
'Wether Karen Webb copped it worse because she is a woman, I guess the record books will show, that's not for me to say, but you can be guaranteed of one thing, no woman will put their hand up any time soon nor will they be considered any time soon,' a senior female officer said.
'I would suggest the powers that be will pick someone who fits the profile of an old school blokey cop. Someone they feel oozes confidence and authority so the public and the media will be on board from day one.
'Whether that's a good thing or a bad thing, I guess time will tell. We will have to watch this space.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The strategies Australians are using to avoid Jim Chalmers' new super tax
The strategies Australians are using to avoid Jim Chalmers' new super tax

The Australian

time3 hours ago

  • The Australian

The strategies Australians are using to avoid Jim Chalmers' new super tax

The Australian Business Network While the federal government hopes to add $2.3bn per year to its coffers from the incoming super tax, savvy Australians are preparing to implement strategies via self managed super funds (SMSFs) to circumvent its impact. It may leave the government well short of its $40bn collection target over the next decade. When federal parliament resumes later this month Labor will welcome three extra senators, boosting their numbers to 29. And with 10 green senators and a further 10 crossbenchers, the government will have multiple pathways to get the required 39 votes needed to pass the contentious Div 296 superannuation tax on super balances above $3m. With the commencement of this new tax on unrealised gains looking more like a case of 'when' rather than 'if', Sydney-based accountant Timothy Ricardo from Accounting Advisor Group says that the key to overcoming Div 296 tax is to bring forward family succession planning arrangements. 'Rather than wait until death to transfer wealth to the next generation, a retiree with over $3m in a self managed super fund might consider adding their children to the fund and start to build their member balance now,' Ricardo says. The way this would work is that the retiree would withdraw a tax-free lump sum from their account-based pension and gift it to the child. The child would then contribute the amount back to the SMSF as a non-concessional contribution. By utilising bring forward rules, the maximum a child could contribute to super is $360,000 in one financial year. 'For someone with $3.5m in super and two children, withdrawing two lots of $360,000 and having the children contribute it back to the SMSF, this would reduce the member balance out of the danger zone of Div 296 to $2.78m while the overall fund balance would remain at $3.5m' Ricardo says. Although the children would be in the accumulation phase and their member balance taxed at up to 15 per cent on income and gains, it sidesteps the annual taxing of unrealised capital gains under Div 296 tax. It was only in 2021 that the Morrison government increased the maximum number of SMSF members from 4 to 6, which conveniently allows more children and family members to participate in this strategy. What you need to know to beat Div 296 The first is that you must have reached a condition of release to be able to withdraw lump sum amounts from super. This usually means reaching age 60 and having retired. For people aged between 60 to 64 who are still working, a transition to retirement pension can be established and up to 10 per cent of the balance withdrawn each financial year as a pension payment. You also need to have a high level of trust that your child or family member will contribute the funds you gift them back to the SMSF rather than take the money and run. And to state the obvious, even when contributed back to the SMSF by the child, it forms part of their members balance, which may be inaccessible for decades if the child is aged in their 30's or 40's. Administratively, as each member of a SMSF must also be a trustee, the operation of the fund becomes more complex. All trustees will be required to sign off on documents such as the investment strategy review, minutes, resolutions, financial statements and tax return. The final challenge is having sufficient liquidity within the super fund to make withdrawals to give to your children. Although this may seem like a deal breaker for those with lumpy assets in the SMSF such as the 17,000 farmers with primary production land inside of SMSF, a recycling strategy can be executed which achieves the goal of transitioning super out of the higher balance parent's name into the lower balance child's name. Ricardo explains the circular nature of the strategy: 'Say a 65 year old retired farmer with a $4m farm in their SMSF only has $100,000 in the fund bank account. To build the member balance of the children, the farmer can withdraw the $100,000 cash from the fund, give it to the child who then contributes it back in the fund, replenishing the $100,000 SMSF bank account balance. This process can then be repeated over and over again until either contribution caps are reached for the child or the desired level of dilution of the parents member balance has been achieved.' It is important to remember that although much has been spoken about the new super tax and its adverse consequences for people with more than $3m in super, its wording has yet to be finalised. Labor does not have a majority in the senate and they may need to compromise with the Greens or crossbenchers, which could see amendments to the final bill. As such, the advice coming from tax, legal and financial advisors is to prepare strategies to mitigate the Div 296 tax, however keep them on ice until the final legislation is passed and comes into effect. James Gerrard is principal and director of financial planning firm Read related topics: Wealth James Gerrard Wealth Columnist

Wighton cops four-game ban in a huge blow for the Rabbitohs
Wighton cops four-game ban in a huge blow for the Rabbitohs

News.com.au

time11 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Wighton cops four-game ban in a huge blow for the Rabbitohs

Wayne Bennett's hopes of avoiding his first wooden spoon have taken a massive hit with veteran playmaker Jack Wighton slapped with a whopping four-match ban after he was found guilty of a grade two shoulder charge at the NRL judiciary on Tuesday night. The Rabbitohs have lost eight in a row and head into round 22 in last spot behind the Knights and Titans on points differential, but their hopes of causing a gigantic boilover against the Broncos have copped a devastating blow with their five-eighth sidelined. He joins a host of stars who are missing for the club including Cam Murray, Latrell Mitchell and Cody Walker. Wighton could have accepted a three-match ban for the grade two charge that saw him sent to the sin bin for a tackle that knocked out Cronulla's Toby Rudolf on Saturday night but rolled the dice after he pleaded not guilty. The panel of Greg McCallum and Bob Lindner listened to the 75-minute hearing and deliberated for just 15 minutes before they unanimously found him guilty. 'It was a fair hearing,' Wighton said afterwards. 'We came here thinking we had a good case. We didn't get the result we wanted. 'I'll turn my attention to preparing my teammates and really helping everyone at my club the best way I can.' It was a reunion of sorts between Wighton and judiciary counsel Patrick Knowles, with the five-eighth asking him 'how many games of rugby league have you played?' during a fiery hearing in 2023 when he was banned for three matches for biting. Wighton didn't give evidence on this occasion, a point not lost on Knowles who suggested he could have explained why there were no other options available to him to make a different type of tackle. However, judiciary chairman Geoff Bellew reminded the panel that Wighton had no obligation to justify. Knowles described the contact as a 'textbook example of a shoulder charge' and that he twisted his body, the right shoulder led the forceful contact and that his left arm raised in a bracing motion but didn't attempt to wrap. 'The amount of force generated in a tackle that used no arms carries a significant risk of injury,' he said. 'The shoulder was the first impact and carried the primary degree of force.' Prominent Sydney lawyer Nick Ghabar represented Wighton and argued it was 'quite wrong' to suggest he propped and drove with the shoulder and that he did his best to avoid a head on collision. Ghabar argued that the right arm wrapped around Rudolf's left arm before contact and that the Cronulla forward generated the force by leading with his head and arms. 'Rudolf stepped 'violently' off his left foot,' he said, arguing that it was inevitable that there'd be a more violent collision if Wighton hadn't dipped his body. 'Wighton drops his body height to avoid the risk of a head clash. He's got a split second decision to make. He's attempting to tackle with his left arm but his right arm doesn't have the ability to swing around the back of Rudolf.' The referee's report from Belinda Sharpe included a quote from Wighton that said 'I couldn't get my arm out', while the medical report said the injury was caused by a 'head clash from opponent'. Ghabar suggested that the first contact was shoulder on shoulder, but that played into the argument it was an actual shoulder charge. Knowles refuted a number of those arguments and pointed out Wighton's right fist was clenched so it couldn't have been a conventional wrapping tackle and that he could've twisted the other way and made a conventional left shoulder tackle. Ghabar sought a downgrade that would have seen Wighton miss two matches, but it was dismissed after Knowles argued the force was moderate, it was careless and the risk of injury was moderate and that the risk came to fruition. Wighton will miss matches against the Broncos, Titans, Eels and Dragons and will return in the final round against the Roosters, with Lewis Dodd likely to start in the halves.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store