logo
The value of ‘almost.' Why near misses can make or break you

The value of ‘almost.' Why near misses can make or break you

Fast Company3 days ago

Whether we like it or not, we live in a world that is ruthlessly optimized to reward results. Nonetheless, failure is a part of everyone's life—and an essential part of achievement in fields ranging from sports to science.
In fact, high achievers are those who fail more often —not less—than the average person. They take more risks, go outside their comfort zone, set more challenging goals, and engage more frequently and vigorously in improving their performance—and this is how they succeed. You can't lose if you never play—you also can't win.
Runner-up
But what about coming in second? Is there value to the 'near miss'—to being so close to a win, but falling short?
In education, being salutatorian is impressive. But it still means you miss out on the valedictory speech and its attendant scholarship. A high spot on the university waitig list rarely becomes an enrollment offer. In careers, the runner-up performer might earn a congratulatory email but not the promotion or hefty salary increase; the second-best job interview candidate gets little consolation from knowing they almost received a job offer but are still unemployed.
Salespeople who hit 99% of their quota still forfeit the Hawaiian-vacation incentive and bonus. In research, the lab that publishes second loses the patent, the grant, and the headlines. And if you are the runner-up in a presidential election, there's at best a slim chance you can run again in the future, and your popularity may actually decrease after losing (in politics, this loser effect leads to a dip in confidence from voters, and there's often no time for a second chance).
Near misses as opportunity
And yet, near misses are not as disastrous as the above thought experiments suggest.
Indeed, finishing a hair's breadth behind the winner still means you've outperformed almost everyone else—be they hundreds of classmates, thousands of job applicants, or an entire electorate. Moreover, the person who edges you out isn't necessarily better on merit alone —factors like political currents, privilege, or just plain luck can tip the scales.
Perhaps most importantly, coming up just short can serve as a springboard for growth, offering the chance to learn, adapt, and come back stronger—provided you choose to seize it. Here's why:
Lessons learned
First, while everyone prefers success to failure, it is often easier to learn from failure than from success. Success tells you that you are great; it is the socially accepted way to provide you with positive feedback on your talents, reinforcing your self-belief, and inflating your ego. While this sounds great—and without much in the way of downside—success is also likely to generate complacency, overconfidence, and arrogance (it's much easier to stay humble in defeat). Conversely, failures are opportunities to learn, especially when you see them as learning experiments that provide you with critical feedback on your skills, choices, and behaviors. As Niels Bohr wisely noted, 'An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field.'
In short, a near miss can act as an inherently, if brutally honest audit of your assumptions and strategies—uncovering blind spots that success tends to conceal. By forcing you—or at least inviting you—to diagnose exactly why you fell short, a near miss suggests you refine your mental models; rethink and tweak your tactics; and build new, better tested, decision-making muscles.
Failing enthusiastically
Second, failure increases the gap between your aspirational self (who you want to be) and your actual self (who you are, at least from a reputational standpoint). This uncomfortable psychological gap is only reduced through hard work, grit, and persistence, which together strengthen your chances of succeeding in the future. At the very least, they help you become a better version of yourself, even if you don't succeed in achieving a sought-after prize or goal. As Winston Churchill famously noted, 'Success is stumbling from failure to failure with no loss of enthusiasm.'
Importantly, near misses can be a powerful form of failure precisely because they hurt the most. Being so close to a success can reaffirm your determination and reignite your ambition. Every extraordinary achiever (across fields) differs from others in one important way: they are less likely to be satisfied with their achievements. Indeed, the most common reason people fail to learn from failure is that they are too wounded or hurt by their lack of success, to the point that it extinguishes their drive. In contrast, extraordinary achievers will not give up or let go—even when their failures are hard to digest. This ambitious mindset helps them seek to understand the factors leading to their near misses without getting deflated or depressed by them. Instead, it makes them even hungrier for victory, resilient, and focused on bouncing back stronger.
Emotionally resilient
Third, the way you respond to any form of defeat or failure, and especially the painful near misses, sends a powerful signal to everyone around you—investors, bosses, or teammates—that you're emotionally mature, resilient, and coachable. Humans have a general tendency to attribute their successes to their own talents and merit, while blaming others, or situations, for their failures and misses. Avoiding this tendency makes you an exception to the norm. This will be noticed and will impress others. While resilience is largely a function of your personality (the more emotionally stable, extroverted, curious, agreeable, and especially conscientious you are, the more resilience you will show), we can all work to increase our resilience if we truly care about achieving our end goal, by becoming grittier and harnessing whatever mental toughness we have.
When you dissect a near miss with curiosity and humility, you demonstrate a growth mindset that invites collaboration and sparks confidence in your potential. Visible resilience often earns more credibility (and resources) than a flawless run, because it shows you're willing to learn in public. Over time, people who witness your thoughtful rebound become your strongest advocates, eager to back the next iteration of your vision. Life, despite how it feels in disappointing moments, is not a final exam but a continuous assessment; what matters most is not brilliant one-off successes but reliable, steady, determined excellence. As Aristotle pointed out, 'We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.'
Greater legacies
To be sure, there's no shortage of prominent historical figures who confirm how near misses and other kinds of failures in their early career stages were poor indicators of their actual talent and potential but instead unfortunate or unlucky episodes, uncharacteristic of their brilliance. Consider Roger Federer: after six runner-up finishes on tour, he finally lifted Wimbledon's trophy in 2003 and would go on to amass 20 Grand Slam titles. The Netherlands of 1974, whose Total Football lost the final, rewrote soccer's playbook. J.K. Rowling, turned down by 12 publishers, went on to sell over 600 million Harry Potter copies. Barbara McClintock, whose 'jumping genes' work was ignored for decades, earned a 1983 Nobel Prize for the discovery. Meryl Streep, whose first Oscar nod in 1979 went unrewarded, has since racked up 21 nominations and 3 wins. The Beatles were rejected by Decca as 'yesterday's sound' before selling some 1.6 billion records. And Alibaba, once dwarfed by eBay in China, now serves over a billion annual active consumers. Each of these (and many other) examples provide evidence that near misses can herald even greater legacies.
Ultimately, the sting of 'almost' is less a verdict on your potential than an invitation to hone it. Near misses aren't life sentences—they're signposts pointing to gaps in your strategy, fuel for your ambition, and a live demonstration of your character to the world. While it is tempting to ruminate about what could have or should have happened, the truth is we never know. We all indulge in counterfactual fantasies—those 'what if' spirals where we picture an alternate universe in which we married someone else, took the other job, or moved to that city. Psychologists call them sliding doors moments: innocuous-seeming forks in the road that, in hindsight, feel like cosmic turning points. But while it's human to ruminate, it's wiser to remember that we're not omniscient authors of our own lives. The illusion of total control is just that—an illusion.
More often than not, the best way to recover from regret or disappointment is not by obsessing over the road not taken, but by taking a different road. Que será, será. Life is less about scripting your destiny than adapting to its plot twists. In other words, how you react to failure matters, but failure is too brutal and negative a word for simply not getting what you think you preferred or wanted, especially when it may not even be what you actually needed or ought to have preferred. When we embrace each narrow defeat as data, not destiny, we are able to build the very habits and resilience that turn 'almost' into subsequent undeniable success. As the saying goes, experience is what you get when you didn't get what you wanted. We add that experience can be more valuable than the objective success of getting what you wanted. In fact, enjoyment of objectives successes including of awards and victories, tends to be more short-lived than we expect.
We need not define ourselves by our past and present achievements. Who we are also comprises our future self, including our possible selves—the parts of our character and identity that are actually the only ones we can influence.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Investigation into Surfside condo collapse is expected to finish in 2026, NIST says
Investigation into Surfside condo collapse is expected to finish in 2026, NIST says

CBS News

time27 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Investigation into Surfside condo collapse is expected to finish in 2026, NIST says

More than four years after a Florida condominium collapse killed 98 people, federal investigators have yet to make a final determination of the cause — but they do have some leading theories. FILE - Rescue personnel work at the remains of the Champlain Towers South condo building, June 25, 2021, in Surfside, Fla. Gerald Herbert / AP The National Institute of Standards and Technology, the agency handling the probe, said this week it hopes to conclude the investigation in 2026. "We intend for our investigation of this failure to have a lasting impact, save future lives and ensure this never happens again," NIST investigator Judith Mitrani-Reiser said in the agency's latest report. Most residents were asleep in the 12-story Champlain Towers South when the beachfront condo building in Surfside, Florida, collapsed into a huge pile of rubble at 1:22 a.m. on June 24, 2021. As the investigation continued, a Miami judge approved a more than $1 billion settlement for personal injury and wrongful death claims from the disaster. Meanwhile, a new luxury condominium is going up at the Champlain Towers site, a few miles north of Miami. What caused the collapse? NIST has zeroed in on what it calls three "higher-likelihood" scenarios, all related to construction flaws that date to the beginning of the 40-year-old structure. "These conditions existed from the time construction was complete, 40 years before the partial collapse," said Glen Bell, co-lead investigator on NIST's National Construction Safety Team. One possibility is the failure of a connection between a building column and the pool deck slab that never met building code standards. Another is that steel reinforcement "was not placed where it should have been," which meant the column and pool deck were far too weak. And a third theory is that work done later around the pool — when heavy planters, sand and pavers were added — increased the weight load on a deck "that was already functionally and structurally inadequate." The NIST report also notes that support columns in the building's basement parking garage had been exposed to frequent flooding, which causes corrosion in steel reinforcements and concrete deterioration. Are there other theories? Investigators did not find evidence of voids in the ground under the building, known as "karst." Using satellite data, the NIST team found there was no sinking or settling underneath Champlain Towers, which would indicate existence of karst. In addition, investigators found the limestone upon which the condo was built was "sufficient to carry the building loads" and that testing of the concrete supporting Champlain Towers had "adequate material strength." One challenge for investigators was the lack of any available records from the original building construction and not many from its earlier years. How are other condo buildings handling new rules? After Surfside, state legislators enacted a law in 2022 requiring condo associations to have sufficient reserves to cover major repairs. Some residents were caught off guard by hefty fees imposed to cover years of deferred maintenance expenses required to bring their buildings into compliance with the law's standards. Gov. Ron DeSantis this week signed new legislation allowing some condo associations to fund their reserves through a loan or line of credit. It also gives residents more flexibility to pause payments into reserve funds while they prioritize needed repairs. It extends the deadline for condo associations to complete structural integrity studies and exempts some smaller buildings from those studies. "Now it's time to make the change," state Sen. Ed Hooper said. "Elderly people are losing their condos because they could not afford to make the increase in their monthly HOA fees. That's just wrong." What is being built on the site? It's a luxury condo building, dubbed the Delmore, with 37 "mansions in the sky" and a starting price of $15 million. The site was purchased at auction by Dubai-based DAMAC International for $120 million. According to the company, there will be amenities such as a see-through swimming pool, an indoor pool, an outdoor kitchen, a fitness center and a meditation garden. The new condo is expected to be completed by 2029. Will there be a memorial to the victims? A design for a memorial to the 98 victims and that honors their families was approved earlier this year by Surfside officials and a family committee. But the city's planning and zoning board objected to its appearance and recommended that alternatives be considered. The existing proposal envisions a tall "wall of water" and exhibition of materials from the collapsed building. Surfside officials say they want to keep the project on track but will consider additional input, especially from the family committee. "I understand the urgency. But this memorial is going to be here long beyond anyone in this room," said planning board chair Lindsay Lecour at an April city commission meeting.

Man Tells His Stepdaughter She Doesn't Have to Call Him ‘Dad.' Now His Wife Is ‘Pissed'
Man Tells His Stepdaughter She Doesn't Have to Call Him ‘Dad.' Now His Wife Is ‘Pissed'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Man Tells His Stepdaughter She Doesn't Have to Call Him ‘Dad.' Now His Wife Is ‘Pissed'

A man told his stepdaughter she doesn't have to call him 'Dad,' causing family conflict His wife felt deeply hurt and betrayed by his refusal to accept the parental role What was meant to make his stepdaughter feel comfortable turned into tension between the married coupleA man turned to the Reddit community for support after a heartfelt parenting dilemma shook up his blended family. 'I married my wife five years ago,' the 40-year-old writes in his post. 'She has a daughter, 'Ava,' from a previous marriage. Her biological dad is in her life and lives nearby.' Over the years, the poster's relationship with Ava, now 14, has grown strong and genuine. 'Ava and I are close, video games, projects, dad jokes, the whole thing,' he shares. At home, Ava usually calls him 'Dad,' a habit that developed without anyone asking her to. 'It started naturally over the years,' he explains. But the dynamic shifts when she's around her biological father or alone with her mom. 'She switches back to my first name,' he says. 'No big deal.' What is a big deal, however, is his wife's reaction to that change. 'My wife constantly scolds her, saying 'He's your dad too' and pushing her to call me 'Dad' all the time, even when I'm not around,' he writes. He's spoken up about it before, trying to protect the trust he's built with Ava. 'Forcing it ruins the bond we have,' he told his wife. Still, the pressure doesn't stop, and tensions arose after Ava recently returned from a visit with her biological father. 'Last week, Ava came home from a visit with her bio-dad and looked really uncomfortable,' he shares. Sensing something was wrong, he checked in with her. 'She said her mom yelled at her in the car for calling me by my name.' Moved by Ava's discomfort, he offered her a moment of reassurance. 'So I told Ava, 'You never have to call me Dad when you don't want to. It doesn't change how much I care about you. You get to decide.' ' But his wife overheard the conversation and became furious. 'She was pissed,' he writes. 'She said I 'undermined' her parenting and now Ava's going to think it's okay to 'pick and choose parents.' ' Even with the backlash, he stands by his words. 'I don't want Ava feeling pressured,' he says. 'My wife thinks I'm enabling emotional distance.' On Reddit, commenters quickly offered empathy and encouragement. 'Your wife's approach might push Ava away instead of bringing her closer," one user wrote. "It's important for her to feel comfortable in her own relationship with you, without the pressure of what to call you.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Another user highlighted Ava's emotional insight. 'She's 14. She knows who you are to her.' They went on to praise the way Ava balances both relationships. 'If she chose to call you dad? Amazing. But if she calls you by your name when with bio dad? Amazing—she's emotionally mature enough to recognize that bio dad would suffer hearing it.' Commenters point to the strength of the stepdad's bond with Ava. 'She knows you are in a strong enough relationship that you know how she feels about you, whatever she calls you.' In the end, his story struck a chord with many navigating the complexities of blended families. The overwhelming support he received serves as a reminder that sometimes the best way to love a child is to give them the freedom to choose what that love looks like. Read the original article on People

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store