10 Pros And Cons Of Using AI For Your Job Application
AI is transforming the job application process, with more than 40% of job seekers turning to artificial intelligence for help, according to research from Jobseeker. Over 90% say it makes their job application better, but there's a catch—41% of hiring managers are less likely to consider candidates who use AI. As reliance on algorithms and ATS (Applicant Tracking Systems) grows, the debate over AI's role in hiring is just beginning. Here are the key advantages and disadvantages to consider before incorporating AI into your job search strategy.
The Pros: Why AI Can Give You an Edge
Let's start with the benefits that are making artificial intelligence an increasingly popular choice among job seekers:
AI tools can dramatically speed up the job application process. With just a few ChatGPT prompts, you can generate resumes, cover letters, and answers to common questions in minutes. This makes it easier to apply for multiple roles without feeling overwhelmed. The traditional approach of crafting each application from scratch can take hours per position, but AI-generated resume tips allow job seekers to maintain quality while significantly increasing their application volume.
Action Step: Use AI to draft content, then set aside time to review, personalize, and edit each document before submitting.
AI Tool Tip: Teal is a free platform that uses artificial intelligence to organize and speed up the job application process, track your progress, and manage documents.
AI-powered writing assistants can spot typos, grammatical errors, and awkward phrasing, helping you submit polished job applications every time. This is especially useful for non-native speakers or those who want their resumes and cover letters to sound more professional. Beyond basic corrections, these tools suggest improvements in sentence structure, word choice, and overall readability that might escape even careful human review.
Action Step: Run your materials through a grammar checker, but always read them over yourself to catch subtle mistakes or unnatural language.
AI Tool Tip: Grammarly instantly checks spelling, grammar, and tone, and can suggest improvements for clarity and professionalism.
AI can help tailor your job application and cover letter to match specific job descriptions, increasing your chances of passing automated screenings and impressing hiring managers. By analyzing keywords and role requirements, artificial intelligence helps ensure your materials are relevant and targeted for each position. This level of customization would be nearly impossible to achieve manually across dozens of job applications while maintaining consistency and quality.
Action Step: Feed the AI key details about the company and role, then customize the final product with your own insights and examples.
AI Tool Tip: Rezi uses AI to automatically tailor your resume to each job description, optimizing keywords and ensuring your application stands out to both ATS and hiring managers.
Submitting an AI-enhanced job application can help you feel more prepared and professional, especially if writing isn't your strong suit. Knowing your resume and cover letter have been reviewed and optimized gives many job seekers a confidence boost during their job search. This psychological benefit can translate into better interview performance and a more positive job search experience.
Action Step: Use artificial intelligence to check your work, but make sure your own achievements and voice come through so you can confidently discuss your materials in interviews.
AI Tool Tip: Kickresume offers AI-powered resume and cover letter creation with personalized templates, making it easy to produce professional documents.
Many companies use ATS software that scans for keywords before a human ever sees your application. AI to optimize job applications can meet these requirements and help ensure your resume makes it through the initial digital screening. Without proper keyword optimization, even highly qualified candidates may never reach human reviewers, making this AI capability particularly valuable in today's automated hiring landscape.
Action Step: Research keywords from the job description and use AI to incorporate them naturally, ensuring your application gets past initial digital screening.
AI Tool Tip: Jobscan compares your resume to job descriptions and uses AI to maximize your keyword match for ATS systems.
The Cons: Where AI Can Work Against You
While AI offers compelling advantages, it's important to understand the potential drawbacks that could hurt your chances with employers:
AI-generated resumes and text can sometimes lack personality or feel overly formulaic, which may cause hiring managers to lose interest in your application. If every candidate's responses sound the same, it becomes harder for you to stand out in a crowded job market. The risk increases when applicants rely too heavily on AI without adding their unique perspective and experiences to differentiate themselves from other candidates using similar tools.
Action Step: Add personal stories, specific achievements, and authentic language to make your application memorable.
AI Tool Tip: ChatGPT can generate personalized responses when you use advanced prompts, but always edit to reflect your unique experiences.
Over-reliance on AI-generated resumes and materials can make your application feel less genuine, raising questions about your true abilities and motivations. Employers may wonder whether you actually possess the skills you describe or if the AI made them up. This authenticity gap becomes particularly problematic during interviews when candidates struggle to elaborate on AI-generated content or demonstrate the capabilities their applications claim they possess.
Action Step: Balance AI assistance with your own insights and experiences, and make sure every statement accurately reflects your background.
AI Tool Tip: Jasper AI can help you write and refine job application materials with the ability to inject your personal tone and stories, so your application remains authentic and unique.
Some hiring managers view AI-generated resumes and cover letters as shortcuts or question the effort behind them, especially when answers sound robotic or vague. Many HR specialists say they are less likely to consider candidates who use AI in the application process. This growing skepticism means that obvious AI usage could hurt your chances, even if the content quality is high.
Action Step: Use AI as a supportive tool, not a crutch. Be prepared to discuss your materials honestly and highlight where you added your personal touch.
AI Tool Tip: CoverDoc.AI guides you in generating AI-assisted cover letters while ensuring your voice and motivation remain front and center.
AI can introduce errors or suggest experiences you didn't have, especially if prompts are vague or information is misunderstood. If unchecked, these inaccuracies can misrepresent your qualifications and potentially damage your credibility with employers.
Action Step: Double-check every detail in your job application for accuracy and truthfulness before submitting.
AI Tool Tip: QuillBot lets you rephrase and fact-check text, ensuring accuracy and helping you verify that the language matches your real experience.
Sharing personal data with online AI tools for job seekers can expose you to privacy risks, especially if you're not using reputable or secure platforms.
Action Step: Use only well-known, secure AI platforms and look for privacy features such as data encryption and user control over submissions.
AI Tool Tip: Blacklight by The Markup uses AI to scan job application sites for trackers and potential privacy risks, helping you understand how your data might be used or shared.
The key to successfully using AI in job applications lies in finding the right balance between efficiency and authenticity. As Anthropic notes, "Where it makes sense, we invite you to use Claude to show us more of you: your unique perspective, skills, and experiences." The future of AI-assisted job searching will favor candidates who can leverage these powerful tools while maintaining their genuine voice and demonstrating real value to potential employers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
3 minutes ago
- Forbes
Audacious Idea That America Is Going To Have An Unnerving Sputnik Moment When It Comes To Attaining AGI And AI Superintelligence
Will the United States attain AGI and ASI first, before any other country, and does it really matter ... More which country is first? In today's column, I examine the provocative chatter that the United States might experience a said-to-be Sputnik moment when it comes to attaining artificial general intelligence (AGI) and artificial superintelligence (ASI). How so? The audacious idea postulates that rather than America being the first to achieve AGI and ASI, some other country manages to beat us to the punch. It is a seemingly unimaginable proposition. You see, the United States is indisputably a world leader in AI and known for the development of leading-edge advances in AI. It is nearly inconceivable that the U.S. won't arrive at AGI and ASI first. But is that wishful thinking rather than real-world thinking? Let's talk about it. This analysis of an innovative AI breakthrough is part of my ongoing Forbes column coverage on the latest in AI, including identifying and explaining various impactful AI complexities (see the link here). Heading Toward AGI And ASI First, some fundamentals are required to set the stage for this weighty discussion. There is a great deal of research going on to further advance AI. The general goal is to either reach artificial general intelligence (AGI) or maybe even the outstretched possibility of achieving artificial superintelligence (ASI). AGI is AI that is considered on par with human intellect and can seemingly match our intelligence. ASI is AI that has gone beyond human intellect and would be superior in many, if not all, feasible ways. The idea is that ASI would be able to run circles around humans by outthinking us at every turn. For more details on the nature of conventional AI versus AGI and ASI, see my analysis at the link here. We have not yet attained AGI. In fact, it is unknown whether we will reach AGI, or that maybe AGI will be achievable in decades or perhaps centuries from now. The AGI attainment dates that are floating around are wildly varying and wildly unsubstantiated by any credible evidence or ironclad logic. ASI is even more beyond the pale when it comes to where we are currently with conventional AI. The Saga Of Sputnik 1 There is immense speculation going on about AGI and ASI regarding which country will be the first to achieve the vaunted pinnacle of AI. One fiery comment that's floating around is that this could turn out to be another semblance of the infamous Sputnik crisis. You might be somewhat familiar with the unnerving exploits of Sputnik that occurred in the 1950s and 1960s, and beyond. I'll provide a quick recap for ease of recollection and then tie the historical reference to our modern times. In October 1957, the Soviet Union launched a small spacecraft known as Sputnik 1 that traveled in a low Earth orbit. A radio signal was then beamed from this orbiting spacecraft. People across the globe could hear the beeping sounds on their radios as retransmitted by amateur radio operators. This made enormous history as it was the first-ever artificial Earth satellite. At the time, this frightening action triggered the American Sputnik crisis. Worries were that the Soviet Union could end up controlling outer space. The Russians could potentially launch military weapons that orbited the planet and would readily threaten the United States and other countries of the world. The action also suggested that the scientific prowess showcased by the Soviet Union was superior to that of America. How much farther behind might the U.S. really be? The sky was the limit, or maybe not, and extended to the heavens far above. This served as a mighty impetus to spur the Space Race. Indeed, a few years later, President John F. Kennedy made his famous speech in 1962 that called for the United States to land on the Moon before the end of the decade. The oft quoted line was this: 'We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard; because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one we intend to win, and the others, too.' Will AI Be The Sputnik 2 Let's tie the Sputnik saga with the ongoing efforts to attain pinnacle AI. There is heated debate in dark backrooms that maybe the United States won't be the first to arrive at AGI and ASI. Some other country might get there first. Lots of big-name countries are vying for that prized position. Smaller countries are doing so too. An eclectic race is avidly underway. Suppose the U.S. isn't first? It would be reminiscent of the Sputnik 1 circumstance. Perhaps such an instance would cheekily be labeled as a kind of Sputnik 2 phenomenon (as an aside, there really was a Sputnik 2 in terms of a second spacecraft launched in November 1957 by the Soviet Union and was the first to put an animal in space, the dog named Laika). America could end up as a second fiddle in the AI race. The idea seems absurd at face value. The United States undeniably has many of the top AI makers, along with amazing academic institutions that are globally recognized as AI leaders, and gobs of first-class AI researchers. Billions upon billions of dollars are flowing into the AI race by American companies and via U.S. federal, state, and local governmental agencies. Any notion of the United States not landing on AGI and ASI before any other country would seem utterly ludicrous and summarily rejected. The Logical Suppositions Whoa, comes the retort, you can't blindly assume that the United States will necessarily be the first to attain AGI and ASI. That is a haughty assumption. It belies the intense efforts taking place beyond the United States. This begs the question as to why America would not be the first to reach that desired goal. I will go ahead and give you a rundown on some of the most compelling reasons that have been expressed on this dicey matter. They consist of these five primary contentions: Let's briefly unpack each of those. Unknown Path To AGI And ASI First, no one anywhere can say for sure how AGI and ASI can be achieved. The whole endeavor is pretty much a shot in the dark. There isn't a pristine map that lays out the steps involved. Furthermore, it is conceivable that AGI and ASI will not be attained at all, i.e., no one will achieve the pinnacle AI. The United States is in the same boat as everyone else, namely, trying all sorts of clever ways to move toward AGI and ASI. No guarantees are to be had. All countries might come up blank on the AGI and ASI pursuit. Thus, no matter how much money or brainpower is employed, the end result might consist nicely of more advanced AI, but not the total package of true pinnacle AI. Marching To The Same Tune A second point is that perhaps a birds of a feather mindset could undermine the United States. Here's what that entails. Some have criticized that, by-and-large, we are using the same methods and similar AI internal structures across the board to reach AGI and ASI, see my analysis at the link here and the link here. If that's the case, our all-alike AI approach could be akin to putting all our eggs into one basket. The true path to pinnacle AI might be something outside of that presumed avenue. Unwilling To Take Risky Chances Another somewhat related consideration is that with the vast investments going into AI efforts, this might be making us more risk-averse. The logic is this. You would find it difficult to take in bucko bucks and not be pursuing AGI and ASI like others are. The investors won't be happy that you are trying some oddball angle. If you don't succeed but have followed the same approach as others, you can hold your head high and proclaim that everyone was caught off guard. On the other hand, if you opt for a risky path that no one else chooses to pursue, you'll have little headspace cover when it comes to explaining why your zany method didn't arrive at AGI and ASI. You will be fully exposed and readily vulnerable to reputational attack. Stealing AI To Reach The Pinnacle Here's a twist for you. Theft might come into play. It is suggested that maybe another country will steal our budding AI and manage to undertake the final steps to AGI and ASI before we do. In other words, suppose we have gotten down to the 90% mark and are struggling to get the final 10% done. Some other country that isn't anywhere near AGI and ASI decides to take a shortcut by stealing the AI that we have. Next, they manage to get the remaining 10% undertaken under their own auspices. Of course, they tout to the world that they did the pinnacle AI by themselves, entirely from A to Z. For more details on the chances of stealing AI, see my coverage at the link here. Discovery By Luck Or Chance One of the most intriguing reasons for the U.S. not being the first to achieve pinnacle AI is that perhaps there is some out-of-the-blue discovery that needs to be made. The ardent belief is that there is a missing piece that nobody has identified yet. No one knows what that piece is. There isn't any definition of it. It is the classical dilemma of not knowing what we don't know. The kicker is this. Suppose that discovering the missing piece is going to be based mainly on luck rather than skill. Assume that there is no inherent advantage in having the biggest AI labs and the biggest AI budgets. AGI and ASI might hinge on a completely left-field discovery that could happen anywhere and at any time. I've pointed out that this particular theory or conjecture has given rise to the credence that AGI and ASI might be achieved on a solo basis, see my discussion at the link here. Yes, instead of vast teams arriving at pinnacle AI, some enterprising individual in their pajamas and in their basement arrives there first. If you believe in this fanciful missing piece concept, it seems plausible that a solo developer with incredible luck might discover it. The solo developer might be in the tiniest of countries, and ergo, bring AGI and ASI to that country before any other country figures it out. Presumably, unbelievable fame and fortune await that solo developer. Being First Does Matter Those above-described handful of mainstay reasons are on the minds of many. Please know that additional reasons are being bandied around. It's a hot topic and raises the heat when emphatically discussed. A smarmy viewpoint about this dire handwringing conundrum is that being first is perhaps overrated. If the U.S. doesn't get to AGI and ASI before some other country, maybe it's not such a big deal, and we are making an undue fuss. A preoccupation with being first can be a bad thing. Go with the flow. However things perchance go, they go. The counterargument to this offhandness is that we all pretty much acknowledge that AGI and ASI have supremely dual-use consequences, doing grand good for the world but also potentially grand bad for the world. The first to get to pinnacle AI might unleash quite a vicious storm upon the globe and muscle themselves into a geo-economic position of a disconcerting nature (see my analysis at the link here, along with why the United Nations also is trying to have a role in the AGI/ASI arrival, see the link here). The planetary and humankind existential stakes underlying AGI and ASI are huge. Whichever country gets there first is, in fact, an important consideration. Humanity And The Future A final thought to ruminate on. Some have likened the attainment of AGI and ASI to the likes of achieving atomic energy and the atomic bomb. Historically, the case can be made that getting there first did make a difference. We now know that being first was significant, and we also know that what happens after the first attainment is an ongoing struggle and vitally crucial too. Thinking further ahead in terms of pinnacle AI, the question arises whether some or all other countries of the world will eventually possess and/or control AGI and ASI. That's another substantive topic worthy of keen chatter. Per the wise words of Albert Einstein, we earnestly need to keep this pointed remark in mind: 'The solution to this problem lies in the heart of mankind.'
Washington Post
3 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Hunter Biden defends father's legacy, blames George Clooney
RFK Jr. has big plans for your food. Here are the facts. May 2, 2025
Business Insider
4 minutes ago
- Business Insider
AMD Stock Rallies as Bernstein Analyst Raises Price Target
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) stock rallied on Monday after the semiconductor company's shares received new analyst coverage. Five-star Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon assigned a Hold rating to AMD stock and increased the firm's price target for the shares to $140 from $95, suggesting a 12.17% downside. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. While Rasgon stuck with a Hold rating for AMD stock, he highlighted several positive catalysts for the company. Among these are the lifted ban on AI chip sales to China, better times for the PC gaming market, and conditions similar to its rivals. In light of all this, Rasgon updated his estimates for AMD earnings. These includes Q2 adjusted EPS of 49 cents on revenue of $7.52 billion, compared to a prior estimate of 47 cents and $7.4 billion. He also updated his Q3 estimates to $1.20 per share and $8.43 billion from $1.09 per share and $8.08 billion, as well as his full-year 2025 estimate to $3.89 per share and $32 billion from $3.71 per share and $31.4 billion. AMD will next report earnings on Aug. 5, 2025. AMD Stock Movement & More Analyst Coverage AMD stock was up 1.43% as of Monday morning, extending a 31.83% year-to-date rally and a 0.72% increase over the past 12 months. AMD stock also received additional analyst coverage today. Five-star Citi analyst Christopher Danely reiterated a Hold rating and raised his price target for the shares to $165 from $145. Is AMD Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold? Turning to Wall Street, the analysts' consensus for AMD is Moderate Buy, based on 25 Buy and 10 Hold ratings over the past three months. With that comes an average AMD stock price target of $145.90, representing a potential 8.33% downside for the shares.
