Regina Rowing Club faces string of vandalism ahead of peak summer season
The club says lines securing the docks to the shore have been cut, on-water start towers have been pushed and sunk, its Pine Island Watch tower has been targeted multiple times and a has been vehicle stolen, all in the past few weeks.
"This has been kind of a pattern of different types of mischievous behaviour," said David Robertson, the club's vice commodore.
Robertson said it's not uncommon for people to be curious about the boating equipment at the club.
"We have had people come into the boathouse and ask and sometimes try to take boats," Robertson said.
In those cases, he usually gives them directions for where to rent boats and equipment in the area. But he said what's happening now is not like that.
"This is the first time we've seen this level of damage and vandalism through the years," Robertson said.
"It's kind of more the mischief and vandalism that we're really concerned about and obviously the boats that are in the boathouse, whether they're rowing shells or kayaks and racing canoes they're quite expensive to maintain."
In the most recent incidents, multiple windows on the watch tower have been broken, monitors have been smashed and the exterior has been defaced with eggs.
Robertson said a team of volunteers from the club spent time cleaning the area on the morning of June 1. They spent more than seven hours shovelling glass and installing new plexiglass windows.
Volunteers to the rescue
Robertson said the recent uptick in vandalism has been disheartening for the community and volunteers.
"Whenever something happens the volunteers have to roll up their sleeves and do whatever needs to get done to make things work," Robertson said.
The club's cleaning and repair efforts are all happening ahead of hosting team trials for the Canada Summer Games on Saturday and the racing club's annual regatta the following weekend, which Robertson said will bring in guests from across Western Canada.
"So again, as we're trying to prepare for these competitions, it adds a lot of extra stress and strain to our volunteers and, again, it's really discouraging," Robertson said.
He is asking the public to report incidents of destruction they see going on, not just at the club, but anywhere in the city.
"I think that's the best thing that we can do," Robertson said.
He has reported the incidents to police and said they are in talks about increased patrolling in the area.
"Hopefully, you know, we're able to find a solution to keep things secure, keep things safe, and keep everything kind of moving in a positive direction."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12-07-2025
- Yahoo
Builder faces prison sentence after committing illicit act to improve view: 'It was my castle'
Australia's 7News reported that a builder is facing up to 10 years in prison after pleading guilty to illegally destroying historic shacks on the Fleurieu Peninsula in South Australia. "They were on Crown land not his," said Shelly Pomtiak, one of the shack owners. Families were heartbroken after their historic holiday homes were destroyed illegally and without warning by George Lavrentiadis. The two shacks were built on the coast in 1934 and had been maintained by the Robertson family of South Australia for almost 60 years. Another shack that was owned by eight people was also destroyed. Lavrentiadis explained that Julian Johnston, a realtor from Miami, paid him $5,000 to clear the land so he could have a better view for the $2 million home he has plans to build on an adjacent plot of land. Johnston has denied any involvement and has not been charged. The owners of the shacks said that to rebuild the dwellings to current standards would cost significantly more and that what they lost was irreplaceable. In addition to having destroyed the historical homes, building a mansion on the adjacent land can have significant environmental impacts on the natural landscape. Fragile natural areas can be destroyed, which would disrupt the balance of the ecosystem. It is important for construction projects to include plans for offsetting the environmental impacts of the construction process. It seems the process of destroying the South Australian shacks wasn't thought out much at all. Lavrentiadis said that he should have checked to see if leveling the homes was against the law, but that he didn't because Johnston, whom he said hired him to do so, spoke with confidence, so he didn't question the legality of the demolition. Lavrentiadis apologized for demolishing the shacks, but that does not bring the historical homes back. "The shacks had to go because he didn't like the look of them," said Pomtiak. Barry Robertson, the owner of one shack, said that "it was much more than a shack. It was my castle." Do you think America is in a housing crisis? Definitely Not sure No way Only in some cities Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
09-07-2025
- Yahoo
Most claims in lawsuit over fatal stabbing at Chicopee Housing Authority moved to Superior Court
SPRINGFIELD — Thirteen counts in a federal lawsuit against the Chicopee Housing Authority and its former executive director will move to a lower court. In a 32-page memorandum and order June 27, Judge Katherine A. Robertson of U.S. District Court in Springfield said some but not all charges against the housing authority — which has been embroiled in several lawsuits — will move to the Hampden Superior Court. In August, six plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the housing authority and its former executive director, Monica Blazic, saying she engaged in neglect and discrimination after a fatal stabbing at the public housing facility. Two months later, attorneys representing the housing authority and Blazic asked the judge to toss all of the claims. That motion was partially denied, according to Robertson's memorandum. 'The plaintiffs are invigorated by the recent federal court decision,' the plaintiffs' attorneys, Cornelius W. Phillips and Richard Morrissey, said in an emailed statement. They said their clients look forward to pursuing their claims in Superior Court. Defense attorneys Gerard Donelly and Wendy Quinn, both of Worcester, declined Thursday to comment about the case. The plaintiffs include the daughters, girlfriend and neighbors of Domingo Arocho, a Hispanic man who in 2021 was fatally stabbed at the Governor George D. Robinson Apartments, a publicly subsidized apartment complex operated and managed by the Chicopee Housing Authority. He was 67. The complaint alleged the housing authority was 'deliberately indifferent to residents' civil rights and racially discriminatory' toward its predominantly Hispanic housing community. It also alleged the housing authority failed to protect its residents by allowing Arocho's suspected killer, Urayoann Urimagua-Guaraboa, who is also Hispanic, to live in the apartment complex despite having a criminal history. The housing authority, which is governed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, offers federal and state housing. According to its policies, Robertson explained in her memorandum and order, the housing authority can '(deny) admissions or continued occupancy to families whose presence in a public housing neighborhood is likely to adversely affect the health, safety or welfare of other residents or the physical environment of the neighborhood.' The housing authority is also responsible for requesting an applicant's criminal record, the memorandum said. The plaintiffs argued the housing authority did not do that in Urimagua-Guaraboa's case. Prior to his tenancy at the housing authority, the man was charged with first degree murder stemming from an incident in Puerto Rico in 2010. The plaintiffs allege the housing authority 'ignored his personal and criminal history before accepting him as a tenant.' Almost a decade later, the plaintiffs allege the man grabbed a neighbor by her neck and threatened to kill her. Following that incident, he was slapped with an assault and battery charge and three other criminal offenses. This incident took place in 2019 outside of his Chicopee Housing Authority residence on Benoit Circle. About four days after the alleged neighborhood assault, Blazic served Urimagua-Guaraboa with a notice-to-quit because his arrest and charges had violated the terms of his lease, the memorandum and order said. The judge noted that the housing authority and Urimagua-Guaraboa came to an agreement that stayed his eviction for six months. Then, Robertson wrote, an alleged pattern of violence from Urimagua-Guaraboa toward his neighbors unfolded. The man was relocated to a new apartment after allegedly threatening to harm the woman on Benoit Circle. An altercation between Urimagua-Guaraboa and a new neighbor, Candida Laracuente, in June 2020 led to the latter filing a police report against the man. She claimed he had threatened her life and she feared for her safety. In September 2020, following more threats to Laracuente, Urimagua-Guaraboa allegedly fatally stabbed Arocho, who was visiting Laracuente's apartment. The lawsuit alleges Urimagua-Guaraboa also attempted to stab Laracuente, and allegedly shouted, 'Who's next?' after the attack. Some of the plaintiffs say they witnessed the killing. Robertson, the judge, agreed with the defendants that three of the plaintiffs' claims — violations of the Fair Housing Act, due process and equal protection clauses of the U.S. Constitution — were not well enough argued. 'The Supreme Court has acknowledged standing under the (Fair Housing Act) for plaintiffs suing to vindicate or advance the right to live in an integrated or racially balanced community,' the memorandum and order said. The plaintiffs were not residents of the housing authority but made discrimination claims based on the trauma they experienced witnessing a violent offense, they assert. However, Robertson said, 'the claims of these bystanders and the nature of the injuries for which they seek to recover are so distantly related to the interests intended to be advanced by the (Fair Housing Act) that these four plaintiffs cannot be said to be in the zone of interests protected by (the law).' She said, the plaintiffs failed to identify how they suffered from violations of the Fair Housing Act. For similar reasons, the other two claims also failed, she said. 'The Constitution does not protect against all intrusions on one's peace of mind,' Robertson said. While Arocho's family members do not have standing to bring these claims against the housing authority and Blazic, the court believes Laracuente does because she lived there. Additionally, a claim that Blazic, the former executive director of the housing authority, committed a civil rights conspiracy was tossed. The judge alleged the plaintiffs did not properly state their claim or prove that Blazic had personally inflicted racial or discriminatory harassment on them. Western Mass communities rally against ICE: What residents are doing When government legalizes suffering — and the church is mum (Viewpoint) Police: Holyoke man arrested with drugs and cash 'Just to be safe;' New Americans say uncertainty as immigrants spurred quest for citizenship Read the original article on MassLive.
Time Business News
26-06-2025
- Time Business News
NorthEdge Capital Faces July 1 Court Showdown Against Fraud Investigator
A highly anticipated legal face-off is set for July 1, as private equity firm NorthEdge Capital LLP prepares to challenge explosive claims filed by John Robertson, a self-styled fraud investigator. The case, being heard in a UK court, revolves around allegations that NorthEdge backed fraudulent and criminal activities through its portfolio companies. NorthEdge is expected to push for a strike-out, arguing that the lawsuit lacks merit and actionable claims. Robertson, who operates a one-man consultancy called International Fraud & Investigation Services Ltd, has accused NorthEdge and its due diligence partner Grant Thornton of overlooking and even enabling misconduct, including fraud and Ponzi schemes. Legal observers note that the court must first assess whether the case has enough factual basis to proceed or if it should be dismissed outright under Civil Procedure Rule 3.4. Since its launch in 2009, NorthEdge has grown into a major regional player, managing nearly £1 billion in assets. Its investments span technology, healthcare, and business services, including notable exits and a strong relationship with Grant Thornton for transactional support. NorthEdge is expected to argue that Robertson's claims are baseless, lacking the specific evidence required for such serious allegations. Industry experts note that defamation claims must be backed by concrete facts—dates, documents, and witness testimony not vague assertions. Without those, the court is unlikely to allow the matter to move forward. John Robertson, with no formal legal training, has built a public persona as an independent fraud investigator. His company, founded in 2023, remains under scrutiny for late filings and was recently subject to but escaped compulsory strike-off actions. Robertson has previously filed lawsuits on his own behalf, often acting without legal counsel. His public communications, including social media posts filled with memes and unsubstantiated claims, have led to account suspensions and cast doubt on his credibility. In early 2024, a tribunal in Scotland dismissed one of his employment claims due to procedural delays and an earlier signed settlement. The July 1 hearing will determine whether the court sees enough merit in the allegations to move toward disclosure. If NorthEdge's application to strike out the claim is successful, the case will end swiftly, and Robertson could face steep legal costs. If it proceeds, he'll need to provide evidence supporting his claims, or risk summary judgment. A full trial remains the most unlikely scenario but could materialize if Robertson clears the disclosure stage. Such a development would extend the timeline into late 2025 and require witness and expert testimonies. Legal professionals and finance insiders are closely monitoring this case, viewing it as a litmus test for how courts handle private litigants who file far-reaching accusations without clear evidence. A dismissal would reaffirm the judiciary's commitment to screening meritless claims. On the other hand, allowing the case to proceed could have broader implications, opening the door to more aggressive legal challenges against investment firms. For NorthEdge, the stakes are high not only to protect its reputation but also to send a message about its commitment to compliance and thorough due diligence. The coming days will reveal whether Robertson's claims hold any legal water or dissolve under judicial scrutiny. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
