CIA official's son killed while fighting in Ukraine, spy agency says
The spokesperson confirmed the death of Michael Gloss — who is the son of Juliane Gallina, the CIA's deputy director for digital innovation — after a Russian news site reported that the 21-year-old American had signed up to serve with Russia's forces.
The CIA spokesperson said Gallina and her family 'suffered an unimaginable personal tragedy in the spring of 2024 when her son Michael Gloss, who struggled with mental health issues, died while fighting in the conflict in Ukraine.'
But the statement did not say which side Gloss was fighting for at the time.
'CIA considers Michael's passing to be a private family matter for the Gloss family — not a national security issue,' the spokesperson said. 'The entire CIA family is heartbroken for their loss.'
'Juliane and her husband shared that 'we adored our son and grieve his loss every moment. We appreciate privacy at this difficult time.'' the spokesperson added.
In social media posts last year, Michael Gloss shared a photo of himself smiling in Moscow's Red Square and expressed sympathy for Russia's war effort against what he called 'the Ukraine Proxy war.'
He wrote that news coverage of the war, which he called 'western propaganda,' was concealing the reality of a conflict in which an allegedly corrupt Ukrainian military was no match for Russian troops.
'Rus is slaughtering dem boys on sight,' he wrote.
On his page on the Russian social media site VKontakte, the backdrop to Gloss' photo in Red Square shows Soviet-era war propaganda.
The Russian news site Important Stories was first to report on Gloss' death. Citing Russian government information and Gloss' social media posts, it documented his extensive overseas travels, which culminated in him joining the Russian army.
According to an obituary published by the family last year, Gloss died 'while traveling in Eastern Europe,' but made no mention of Russia or the war in Ukraine.
It added that he lived a 'brief, but fiercely beautiful life until he was taken from us during his travels overseas.'
'Michael should be remembered for his noble heart, and warrior spirit,' the obituary said.
Reached Friday, Michael Gloss' maternal grandmother, Marie Cook, declined to confirm details of her grandson's death and instead referred questions to her daughter, Gallina.
'My daughter and son-in-law are the best parents I have ever seen in my life,' Cook said. 'This is a tragedy.'
Gallina was appointed last year to her current position at the CIA and has held senior roles overseeing technology and cybersecurity. She also worked as an executive at IBM and began her career as a Navy cryptologic officer, retiring from the Navy Reserves in 2013. At the U.S. Naval Academy, Gallina made history as the first woman to lead the brigade of midshipmen.
In an interview with NBC News last year, Gallina discussed the threats posed by China and Russia to America's cybersecurity.
Gloss' father, Larry Gloss, is a Navy veteran who served in Operation Desert Storm and works in cybersecurity in the private sector.
Michael Gloss attended Oakton High School in the northern Virginia suburb of Vienna, where he played football and lacrosse, according to social media. He later attended the College of the Atlantic in Bar Harbor, Maine, where he studied human ecology, according to his obituary.
The obituary said that 'Michael grew to be physically strong and tall, thoughtful and principled, and from an early age he used these strengths to protect and guard against injustice of all forms — whether it was on the playground, on the field or in politics.'
The obituary offers suggestions for causes to donate to that Michael Gloss embraced, including charities devoted to helping refugees and protecting the environment. And it also suggested a charity 'we hope will help others,' the National Alliance on Mental Illness.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
Riverdance star Michael Flatley to run for Irish presidency
Riverdance star Michael Flatley is to seek a nomination to become Ireland's next president, a court has heard. The dancer and choreographer will move back to Ireland in the next two weeks and 'intends to seek nominations to run for president of Ireland,' his lawyer has announced. Barrister Ronnie Hudson made the announcement during a High Court case he has taken in relation to works carried out at his mansion in Co Cork, the Castlehyde. An affidavit, signed by Flatley's solicitor Maxwell Mooney, was submitted to the court stating that the Irish-American is 'to seek nominations to run for president of Ireland'. Lord Of The Dance star Flatley, who is eligible to run as an Irish citizen, had strongly hinted at a presidential bid last week, but said he had not made a final decision. Michael Flatley performing at Madison Square Garden in New York in 2005 / Credit: AP He said during a radio interview that he did not believe the Irish people 'have a voice – not a true proper deep voice that speaks their language'. Flatley said he hears concerns from the 'average person on the street' and they are not 'happy right now'. 'Somebody has to speak for the Irish people,' he said. He was in Ireland earlier this month where he performed on a flute at a July 4 celebration hosted at the residence of the US Ambassador to Ireland, Edward Walsh, who was recently appointed to the role by Donald Trump. An election for the largely ceremonial president role is expected towards the end of October, as it must take place in the 60 days before outgoing President Michael D Higgins's term ends on November 11. To be eligible to run, a candidate must be an Irish citizen who is 35 or older, and must be nominated either by at least 20 members of the Irish parliament or at least four local authorities. So far, two candidates have secured sufficient backing to enter the race former farming journalist and EU commissioner Mairead McGuinness, former Galway mayor Catherine Connolly. Several other figures have hinted at their intention to run, including MMA fighter Conor McGregor, who has criticised the Irish Government's policies on immigration and public safety. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
JAMnews
an hour ago
- JAMnews
Armenia will serve as an alternative route
Armenia will serve as an alternative route 'In the context of unblocking regional transport links, we are seeing political demands and threats of force from Azerbaijan. Under such conditions, economic projects cannot have a long-term character,' this is the view expressed by economist Suren Parsyan regarding ongoing negotiations on the matter. He believes Armenia urgently needs alternative routes and must be brought out of its blockade. According to Parsyan, current developments represent an attempt by Baku to establish political control over Armenia, wrapped in an economic guise. 'The argument that such projects might help win over Azerbaijan or move relations towards a more constructive level is weak. The opposite will happen: Azerbaijan will try to corner Armenia even further by using these projects,' Parsyan said in an interview with a local television channel. The economist calls for a sober assessment of the project — analysing both its strengths and weaknesses, as well as associated risks and opportunities. Azerbaijan is demanding an extraterritorial corridor through Armenia, referring to it as the 'Zangezur Corridor'. Baku insists on unobstructed transit between mainland Azerbaijan and its exclave, Nakhichevan. For several years, Yerevan has responded that it is willing to provide a road, but only under four conditions: sovereignty, jurisdiction, territorial integrity, and reciprocity. Recently, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan announced that Yerevan and Baku had received a proposal from Washington regarding the unblocking of regional communications. The proposal reportedly involves control over the road being exercised by an American or joint Armenian-American body. The specific functions of this body have not yet been made public. According to Pashinyan, interest in outsourcing control of Armenian roads has been expressed not only by the United States but also by the European Union, with China also showing investment interest. Below are the key points from economist Suren Parsyan's interview. In Armenia, the focus is not on economic benefit, but on preventing aggression 'The current Armenian authorities are attempting to ensure a certain level of security through economic projects. Their logic is as follows: if we attract an American investor to the region, it could help deter Azerbaijani aggression against Syunik.' Syunik is Armenia's southern province, which borders Azerbaijan. It is through this region, specifically the Meghri community, that the proposed road connecting Azerbaijan to Nakhichevan is expected to pass. 'In Armenia, the focus is not on investment or economic gain, but on preventing possible aggression. It is clear that by involving an American or Armenian-American organisation, the authorities are not seeking to resolve economic issues — they are addressing a security concern.' Why US is interested in a presence on the unblocked route 'U.S. policy in our region is aimed primarily at reducing the influence of Russia and Iran. American involvement should be viewed through this lens. First and foremost, they are attempting to weaken Russia's role in regional transit corridors. Another factor is China. The Chinese Belt and Road Initiative is viewed as a strategic challenge by the United States. By securing influence over this route, the U.S. is seeking to assert some degree of control. Since the outbreak of the Russia–Ukraine conflict, Belt and Road projects across Russian territory have been frozen — leaving the 'Middle Corridor' as the remaining option. If the United States succeeds in gaining oversight of China's 'Middle Corridor', it will be in a position to exert influence over China's economic growth and infrastructure initiatives. China views the route through Meghri as a viable alternative, so the U.S. interest in controlling this overland [unblocked] route is far from coincidental.' The US proposal introduces 'new rules of the game' 'The American proposal on unblocking the region fits into the logic of the MAGA [Make America Great Again] movement. The idea is that the US should have economic interests everywhere — investing and profiting globally. Washington is attempting to reframe its foreign policy in terms of economic projects, to revitalise its external engagement while simultaneously reaping certain economic dividends.' All regional players — Iran, Russia, and Turkey — are interested in unblocking transport links, but on the condition that the routes are under their own control. And now a third party — the United States — enters the picture, not as a regional actor, and declares: 'I'm part of the project too.' 'This introduces new rules of the game in the region. We must understand how realistic the implementation of the American proposal is given the presence of such actors.' 'If we try to tie the functioning of the road to just one country, others will undermine the project. If the route is controlled solely by an American company, it will become a target for both Iran and Russia. We must try to find a format in which they do not see the project as a threat to their national security. We need to strike a balance.' Transit to Europe via Georgia remains more profitable 'If the region is unblocked, the route through Armenia will become an alternative, not the main one. Any overland transport is more expensive than maritime transport. Maritime transit to Europe via Georgia is the shortest and least costly option. In this regard, Georgia holds a competitive advantage, and it already has a developed infrastructure.' 'Had this situation arisen in the mid-1990s, when there were no pipelines or railways, Armenia might have played a more significant role. But now that infrastructure is in place, we must accept that Armenia will be seen as an alternative, not a primary, route. The Georgian corridor will remain the main one, and only in case of problems there will cargo flows be diverted to the Armenian route.' 'The primary player in East–West freight transport will be China, through its Belt and Road Initiative and various infrastructure projects. I find it unlikely that Chinese companies or officials will transport cargo via an 'American corridor', given the strategic rivalry between China and the United States. Those same Chinese companies have already invested billions in Georgia. China views Georgia as its 'corridor country'. Beijing's objective is to deliver goods to a Georgian port and then transport them by sea to Europe. Routing goods through southern Armenia and then across Turkey would be more expensive.' 'As for Central Asian states, their use of the unblocked Armenian route will depend on their export destinations. If they are aiming to ship goods to Europe, the shortest path is still through Georgia — to a Georgian port and then on to European markets.' Armenia's presence as an alternative could strengthen Ankara and Baku's hand in talks with Tbilisi 'We often hear complaints that the Georgian side creates obstacles for our freight transport. In reality, Azerbaijani and Turkish companies face similar issues in Georgia. The country frequently reviews and increases transit tariffs. At present, Georgia sets the terms, knowing that Turkey and Azerbaijan have no alternative routes. But if Armenia emerges as an alternative corridor, it could strengthen the negotiating positions of Turkey and Azerbaijan. They would then be in a better position to demand more favourable transit terms, and so forth.' Ankara's goals are also more political than economic 'Among these goals are establishing a degree of political control over Armenia and weakening Iran's influence in Nakhichevan. Moreover, the launch of the road would allow Turkey to partially control Iranian freight transport along the North–South transport corridor. Yes, if the route through southern Armenia is unblocked, Tehran will lose its leverage over Nakhichevan. However, the financial losses in reality would be rather limited. The Iranian side reacts sensitively to the idea of an extraterritorial road, as Armenia is viewed as an alternative route to the north. Whenever Iran faces difficulties with Turkey and Azerbaijan, Armenia has always been a fallback option.' Follow us – Twitter | Facebook | Instagram Armenia will serve as an alternative route
JAMnews
an hour ago
- JAMnews
"What Russia is doing is systematic colonization." Opinion from Abkhazia
Russia is taking control of Abkhazia A new stage of Russia–Abkhazia cooperation is, in essence, a controlled integration of Abkhazia into the Russian Federation. This is how the Abkhaz media outlet Aiashara interprets several recent decisions made by the Kremlin regarding Abkhazian citizens. In particular, it refers to the simplification of Russian citizenship procedures and the ban on Abkhaz driving licenses in Russia, accompanied by the issuing of Russian licenses within Abkhazia. Aiashara interprets these Kremlin initiatives as follows: What is the idea behind it? Controlled integration = a strategy of 'absorption without annexation' Russia is applying a tactic of asymmetric absorption. It does not declare official unification but inserts itself into key elements of sovereignty – documents, borders, rights, and governance. At the same time: Russia complicates regular border crossings, But simplifies the switch to a new identity (Russian citizenship). The goal is to make the population 'voluntarily' choose Russian jurisdiction as the only convenient option. Want to travel, work, live? Then give up independence. Russia offers convenience – in exchange for loyalty. This is infrastructural occupation without tanks. Driver's licenses: not about cars, but about legitimacy By banning Abkhaz driving licenses in its jurisdiction, Russia delegitimizes Abkhazia's very statehood. Moscow is effectively sending a clear message: 'Your documents are fake. Only the ones we issue are real.' And by issuing its own licenses on Abkhaz territory, Russia: Extends its jurisdiction directly onto foreign soil; Builds a parallel state; Turns Abkhazia into a regional proxy zone. This is soft colonization – no flag, but full control over daily life. Russia's real but hidden goals: 1. Demographic absorption The more Russian citizens live in the region, the easier it becomes to control – even through military means 'to protect Russian nationals.' 2. Erosion of Abkhaz sovereignty Abkhazia becomes a de facto federal protectorate without formal annexation. 3. Blocking alternative influences By monopolizing legitimacy and documentation channels, Russia eliminates competition. How to resist? 1. Expose the logic of soft occupation People need to be explaimed: Russian citizenship means a gradual loss of national independence; Russian documents are control tools, not gifts; Simplified procedures are traps, not benefits; Russia is not 'helping' Abkhazians — that's a myth. 2. Build alternative legitimacy infrastructure Even without global recognition, Abkhazia must build internal trust. For that, the following are needed: Digital IDs; Third-country agreements; Trusted platforms independent of Russia. No infrastructure – no sovereignty, even if there's a flag. 3. Develop domestic economy and services as an alternative to Russian oversight As long as Russia provides more, people will choose it. But once internal systems start feeding, healing, and transporting people, the incentive to rely on foreign jurisdiction will weaken. Russian agents in Abkhazia | Discussion of Inal Khashig and Astamur Tania 'Georgia must learn to say 'yes'' – view from Abkhazia Conclusion What Russia is doing is systematic colonization through documents. Not guns, but passports. Not annexation, but 'assistance.' Not orders, but 'convenient choices.' Russia is playing the long game: Undermining internal legitimacy; Building direct influence through citizenship; Imposing its legal grid. Resistance is possible – but only by abandoning illusions and starting to play the same game: the game of systems, not slogans. Toponyms, terminology, views and opinions expressed by the author are theirs alone and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of JAMnews or any employees thereof. JAMnews reserves the right to delete comments it considers to be offensive, inflammatory, threatening or otherwise unacceptable. News in Abkhazia
