Trump is getting the world economy he wants — but the risk to growth could spoil his victory lap
By JOSH BOAK and PAUL WISEMAN
President Donald Trump is getting his way with the world economy.
Trading partners from the European Union to Japan to Vietnam appear to be acceding to the president's demands to accept higher costs — in the form of high tariffs — for the privilege of selling their wares to the United States. For Trump, the agreements driven by a mix of threats and cajoling, are a fulfillment of a decades-long belief in protectionism and a massive gamble that it will pay off politically and economically with American consumers.
On Sunday, the United States and the 27-member state European Union announced that they had reached a trade framework agreement: The EU agreed to accept 15% U.S. tariffs on most its goods, easing fears of a catastrophic trans-Atlantic trade war. There were also commitments by the EU to buy $750 billion in U.S. energy products and make $600 billion in new investments through 2028, according to the White House.
'We just signed a very big trade deal, the biggest of them all,' Trump said Monday.
But there's no guarantee that Trump's radical overhaul of U.S. trade policy will deliver the happy ending he's promised. The framework agreement was exceedingly spare on details. Most trade deals require months and even years of painstaking negotiation that rise and fall on granular details.
Financial markets, at first panicked by the president's protectionist agenda, seem to have acquiesced to a world in which U.S. import taxes — tariffs — are at the highest rates they've been in roughly 90 years. Several billion in new revenues from his levies on foreign goods are pouring into the U.S. Treasury and could somewhat offset the massive tax cuts he signed into law on July 4.
Outside economists say that high tariffs are still likely to raise prices for American consumers, dampen the Federal Reserve's ability to lower interest rates and make the U.S. economy less efficient over time. Democrats say the middle class and poor will ultimately pay for the tariffs.
'It's pretty striking that it's seen as a sigh of relief moment,' said Daniel Hornung, a former Biden White House economic official who now holds fellowships at Housing Finance Policy Center and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 'But if the new baseline across all trading partners is 15%, that is a meaningful drag on growth that increases recession risks, while simultaneously making it harder for the Fed to cut.'
The EU agreement came just four days after Japan also agreed to 15% U.S. tariffs and to invest in the United States. Earlier, the United States reached deals that raised tariffs on imports from Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom considerably from where they'd been before Trump returned to the White House.
More one-sided trade deals are likely as countries try to beat a Friday deadline after which Trump will impose even higher tariffs on countries that refuse to make concessions.
The U.S. president has long claimed that America erred by not taking advantage of its clout as the world's biggest economy and erecting a wall of tariffs, in effect making other countries ante up for access to America's massive consumer market.
To his closest aides, Trump's use of tariffs has validated their trust in his skills as a negotiator and their belief that the economists who warned of downturns and inflation were wrong. Stocks dipped slightly in Monday afternoon trading, but they've more than recovered from the tariff-induced selloff in April.
'Where are the 'experts' now?' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick posted on X.
But the story is not over. For one thing, many of the details of Trump's trade deals remain somewhat hazy and have not been captured in writing. The U.S. and Japan, for instance, have offered differing descriptions of Japan's agreement to invest $550 billion in the United States.
'The trade deals do seem to count as a qualified win for Trump, with other countries giving the U.S. favorable trade terms while accepting U.S. tariffs,' said Eswar Prasad, a Cornell University economist. "However, certain terms of the deals, such as other countries' investments in the U.S., seem more promising in the abstract than they might prove in reality over time.''
Trump is also facing a court challenge from states and businesses arguing that the president overstepped his authority by declaring national emergencies to justify the tariffs on most of the world's economies. In May, a federal court struck down those tariffs. And an appeals court, which agreed to let the government continue collecting the tariffs for now, will hear oral arguments in the case Thursday.
And he's yet to reach an accord with China — which has deftly used the threat of retaliatory tariffs and withholding exports of rare earth minerals that are desperately needed for electric vehicles, computer chips and wind turbines to avoid caving in to Trump's demands. The U.S. and China are talking this week in Stockholm, Sweden.
There is also skepticism that tariffs will produce the economic boom claimed by Trump.
Analysts at Morgan Stanley said 'the most likely outcome is slow growth and firm inflation,' but not a recession. After all, the 15% tariffs on the EU and Japan are a slight increase from the 10% rate that Trump began charging in April during a negotiation period.
While autos made in the EU and Japan will no longer face the 25% tariffs Trump had imposed, they will still face a 15% tax that has yet to appear in prices at U.S. dealerships. The administration has said the lack of auto price increases suggests that foreign producers are absorbing the costs, but it might ultimately just reflect the buildup of auto inventories to front-run the import taxes.
'Dealers built stocks ahead of tariff implementation, damping the immediate impact on retail prices. That cushion is starting to wear thin,' Morgan Stanley said in a separate note. 'Our Japan auto analyst notes that as pre-tariff inventory clears, replacement vehicles will likely carry higher price tags.'
Economist Mary Lovely of the Peterson Institute for International Economics warned of a 'slow-burn efficiency loss'' as U.S. companies scramble to adjust to Trump's new world. For decades, American companies have mostly paid the same tariffs – and often none at all – on imported machinery and raw materials from all over the world.
Now, as a result of Trump's trade deals, tariffs vary by country. 'U.S. firms have to change their designs and get inputs from different places based on these variable tariff rates,'' she said. 'It's an incredible administrative burden. There's all these things that are acting as longer-term drags on economy, but their effect will show up only slowly.''
Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said that the United States' effective tariff rate has risen to 17.5% from around 2.5% at the start of the year.
'I wouldn't take a victory lap,'' Zandi said. 'The economic damage caused by the higher tariffs will mount in the coming months.''
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
2 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Taiwan-US Ties Are Becoming a Political Headache for the Lai Administration
Supporters hold up the flags of Taiwan and the U.S. as they welcome President Lai Ching-te (not pictured) upon his arrival at the Honolulu airport during a transit of Hawai'i, Dec. 1, 2024. Late July brought a series of setbacks for the Lai administration of Taiwan. After the disastrous failure of the first round of recall votes of the 'Great Recall Movement' on July 26, the Trump administration in the United States imposed 20 percent tariffs on Taiwan, part of a wider announcement of tariffs on major trading partners. More unusually, a planned trip by President Lai Ching-te that would have involved a stopover in the United States was canceled, reportedly because the Trump administration did not want to upset China as the two side pursue trade negotiations. The Lai administration probably had hoped for a different series of events to buoy its July and August: successes in terms of Taiwan-U.S. diplomacy that could carry the Lai administration through the recall season (the second round of recall voting is scheduled for late August). But its vision was not to be. In U.S. President Donald Trump's initial 'Liberation Day' tariff announcement in early April, Taiwan was hit with 32 percent tariffs. This led to strong reactions in Taiwan, particularly as this was only slightly lower than China's tariff rate of 34 percent. Trump later announced a 'pause' on the higher tariff rates, inviting governments from around the world to negotiate deals. Taiwan was one of many seeking to lower the tariff rate through talks with Washington. Ahead of the voting date for the recall, however, rumors arose that the United States would continue with its plans for a 32 percent tariff rate on Taiwan. The claims continued to circulate online, even though they were denied by the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT), which functions as a de facto U.S. embassy in Taiwan in the absence of official diplomatic ties. AIT stressed that news on tariff rates would come through official channels. The online rumors implied that the Lai administration had had no success in convincing the United States to reduce the tariff rate. The claims were picked up by Kuomintang (KMT) politicians, such as pan-Blue commentator Jaw Shaw-kong, who also served as the KMT's vice presidential candidate in 2024 elections, and KMT party chair Eric Chu. Contrastingly, Lai administration trade officials stated that Taiwan expected to see a tariff rate that was below 25 percent, in line with what Japan and South Korea received. Lai administration officials also denied allegations from KMT legislator Chang Chia-chun that Taiwan had already been informed of a tariff rate but was seeking to keep it secret ahead of the recall. The Lai administration appeared to hope that it could tout a preferential tariff rate as a political victory, potentially influencing the recall vote. Vice Premier Cheng Li-chiun was dispatched to the United States for four rounds of trade talks. An op-ed in Bloomberg published by Lai in April, suggesting that the United States and Taiwan should deepen economic connections for greater prosperity was also seen as an attempt to convince Washington to lower tariffs. The choice of Cheng for trade negotiations is notable. Cheng, who previously served as minister of culture under the Tsai administration, is considered a Lai loyalist. She was previously considered a contender against Hsiao Bi-khim, best-known as Taiwan's representative to the U.S. during the Tsai administration, as Lai's vice presidential candidate. It is possible that in the event of a future cabinet reshuffle, Cheng will become the next premier. Ultimately, the Lai administration did not see tariff rates for Taiwan announced ahead of the July 26 recall vote, even though it touted that it was near closing a deal. And when the rate was announced, Taiwan's 20 percent tariffs were higher than the rates imposed on Japan and South Korea – both at 15 percent. Taiwan's tariff rate is also higher than Southeast Asian economies such as Cambodia and Thailand, which both received 19 percent. This was a blow to the Lai administration. The Taiwanese public is mostly focused on the numbers and appears unconvinced that 20 percent was the best that could be secured while still protecting Taiwanese industries. U.S. trade negotiators were reportedly placing significant pressure on Taiwan to make further concessions. To this extent, there has been relatively little discussion in Taiwan of what Japan and South Korea offered to receive lower tariff rates – for example, Trump's claims that Japan would directly pay the U.S. funds to be used for investment at the discretion of the Trump administration – or other uncertainties about tariff negotiations. Most reporting has focused on the percentage of tariffs that Taiwan would receive. As pan-Blue figures accuse the government of failing in its trade negotiations, the pan-Green camp has sought to recenter political attacks on the pan-Blue politicians who claimed on the basis of mysterious inside sources that Taiwan would have a 32 percent tariff rate. The Lai administration has also sought to emphasize that trade talks with the United States are ongoing, and that Taiwan may see a further reduction in tariff rates. The KMT is demanding that the Lai administration clarify what it means by saying that trade negotiations are ongoing. The KMT has also alleged that trade negotiations are lacking in transparency and should be disclosed to the public, though the party's leaders probably knows well that it is standard practice for such trade negotiations to be kept secret. The KMT is currently calling for a national conference to be held on the tariffs. There is a rare opportunity for bipartisan cooperation if both the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) agree to pass special funding to deal with the economic impact of the tariffs. But the KMT may simply use the national conference as a political opportunity to attack the Lai administration, perhaps through interrogating DPP politicians, or attack the Executive Yuan's proposed budget as failing to do enough for affected industries. This has generally been the pattern in the last two years, with the KMT staging public walkouts during reports to the legislature by Premier Cho Jung-tai, after calling for Cho to make such reports. There is also a recurring pattern of one-upmanship between the KMT and DPP legislative caucuses when it comes to relief funding for disasters. Amid accusations of 'failed' trade talks with Washington, there came another blow to the Lai administration. In late July, reports began to appear in the international press that Lai's planned August stopover in New York was off. The Lai administration and U.S. State Department denied the veracity of such reports, with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs pointing out that no trip had been formally announced, so it couldn't have been canceled. However, it was known that Lai had planned to visit Belize, Guatemala, and Paraguay, Taiwan's diplomatic allies in South America. The Guatemalan government later claimed that the trip was off due to the impact of typhoons on Taiwan. Taiwanese presidents cannot pay formal visits to the United States, due to the lack of formal diplomatic ties. However, it's long been standard practice for them to make 'stopovers' – essentially transiting through major U.S. cities en route to visit Taiwan's diplomatic allies. China vociferously protests every such transit by a Taiwanese president, something the U.S. government has always ignored – until now. Among those to criticize the Trump administration for reportedly rejecting Lai's stopover request was former U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, who traveled to Taiwan in August 2022. Pelosi, as well as others, have criticized the Trump administration for the optics of throwing Taiwan under the bus in order to please China. The underlying suggestion would be that the Taiwan-U.S. relationship is up for negotiation. The shock of U.S. tariffs and the cancellation of the Lai administration's planned stopover is likely to amplify skepticism about whether the United States will support Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion. What has been termed 'U.S.-skeptic rhetoric' has been on the rise in Taiwan in past years, as embraced by pan-Blue politicians such as Jaw and others. The cancellation of Lai's trip is a slap in the face, given that past Taiwanese presidents have been allowed to transit in the United States. The importance of the stopover visit can be seen through the fact that the entire trip was cancelled when a U.S. transit was not possible. Yet there is opportunity to remedy this if the trip is later rescheduled. Even Pelosi's visit to Taiwan was called off once, due to the then-House speaker contracting COVID-19. That raised questions about whether the trip would actually occur – and it eventually did. That being said, the impact of the tariffs may turn out to have a larger impact for the Lai administration, particularly as midterm elections approach. As agriculture and industry feel the heat, the Lai administration will be under pressure to not only come up with relief measures but also manage the Taiwan-U.S. relationship – otherwise it will again face punishment at the polls.
Japan Today
3 hours ago
- Japan Today
Japan's farm exports rise 16% in 1st half of 2025, setting record
Japan's agricultural, fisheries and forestry product exports in the first half of 2025 rose 15.5 percent from a year earlier to a record 809.7 billion yen, as sales in the United States increased sharply, the government said. The record for the January-June period followed a fall in the same period of the previous year. The turnaround came as Japan expanded sales channels in the United States and other areas following China's import ban on Japanese seafood in the wake of the discharge of treated radioactive wastewater from the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. Exports were also likely helped by an increase in the number of Japanese restaurants operating overseas as awareness of the cuisine increased on the back of surging foreign tourism. Supermarkets outside the country are also selling more Japanese food, the farm ministry said. The record figure came as the government aims to boost Japan's farm and seafood exports to 2 trillion yen by 2025, after exports in 2024 grew 3.6 percent from the previous year to a record 1.51 trillion yen. But there is uncertainty over Japan's prospects of achieving the goal, as the United States will implement a 15 percent "reciprocal" tariff on Japanese imports on Thursday. China, however, is moving to resume imports of Japanese marine and other products. By country and region, exports to the United States topped the list with 141.0 billion yen, up 22.0 percent, boosted by strong demand for scallops, green tea and yellowtail. The increase came despite the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump imposing a new 10 percent tariff in April. Hong Kong ranked second with a 3.4 percent increase to 106.8 billion yen, followed by China, which saw 15.0 percent growth to 90.2 billion yen as exports of sake, timber logs and animal feed notably expanded, according to the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. By item, exports of scallops surged 45.4 percent to 34.9 billion yen, while sauce mixed seasoning increased 7.6 percent to 34.0 billion yen and beef climbed 15.5 percent to 32.5 billion yen. © KYODO
Japan Today
3 hours ago
- Japan Today
Trump narrows Fed chair candidates to four, excluding Treasury Secretary Bessent
By FATIMA HUSSEIN President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he's whittled down his list of potential Federal Reserve chair candidates to four as he considers a successor to Jerome Powell — a choice that could reset the path of the U.S. economy. Asked on CNBC's 'Squawk Box' for a future replacement to Powell, Trump named Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, and Kevin Warsh, a former member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. 'I think Kevin and Kevin, both Kevins, are very good,' Trump said during an interview on CNBC's 'Squawk Box.' He said two other people were also under consideration, but Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is not among them. 'I love Scott, but he wants to stay where he is," Trump said. He did not name his other two top candidates but used the opportunity to disparage Powell, whom he has dubbed 'too late' in cutting interest rates. The news that Trump plans to make a decision on the Fed chair 'soon' comes as the Republican president has been highly critical of current Powell, whose term ends in May 2026. Trump recently floated having the Fed's board of governors take full control of the U.S. central bank from Powell, whom he has relentlessly pressured to cut short-term interest rates in ways that raise questions about whether the Fed can remain free from White House politicking. Trump has openly mused about whether to remove Powell before his tenure as chair ends, but he's held off on dismissing the Fed chair after a recent Supreme Court ruling suggested he could only do so for cause rather than out of policy disagreements. The president has put pressure on Powell by claiming he mismanaged the Fed's $2.5 billion renovation project, but he's also said that he's 'highly unlikely' to fire Powell. One of the Fed's governors, Adriana Kugler, made a surprise announcement last Friday that she would be stepping away from her role. That created an opening for Trump, who called her departure 'a pleasant surprise,' to name a new Fed governor. Trump told CNBC it's 'a possibility' that his pick to replace Kugler could also be his choice to replace Powell. Here's what to know about the two known candidates: Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, has been supportive of the president's agenda — from his advocacy for income tax cuts and tariffs to his support of the recent firing of BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer. Hassett served in the first Trump administration as chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers. He has a doctoral degree in economics from the University of Pennsylvania and worked at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute before joining the Trump White House in 2017. As part of Hassett's farewell announcement in 2019, Trump called him a 'true friend' who did a 'great job.' Hassett became a fellow at the Hoover Institution, which is located at Stanford University. He later returned to the administration to help deal with the pandemic. On CNBC on Monday, Hassett said 'all over the U.S. government, there have been people who have been resisting Trump everywhere they can." A former Fed governor who stepped down in 2011, Warsh is currently a fellow at the Hoover Institution. He has been supportive of cutting interest rates, a key goal of Trump's. 'The president's right to be frustrated with Jay Powell and the Federal Reserve,' Warsh said on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' last month. Warsh has been increasingly critical of Powell's Federal Reserve and in July, on CNBC, called for sweeping changes on how the Fed conducts business as well as a new Treasury-Fed accord 'like we did in 1951, after another period where we built up our nation's debt and we were stuck with a central bank that was working at cross purposes with the Treasury.' He said the Fed's 'hesitancy to cut rates, I think, is actually quite a mark against them.' 'The specter of the miss they made on inflation" after the pandemic, he said, "it has stuck with them. So one of the reasons why the president, I think, is right to be pushing the Fed publicly is we need regime change in the conduct of policy.' 'He's very highly thought of,' Trump said in June when asked directly about Warsh. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
