
I dropped Gemini for Bixby for a week, and I'm so glad that I did
When Samsung launched Bixby in 2017, it wasn't well received. The virtual assistant, intended to rival Google Assistant, wasn't nearly as mature or capable as it is now. Nevertheless, Samsung tried to push it onto users with a dedicated button well before it was ready. The voice assistant landscape has changed significantly since then. Google Gemini has replaced Assistant as my primary voice channel, but it hasn't been smooth sailing. I've encountered many problems with Google's next-gen assistant on various devices in recent months. So, as a last resort, I turned to Bixby again. It's something that I should've done much sooner.
What is your preferred voice assistant on Android?
0 votes
Google Assistant / Gemini
NaN %
Amazon Alexa
NaN %
Samsung Bixby
NaN %
ChatGPT
NaN %
Perplexity
NaN %
Microsoft Copilot
NaN %
Another voice assistant (mention which in the comments)
NaN %
I don't use a voice assistant.
NaN %
I'm not a fervent voice assistant user. Yes, I occasionally talk to my phone, but only in certain situations — when my hands aren't free, like when I'm driving, cooking, or in the middle of a game. I'll also use a voice assistant if a query is better suited to verbal instruction. As a result, I value understanding, quick execution, and quality of answers above all else.
As I mentioned in the intro, Bixby is now a capable virtual assistant for Samsung smartphone users. It can perform various complex tasks, from article summaries to live translations. It can also open apps, tell me what song is playing, answer questions on multiple topics, and handle everyday tasks like setting reminders or alarms.
Bixby is a mixed bag of thrills and spills
Andy Walker / Android Authority
As a Galaxy S24 FE user, I hadn't bothered setting up Bixby when I got the phone, but this was a mistake. It's far slicker, quicker, and more reliable than Gemini when performing some on-device tasks.
Bixby is far slicker, quicker, and more reliable than Gemini when performing some on-device tasks
Its real strength is demonstrated through on-device tasks to trigger the camera, call up a specific settings tree, or open a particular app. While I generally don't use voice assistants this way, I asked Bixby and Gemini to 'open the selfie camera.' Bixby launched my camera app much faster than Gemini, which had to call on its Utilities extension to accomplish the same. Even a simple 'open my home screen' command, which theoretically requires the phone to hit the virtual home button, sees Bixby with a comfortable win. Samsung's assistant's better integration with One UI and the phone's hardware gives it a massive advantage for these mundane tasks.
As I own a Galaxy Watch, Bixby is also on my wrist, so I get the same control over my wearable as my smartphone. This makes for predictable outcomes, even though the feature doesn't work when power-saving mode is active. I generally use Modes and Routines to automatically trigger this feature in the afternoons. You can see the problem. However, I have found that Gemini is glacial on my smartwatch, so I'd rather work around the limitations Bixby presents here.
Andy Walker / Android Authority
Regarding offline capabilities, Bixby remains quick and responsive even if its broader feature set isn't available. I switched off mobile data and asked the assistant, 'What's 55 plus 2?' It hit me with an 'I couldn't connect' message. I'm unsure why Samsung's assistant needs the internet to solve a simple math problem, but at least it tries to answer the question. When offline and asked the same question, Gemini hangs. Gemini will flat out refuse to work in any capacity when an internet connection isn't in view.
When that Wi-Fi or mobile connection is going strong, Bixby does fall slightly behind Gemini, in my opinion. Before it could give me a 'good butter chicken recipe,' Bixby wanted me first to install SmartThings and connect my Samsung and Samsung Food accounts. It wouldn't just offer a web result, as it does for other queries. Then, when I asked it again, it provided wildly unrelated recipes. 'Ultimate risotto primavera' and 'creamy tomato pasta sauce' sound delicious, but they aren't curries, are they?
Bixby offers select smarts when offline, but when the internet is available Gemini pulls ahead.
This performance seems to be query-dependent, though. For questions like 'How do I care for a Syngonium?' Bixby opens a Google Search on Samsung Internet. Even if it mishears me, it still understands the crux of my query. Perhaps it's ironic that the top result is usually an AI Overview. Nevertheless, opening a browser window is a nice way to start a broader browser-based information search.
Notably, while expected, Bixby will always prioritize Samsung apps for information or utility. 'Save a note on Google Keep' instead saved a note to Samsung Notes. Saying 'Open Google Keep' does indeed open Keep, but Bixby cannot create actual notes within the app. As someone deeply entrenched in Google's ecosystem, this is a problem for me.
Gemini is as slow as a sloth but reaches a little further
Andy Walker / Android Authority
In these moments, I was reminded of how often I take Gemini and its features for granted. Yes, it's as slow as molasses in the Arctic, but I was still tempted to drop this experiment altogether.
Bixby lacks core elements that make the Google product valuable beyond simply calling up information or commanding my phone. One example is Gemini Live. Google's live contextual voice assistant has become a de facto scratch pad for me. I'll often walk around my house, organizing my thoughts with the tool, and then exporting the refined version to a Keep note. That's something Bixby can't offer at this point in its development.
It's difficult living without Gemini Live, especially as it has become my de facto scratch pad.
I also mentioned that Bixby struggles to succinctly serve information from the internet, instead regularly relying on other Samsung apps or its web browser. Well, Gemini does a much better job presenting this information and contains the results of queries within its UI. Let's go back to my butter chicken query. Instead of giving me Italian dishes, it explains exactly what butter chicken entails, including the use of methi. Gold star! This makes it far easier to double-check information without all the fluff of a web page.
Gemini also outperforms Bixby in another core modern assistant task: generating new content. When asked to 'generate a birthday message,' Gemini creates a standard message filled with well wishes. Bixby asks me what the message should include. This is the starkest difference between the two products' feature sets.
There are other smaller reasons why I preferred Assistant and Gemini during this experiment. Its flawless integration with Google products is one, especially Tasks, Keep, and Docs. A Nest Mini in my kitchen, which doesn't support Bixby, also pushes me to use Google's products when I need to set a timer, convert units, or play my kitchen cleaning playlist.
Gemini and Bixby: better together?
Mishaal Rahman / Android Authority
Both assistants still fail to be genuinely helpful in every scenario, and I still long for more functionality across the board. Neither can I input text into a WhatsApp text box, for instance, and neither seems to recognize precisely what I'm saying all the time. What is a 'simbonium' Bixby? Sure, it's an accent thing, but I can't believe their performance in this regard is still so poor.
It's difficult to recommend a winner here, so I'll likely continue using both assistants going forward.
After returning to Samsung's assistant after all these years, I feel the relatively negative sentiment towards it is unjustified. Sure, it was a terrible experience when it first launched, but in 2025, it's a solid on-device tool that works well on the company's smartphones. It lacks Gemini's generative capabilities or information processing skills, but it's much faster than Google's product in many aspects. Conversely, Gemini is still the best product for those deeply invested in Google's ecosystem, while Live remains one of the best generative AI efforts I've ever used.
So, which is best? Well, a single-word answer is pretty complicated. In the future, I'll keep Bixby on call for on-device tasks, while Gemini will be there for more generative or informational purposes. Sure, using two voice assistants on one phone might be overkill, but that's the conundrum Google and Samsung have left users with.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Digital Trends
2 hours ago
- Digital Trends
iPhone 17 Pro could get unexpectedly huge camera upgrades
Over the past few months, leaks showing a redesigned iPhone 17 Pro pair and an uber-slim iPhone 17 Air have occupied social media. But it seems the upcoming Apple flagships will serve a few other niceties that will appeal to camera fans. According to a Macrumors report, which cites an unnamed source, the iPhone 17 Pro will come with an upgraded 8x optical zoom camera. For comparison, the iPhone 16 Pro pair is limited to 5x optical zoom output. Apple is stepping up Looking over at the competition, Samsung's Galaxy S25 Ultra and Google Pixel 9 Pro peak at 5x optical zoom output. Stepping into the hypercompetitive Asian markets, Oppo's Find X8 Ultra goes up to 6x optical zoom, and the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra reaches the 9.4x optical zoom figure. 'The lens can apparently move, allowing for continuous optical zoom at various focal lengths,' adds the report. To recall, all the leaks point at a massive camera bump at the back of the iPhone 17 Pro, so it's plausible that Apple is indeed eyeing a major upgrade for the imaging hardware. Recommended Videos Assuming the rumor turns out to be true, the iPhone 17 Pro will emerge as one of the best smartphones out there for long-range photo and video capture, at least going by the on-paper hardware. Whether Apple upgrades the tetraprism design for the next-gen telephoto camera system remains a mystery. A true camera powerhouse, at last Older leaks are also predicting a triple 48-megapixel camera layout for the iPhone 17 Pro, with support for 8K video capture in tow. We are also hearing some chatter about a mechanical aperture feature that will offer users more granular control over photo capture. The camera app will reportedly allow simultaneous capture by the front and rear snappers, a solution that is tailor-made for vlogging. This facility, however, isn't exactly a groundbreaking innovation, as the likes of Samsung have offered it for years on the Galaxy smartphones. The latest Apple leak also claims that Apple will release a new camera app with the iPhone 17 Pro, one that will focus on Pro-grade features and deeper controls. So far, the likes of Halide and Kino have remained a favorite in the 'mobigrapher' community, so it would be interesting to see what Apple has to offer in terms of standout capabilities.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
I spent 24 hours with the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — here's what I like and what I don't
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Update: Our in-depth Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra review is live. Check out our verdict. Samsung introduced the world to the Galaxy S25 Ultra last week, meaning even those of us lucky enough to have tried the phone haven't spent much time with it yet. But even after just a single day of use, the phone's left an impression on me. The Ultra version of each year's Galaxy S flagship is usually one of the best phones of the year, and with the number of new software and AI features Samsung's added this time around, the Galaxy S25 Ultra is likely to clear that bar, too. I have one main complaint about the phone which could impact the eventual verdict of our review, but everything else I've sampled so far is promising. Here's my take based on my short time with the S25 Ultra so far. And for more see our full Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra review. A new but familiar look The Titanium Silverblue color of my review unit looks excellent, but the Black, Grey and Whitesilver versions also look pretty slick as well. And the more lively Samsung Store-exclusive colors don't look bad either. The new rounded corners on this year's edition give the Galaxy S25 Ultra a matching design with the Galaxy S25 and Galaxy S25 Plus, which makes sense even if I'm going to miss the Galaxy Note-style pointy corners for the unique look they provided. Black camera surrounds help the phone look like it means business, too even if only one of them (the 50MP ultrawide camera) is any different from the Galaxy S24 Ultra. On the topic of cameras, I've yet to properly test the photographic potential of the S25 Ultra. But from the Galaxy S25 Ultra photo comparisons I and my colleagues have already taken, this is looking like one it'll be another entry on our best camera phones guide from Samsung. Now Brief seems immediately useful The one Galaxy AI tool that's already showing potential is the Now Brief, which draws info from various apps into one easily-accessible widget. By default, it lives on your home screen, but it can also be found in the Edge panel that appears when swiping in from the side of the screen, or on the lock screen when it's got an update for you. I'm hoping to see Now Brief offer more as I keep using the phone. Even in its basic format, having a single screen containing the day's weather and events available at any time is useful, but I look forward to seeing it recommend automated routines and surface relevant tickets and coupons saved to Samsung Wallet. Display looks better than ever Samsung knows its screens, and the Galaxy S25 Ultra is another example of this. Early test results show the 6.9-inch panel is way brighter than the Galaxy S24 Ultra, and is only beaten by the screen on the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL. Plus the increased size and slimmer bezels mean even more viewing space, with the ProScaler system helping lower-res content fit better on the QHD panel. I don't plan on testing the Gorilla Armor 2 display's durability, but the anti-glare layer, combined with the screen's high overall brightness, is already making the screen easier to read outdoors or when a bright spotlight is overhead. Watching movie trailers (like Captain America: Brave New World) still look exciting and colorful even with the sun trying its best to outshine the display. A bright screen with anti-glare tech is something I wish every phone had. But the only place you'll currently find it is on Samsung's Ultra flagships. Galaxy AI and One UI 7 are already complete Samsung has launched its latest OS and all of its new tools on the Galaxy S25 at the same time as the phone, something that Google didn't manage with its latest flagships. Apple's iPhone 16 lineup arrived with iOS 18 preinstalled, but Apple Intelligence started appearing later. Everything Samsung has to show off is ready to try, rather than waiting on a full or partial OS update. One UI 7's new design steals a few cues from iOS, but still looks distinctly Samsung. It all works wonderfully smoothly from what I've seen so far. The only potential sticking point is the new default notification style, which puts all the app icons into the top right corner rather than having them in obvious view front and center. I'm sticking with the default for now, but I may switch it to the traditional "card' layout down the road if I find the lack of information irritating when I want a quick glance of incoming messages. The S Pen remains a faithful companion I'm happy Samsung's continuing to bundle a stylus with the Galaxy S25 Ultra, and while it's never good to see features disappear, I'm not missing the Air Actions that the Galaxy S24 Ultra offered. Other than testing to see that they worked on previous models, I never used them. As long as the stylus stays included and stored within the body of future Galaxy S Ultras, it's cool. The price still makes me wince All of these useful or fun features aside, I still can't get over the fact that the Galaxy S25 Ultra costs $1,300 (£1,250 here in the U.K. or AU$2,149 in Australia). The iPhone 16 Pro Max and Google Pixel 9 Pro XL, both amazing phones, sell for $100 or $200 less. Perhaps the S25 Ultra's features are worth the extra money, and my opinion on the price will soften as I get more use out of them. But as the most expensive phone in its class, the Galaxy S25 Ultra may be hard to justify buying this yourself. We're still testing the whole Galaxy S25 series, including the Ultra though. So perhaps when our full reviews arrive, the phone will have justified its hefty price tag, and it'll be surprisingly simple to recommend upgrading to Samsung's latest premium device. More from Tom's Guide Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs OnePlus 13: Which flagship will win? I saw the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge at Unpacked — and I'm super excited and super confused The Samsung Galaxy S25 stole this genius idea from a dead phone and finally made it a reality
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs Pixel 10 Pro Fold: Here's how Google can beat Samsung
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold will debut at the Made by Google 2025 hardware event on August 20. But even before the new version of the foldable phone hits retail shelves, it's already facing a big challenge. And the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is the reason why. Samsung's own updated foldable phone goes on sale this Friday (July 25). And though the $1,999 starting cost is a steep price to pay, you get an impressive phone in return In fact, in his Galaxy Z Fold 7 review, my colleague Mark Spoonauer calls the new Samsung model the foldable phone he's been waiting for, thanks to an ultra portable design that's uncommon for devices this big. We've got the Galaxy Z Flip 7 ranked as the best foldable phone thanks in part to its more palatable price tag, but the Galaxy Z Fold 7 isn't that far behind. And that poses a problem for Google, which is about to roll out a new version of its foldable phone immediately after Samsung has seriously stepped up its game. It's certainly a formidable prospect for the Pixel 10 Pro Fold to take on, but it's not an impossible task. Even with the Galaxy Z Fold 7 raising the standard for foldable phones, here's how the Pixel 10 Pro Fold can answer back. Galaxy Z Fold 7: from $799 w/ trade-in @ SamsungSamsung is knocking up to $1,150 off Galaxy Z Fold 7 preorders when you trade-in an older phone. Additionally, you'll get a free storage upgrade with your preorder. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 features an 8-inch AMOLED (2184 x 1968) 120Hz main display, 6.5-inch AMOLED (2520 x 1080) 120Hz cover display, Snapdragon 8 Elite CPU, 12GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage. On the rear you get a 200MP f/1.7 main wide-angle lens, 12MP f/2.2 ultra-wide lens, and 10MP f/2.4 telephoto lens. Selfie cams include a 10MP f/2.2 main display and cover Deal Why the Galaxy Z Fold 7 stands out To understand exactly what the Pixel 10 Pro Fold is up against, let's first look a little closer at what the Galaxy Z Fold 7 gets so right. And a lot of it comes down to the phone's design. We can argue about what foldable is the thinnest in the world when it's opened up — Samsung's latest or a couple of foldable phones largely available only in China. But the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is certainly in the conversation. An opened Z Fold 7 is 4.2mm thin, and even when snapped shut the 8.9mm profile isn't that much thicker than conventional phones. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 is light, too, tipping the scales at a mere 7.5 ounces. For context, that's lighter than the Galaxy S25 Ultra (a shade under 7.7 ounces) and iPhone 16 Pro Max (8 ounces). It's definitely lighter than the Pixel 9 Pro Fold, which is 1.5 ounces heavier than Samsung's latest. We've heard the Pixel 10 Pro Fold will slim down the size of the hinge compared to the current model, but it's unclear how that would translate to the new phone's dimensions. Even so, Google would have to shave nearly a millimeter off the 5.1mm Pixel 9 Pro Fold to make its new model as thin as an opened Galaxy Z Fold 7. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 ushers in other improvements, particularly to the cameras — long a strength of Google's phones. You get a 200MP main camera with the Galaxy Z Fold 7, along with a much improved 10MP selfie cam on the phone's interior display. Throw in an improved ProVisual Engine, and the new Fold produced detailed, colorful photos in our testing. Samsung also tweaked its Galaxy AI features to take better advantage of the Galaxy Z Fold 7's unique design, from accessing the Now Brief and Gemini Live features from the phone's larger cover display to side-by-side comparisons of generative AI edits on the super-sized 8-inch main screen. How the Pixel 10 Pro Fold responds That last area — AI capabilities — gives Google an in with the Pixel 10 Pro Fold. While Samsung's Galaxy AI features certainly impress, Google's no stranger to developing on-device AI features of its own, as evidenced by the company's win in our recent AI phone face-off. Besides, as great as Samsung's use of Gemini is, let's not forget that's Google's assistant will be very present on the new Pixel 10 models coming out, the Fold included. While Google may have a hard time out-designing the Galaxy Z Fold 7, there are apparently other steps the phone maker can take to make the Pixel 10 Pro Fold stand out. One of those ways apparently involves increased durability, as leaked Pixel 10 Pro Fold specs suggest that the phone will boast a dust-and-water resistance rating of IP68 — a first for foldable phones. The higher rating means that Google's new foldable will not only be able to survive a dunk in water but keep out dust as well. That's been a challenge for other foldable phones, as the moving parts leave plenty of areas for finer particles to get inside the device. As durable as the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is, for example, it still offers an IP48 rating, as it's not graded to repel smaller dust particles. There's one other area where Samsung has left the door open for other foldable phone makers to challenge the Galaxy Z Fold 7 — battery life. While the new Samsung phone lasts longer than its predecessor, it's only a slight gain and barely ahead of the average battery life for phones that we test. That's likely a reflection of the fact that the Galaxy Z Fold 7 features the same size battery as the Galaxy Z Fold 6. That's not a mistake Google sounds like it's going to make with the Pixel 10 Pro Fold. According to those leaked specs, the new foldable Pixel could offer a 5,015 mAh battery, which would be a fairly noteworthy step up from the Pixel 9 Pro Fold's 4,650 mAh cell. Assuming that's accurate, we'd expect the new model to improve up the Pixel 9 Pro Fold's 11.5-plus hour result on our battery test, especially if the Tensor G5 chipset likely to power the Pixel 10 Pro Fold proves to be more power efficient. Pixel 10 Pro outlook Any phone that takes on the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is going to have its work cut for it, given all the positive changes Samsung has introduced to this year's model. But focusing on AI features, durability and longevity would give Google an in for making a splash with the Pixel 10 Pro Fold. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. More from Tom's Guide Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. Fold 6 camera face-off 24 hours with the Galaxy Z Fold 7 — what I liked and what I didn't Galaxy Z Fold 7 pre-order deals: Save on Samsung's new phone