India evaluates 28 global indices, finds metrics in some flawed
Synopsis India is scrutinising the methodologies of 28 global indices, including the Democracy Index and Global Hunger Index, due to concerns over flawed assessments. The Ministry of Statistics is analysing sample sizes and models used in cross-country comparisons. Preliminary findings reveal issues with scoring systems, prompting the government to send inputs to relevant departments. India is closely looking at the methodologies used by 28 global indices such as the Democracy Index, Network Readiness Index, Global Hunger Index to track its performance vis-a-vis other countries, a government official told ET.
ADVERTISEMENT New Delhi has termed the methodology followed in some of these indices, including the Global Hunger Index, as flawed.
"We are looking at these indices to identify any imperfections or drawbacks," the official said.
The ministry of statistics and programme implementation (MoSPI) is analysing the methodologies used by international bodies that conduct cross-country comparisons, including sample sizes and models.The indices under review are the Democracy Index by the Economist Intelligence Unit, the Network Readiness Index by the Portulans Institute, the Global Hunger Index (GHI) by Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe, and the Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI) by Germanwatch, the NewClimate Institute, and Climate Action Network International.The official said preliminary findings have highlighted issues around scoring system and methodology. The MOSPI has already sent inputs to the concerned departments and ministries, the official added.
ADVERTISEMENT A paper co-authored by Sanjiv Sanyal, member, Economic Advisory Council to PM, had in 2023 highlighted that India's poor performance on specific international indicators despite rising per capita income was due to methodological issues.In another working paper the Prime Minister's economic advisory council said there were serious problems with the methodology used in these perception-based indices-Freedom in World Index, V-DEM indices, and EIU Democracy Index.
ADVERTISEMENT
Indices under scannerFor instance, in 2024, India was placed 41 out of 167 countries and categorised as a 'flawed democracy' on the Democracy Index. In the 2024 edition, India was ranked 105 out of 127 countries on the GHI and classified under the 'serious' hunger category.
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)
(Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2025 Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)
Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online.
NEXT STORY
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Chief Secy calls for modern statistical system
Bhubaneswar: Odisha Chief Secretary Manoj Ahuja on Monday batted for a modern statistical system to measure the socio-economic progress of the State. Addressing the 19th National Statistics Day here, Ahuja said the system would also help in identifying the areas of shortfall and the way forward. He stressed the need for institutional capacity building, too. Speaking on the occasion, Development Commissioner Anu Garg advised the officials concerned to develop the recommended statistical system, which would help in effective monitoring of the goals and targets set in the 'vision document' for a 'Viksit Odisha - 2036 and 2047'. Citing the example of the 'Subhadra' scheme, she said the State government has been emphasising the use of data and, in the process, it has prepared a robust database that may be used in implementation of other beneficiary-oriented programmes. Ashish Kumar, former Director-General, Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation, highlighted the role of the National Statistical Office (NSO) in conducting sample surveys to provide data at regular intervals for the unorganised sectors of the economy.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Privacy bill could be sent to Attorney General for assessing RTI impact
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills India's proposed privacy bill—Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act—will be referred to the Attorney General of India R Venkataramani for an opinion on whether the much-awaited legislation violates the country's Right to Information (RTI) Act as alleged by opposition parties and members of civil society, people in the know move may clear the clouds of uncertainty hovering over the legislation enacted by Parliament in August 2023, but which is not yet operational pending notification of its Rules.A draft of the proposed Rules was released for stakeholder consultation in January this a meeting chaired by minister for electronics and IT, Ashwini Vaishnaw on Monday, the stalled Act, which bestows individuals with greater control over their personal data while also enabling responsible data processing practices, came up for discussion.'There are a couple of issues which need to be resolved,' a senior government official told ET.'It will be referred to the AG, but the government's view is that the DPDP Act doesn't dilute the RTI Act and amendment doesn't stop those seeking information under RTI to get access to it,' the official Vaishnaw is expected to write to all the members of Parliament explaining the position.'Anyone accessing any information, be it about the MNREGA scheme or data about a farmer welfare scheme can do it without any issue through the RTI, " according to officials who said there are no restrictions for journalists seeking information has been an outcry by the opposition, civil society over an amendment to the RTI Act's Section 8(1)(j) made through the DPDP Act, passed in 2023. It amended a section of the RTI Act, removing the earlier safeguard that allowed disclosure of personal information if it served public interest and did not amount to 'unwarranted' invasion of amendment – allowing authorities to withhold any information containing personal details – restricts journalists, activists, lawyers, and others from accessing crucial information needed to hold governments accountable and expose corruption, members of the civil society have who spoke to ET pointed out that the Rules are not being held in abeyance because of the outcry over the Act.'The Act was passed in 2023, where the RTI amendment was brought about, if there were concerns about it, they should have been raised then,' said people cited above.'The government is holding discussions about the Rules and keeping them ready while the political issue has to be resolved at the political level,' they proposed legislation has also left out another provision that stated that "information which cannot be denied to the Parliament, or a state legislature shall not be denied to any person".On March 26, over 120 MPs from the INDIA bloc urged the repeal of Section 44(3) of the DPDP Act, warning that it undermines the RTI Act by removing the public interest test in Section 8(1)(j).Shortly after, in response to a letter by Congress leader Jairam Ramesh, Vaishnaw cited Section 3 of the DPDP Act and said that the RTI framework remains protected."The DPDP Act, as outlined in Section 3, provides exemptions for personal data that is 'made or caused to be made publicly available' by individuals or entities under legal obligations. This ensures transparency while maintaining the need for privacy," Vaishnaw had written in an April 10 letter to Jairam had reported on 22 March that more than 30 civil society organisations launched a campaign seeking the rollback of a provision in the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act that amended the Right to Information (RTI) Act.
Time of India
13 hours ago
- Time of India
ETtech Explainer: Inside Karnataka's fake news bill, what it means for Big Tech
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills The government looks to criminalise and punish those who spread misinformation. Companies and social media platforms may also be held liable for fake news shared through their networks. Social media users found guilty can face two to five years in jail. If one posts fake news on social media platforms, they can be imprisoned for up to seven years and fined up to Rs 10 lakh. Abetment of such offences will also attract a two-year jail term. The Karnataka Misinformation and Fake News (Prohibition) Bill, 2025, introduced by the state government, seeks to curb the spread of misinformation and fake news on social media by criminalising offenders. However, the bill's provisions have drawn criticism for being 'vague' and overly 'broad' in are being drawn with the 1975 Emergency, with critics warning of a potential threat to free speech, while supporters, on the other hand, viewing the bill as a weapon to combat digital propaganda surfacing on social media. In a recent interview with ET , Karnataka's IT-BT minister Priyank Kharge said, 'We're not trying to change any policy. We're just trying to connect the dots that already exist and make a bill out of it.''We are not doing anything such as tampering with the IT Act, 2000. We are merely categorising any public interest information as true or false,' he takes a deep dive on the key provisions of the bill, its implications for Big Tech and related to the state government's draft proposal—the Karnataka Misinformation and Fake News (Prohibition) Bill, 2025—placed before the cabinet in mid-June, includes the following provisions:The draft bill includes formulating a six-member 'fake news regulatory authority' tasked with a broad mandate to monitor and regulate the content disseminated on social media includes the prohibition of publication of content amounting to disrespect of Sanatan symbols and beliefs on social media platforms and the prohibition of publication of content promoting social media landscape currently falls under the jurisdiction of the Central government via the Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000 and IT Rules, enacted, Karnataka's bill would mark the first time a state government has introduced criminal penalties for online development comes amid a broader trend of regulatory scrutiny on Big Tech. In March, social media platform X Corp (formerly Twitter), owned by Elon Musk, filed a writ petition in the Karnataka high court challenging the central government's authority to issue content-blocking orders under Section 69A of the IT Act.X began blocking over 8,000 accounts in India following executive orders from the Indian government, according to the April last year, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) unveiled the Digital Competition Act to regulate anti-competitive practices by global tech giants like Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, and Competition Commission of India (CCI) in November last year slapped a penalty of Rs 213.14 crore on Meta for alleged abuse of its dominant position in the implementation of the messaging app's 2021 privacy an order, the antitrust regulator said that user data was collected and shared with other Meta companies in contravention of the competition same year, WhatsApp was asked to break the end-to-end encryption norm and require it to trace the originator of certain messages. Delhi High Court heard a petition by WhatsApp challenging the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules 2021, which makes it obligatory for social media intermediaries requiring the messaging app to trace chats and make provisions to identify the first originator of information on the court's this, a state-level policy framework to criminalise the spread of misinformation and hold platforms liable introduces an additional layer of regulation. This fragments the digital space, forcing Big Tech companies to navigate different rules in different over 600 million internet users in India, as per a report by CNBC, the platforms currently enjoy 'safe harbour' protection from liability for user-generated shift now would hold platforms criminally liable if they fail to comply with the proposed bill and miss out on restricting fake news or concerns remain over the vague definitions used in the drafted legislation on what qualifies as misinformation and fake IT-BT minister Priyank Kharge, in a statement on X, said the departments of law, home, and IT will hold consultations and come up with a draft proposal before it receives approval.
