Woman charged over Shannon Airport protest refused travel to UK for Arts Council-funded trip
At Ennis District Court today, Judge Alec Gabbett said that Galway woman, Nell Buckley (29), 'is charged with serious offences' and refused an application to have Ms Buckley's passport returned to allow her travel to Great Yarmouth over three days at the end of this month.
Judge Gabbett said that the incident at Shannon airport received wide publicity in the papers and on social media.
He said that the great concern to the court is the serious issue about airport safety 'and there could potentially be an international incident'.
Ms Buckley of Ard Omra, Ballyburke, Ballymoneen Rd, Galway who has a Masters qualification, is one of three women
charged with the criminal damage of the Omni Air International aircraft at Shannon airfield
on 17 May.
It will be alleged that part of the front of the aircraft was spray painted with red paint.
Ms Buckley is also charged with entering a restricted area beside the control tower at Shannon airport with intent to unlawfully interfere with property on the same date.
All three first appeared before a special sitting of Ennis District Court at 9pm on Sunday night and Ms Buckley's co-accused were bailed to re-appear before court on 9 July on strict bail conditions.
Ms Buckley also obtained bail and as part of Ms Buckley's own bail conditions, she is barred from entering any aerodrome and must return her passport.
Advertisement
In court today, solicitor for Ms Buckley, Daragh Hassett asked that Ms Buckley's bail be amended to allow her to travel to the UK for three days for Arts Council-funded work.
Hassett said that the flight tickets were booked for Ms Buckley 'by someone in the Arts Council'.
He also said that at the initial bail hearing on Sunday it was flagged that a pre-booked work trip that had been arranged for her.
'She has a job. She works in the arts,' the solicitor said.
Det Garda Roddy Burke said that the concerns he outlined at the bail hearing on Ms Buckley entering an airport remain.
He said: 'There is a possibility there will be further charges in this case.'
Mr Hassett said that the charges Ms Buckley faces are 'serious' and she intends to contest those charges when the case comes for trial.
Ms Buckley said that has lived overseas for periods and did her Masters in Holland and returned from there in 2020. Mr Hassett said that Ms Buckley's mother has an independent surety of €500 in court to allow her daughter make the journey.
Mr Buckley agreed with Mr Hassett that she was travelling to the UK for work and not under the guise of a protester and would be travelling alone. Mr Hassett said that Ms Buckley's flight tickets are to fly out of Dublin on Ryanair.
Judge Gabbett refused the application and remanded Ms Buckley on continuing bail to re-appear in court on July 9th.
Judge Gabbett later told Mr Hassett that he was not open to an application to allow Ms Buckley travel by ferry to the UK this month.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
USAID analysis found no evidence of massive Hamas theft of Gaza aid
An internal US government analysis found no evidence of systematic theft by the Palestinian militant group Hamas of US-funded humanitarian supplies, challenging the main rationale that Israel and the US give for backing a new armed private aid operation. The analysis, which has not been previously reported, was conducted by a bureau within the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and completed in late June. It examined 156 incidents of theft or loss of US-funded supplies reported by US aid partner organisations between October 2023 and this May. It found "no reports alleging Hamas" benefited from US-funded supplies, according to a slide presentation of the findings seen by Reuters. A US State Department spokesperson disputed the findings, saying there is video evidence of Hamas looting aid, but provided no such videos. The spokesperson also accused traditional humanitarian groups of covering up "aid corruption". The findings were shared with the USAID's inspector general's office and State Department officials involved in Middle East policy, said two sources familiar with the matter, and come as dire food shortages deepen in the devastated enclave. Israel says it is committed to allowing in aid but must control it to prevent it from being stolen by Hamas, which it blames for the crisis. The UN World Food Programme says nearly a quarter of Gaza's 2.1 million Palestinians face famine-like conditions, thousands are suffering acute malnutrition, and the World Health Organization and doctors in the enclave report starvation deaths of children and others. The UN also estimates that Israeli forces have killed more than 1,000 people seeking food supplies, the majority near the militarised distribution sites of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), the new private aid group that uses a for-profit US logistics firm run by a former CIA officer and armed US military veterans. The study was conducted by the Bureau of Humanitarian Assistance (BHA) of USAID, which was the largest funder of assistance to Gaza before the Trump administration froze all US foreign aid in January, terminating thousands of programmes. It has also begun dismantling USAID, whose functions have been folded into the State Department. The analysis found that at least 44 of the 156 incidents where aid supplies were reported stolen or lost were "either directly or indirectly" due to Israeli military actions, according to the briefing slides. Israel's military did not respond to questions about those findings. The study noted a limitation: because Palestinians who receive aid cannot be vetted, it was possible that US-funded supplies went to administrative officials of Hamas, the Islamist rulers of Gaza. One source familiar with the study also cautioned that the absence of reports of widespread aid diversion by Hamas "does not mean that diversion has not occurred". The war in Gaza began after Hamas attacked Israel in October 2023, killing 1,200 people and capturing 251 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Nearly 60,000 Palestinians have been killed since the Israeli assault began, according to Palestinian health officials. Israel says Hamas diverts humanitarian aid Israel, which controls access to Gaza, has said that Hamas steals food supplies from UN and other organisations to use to control the civilian population and boost its finances, including by jacking up the prices of the goods and reselling them to civilians. Asked about the USAID report, the Israeli military told Reuters that its allegations are based on intelligence reports that Hamas militants seized cargoes by "both covertly and overtly" embedding themselves on aid trucks. Those reports also show that Hamas has diverted up to 25% of aid supplies to its fighters or sold them to civilians, the Israeli military said, adding that GHF has ended the militants' control of aid by distributing it directly to civilians. Hamas denies the allegations. A Hamas security official said that Israel has killed more than 800 Hamas-affiliated police and security guards trying to protect aid vehicles and convoy routes. Their missions were coordinated with the UN. Reuters could not independently verify the claims by Hamas and Israel, which has not made public proof that the militants have systematically stolen aid. GHF also accuses Hamas of massive aid theft in defending its distribution model. The UN and other groups have rejected calls by GHF, Israel and the US to cooperate with the foundation, saying it violates international humanitarian principles of neutrality. In response to a request for comment, GHF referred Reuters to a 2 July Washington Post article that quoted an unidentified Gazan and anonymous Israeli officials as saying Hamas profited from the sales and taxing of pilfered humanitarian aid. Aid groups required to report losses The 156 reports of theft or losses of supplies reviewed by BHA were filed by UN agencies and other humanitarian groups working in Gaza as a condition of receiving US aid funds. The second source familiar with the matter said that after receiving reports of US-funded aid thefts or losses, USAID staff followed up with partner organisations to try to determine if there was Hamas involvement. Those organisations also would "redirect or pause" aid distributions if they learned that Hamas was in the vicinity, the source said. Aid organisations working in Gaza also are required to vet their personnel, sub-contractors and suppliers for ties to extremist groups before receiving US funds, a condition that the State Department waived in approving $30m for GHF last month. The slide presentation noted that USAID partners tended to over-report aid diversion and theft by groups sanctioned or designated by the US as foreign terrorist organisations - such as Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad - because they want to avoid losing US funding. Of the 156 incidents of loss or theft reported, 63 were attributed to unknown perpetrators, 35 to armed actors, 25 to unarmed people, 11 directly to Israeli military action, 11 to corrupt sub-contractors, five to aid group personnel "engaging in corrupt activities," and six to "others," a category that accounted for "commodities stolen in unknown circumstances," according to the slide presentation. The armed actors "included gangs and other miscellaneous individuals who may have had weapons," said a slide. Another slide said "a review of all 156 incidents found no affiliations with" US-designated foreign terrorist organisations, of which Hamas is one. "The majority of incidents could not be definitively attributed to a specific actor," said another slide. "Partners often largely discovered the commodities had been stolen in transit without identifying the perpetrator." It is possible there were classified intelligence reports on Hamas aid thefts, but BHA staff lost access to classified systems in the dismantlement of USAID, said a slide. However, a source familiar with US intelligence assessments said that they knew of no US intelligence reports detailing Hamas aid diversions and that Washington was relying on Israeli reports. The BHA analysis found that the Israeli military "directly or indirectly caused" a total of 44 incidents in which US-funded aid was lost or stolen. Those included the 11 attributed to direct Israeli military actions, such as airstrikes or orders to Palestinians to evacuate areas of the war-torn enclave. Losses indirectly attributed to Israeli military included cases where they compelled aid groups to use delivery routes with high risks of theft or looting, ignoring requests for alternative routes, the analysis said.
Irish Times
16-07-2025
- Irish Times
O'Donovan to visit Arts Council in wake of controversies at State agency
Minister for Culture Patrick O'Donovan is due to visit the Arts Council today in the wake of several controversies and issues at the State agency. Mr O'Donovan will meet a select number of staff at the national art agency's Dublin city centre office. The Minister is understood to have wanted to meet the Arts Council before the Dáil recess after several months of public controversy for the body. The meeting comes as the Data Protection Commission (DPC) has confirmed it has written to the council after concerns were raised about personal information collected from artists applying for grants. It had emerged that concerns had been raised within the council that sensitive personal data may not have been stored and handled in line with General Data Protection Regulation requirements. READ MORE About 1,700 people had applied for a bursary earlier this year via a form that collected information about an applicant's gender, ethnicity, sexual identity and religion. The data protection concerns became public following the release of internal council emails to news website The Currency. Stephanie O'Callaghan, the creative arts director at the agency, had warned colleagues that artists had raised concerns about the questions asked during the application process. The Data Protection Commissioner has now written to the council seeking more information about the issue. In a statement, the Data Protection Commission said: 'The DPC made contact with the Arts Council last week in relation to this matter and we are currently engaging with them. We are not in a position to comment any further at this stage.' It is the second time in recent months that the council has come to the attention of the DPC. It was claimed that a former employee had taken files from the council office in a separate alleged data breach. Feargal Ó Coigligh, the secretary general at the Department of Culture, ordered the council to carry out a review of the incident. In February, Mr O'Donovan revealed that the council had spent €6.7 million on a botched IT project, with almost nothing to show for it. The project was designed to reform the system that the council uses to receive and process funding applications from artists. The doomed project was finally shelved towards the end of 2023 with an estimated loss of at least €5.3 million.
Sunday World
07-07-2025
- Sunday World
Woman who claims brother is ‘trying to get mother diagnosed with dementia' granted restraining order
The woman told the court that their mother, now in her mid-80s, owns all of the land and the house A judge has granted a woman a 200 metre exclusion order at her home against two of her brothers arising from 'some shenanigans going on over land'. At Ennis District Court, Judge Alec Gabbett has granted the woman the interim restraining order against the two after hearing evidence of an alleged minor assault carried out on the woman by one of her brothers. After viewing photos of marks from the alleged assault on the woman's phone, Judge Gabbett told her: 'You were assaulted. You were badly bruised.' The woman said that the assault arose in circumstances where her brother was trying to get their mother to get her into a nursing home to get her tested for memory. As part of her ex-parte application, when only one side is present in court, she said: 'He is trying to get her diagnosed with dementia." The woman told the court that her mother, now in her mid-80s, owns all of the land and the house. Judge Gabbett said that it was his understanding that the woman, from a rural area of Co Clare, was seeking the restraining order as there are 'some shenanigans going on regarding land'. Explaining the background, the adult daughter said her mother was recently at home in bed with a chest infection. She said that her brother came the night before to stay and he wanted to get her into a nursing home. She said: 'I knew my mother was too sick that morning." Judge Gabbett asked: 'What does he want out of all of this? Why is he trying to get her tested?' The woman said that 'he is trying to take her rights away' so she will have appointed a Decision Making Representative (DMR). The woman said: 'I think the DMR can over-ride her will.' Judge Gabbett said that this wasn't the case and said her view was an example of 'barstool lawyering'. The woman said: 'I am frightened of my brothers.' She said that she has cared for her mother for years and when her brother was trying to get her to leave the house to go to a nursing home for tests, 'he kept going on and on and trying to bully her to get up'. The woman recalled: 'I knew she was too sick and I said 'she is not going and that's it' and he grabbed hold of me and dragged me from the bedroom into another bedroom across the hallway'. Judge Gabbett said that he was putting in place a 200 metre exclusion order from the house against her two brothers and directed service by An Garda Síochána to serve the order because of the assault. Judge Gabbett adjourned the case to this Friday "where your brothers will be able to put their side of the story to the court'. He told the woman: 'You will all be here together so that might be problematic for you. Sometimes that is difficult when there is a family row. I would suggest that you have someone with you.' Judge Gabbett said that he was granting the interim restraining order due to the alleged assaultive behaviour. Civil restraining orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2023 as a measure for people seeking protection. The District Court may issue an order to prevent the respondent from violence or threats, stalking, harassing or approaching the applicant's home, work, or school. It can run for up to five years but may be shorter. Breaking it could mean jail for up to a year and a maximum of €4,000 fine. Judge Gabbett adjourned the case to July 11th. Ennis courthouse Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 7th
