logo
The BBC has finally got something right in broadcasting unseen MasterChef

The BBC has finally got something right in broadcasting unseen MasterChef

Telegraph4 days ago
The BBC has made a right dog's dinner of the MasterChef saga, but its decision to broadcast the culinary contest's latest series after all is the right one. In the 'scrap it or screen it?' debate, screening it won out. It's the only wise move that the BBC has made during the whole sorry fiasco.
A spiralling crisis in recent months has seen both the hit programme's judges-cum-presenters, Gregg Wallace and John Torode, exit through the studio kitchen's swing doors, following upheld complaints of inappropriate sexualised language and actions, and use of an offensive racial term respectively. Multiple victims came forward. Inquiries were launched. Self-pitying social media responses were posted. It seemed like every day, there was another twist in this tawdry tale.
Throughout, the BBC has hardly covered itself in glory. It took far too long – years, in fact – to tackle Wallace's misconduct, so keen was it to keep the lucrative show on the road. It ignored duty of care concerns and brushed problems under the carpet, despite his unsavoury antics being an open secret. When scandal finally engulfed the franchise, executives prevaricated, panicked and hung Torode out to dry for what was – at least compared to the litany of charges against his co-host – a relatively minor misdemeanour.
Now, though, the right conclusion has been reached. Despite controversy continuing to swirl around the disgraced duo, the BBC has announced that it will air the series filmed last autumn, before the allegations became public and the pair were sacked. This is only fair. Canning the entire run would have been an injustice. An over-correction which punished the wrong people.
Many TV contests bill themselves as 'life-changing' but MasterChef genuinely is. Many of its amateur alumni go on to work in Michelin-starred kitchens, write recipe books or open their own restaurants. Winning the competition just about guarantees that gifted cooks can quit their day jobs and forge a new career in food.
The latest cohort gave up months of their lives but have been left in limbo. It would have been a huge shame if their hard work had been squandered and their hopes dashed through no fault of their own. Beneath the slick editing and flashy trimmings, the show is about the contestants – watching their skills improve, their confidence blossom, their creativity come to the fore. The word 'journey' is flogged to within an inch of its life on such series but MasterChef traced that trajectory more than most.
The show has always been bigger than its bellowing blokey figureheads who, it turns out, didn't even like each other very much. It's about the compellingly addictive, all-conquering format, which has been rolled out across 60 countries and watched by 300m viewers worldwide. Most of all, it's about the contestants. Not the ghastly greengrocer and the gaffe-prone Aussie but the talented amateurs whose stories viewers love to follow.
Their series was completed and delivered to the BBC by production company Banijay months ago. It has been gathering dust on a shelf ever since, due to the bad behaviour of two individuals. At least it will soon see the light of day. The publicity alone of appearing on the show is priceless to those trying to succeed in the unforgiving hospitality business.
Now that a launch date has been confirmed, Banijay ought to re-edit the 24-part series judiciously, to keep Torode and especially Wallace's contributions to a minimum. Any of the latter's clumsy attempts at 'banter' are now cast in a depressing new light and should be consigned to the cutting-room floor. It will be instructive to see if any disclaimers or trigger warnings are aired at the beginning and end of each episode.
News of the long-awaited decision has also given the BBC and Banijay some breathing space until autumn. Producers now need to get busy. They must smartly set about the task of wiping the slate clean, recruiting new judges and giving the programme a reset.
In the meantime, viewers should pop a TV dinner on Wednesday 6 August in their diaries. Six months after it was originally due to air, MasterChef will return to BBC One and iPlayer. It promises to hold a sort of grim fascination. At least for the contestants, their moment in the spotlight will come at last.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How to get two theme park visits for the price of one this summer
How to get two theme park visits for the price of one this summer

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

How to get two theme park visits for the price of one this summer

The cost of summer holiday activities can quickly add up, which is why we're always on the hunt for cost-effective ways to have fun. Case in point: if you're looking for a cheap family day out this summer, we've found a deal that will save on theme park visits. Until Sunday 17 August, when you book a ticket for Alton Towers, Chessington, Legoland Windsor or Thorpe Park, you'll get a ticket for a second visit for free. This doesn't mean visiting the same theme park twice, as it can be used at any of the four parks. In order to qualify, you'll need to pre-book a 'twice the fun' ticket to get your hands on the freebie. You'll then receive a confirmation email with a barcode, which you can use to make your second booking, so keep this handy. The second ticket is valid until Tuesday, 30 September, so there is plenty of time to squeeze in a second visit. It is rare for a free ticket offer to come along, particularly during peak season. Advanced tickets to the theme parks typically start from around £34, so if you're visiting as a family, that's a chunky saving for your second visit. You can book your visit using the links below, or keep reading if you want more inspiration on which of the theme parks to visit this summer. Alton Towers If you've got little thrill-seekers to entertain this summer, Alton Towers is worth a visit. There are nine roller coasters to enjoy, including the Toxicator, which is new for 2025, while younger kids can head to the rides and attractions in CBeebies Land. Alton Towers is located outside of Stoke-on-Trent, so if you're based in the north of England, this is likely to be your nearest major theme park. Chessington World of Adventures There are plenty of adventures for kids of all ages to enjoy at Chessington, with rides inspired by the fantasy board game Jumanji, the tales of the Gruffalo and more. Your ticket also includes a visit to the park's zoo and aquarium, with the chance to see penguins, giraffes, monkeys and zebras. The park is based just outside of London, and there are regular train services running from the capital to Chessington South, which is around a 10-minute walk away. Legoland Windsor There are more than 50 rides and attractions to enjoy at Legoland Windsor. Kids can cool off on a hot day in the splash safari water play park, hop aboard the Lego submarine as part of the deep-sea adventure, get behind the wheel at the Lego driving school and lots more. The theme park is two miles outside of Windsor town centre, with shuttle services available from nearby train stations. Thorpe Park If you or your youngsters can't get enough of roller coasters, a visit to Thorpe Park is a must. The theme park is home to Hyperia, the UK's tallest and fastest rollercoaster, plus five other rides for those that want an adrenaline-filled day out. There are also plenty of rides and play areas for little ones, so the whole family can enjoy the day. The theme park is located in Chertsey, which is about 30 minutes outside of London, with shuttle buses running to the park from nearby train stations.

Financial Ombudsman Service boss paid £230,000 after ousting
Financial Ombudsman Service boss paid £230,000 after ousting

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Financial Ombudsman Service boss paid £230,000 after ousting

The ousted head of the Financial Ombudsman Service received a pay-off of almost £230,000, it has been disclosed in the annual report. Abby Thomas, who left abruptly on 6 February, was paid £229,869 in severance payments on top of her normal salary. The payoff included £100,000 for loss of office, £107,692 in lieu of notice and £22,177 for a period of gardening leave that began on the day she left, the FOS said. MPs on the Treasury select committee have hit out at the manner of her departure and criticised the FOS chairwoman Baroness Manzoor for refusing to answer questions on why Thomas left and whether she was forced out. The FOS, which rules on complaints by consumers about financial services firms and can set compensation orders, is under pressure to reform. Rachel Reeves has pledged to curb its powers so it no longer acts like a regulator after complaints from the industry that it has increased the cost of 'mass redress events'. It has been dealing with a significant rise in claims, mainly related to car finance loans, but also because of concerns about other consumer loans and more people complaining about banks' handling of frauds. Dame Meg Hillier, chairwoman of the Treasury committee, said this month: 'The handling of this situation by the senior leadership has been deeply disappointing.' Thomas, a former Virgin Media executive, served for less than three years. She has been replaced by James Dipple-Johnstone as chief ombudsman and Jenny Simmonds as interim chief executive. Manzoor is due to retire on August 1. The FOS received 450,000 new inquiries in the year to March, up from 330,000. The motor finance industry is braced for a judgment from the Supreme Court this Friday that could determine the scale of compensation payments for failing to disclose commissions paid to dealers.

NatWest faces questions over links to collapsed 79th Group
NatWest faces questions over links to collapsed 79th Group

Times

time2 hours ago

  • Times

NatWest faces questions over links to collapsed 79th Group

NatWest is facing scrutiny over its relationship with a collapsed £200 million investment group which insolvency practitioners suspect was a Ponzi scheme. 79th Group attracted thousands of investors from the UK and overseas, before collapsing into administration in April, two months after the City of London police announced an investigation into a 'suspected widespread fraud'. The company has denied wrongdoing. Insolvency practitioners estimate 79th Group owes more than £200 million to about 3,700 people. Some investors have life savings at risk. The matter was raised in parliament this month. The 'main account' of the group was held at NatWest, according to administrators from Kroll and Quantuma. It is understood that the relationship originated at the bank's Southport branch, which is near 79th Group's Merseyside head office. The bank also holds an outstanding charge over a 79th Group entity which was first registered 20 years ago. That company went into insolvency in May. Investors' funds were paid into a 'treasury account [and then] transferred out to other entities', administrators said in a recent report to creditors. They are investigating the 'flow of funds'. Investors' money does not appear to have been 'ring-fenced' and was instead 'pooled' in group accounts. No formal loan accounts appear to have been recorded or board minutes yet identified relating to the management of investors' money, insolvency practitioners have claimed. The bank declined to answer a series of questions over its banking relationship with 79th Group, including how much money was received and processed by the bank; whether it had continued to receive investor funds after the arrests; whether it had failed to detect serious irregularities; and whether NatWest was investigating. A NatWest spokeswoman said: 'Combating fraud is a top priority and we are committed to preventing criminal activity. We will not make any further comment on this case.' Contractual agreements between the group and investors stated that funds would be used for specific projects, including a £250 million holiday park in north Wales and a mining venture. City of London police said in February that four people had been arrested and that 'a large amount of cash, luxury watches and jewellery were found during searches of properties, all of which were seized'. All people arrested have been released on bail and inquiries continue. There have been no charges. The Times reported this month that 79th Group's board included a former senior HM Revenue & Customs official who was in charge of combating fraud for the tax office. Andy Cole, former director of specialist investigations at HMRC, was a non-executive adviser. There is no suggestion of wrongdoing by Cole or that he is being investigated. He has not been arrested. Administrators from Grant Thornton have told 79th Group investors that 'we believe this is a Ponzi', the term for a fraudulent investment scheme in which early investors are paid with money from later investors rather than legitimate business activities. Banks have a regulatory duty to counter the risk that they might be used to further financial crime. Lenders face strict 'know your customer' and anti-money laundering rules; adherence requires due diligence, transaction monitoring and reporting of suspicious activity. Three sets of insolvency firms are engaged on the case. Administrators are liaising with NatWest over the outstanding charge owed to the bank, which has said it is not in a position to release it, according to its report. In 2021, NatWest was fined £264.8 million for anti-money laundering failures related to the gold trading business Fowler Oldfield. This month Barclays was fined £39.3 million for failing to tackle financial crime risks in its dealings with Stunt & Co, which received £46.8 million from Fowler Oldfield.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store