Khaman vs Dhokla: What sets these Gujarati favourites apart?
People eat them all the time — with chai, during festivals, when relatives randomly show up, or just because they're bored and want to eat something. They look kind of the same, but nope, they're not twins. They taste different, they're made different, and honestly, both come with their own little personality. So no need to overthink — let's just see what makes each one different and why it's totally fine to love both.
What is dhokla?
Dhokla is this soft, squishy, yellow-ish snack that kind of looks like a sponge but doesn't taste weird — it's actually pretty great.
It's made from rice and urad dal that's been sitting around fermenting (on purpose), and then it gets steamed until it turns all fluffy and bouncy. There's a tiny bit of sourness from the fermentation, but it's nice. It doesn't feel heavy in your stomach, but somehow still fills you up.
People usually throw some mustard seeds, chopped coriander, and grated coconut on top — just to make it taste better and give it a bit of crunch.
And because it's fermented, it has those good tummy bacteria that help you digest stuff properly. Also, it's steamed, not fried, so there's hardly any oil. You can eat it in the middle of the day, before chai, after chai, or whenever you just want to snack without feeling like you messed up your life.
What about khaman?
Khaman is made with chickpea flour, which is just besan — the regular yellow stuff you find in every kitchen. It's also steamed like dhokla, but it looks more yellow-y and feels extra soft and kind of falls apart when you bite it.
It's a little sweet too, which tastes amazing. The reason it's all puffy and bouncy is because people chuck in some baking soda or Eno, and boom — it rises fast. No long fermenting drama. Just mix the thing, steam it, and eat.
Khaman usually gets a louder tempering — like, mustard seeds popping everywhere, green chillies doing their thing, and curry leaves in hot oil. It gives the whole thing a nice spicy kick. Also, khaman tastes even better when you dunk it in green chutney or that sweet tamarind one.
Everyone loves it.
Since it's made with chickpea flour, it's got a good amount of plant protein and fibre, which basically means it keeps you full and doesn't crash your energy. Also, no gluten in there, so people who avoid wheat can eat it without stressing.
Key differences to remember
Both come from Gujarat and kind of use similar stuff, but they're totally different when you actually eat them. Dhokla has this light sour taste and feels a bit grainy because it's made with rice and dal.
Khaman is sweeter, way fluffier, and kind of breaks apart when you touch it. Dhokla gets its tangy vibe from fermentation — you gotta wait for it. Khaman, on the other hand, just puffs up quickly with baking soda or Eno. No waiting, just steam and go.
If you ever get confused at a stall or restaurant, here's the cheat code: khaman is bright yellow, super soft, and a little sweet. Dhokla is paler, a bit tangy, and feels more sponge-like when you bite into it.
Why you should love both
Both khaman and dhokla are proof that Gujarati food knows what it's doing. They're light, not oily, full of flavour, and you can eat them pretty much whenever — breakfast, with chai, random hunger moments, you name it.
And it's not just about taste. They're actually healthy too. You get some protein, fibre, and in dhokla's case, beneficial gut-friendly bacteria that support digestion. They're easy on the tummy and give you enough to get through the day — whether you're running around or just lying on the sofa doing nothing.
So next time you want something tasty and light, try both! Whether you prefer the tangy, probiotic dhokla or the soft, protein-packed khaman, you're in for a tasty treat that's truly Gujarati. And honestly, you can't go wrong with either!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
5 days ago
- Indian Express
When nilgais came to town: Wildlife in the heart of Ahmedabad
Monsoon had just arrived and as I stood on the balcony watching the first rains, I saw an animal soaking wet, standing under a tree outside our housing society. At first, I assumed it was a cow. But, I noticed that it was slimmer and had two tiny horns on its head. It was a nilgai. They have always been there, on the outskirts of the city. More recently, I had seen a small herd of nilgai, nervously walking in a densely populated lane. And, last month, when I was returning from Delhi, while landing, I had seen a herd of nilgai on the periphery of the airport. I realised that their habitat was slowly being destroyed and they were coming closer to the city. Interestingly, they did not appear to be afraid of human beings. Nilgais, also known as blue bulls, have been observed in various areas of Ahmedabad in recent days. With their iron-gray-bluish coat and a dark mane, a sensitive wet snout, a short stiff black tuft on the throat, white beauty-spots on both cheeks and those beautiful large watery kohl-filled eyes, they have been spotted around the airport, Motera stadium, Koteshwar, Bhat village on Karnavati Road, near New LJ College and the Shahibaug area. I have been wondering how and why they have suddenly found the courage to enter a big city like Ahmedabad and wondered what is happening in the areas they have lived in for so many years. They are protected animals, but some have been observed in urban areas, causing conflicts with humans. One night, when the chowkidar (security guard) was on leave and the gates of our housing society were open, I discovered why. Suddenly, there was a commotion and from the balcony, I saw about five or six nilgais rushing into the compound, driven by the municipal corporation staff. When I asked around, I discovered that herds of nilgai often enter the city and are chased. It makes them run helter-skelter, colliding into two-wheeler-riders, injuring themselves and others. From my balcony, I saw that the nilgais looked frightened and lost, as they tried to find their bearings in a city that seemed to have no space for them. Maybe, soon they will be a new addition to Ahmedabad's fauna, alongside cows, buffalos, bullocks, camels, horses, donkeys, cats, stray dogs and armies of langurs all around. Their population was increasing and the encroachment of urban development into their natural habitat meant less space for them. Perhaps, they will be safe in Ahmedabad — its last name ends with 'gai', meaning cow in Gujarati. I will not be surprised if soon they are fed, worshipped and domesticated. In the meantime, I love watching them, even if they resemble ungainly horses. Their presence in Ahmedabad is a new phenomenon, as they walk around looking suspicious, eating leaves, flowers and berries. If you spot them again, let them be, if you can. You will see them standing still, with heads held high, gazing at the stars, a tiny oasis in the middle of a busy city. David is a Sahitya Akademi Award-winning author, artist and art critic
Time of India
6 days ago
- Time of India
Khaman vs Dhokla: What sets these Gujarati favourites apart?
If you've ever walked into a Gujarati house or stood staring into a sweet shop glass counter, you've 100% seen dhokla or khaman sitting there, all yellow and fluffy like they own the place. People eat them all the time — with chai, during festivals, when relatives randomly show up, or just because they're bored and want to eat something. They look kind of the same, but nope, they're not twins. They taste different, they're made different, and honestly, both come with their own little personality. So no need to overthink — let's just see what makes each one different and why it's totally fine to love both. What is dhokla? Dhokla is this soft, squishy, yellow-ish snack that kind of looks like a sponge but doesn't taste weird — it's actually pretty great. It's made from rice and urad dal that's been sitting around fermenting (on purpose), and then it gets steamed until it turns all fluffy and bouncy. There's a tiny bit of sourness from the fermentation, but it's nice. It doesn't feel heavy in your stomach, but somehow still fills you up. People usually throw some mustard seeds, chopped coriander, and grated coconut on top — just to make it taste better and give it a bit of crunch. And because it's fermented, it has those good tummy bacteria that help you digest stuff properly. Also, it's steamed, not fried, so there's hardly any oil. You can eat it in the middle of the day, before chai, after chai, or whenever you just want to snack without feeling like you messed up your life. What about khaman? Khaman is made with chickpea flour, which is just besan — the regular yellow stuff you find in every kitchen. It's also steamed like dhokla, but it looks more yellow-y and feels extra soft and kind of falls apart when you bite it. It's a little sweet too, which tastes amazing. The reason it's all puffy and bouncy is because people chuck in some baking soda or Eno, and boom — it rises fast. No long fermenting drama. Just mix the thing, steam it, and eat. Khaman usually gets a louder tempering — like, mustard seeds popping everywhere, green chillies doing their thing, and curry leaves in hot oil. It gives the whole thing a nice spicy kick. Also, khaman tastes even better when you dunk it in green chutney or that sweet tamarind one. Everyone loves it. Since it's made with chickpea flour, it's got a good amount of plant protein and fibre, which basically means it keeps you full and doesn't crash your energy. Also, no gluten in there, so people who avoid wheat can eat it without stressing. Key differences to remember Both come from Gujarat and kind of use similar stuff, but they're totally different when you actually eat them. Dhokla has this light sour taste and feels a bit grainy because it's made with rice and dal. Khaman is sweeter, way fluffier, and kind of breaks apart when you touch it. Dhokla gets its tangy vibe from fermentation — you gotta wait for it. Khaman, on the other hand, just puffs up quickly with baking soda or Eno. No waiting, just steam and go. If you ever get confused at a stall or restaurant, here's the cheat code: khaman is bright yellow, super soft, and a little sweet. Dhokla is paler, a bit tangy, and feels more sponge-like when you bite into it. Why you should love both Both khaman and dhokla are proof that Gujarati food knows what it's doing. They're light, not oily, full of flavour, and you can eat them pretty much whenever — breakfast, with chai, random hunger moments, you name it. And it's not just about taste. They're actually healthy too. You get some protein, fibre, and in dhokla's case, beneficial gut-friendly bacteria that support digestion. They're easy on the tummy and give you enough to get through the day — whether you're running around or just lying on the sofa doing nothing. So next time you want something tasty and light, try both! Whether you prefer the tangy, probiotic dhokla or the soft, protein-packed khaman, you're in for a tasty treat that's truly Gujarati. And honestly, you can't go wrong with either!
Hindustan Times
6 days ago
- Hindustan Times
How community journals are soldering on against winds of change
MUMBAI: In a city where identities jostle as tightly as commuters on a local train, Mumbai's regional, community-based publications continue to thrive—quiet sentinels of memory, language and belonging. While 'Parsiana', the polished SoBo journal of Zoroastrian life, is perhaps the most well-known with its global readership, it is within the pages of the less celebrated but equally vibrant Marathi, Gujarati and Konkani periodicals that the city's diverse inner lives find an expression. While Urdu journal 'Shayar' folded up after a 93-year run in 2023, 'Kalnirnay' stands out as a rare success. Consider 'Marmik', the Marathi weekly founded in 1960 by Bal Thackeray. Initially conceived as a political cartoon magazine, it quickly transformed into a platform for Marathi pride and grievance—what the late Sena supremo described as 'anxieties of a community pushed to the margins of its own city'. It eventually galvanised a linguistic identity into a political force, showing the mettle of regional publications. But beyond political assertion lies a quieter world of Marathi magazines and journals. 'Society newsletters, temple magazines and monthly cultural journals continue to hum gently,' says Dr Vidyesh Kulkarni, a Pune-based scholar who chronicled these for his doctoral thesis in 1991. He points to titles such as 'Sahyadri', 'Antarpat' and 'Deepstambh', which offer poetry, short fiction, essays on saints and rituals, and commentary on theatre and literature. 'Produced by cultural mandals, these magazines circulate through homes, temples and libraries—carrying the scent of agarbatti and old paper. They are cultural bridges between generations.' However, Kulkarni notes a growing fragmentation. 'There's a tendency I call 'sociocultural meiosis and mitosis' — where every sub-group within a community demands its own platform. In the age of WhatsApp and social media, this proliferation is becoming unsustainable.' Among Marathi publications, 'Kalnirnay' stands out as a rare success. For 53 years, it has had a pan-Maharashtra presence. 'It began as a way to democratise the panchang, but quickly became more than an almanac,' says Shakti Salgaonkar, the current director. 'The back pages featured writers like Durgabai Bhagwat and P L Deshpande. We've included recipes, lifestyle columns, even train timetables.' So deeply woven is 'Kalnirnay' into the Maharashtrian ethos that its jingle is played on the shehnai at weddings and naming ceremonies. Mumbai's Gujarati-speaking communities offer a similarly layered ecosystem. 'Kutchi Patrika', a newsletter for the Kutchi Jain community, has run for over 60 years. 'It's our mainstay for news, obituaries and event updates,' says Kanji Savla Vamik, part of the team that produces and distributes it. 'It's particularly vital to the Kutchi Visa Oswal Jain community, whose ties stretch across the world.' Religious institutions also publish journals — 'Anand Yatra', 'Shree Yamuna Krupa', 'Vallabh Ashray'—distributing discourses, festival calendars, and moral reflections. 'We tried to keep the younger generation connected,' says Hemal Rawani, who edited 'Raghuvansham' till it shut in 2005. 'But it's a losing battle—they don't even want to learn the language.' His lament finds an echo in Hamid Siddiqui who recalls with anguish the folding up of the Urdu 'Shayar' after a 93-year inning. 'Despite being a top-notch literary publication, it was becoming increasingly unsustainable to produce and we had to stop in 2023,' he says, recounting how his family still 'has sack-loads of the mail' from the readers. 'I wonder why none of them came forward to keep 'Shayar' going…' Among Mumbai's Konkani-speaking communities—Catholics, Goud Saraswat Brahmins, and others—journals have long served as spiritual and cultural anchors. Weekly 'Raknno', printed in Roman-script Konkani since 1938 and distributed from Mangalore to Mumbai, blends religious reflection, fiction and news, often touching on migration, memory, and the sea. Closer home, 'Voice of GSB', a monthly GSB Konkani magazine, features articles on festivals, recipes, wedding traditions and proverbs. What binds these publications—across language, caste, and faith—is their intimacy. They are not driven by TRPs or algorithms. Their contributors are often retired teachers, community elders or enthusiastic youth. Their pages, modest in print and design, pulse with lived experience. 'They are guardians of language in a city where English and Hindi often drown out the subtler cadences of mother tongues,' says Dr Kulkarni. 'In their pages, Marathi, Gujarati and Konkani breathe—not as relics, but as living entities that argue, console and dream.' To read them is to walk the bylanes of Matunga, Dadar, Girgaon and Mahim, listening in on the inner life of communities that built this city long before it reached for the skies.
