Bengal plans 800-km ‘green wall' along Jharkhand border
The announcements came at a special session, 'Fostering Climate Consciousness — Business and Beyond', hosted by the Bharat Chamber of Commerce on the eve of World Environment Day.
The Green Wall will be a green corridor of forest cover along the State's 800-km northwestern border with Jharkhand. The bioshield will start from the Jharkhand border and extend up to Birbhum and Dinajpur districts of West Bengal. The trees will take over a decade to grow.
'We are proceeding in phases,' Mr. Rudra said. 'It will intercept a part of these pollutants entering Bengal. It will take about a decade to grow, but when fully grown... people who go to see the Chinese wall will come to Bengal to see a green wall that we have been able to create.' He also encouraged businesses to participate in this plan.
The proposed bioshield, Mr. Rudra said, is part of a larger effort to reduce in-situ pollution and mobilise industry participation in sustainable practices. The panel also underscored Kolkata's recent achievement of being recognised as one of the cleanest metropolises in the country, a result of collaboration between the pollution control board and Kolkata Municipal Corporation.
However, Mr. Rudra also recognised that winters in Bengal are marked by heavy air pollution, unlike the relatively clean air during the summer and monsoon seasons.
The session on the eve of World Environment Day brought together multiple experts on pollution to emphasise the need for on-ground action and the urgency to implement change beyond symbolic gestures. Swati Nandi Chakraborty, environment consultant, drew attention to the hazards of plastic pollution and the need for bioplastics as a viable, sustainable alternative to combat the rising issue of microplastics and nanoplastics, which are known to impact humans and animals alike.
'We have hardly heard about bioplastics,' she said. 'But they could work hand-in-hand to create a techno-socio-economic response to plastic waste.'
Citing the harmful health effects of microplastics, from respiratory issues to gastrointestinal damage, Dr. Nandi called for strict local implementation of plastic regulations and mass advocacy for sustainable materials, including awareness programmes. She also insisted that policy-level changes can help bring about a bigger impact on pollution levels and plastic usage.
Aniruddha Mukhopadhyay, Professor in the Department of Environmental Science at the University of Calcutta, highlighted that behaviour change requires community level engagement, especially from students to bring about bigger impact and long-term change. 'New pollution-control technologies are being implemented that are being monitored by regulatory agencies. Regulatory agencies are doing very well in that direction and many more things can be done, and there is a genuine consciousness amongst the common people that it is very important,' Mr Mukhopadhyay said.
The experts reiterated that the business community has a pivotal role to play, saying climate conscious business in the contemporary world is crucial for sustainable growth. But the experts also stated that real climate consciousness must extend 'beyond boardrooms' into homes, schools, and streets. As Mr. Rudra reminded, 'No pollution control board or chamber can achieve success alone. It should be a people's movement where every citizen comes forward.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
21 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India ready to extend all possible support: PM on Bangladesh plane crash
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Monday (July 21, 2025) expressed deep shock at the loss of lives in an aircraft crash in Dhaka. India stands in solidarity with Bangladesh and is ready to extend all possible support and assistance, he added. "Deeply shocked and saddened at the loss of lives, many of them young students, in a tragic air crash in Dhaka. Our hearts go out to the bereaved families," Mr. Modi said on X. He added, "We pray for the swift recovery of those injured. India stands in solidarity with Bangladesh and is ready to extend all possible support and assistance." A Bangladesh Air Force training aircraft crashed into a school building in Dhaka shortly after takeoff on Monday, killing at least 19 people, mostly children, and injuring dozens, officials and witnesses said. The Chinese-made F-7 BGI training aircraft crashed into the Milestone School and College campus in Dhaka's Uttara area.
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Iran Rules Out US Talks Ahead of Nuclear Meeting With Europe
Iran said it has no plans to resume nuclear talks with the US even as it prepares to hold discussions on its atomic program with European, Russian, and Chinese officials this week. 'At the moment, we have no plans to hold talks with the US,' Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said in a televised press conference on Monday. Earlier, Iranian state TV said Iranian diplomats planned to meet counterparts from the UK, France and Germany for nuclear talks in Istanbul on Friday. Baghaei said Iran's deputy foreign ministers will 'seriously raise' Tehran's demands during those discussions. He didn't detail the demands but said Tehran will take the countries to task for their stance during last month's US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran. Baghaei also warned any attempt by the three European countries — also known as the E3 — to reinstate United Nations sanctions through the so-called snapback mechanism would compromise their right to any role in the nuclear negotiations and their ability to invoke any of its provisions or processes. The 'snapback' is a rule within the 2015 nuclear deal that allows participating countries to trigger a UN Security-Council process that could automatically reimpose broad sanctions on the Islamic Republic if it's deemed to be violating the agreement. On Sunday, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the E3 'lacks any legal, political, and moral standing' to activate the mechanism because of its failure to comply with the nuclear deal after US President Donald Trump abandoned it during his first term and because of the bloc's 'political and material support' for Israeli and US attacks on his country. On Tuesday Tehran plans to host Russian and Chinese officials for talks focused on the nuclear issue and the prospect of additional sanctions, Baghaei said. The meeting comes after Ali Larijani, a senior adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, visited Russia on Sunday and discussed Iran's nuclear program and regional developments with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Russia recognised Taliban, but India must tread cautiously
Given the fragile security landscape and many competing forces vying for influence in Kabul, placing exclusive bets on the Taliban would be strategically unwise for India. Representational Image In a significant turn of events, on July 3, Russia became the first nation to officially recognise the Taliban-ruled 'Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan', a political entity not recognised by any other state in the world. Ever since the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan on August 15, 2021, it took 4 years for the Kremlin to extend de jure recognition to the Taliban. However, Russia has been engaged with the Taliban at the highest level since 2021 and has treated Taliban authorities as de facto rulers. The Russian embassy was kept open and had been fully functional throughout. Besides Russia, other states also have a pragmatic or de facto relationship with Afghanistan, such as the UAE, Azerbaijan, Turkey, China, Iran, Uzbekistan, and Pakistan, for their respective diplomatic reasons and have allowed the Taliban to man their embassies in their respective countries. Still, they have stopped short of formally recognising it as a 'state'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It can be anybody's guess that it is just a matter of time before recognition of the group as the legitimate rulers of Afghanistan happens. China welcomed the Kremlin's move, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said, 'Beijing supports the international community in strengthening engagement and dialogue with the Afghan interim government.' Despite diplomatic overtures by other regional players, the Chinese still withhold formal recognition of Afghanistan. Prima facie, Russia's engagement and sustained cooperation with the Taliban in Afghanistan is primarily to keep a check on the Taliban's rival terrorist groups, mainly the Islamic State-Khorasan Province (ISKP), and seeking the Taliban's guarantee that Afghanistan will not be used as a launchpad against Russia and its allies necessitates the Kremlin's recognition of the regime. ISKP's terrorist attacks in Moscow in 2024, which left 133 people dead, created a common enemy, forcing the Kremlin to explore pragmatic cooperation with the Taliban it loathed. As ISKP consists mainly of defected Talibani commanders and soldiers, a sworn enemy and ideologically hostile to the Taliban, it has openly declared it an apostate regime. The militant group is known to commit terror acts not just in Afghanistan, but also in Pakistan, Iran, and even Central Asia, which is a de facto strategic and security realm of Russia. However, the urgency shown in the formal declaration by Russia warrants scrutiny, as it carries signals for other regional players, including India. Some scholars believe this is a Russian gift for the Taliban in recognition of its cooperation on counter-terrorism and its sensitivity towards Moscow's security and strategic concerns. Geography Shape Choices STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Afghanistan sits at the crossroads of three geopolitical hotspots in Asia: West Asia, Central Asia, and South Asia. A region with the latent potential to cause instability across its periphery. For Russia, imperatives of stability and security in Central Asia and the North Caucasus compel it to reassess the strategic utility of Afghanistan, regardless of the regime's nature. Russia cannot afford to alienate a state that holds the geographic keys to its regional strategy and, most importantly, security in its backyard—even if that state is unstable, isolated, or untouchable among a comity of nations. Russia's dalliance with the Taliban underscores the enduring truth of the geopolitics that geography dictates state moves and motives. Russia already uses Afghanistan as a transit route for energy exports heading to Southeast Asia. In geopolitics, the moral or normative considerations associated with the regime type often succumb to geographic and economic necessity. Unlike the West, for Russia, interests take precedence over values. In the case of Afghanistan, geography doesn't guarantee affluence, but it certainly guarantees relevance. Historically, its significance has not been restricted to only regional powers; even global powers in the past have attempted to exercise levers in the country. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD US Withdrawal The hasty withdrawal of the US from Kabul in February 2021 resulted in a power vacuum. As with any vacuum, it has attracted a range of regional forces—some overlapping, others disjoint—each seeking to assert influence driven by their respective national interests. As preceding sections of the article underline, the security of its southern realm drives the Russian active engagement with the Taliban. Similarly, despite initial inhibition, other countries in the region, such as India, Iran, and China, made diplomatic overtures to Kabul through informal channels. A Game of Optics Beyond the structural factors motivating Moscow's engagement with the Taliban, the Kremlin seems to convey a broader message regarding the shift towards multipolarity in the world, where regime legitimacy is no longer rooted in liberal democratic norms. This initiative can be interpreted as part of a larger resistance against the Western approach of normative universalism. It is an opportune time, as under Trump's leadership, marked by his transactional foreign policy approach, the American liberal agenda has been relegated to the back burner. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Simmering Tension in West Asia A more far-fetched explanation for this move could be that it is a proactive step on the part of Russia amidst the unravelling of the West Asian regional order. Russia has already lost a regional ally in Bashar al-Assad in Syria. In the recent conflict between Iran and Israel, Russia could not help Iran as much as was expected. For Israel, Iran's nuclear question has not been settled and can be a flashpoint between Iran and Israel/the US, for which Russia, in the present geopolitical context, can do little for its ally, Iran. A regime change in Iran can further upend the regional order in the West's favour. A favourable balance of power in broader West Asia is vital for Moscow's security and economic interests. The US's design of regime change in Iran, which involves Russia and China and undermines Russian influence over Central Asia, necessitates an astute reading of the evolving situation. It demands proactive engagement with countries like India, Uzbekistan, and other neighbouring powers. In essence, many factors could undergird the Russian strategic gambit in Afghanistan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How should India react? India should approach Russia's recognition of the Taliban with careful pragmatism, rather than simply mirroring Moscow's actions. A more effective strategy involves increasing engagement through diplomatic, economic, and humanitarian channels while avoiding formal acknowledgement. This approach allows India to protect its interests in Afghanistan, counterbalance competing influences, and maintain the flexibility needed for future policy adaptations as circumstances evolve. The most suitable course of action is to deepen involvement through various channels while stopping short of formal recognition. This strategy enables India to safeguard its interests, counter rival influences, and stay adaptable to future policy shifts based on changing conditions. It is important for India to see Russia's recognition not as a direct template to follow but as part of a wider regional change that presents both opportunities and challenges for its policy in Afghanistan. By practicing strategic patience in its engagement, India can achieve its goals in Afghanistan while preserving its principled stances and maintaining relationships with other partners. India's response should be carefully calibrated to maximise strategic advantages while minimising diplomatic repercussions, ensuring that any engagement aligns with its long-term objectives in regional stability, counter-terrorism, and economic ties to Central Asia. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Given the fragile security landscape and many competing forces vying for influence in Kabul, placing exclusive bets on the Taliban, which has yet to prove its authority across the length and breadth of the country, would be strategically unwise. In the current scenario, a people-centric engagement policy that keeps informal diplomatic channels open and working is the most prudent framework. Amitabh Singh teaches at the Centre for Russian and Central Asian Studies, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University. Ankur is a doctoral candidate at the Centre for Russian and Central Asian Studies, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
