logo
Islamic charity warned over ‘inflammatory' sermon after October 7 attacks

Islamic charity warned over ‘inflammatory' sermon after October 7 attacks

Glasgow Timesa day ago
Language in the sermon included 'the hour will not begin until the Muslims fight the Jews and the Muslims will kill them until a Jew hides behind a rock or a tree' and attendees were encouraged not to 'busy yourselves with politics and voting', the Charity Commission said.
It is one of more than 300 cases involving charities in the past 18 months related to the Middle East conflict, the regulator – which operates across England and Wales – said.
The latest case involved Nottingham Islam Information Point, a charity said to provide support to victims of Islamophobic attacks and address misconceptions about the religion of Islam.
But a sermon, given on October 13 2023 by trustee Harun Abdur Rashid Holmes 'did not further the charity's purposes, including to provide relief to those in need, and was not in the charity's best interests', therefore amounting to misconduct and/or mismanagement, the regulator said.
Mr Holmes, who is not a trained imam, was deemed not to have acted in accordance with his duties as a trustee and was disqualified in July last year.
He is prevented from holding any senior management position in a charity in England and Wales for three years – and noted by the commission to lack the good judgement expected of a trustee.
While the charities watchdog said it recognised some of the sermon's content had come from a specific hadith – a narration of historical events ascribed to the prophet Mohammed – the appropriate context was not given and it therefore was 'inflammatory and divisive'.
The regulator also said 'no consideration' had been given to the timing of the sermon, coming six days after the October 7 Hamas attacks in Israel.
The commission said Mr Holmes had accepted that, with hindsight, the hadith was sensitive, and that he had not given sufficient context to it.
The commission's assistant director of investigations and compliance, Stephen Roake, said: 'In times of conflict, people expect charities to bring people together, not to stoke division. In this case, we found due consideration had not been given to the words and rhetoric used.
'The sermon was inflammatory and divisive, and we acted robustly and disqualified the trustee who gave the sermon. We also issued the charity with a formal warning.
'Following our intervention, the charity's remaining trustees have taken positive steps to improve their governance. This includes the introduction of a more robust events policy. All charities that host events and speakers should take note of this case and ensure they have sufficient due diligence in place.'
Nottingham Islam Information Point has been contacted for comment.
Charity Commission chief executive David Holdsworth said some people are undermining charities' 'potential for good' in an opinion piece for the Sunday Telegraph.
'Over the past few years, and particularly since the escalation of conflict in the Middle East in October 2023, we have seen charities misused to promote the personal views of those linked to the charity, in some cases inciting hate, or condoning violence,' Mr Holdsworth wrote.
'While trustees, like all of us, have personal rights to freedom of speech, there can be no hiding place for those who seek to use charities to promote hate or harm to others.
Charity Commission chief executive David Holdsworth (Peter Byrne/PA)
'This is not only to put a stop to fundamentally uncharitable activity, but also to help protect and promote public trust in the wider charitable sector.
'I will not shy away from using the more robust powers Parliament has granted us when that is necessary, and taking action against those who risk undermining the incredible positive impact of charities at home and abroad,' he added.
Of the 300 cases considered since the end of 2023 in relation to what is happening in the Middle East, about a third have resulted in formal statutory guidance being issued by the commission.
More than 70 referrals to the police have been made where the regulator considered that a criminal offence might have been committed.
In January, a London charity was handed an official warning after fundraising for a soldier in the Israel Defence Forces (IDF).
The Chabad Lubavitch Centres North East London and Essex Ltd, which describes itself as working for the advancement of the Orthodox Jewish religion, raised more than £2,000 after setting up an online page in October 2023 for a soldier stationed in northern Israel.
Some £937 was sent directly to an individual soldier but the commission said the trustees of the charity were unable to account for how the money was spent and the regulator concluded the charity's actions had amounted to misconduct and a breach of trust.
While charities in England and Wales can legally raise funds to support the UK armed forces, they cannot legally provide aid or military supplies to any foreign armed force, the commission said.
It was believed to be the first time the regulator had used its powers to issue an official warning on the issue of fundraising for a foreign military.
The case was not one among those referred to police, as the commission said its unlawfulness related to charity law rather than criminal law.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A glimmer of hope in Gaza? Inside the fragile ceasefire push as Trump hosts Netanyahu
A glimmer of hope in Gaza? Inside the fragile ceasefire push as Trump hosts Netanyahu

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

A glimmer of hope in Gaza? Inside the fragile ceasefire push as Trump hosts Netanyahu

A proposal for a badly needed ceasefire in Gaza will be top of the agenda during a key visit between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump this week. After months of deadlock and a soaring death toll in Gaza, a potential breakthrough appeared when Trump announced a proposal for a 60-day truce, which he said could pave the way for discussions to end the 21-month-long devastating war. On Sunday, Netanyahu flew to Washington DC – a third trip since Trump took office in January. As he boarded the plane, he said he vowed to bring home the remaining 50 Israeli captives held by Hamas militants in Gaza, adding: 'the discussion with President Trump can certainly help advance these results. At the same time, an Israeli negotiating team flew to Qatar, where Hamas delegations are already meeting with Qatari and Egyptian mediators. Reaching a deal has felt impossible in the recent past. Previous negotiations have repeatedly broken down, with Israel stating it would not consider a permanent ceasefire until Hamas was defeated. Hamas, for its part, has refused to engage in any talks that do not outline a definitive end to the war. Speaking to officials from Israel and Hamas, those briefed on the negotiations, as well as US-linked mediators, it appears there is a genuine shift in momentum — although significant obstacles remain. In Gaza, Palestinian health officials say that since the last ceasefire collapsed in March, Israel's unprecedented bombardment of the narrow strip has killed nearly 7,000 more people — pushing the overall death toll since 2023 to nearly 57,500. Most of the 2.3 million-strong population is struggling through famine-like conditions, as Israel has intermittently imposed full blockades on the entry of aid and supplies. Hundreds of Palestinians have reportedly been killed by Israeli fire while attempting to collect food at controversial aid distribution points. Families — displaced multiple times and now living in tents — told me they can no longer survive under conditions which are 'worse than a Hollywood horror movie'. In Israel, the largest group representing the remaining 50 Israeli hostages believed to be held in Gaza, has taken to the streets almost every week, demanding Netanyahu agree to a ceasefire. Fewer than half of those hostages are believed to still be alive. The families held another protest on Sunday evening, as Netanyahu travelled to the US, declaring: 'This is the time to save lives.' They have repeatedly told me that every day their loved ones remain in Gaza could be their last. A turning point in Gaza? What's changed on the ground There does, however, appear to be some movement. An official close to the mediators in Doha told me that US guarantees that this deal would lead to a permanent ceasefire are a first and a key change that may help assuage Hamas's concerns. That official, who asked to remain anonymous as they are not permitted to speak to the media, believes that with proper promises from Washington, Israel's most powerful ally and primary arms provider, Hamas might remain at the table. A different official, briefed on Israel's position, who also asked for anonymity, told me that added to this there is more 'flexibility' from Netanyahu to discuss an end to the war. Netanyahu has faced fierce pressure from the extreme-right members of his fragile, razor-thin coalition not to enter into any truce. Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has called any deal a 'surrender' and threatened to exit the coalition — a move that would likely collapse the government. However, the Israeli prime minister is in a stronger position domestically after Israel's recent intense bombardment of Iran, which took out much of the military leadership and caused 'extensive' damage to Iran's nuclear facilities. That came on the heels of Israeli airstrikes in Lebanon that decimated the Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah — another of Israel's regional foes. 'There's a different kind of atmosphere altogether after Iran,' that official told me. 'Netanyahu is in a mindset to go for a deal.' Netanyahu reputedly hopes to use a Gaza ceasefire as a launching point to expand the Abraham Accords — the 2020 diplomatic normalisation agreements Israel signed with Bahrain and the UAE. The official added that Netanyahu hopes powerful regional players like Saudi Arabia may now be more inclined to sign on. Meanwhile, Hamas's position has undoubtedly been weakened. The militant group, which led the bloody 7 October 2023 attacks on southern Israel killing over 1,000 people and taking more than 250 people hostage, is under extreme pressure to end the war. It is struggling to survive: short on commanders, deprived of much of its tunnel network, grappling with rebellious local clans, enduring relentless Israeli bombardment, and now facing a decline in support from its most powerful ally, Iran. The lack of a military response from Iran-backed groups in the region to Israel's strikes on Iran — whether due to strategic restraint or lack of capability — has cast a long shadow over Hamas's strategic position. Hamas officials told me they still have firm red lines, including the unfettered delivery of aid to Gaza, which they insist should not be routed through Israel's controversial aid mechanism run by a US-based company called the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. They also want the complete withdrawal of Israeli troops from the territory and an end to the war. And so that leads us to the potential obstacles. Before Netanyahu left Israel, he said that Hamas had proposed changes to the US proposal which were 'unacceptable to Israel.' A source familiar with the matter told me one of the main changes concerned delivery of aid: 'Hamas does not want GHF there, they want a mechanism run by the United Nations and the Red Cross'. Hamas also wants Israel to withdraw all its troops. Those briefed on Israel's position have made clear that in particular Israel will not agree to withdraw from the strategic border between Gaza and Egypt — a nine-mile strip of land known as the Philadelphi Corridor. In fact there are reportedly Israeli plans to connect it to a newly planned corridor around three miles deep into Gaza — named Morag after an Israeli settlement that used to exist before the 'disengagement' from Gaza in 2005. Hamas has also objected to US guarantees that this deal would herald an end to the conflict. 'The guarantees to end the war, the wording that comes from the American administration it is not apparently strong enough for Hamas,' the official added. Perhaps the most contentious sticking point is who governs Gaza in the future. Israel insists it cannot include Hamas in any future administration of the territory. There are also questions about whether the occupied West Bank will be dragged into the negotiations. In leaked reports of phone conversations between the US administration and Israeli officials — published in the Israeli press last month — Washington reportedly signalled it would be willing to acknowledge 'limited Israeli sovereignty' in parts of the West Bank. That has raised fears the US could effectively recognise Israel's de facto annexation of territory Palestinians hope will form the basis of a future state — including Israeli settlements, which are widely considered illegal under international law. There is still a long way to go until a deal can be signed, and a lot that could scupper any agreement. But for the first time in a while all sides are at the negotiating table, and that for now is a glimmer of hope for the civilians suffering slaughter and starvation.

Crew members abandon ship after Red Sea attack
Crew members abandon ship after Red Sea attack

Rhyl Journal

time2 hours ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Crew members abandon ship after Red Sea attack

The attack marks the first serious assault in the vital corridor for trade after a months-long campaign by Yemen's Houthi rebels there. Suspicion for the attack immediately fell on the Houthis, particularly as a security firm said it appeared bomb-carrying drone boats hit the ship after it was targeted by small arms and rocket-propelled grenades. The rebels' media reported on the attack but did not claim it. It can take them hours or even days before they acknowledge an assault. A renewed Houthi campaign against shipping could again draw in US and Western forces to the area, particularly after President Donald Trump targeted the rebels in a major air strike campaign. And it comes at a sensitive moment in the Middle East, as a possible ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war hangs in the balance and as Iran weighs whether to restart negotiations over its nuclear programme following US air strikes targeting its most-sensitive atomic sites amid an Israeli war against the Islamic Republic. 'It likely serves as a message that the Houthis continue to possess the capability and willingness to strike at strategic maritime targets regardless of diplomatic developments,' wrote Mohammad al-Basha, a Yemen analyst at the Basha Report risk advisory firm. The British military's United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations centre first said that an armed security team on the unidentified vessel had returned fire against an initial attack and that the 'situation is ongoing'. It described the attack as happening 60 miles south west of Hodeida, Yemen, which is held by the country's Houthi rebels. 'Authorities are investigating,' it said, later adding that the ship was on fire after being 'struck by unknown projectiles'. Ambrey, a private maritime security firm, issued an alert saying that a merchant ship had been 'attacked by eight skiffs while transiting northbound in the Red Sea'. Ambrey later said the ship also had been attacked by bomb-carrying drone boats, which could mark a major escalation. It said two drone boats struck the ship while another two had been destroyed by the armed guards on board. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations centre said the ship was taking on water and its crew were abandoning the vessel. Authorities did not identify the vessel for hours. However, the description of the vessel targeted matched against the Liberian-flagged bulk tanker Magic Seas, which had been broadcasting it had an armed security team on board in the vicinity the attack took place and had been heading north. The Houthi rebels have been launching missile and drone attacks against commercial and military ships in the region in what the group's leadership has described as an effort to end Israel's offensive against Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The group's al-Masirah satellite news channel acknowledged the attack occurred, but offered no other comment on it as it aired a speech by its secretive leader, Abdul Malik al-Houthi. However, Ambrey said the vessel targeted met 'the established Houthi target profile'. Between November 2023 and January 2025, the Houthis targeted more than 100 merchant vessels with missiles and drones, sinking two of them and killing four sailors. That has greatly reduced the flow of trade through the Red Sea corridor, which typically sees 1 trillion dollars of goods move through it annually.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store