Melbourne defender May sent straight to AFL tribunal
Despite Melbourne and Carlton's coaches defending May, the All Australian defender has been cited for rough conduct.
The AFL's match review officer Michael Christian graded May's contact as careless conduct, severe impact and high contact.
May and Evans clashed at speed while attacking a loose ball in the Blues' eight-point win at the MCG on Saturday night.
Evans arrived a fraction of a second earlier than his opponent, getting his hands to the ball before May caught him high.
Blues coach Michael Voss believed May's act was fair.
"Both players were in line with the ball and seemed to be attacking it," he said post-match.
"Both sort of making a play at the ball, maybe one person was one step late, and obviously then the incident happens.
"But for Frankie (Evans) to be able to hold his line with a pretty strong man coming the other way was a pretty important moment in the game."
Melbourne coach Simon Goodwin said May's intent was "clearly" to win the ball.
"If you just look at his pure intent, it was purely for the ball and it was unfortunate," he said.
Goodwin said the AFL was doing an "unbelievable" job in trying to eradicate concussion from the game.
"It's important that we limit it as much as we can but there will be football incidents where someone is concussed," he said.
May will miss round 20 regardless of the tribunal outcome after being concussed himself in a separate incident.
He sustained an accidental knee to the back of the head late in the match when Carlton ruck Tom De Koning flew to take a spectacular a mark.
Melbourne star Steven May faces a lengthy ban for a controversial collision that concussed Carlton's Francis Evans after being referred directly to the tribunal.
Despite Melbourne and Carlton's coaches defending May, the All Australian defender has been cited for rough conduct.
The AFL's match review officer Michael Christian graded May's contact as careless conduct, severe impact and high contact.
May and Evans clashed at speed while attacking a loose ball in the Blues' eight-point win at the MCG on Saturday night.
Evans arrived a fraction of a second earlier than his opponent, getting his hands to the ball before May caught him high.
Blues coach Michael Voss believed May's act was fair.
"Both players were in line with the ball and seemed to be attacking it," he said post-match.
"Both sort of making a play at the ball, maybe one person was one step late, and obviously then the incident happens.
"But for Frankie (Evans) to be able to hold his line with a pretty strong man coming the other way was a pretty important moment in the game."
Melbourne coach Simon Goodwin said May's intent was "clearly" to win the ball.
"If you just look at his pure intent, it was purely for the ball and it was unfortunate," he said.
Goodwin said the AFL was doing an "unbelievable" job in trying to eradicate concussion from the game.
"It's important that we limit it as much as we can but there will be football incidents where someone is concussed," he said.
May will miss round 20 regardless of the tribunal outcome after being concussed himself in a separate incident.
He sustained an accidental knee to the back of the head late in the match when Carlton ruck Tom De Koning flew to take a spectacular a mark.
Melbourne star Steven May faces a lengthy ban for a controversial collision that concussed Carlton's Francis Evans after being referred directly to the tribunal.
Despite Melbourne and Carlton's coaches defending May, the All Australian defender has been cited for rough conduct.
The AFL's match review officer Michael Christian graded May's contact as careless conduct, severe impact and high contact.
May and Evans clashed at speed while attacking a loose ball in the Blues' eight-point win at the MCG on Saturday night.
Evans arrived a fraction of a second earlier than his opponent, getting his hands to the ball before May caught him high.
Blues coach Michael Voss believed May's act was fair.
"Both players were in line with the ball and seemed to be attacking it," he said post-match.
"Both sort of making a play at the ball, maybe one person was one step late, and obviously then the incident happens.
"But for Frankie (Evans) to be able to hold his line with a pretty strong man coming the other way was a pretty important moment in the game."
Melbourne coach Simon Goodwin said May's intent was "clearly" to win the ball.
"If you just look at his pure intent, it was purely for the ball and it was unfortunate," he said.
Goodwin said the AFL was doing an "unbelievable" job in trying to eradicate concussion from the game.
"It's important that we limit it as much as we can but there will be football incidents where someone is concussed," he said.
May will miss round 20 regardless of the tribunal outcome after being concussed himself in a separate incident.
He sustained an accidental knee to the back of the head late in the match when Carlton ruck Tom De Koning flew to take a spectacular a mark.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
9 minutes ago
- ABC News
Greg Swann rules out shortening AFL quarter lengths, will resist making 'radical' changes
AFL football performance boss Greg Swann has hinted play could be sped up before the end of the season as he prioritises reducing the length of matches in his new role. Insisting he won't be making "radical" changes to the game, Swann is also eager to see the umpires throw the ball up rather than bouncing it in the centre of the ground. The veteran administrator has ruled out reducing the 20-minute playing time for each quarter, but believes the league can tighten up in situations where umpires are waiting for players to get to ruck contests and boundary throw-ins. "There's a chance to actually speed that up a bit," Swann told reporters on Monday. "There's good vision and video of ruckmen taking 20 seconds to come from one end of the ground to the other. "Everyone stands around and waits, so to me that's something that hopefully we can have a look at and maybe address even before the season finishes." Swann said it was too early to tell whether the ball would be bounced to open the 2026 season, but has received strong support from "a majority" of clubs for his plan to scrap the bounce. He is also keen to introduce more transparency around key AFL decisions, including those under the match review system. "We're not going to explain everything away because otherwise you'd be here all day," Swann said. "But there's some things that are a bit contentious that I think people deserve to understand why we've gone a certain way." Swann gave his tick of approval to the controversial 50-metre penalty paid against Fremantle's Karl Worner for dissent on Sunday, and declared umpires have been doing a "fantastic job" this season. "One of the things that's difficult for the umpires is the rules; we just need to try and make them a bit simpler," Swann said. "Whether it's the stand (rule), whether it's holding the ball … that's something that I'm really keen to talk to clubs and coaches and footy managers about. "Is there an easier way for these guys to have to adjudicate it?" While AFL traditionalists often call on the league to "leave the game alone", Swann flagged innovation as being crucial to the competition's ongoing success. "It's the best game there is but the reason for that is we keep trying to make it better, and I think that's what we should do," he said. AAP
Sydney Morning Herald
38 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Picked off' or ‘not that bad'? The hit dividing football - and why it will decide the game's future
King said on Fox Footy that he believed May 'picked off' Evans in an incident from a 'bygone era', and his hit warranted a six-week suspension. May later suffered a concussion of his own when Tom De Koning accidentally kneed him in the head during a last-quarter marking contest, so he will miss Sunday's match against St Kilda anyway. Comparable recent cases In May, the tribunal cleared Fremantle captain Alex Pearce after the Dockers successfully argued against Christian's careless classification for his collision with Port Adelaide's Darcy Byrne-Jones. Pearce's case differed from May's in that it was an aerial collision in a marking contest, but there were similarities in how Pearce arrived second to the ball and took his eyes off it at the last second to brace for contact. Pearce's legal team did not challenge the classifications of severe impact and high contact. They argued Pearce's actions were reasonable, with the veteran defender stressing he was making a genuine attempt to complete a chest mark at the point of collision. However, the case involving North Melbourne's Jackson Archer in March could also be relevant. Archer's three-game ban for his role in a collision that concussed Western Bulldog Luke Cleary was upheld at the tribunal, after the match review officer graded the Roo's actions as careless, severe impact and high contact. North's defence focused on Cleary's decision to go to ground to collect the ball, rather than stay on his feet. Tribunal chairman Jeff Gleeson acknowledged that rules encouraged players to keep their feet, but said that did not always happen and 'players need to be aware', saying Archer had 'slowed too little and too late'. What others are saying Former Hawk Isaac Smith's take on May's actions contrasts greatly with King. Speaking on Nine's Sunday Footy Show, Smith argued that May should not be suspended and that Evans' injuries were an unfortunate consequence of playing a contact sport. 'The only thing I can see the MRO picking up is that he didn't stay low, and he came up a couple of steps before he got to the contest – and that's what caused the impact,' Smith said. 'It's a line-ball one, and it's going to be fascinating to see where it ends up. I feel for Steven May here because I feel like he was contesting the ball and obviously, Evans is a smaller player to what he is. 'I think you can see him getting no weeks, or you can see him getting four weeks. The more I look at it, I think no weeks ... you look at the Alex Pearce one, [and] May has not done anything to initiate that contact.' Triple M's breakfast crew, including ex-St Kilda champion Nick Riewoldt, grilled Gawn on the May case on Monday. Gawn was adamant that May did not bump Evans, but that he was 'never going to take a backward step'. 'Whatever happens, will be the precedent. I understand you've got to look after the head, but it's going to be an interesting tribunal case. I might actually watch it,' Gawn said. 'I came in to defend [May] a little bit when it first happened, and the Carlton boys weren't really remonstrating, and then we all had a look at the ground and the guy's tooth was missing, so it was, 'OK, maybe I can't defend 'Maysy' '. 'Then we watched the replay, and we were like, 'Actually, it's not that bad', and the Carlton boys still didn't remonstrate, really, so it's a tough one.' Riewoldt, who did not believe May's actions were 'malicious', added that the Blues' eventual reaction was 'almost like out of obligation'. 'If he does get rubbed out, then essentially what we're saying is ... players have to be able to calculate from 20 metres away; the speed the other player is going, the speed you're going to be going, and the fact you're going to arrive a microsecond late,' Riewoldt said. Carlton forward Harry McKay said Nova that it was a 'nasty incident' but that no player would intentionally hit an opponent in the head. Former greats James Hird and Jimmy Bartel had sympathy for May but expect him to receive a suspension. Loading 'This is a really difficult one,' Hird said. 'If he had have stayed a little bit lower and kept his eye totally on the ball, he would be OK. But at the last split-second, he comes up, and his eyes go off the ball, which is why I think it will be three weeks. 'I don't think he has gone out on purpose to hurt anybody. Five years ago, it wouldn't have got weeks. But the rules have changed and unfortunately, for him, his shoulder gets him in the head.'
The Age
38 minutes ago
- The Age
‘Picked off' or ‘not that bad'? The hit dividing football - and why it will decide the game's future
King said on Fox Footy that he believed May 'picked off' Evans in an incident from a 'bygone era', and his hit warranted a six-week suspension. May later suffered a concussion of his own when Tom De Koning accidentally kneed him in the head during a last-quarter marking contest, so he will miss Sunday's match against St Kilda anyway. Comparable recent cases In May, the tribunal cleared Fremantle captain Alex Pearce after the Dockers successfully argued against Christian's careless classification for his collision with Port Adelaide's Darcy Byrne-Jones. Pearce's case differed from May's in that it was an aerial collision in a marking contest, but there were similarities in how Pearce arrived second to the ball and took his eyes off it at the last second to brace for contact. Pearce's legal team did not challenge the classifications of severe impact and high contact. They argued Pearce's actions were reasonable, with the veteran defender stressing he was making a genuine attempt to complete a chest mark at the point of collision. However, the case involving North Melbourne's Jackson Archer in March could also be relevant. Archer's three-game ban for his role in a collision that concussed Western Bulldog Luke Cleary was upheld at the tribunal, after the match review officer graded the Roo's actions as careless, severe impact and high contact. North's defence focused on Cleary's decision to go to ground to collect the ball, rather than stay on his feet. Tribunal chairman Jeff Gleeson acknowledged that rules encouraged players to keep their feet, but said that did not always happen and 'players need to be aware', saying Archer had 'slowed too little and too late'. What others are saying Former Hawk Isaac Smith's take on May's actions contrasts greatly with King. Speaking on Nine's Sunday Footy Show, Smith argued that May should not be suspended and that Evans' injuries were an unfortunate consequence of playing a contact sport. 'The only thing I can see the MRO picking up is that he didn't stay low, and he came up a couple of steps before he got to the contest – and that's what caused the impact,' Smith said. 'It's a line-ball one, and it's going to be fascinating to see where it ends up. I feel for Steven May here because I feel like he was contesting the ball and obviously, Evans is a smaller player to what he is. 'I think you can see him getting no weeks, or you can see him getting four weeks. The more I look at it, I think no weeks ... you look at the Alex Pearce one, [and] May has not done anything to initiate that contact.' Triple M's breakfast crew, including ex-St Kilda champion Nick Riewoldt, grilled Gawn on the May case on Monday. Gawn was adamant that May did not bump Evans, but that he was 'never going to take a backward step'. 'Whatever happens, will be the precedent. I understand you've got to look after the head, but it's going to be an interesting tribunal case. I might actually watch it,' Gawn said. 'I came in to defend [May] a little bit when it first happened, and the Carlton boys weren't really remonstrating, and then we all had a look at the ground and the guy's tooth was missing, so it was, 'OK, maybe I can't defend 'Maysy' '. 'Then we watched the replay, and we were like, 'Actually, it's not that bad', and the Carlton boys still didn't remonstrate, really, so it's a tough one.' Riewoldt, who did not believe May's actions were 'malicious', added that the Blues' eventual reaction was 'almost like out of obligation'. 'If he does get rubbed out, then essentially what we're saying is ... players have to be able to calculate from 20 metres away; the speed the other player is going, the speed you're going to be going, and the fact you're going to arrive a microsecond late,' Riewoldt said. Carlton forward Harry McKay said Nova that it was a 'nasty incident' but that no player would intentionally hit an opponent in the head. Former greats James Hird and Jimmy Bartel had sympathy for May but expect him to receive a suspension. Loading 'This is a really difficult one,' Hird said. 'If he had have stayed a little bit lower and kept his eye totally on the ball, he would be OK. But at the last split-second, he comes up, and his eyes go off the ball, which is why I think it will be three weeks. 'I don't think he has gone out on purpose to hurt anybody. Five years ago, it wouldn't have got weeks. But the rules have changed and unfortunately, for him, his shoulder gets him in the head.'
