logo
No more GI Joe trucks: Army swaps iconic Humvee for a faster, cheaper vehicle

No more GI Joe trucks: Army swaps iconic Humvee for a faster, cheaper vehicle

Yahoo7 hours ago
WASHINGTON – The Army is swapping an icon – the 40-year-old Humvee – for a lighter, faster, cheaper truck designed for future battlefields.
The Infantry Squad Vehicle, more dune buggy than armored truck, is one of the most visible signs of the Army's transition from Cold War-era equipment that has defined it for generations. The grinding insurgencies that followed the collapse of the Soviet Union demanded more and more armor to protect troops from roadside bombs.
In their place: a range of vehicles and drones that can be fielded quickly, and, in many cases, with commercial, off-the-shelf technology.
"The Humvee is the quintessential G.I. Joe vehicle," said Alex Miller, the chief technical adviser to Army leadership for transforming its equipment. "It is the quintessential Army vehicle we've had in the inventory since 1985. So, 40 years of Humvee. It was good for what it was built for, which was high mobility at the time. It is not good for the fight we think we're going to be in."
That fight, to Pentagon officials like Miller, likely involves China and will require speed and agility to survive. Battles will also almost certainly resemble the combat sparked by Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Lethal drones have turned slow-moving trucks and even tanks into death traps.
Enter the Infantry Squad Vehicle. It's basically a stretched-out, stripped-down all-terrain vehicle without doors or a roof with seating for as many as nine soldiers. The Army plans to equip its light infantry units with the trucks, along with hundreds of drones to spy on and attack enemies.
The Army's new signature vehicle
During World War II and for most of the 40 years that followed, the olive-drab Jeep became synonymous with the Army. The small, rugged truck crossed over into civilian use and is the ancestor of the off-road vehicles and SUVs that patrol suburbs and ferry kids to the frontlines of soccer games.
The High Mobility Multi-Purpose Wheeled Vehicle, better known as the Humvee, had another 40-year run as the Army's workhorse truck beginning in 1985. The Pentagon bought more than 300,000 Humvees, and nearly 100,000 remain in service. Soldiers have driven them in operations from Afghanistan to Alaska. More versatile than a Jeep, the Humvee offered multiple versions, including one that could hunt and destroy a tank with a missile.
They gained infamy, though, in Iraq and Afghanistan, where insurgents relentlessly attacked their chief vulnerability: a flat bottom made of aluminum easily shredded by explosives buried in roads. Improvised explosive devices, IEDs, became the number one killer of U.S. troops in both wars.
The Pentagon, under Defense Secretary Robert Gates, made replacing the Humvee the military's top priority during the George W. Bush administration. The Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle, a heavy truck with a V-shaped hull that deflected the blast from bombs, saved the lives and limbs of thousands of troops.
In 2012, then-Defense Secretary Ashton Carter released data to USA TODAY on the effectiveness of MRAPs in IED attacks.
"You are between nine and 14 times less likely to be killed if you were in an MRAP than if you were in a Humvee," Carter said.
But the protection the MRAP offered came at the cost of speed and agility. The Pentagon bought smaller, armored trucks such as the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle. Though nimbler than MRAPs, JLTV's bulk meant it couldn't be sped to battlefields.
The Army's new 'Jeep' is easier to repair
Thousands of pounds lighter and $80,000 cheaper than the Humvee, the Infantry Squad Vehicle is based on the Chevrolet Colorado truck built in Missouri. It's basically the same truck that consumers can buy at a local dealership. Only about 20% of the Infantry Squad Vehicle's components, including communication and electronic gear, are unique to the Army.
That's a key difference compared to trucks such as Humvees and JLTVs, which were custom-built for the military.
'You can repair it anywhere on earth as long as you have access to commercial parts rather than a special military vehicle with special military parts,' said Miller, the Army's top technical adviser.
Some Pentagon officials, however, acknowledge that the tradeoff for speed and expense is losing the armor that saved lives and limbs in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Infantry Squad Vehicle represents the Army's latest assessment of what soldiers will need for the next war.
The new drones and robots accompanying the truck can be sent ahead of it to help soldiers avoid ambushes. Speed, not armor, is what will save soldiers' lives in the next fight, Miller said.
'The longer you sit and the slower you are, the easier it is to kill you,' he said.
The Infantry Squad Vehicle represents the Army's best guess, based on decades of combat experience, of what will work best for future combat, according to a senior Defense official who was not authorized to speak publicly.
The vehicle isn't meant to withstand an attack, the official said. It's designed to whisk soldiers within a few miles of the frontline and allow them to walk a short distance to the fight.
If the Army gets drawn back into a bloody, urban fight with IEDs?
We'll buy something else, the official said.
Michael O'Hanlon, a national security expert at the Brookings Institution, counts himself a skeptic of the ISV.
He recalled that 20 years ago, the Army sank billions into what it called Future Combat Systems. The initiative was intended to replace Abrams tanks and Bradley Infantry Fighting vehicles with a fleet of manned and unmanned systems. It failed.
"Worked great on Powerpoint," O'Hanlon said. "But the technology wasn't there then (to find everything before it exploded or impacted) and it still isn't. Like Muhammad Ali said, 'I'll float like a butterfly, sting like a bee.' Except the technology may not deliver.
"They had to cut something but I'm wary about this choice."
What do soldiers think of it?
Soldiers in the 101st Airborne Division were among the first in the Army to drive the trucks. Many swear by it.
Its lighter weight, relative to a Humvee, means the Infantry Squad Vehicle can be carried by a Black Hawk helicopter for a short distance with a sling. A twin-rotor Chinook helicopter can carry two of the trucks inside its cargo bay for a greater distance. A Humvee's weight requires a Chinook, and then just one can be carried in a sling.
On the ground, the Infantry Squad Vehicle is faster than a Humvee and more fuel-efficient. Speed helps infantry soldiers keep pace with armored units traveling to war, said Col. Trevor Voelkel, who commands the 1st Mobile Brigade Combat Team for the 101st Airborne Division. Voelkel's brigade tested new equipment, including about 200 of the trucks, at the Joint Readiness Training Center at Fort Polk in Louisiana in May.
'We're getting back to our original concept of the Humvee,' Voelkel said. 'But with a newer, lighter, more commercial vehicle that's going to be easier to repair, cheaper to repair.'
William Melko, a 1st sergeant in Voelkel's brigade, had experience driving other Army trucks in Afghanistan. None of them, he said, gave his soldiers a better view of potential threats around them. It's easier to drive, too, especially for younger soldiers.
'The best way that I can describe it is like a normal pickup,' Melko said.
Last year, after Hurricane Helene swamped the southeast, Lt. Col. Jonathan Nielsen commanded a battalion of the 101st that responded to the flooding in North Carolina. His soldiers drove Infantry Squad Vehicles on damaged roads inaccessible to a Humvee, he said.
The trucks also maneuvered through city streets better than Humvees.
'ISV is going to be an iconic vehicle,' Nielsen said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Acura Can Catch Porsche in IMSA WeatherTech Manufacturer's Chase
Acura Can Catch Porsche in IMSA WeatherTech Manufacturer's Chase

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Acura Can Catch Porsche in IMSA WeatherTech Manufacturer's Chase

Now that the others have won, look for a return to a less draconian BoP for the Ferrari 499P in the WEC and Porsche in IMSA. It remains to be seen if IMSA officials have in fact balanced the performance. Hopefully, there will be a straight fight for the manufacturer title between Porsche and Acura, which trails by 90 points. After two straight victories by the Acura MSR team in the WeatherTech Championship, the interregnum is over for the Porsche Penske Motorsport team. Having been hobbled by the Balance of Performance (BoP), the Porsche team will have a chance to stand atop the podium again on Sunday after the sprint race at Road America. Urs Keratle, the director for Porsche's 963 program, said that simulations have shown the team will 'be able to compete with the others. The reality we will see in qualifying and the race.' The subtraction of weight (nine kilograms) and a 5.2% increase in Stage 2 power for the Porsches in the BoP prior to Road America reflects the current sports car racing season's pattern in both the World Endurance Championship and IMSA. The best performing cars and their teams have been heavily penalized midway in the season by BoP to open the door to other manufacturers. Now that the others have won, look for a return to a less draconian BoP for the Ferrari 499P in the WEC and Porsche in IMSA. Cadillac and its Jota team won its first WEC race in Round 5 in Brazil, where officials made it very unlikely for the Ferraris, winners of four straight races, to compete for victory. IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship Porsche 2,182 Acura 2,092 Cadillac 1,974 BMW 1,962 Aston Martin 1,439 In IMSA, each of the two Acuras entered by Jim Meyers and Michael Shank won in Detroit and Watkins Glen in part because of the BoP hampering the Porsches. Cadillac scored three podiums in those two events. Keratle suggested Porsche Penske was unable to control its own destiny. 'We are prepared to be competitive in the races if it's very well in our hands,' he said. Who stands atop the podium at Wisconsin's picturesque Elkhart Lake circuit and then celebrates at the Siebkens resort will have a significant impact on the driver and manufacturer championships for the IMSA GTP season, which has two endurance races remaining after the Motul SportsCar Grand Prix. It remains to be seen if IMSA officials have in fact balanced the performance and a straight fight for the manufacturer title will evolve between Porsche and Acura, which trails by 90 points. On the driver side, the four straight victories by Porsche Penske to open the season put its drivers in an almost unassailable position. Matt Campbell and Mathieu Jaminet, drivers of the No. 6 Porsche 963, lead teammates Nick Tandy and Felipe Nasr by 12 points after the latter two's poor result at the Glen. Acura MSR drivers Renger van der Zande and Nick Yelloly, winners in Detroit, trail the Porsche drivers by 262 points in third place. There's more to come in the manufacturers' contest after the Glen victory, said David Salters, president of Honda Racing Corporation USA. The combination of the Meyers-Shank team and engineers from the HRC factory is beginning to pay dividends. Along with driver Tom Blomqvist, they successfully executed a challenging fuel strategy to grab the victory at the Glen from the Cadillac of Action Express Racing before celebrating at the Seneca Lodge. 'We are six races into the season and we're starting to show what we're made of,' said Salters. 'It was a great weekend, but we must keep pushing.' The Acura MSR squad gained 112 points in the factory title chase with its victories. The team likely needs to win at least two of the three remaining races to overcome the 90-point gap to Porsche Penske. Where Porsche Penske has no team orders, Acura MSR can employ split strategies and concentrate on just getting one car into Victory Lane. Blomqvist, who co-drove with Colin Braun on board the No. 60 ARX-06 at the Glen, is reconciled to his team now concentrating on the manufacturers title. 'We still stand a chance in the manufacturers, which is definitely a big goal of Acura's,' said Blomqvist. 'So, we haven't given up there, having won the last two events. Obviously, only one of the team's cars gets points for that. I think ultimately that's probably what we're going to focus on more than the drivers' title. Let's see.'

'I Stopped My Car Wash Subscription:' Woman Skips Wash Because it's Raining. Is it Worth Going Through the Wash if it's Raining?
'I Stopped My Car Wash Subscription:' Woman Skips Wash Because it's Raining. Is it Worth Going Through the Wash if it's Raining?

Motor 1

time2 hours ago

  • Motor 1

'I Stopped My Car Wash Subscription:' Woman Skips Wash Because it's Raining. Is it Worth Going Through the Wash if it's Raining?

Are you washing your car enough? If you're only sudsing up after a bird poop incident, a mud splash or once you have so much dust or pollen that you can write in it, you're probably doing it wrong. Creator Suz ( @suzjo187 ) has a specific question: Should you wash your car before it rains? Suz explains that she has a 'fairly new' car that she's barely washed yet, and it looks like it's due for a cleaning. Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . However, Suz is only able to wash her car on the weekends, and it's consistently been raining every weekend in her area. 'So here's my question: Is it helpful to wash a car even if it's going to rain the next day?' Suz asks in a TikTok. How Often Should You Wash Your Car? Experts recommend washing your car about every two weeks, even if it doesn't look visibly dirty. According to AAA , regular washes protect your car's paint from long-term damage caused by environmental buildup—things like pollen, tree sap, bird droppings, and general grime. These might seem harmless, but over time, they can eat away at the paint, dull the finish, and lead to corrosion. If you live near the coast or in a place where roads are salted in the winter, that timeline shortens. Consumer Reports recommends rinsing your car every 10 days during snow season or after driving through salty conditions. Salt is especially corrosive and tends to build up underneath the car, which is why frequent undercarriage washes are key. Saves Money Over Time A regular car wash isn't just about aesthetics—it's preventive maintenance. Trending Now Man Leaves Car in Parking Lot. Then He Sees What the 'Arizona Heat' Did to it After Reviewing Security Footage Virginia Man Says Chevrolet Dealership Forced Him to Pay for $2,500 Package. Now He's Calling It Out for a Bait-and-Switch Letting dirt, salt, or bugs sit on your car's exterior can lead to rust and paint damage, which can be expensive to repair, Progressive reports. The insurer notes that even a few days of exposure to acidic splatter, like bird droppings or bug guts, can start to wear down your car's protective coating. Neglecting the undercarriage can be particularly costly. It's often overlooked, but it's where corrosion tends to start, especially in colder climates where salt is used on roads. Over time, that rust can affect not just the body of the car, but its structural components and resale value, too. Rain Isn't Enough 'Absolutely wash your car weekly, it's one of my favorite things to do (I wash it at home),' a person said. 'I stopped my car wash subscription. Not only was it getting pricey, but the damage to my vehicle was just too much. My front license plate is torn more than 3/4 of the way through from the 'touchless' washer arms. And then there's all the other things that they'd have to detail off my car 1-2X a year,' another shared. If a car wash does damage your car, such as with malfunctioning or faulty equipment, you should report it to the manager, as the business could be liable. If they refuse to pay, you can always take the matter to court. Your insurer may also cover the damage. 'I don't wash it generally. Better things to do with my time/money,' a commenter wrote. 'Does the rain use soap and wash the underside and your tires? I get a mini detail and they scrub the inside and vacuum it. Does the rain clean the inside of your car? Go to a car wash,' another said snarkily. Suz took the advice of people on team wash. 'Caved and went to the car wash,' Suz said in a follow-up video. 'I gotta tell you, that is the best money I have spent. Like, the joy I have looking at my car so clean and I really really vacuumed everything inside,' she adds. 'I feel like I just got out of a nice cold shower after a boiling hot day.' Motor1 reached out to Suz for comment via TikTok direct message and comment. We'll update this article if we hear back. More From Motor1 'So Who Was Gonna Tell Me?': Woman Goes Through Car Wash On 'Really Hot' Day. Then Her Windshield Cracks Ford Bronco Driver Goes Through Car Wash. Then She Forgets To Push This Little-Used Button Watch This Obscure Mitsubishi Sports Car Get Its First Wash In 12 Years The Coolest Car Toys We Forgot: Super Spin Car Wash Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store