US Senate begins voting on Trump's 'big beautiful bill'
Republicans - who control both chambers of Congress - were divided over how much to cut welfare programmes in order to extend tax breaks.
President Donald Trump wants Congress to pass the bill by 4 July.
After the House of Representatives passed its version of the bill last month by a single vote, the legislation went to the Senate. Because of the changes made by the Senate, the bill will go back to the House for another vote.
Senators zipped through the halls of the Capitol building on Monday, making their way to the Senate floor for various amendment votes, then back to their private meeting rooms where they hashed out grievances outside the view of reporters.
There could be up to 20 hours of debate when senators argue for or against adding amendments to the nearly 1,000-page bill in a process called "vote-a-rama".
"We're still obviously perfecting a few things," Senate Majority Leader John Thune said on Monday.
An amendment to the proposal for Medicaid cuts recently proposed by Florida Senator Rick Scott could cause roughly 20 million Americans to lose their health insurance coverage, according to one estimate.
When asked about the report, Thune said there are "lots of analyses out there".
"The thing that (Scott's) bill doesn't do is it doesn't take effect until 2031. So I'm not sure how you can make the argument that it's going to kick any people off of health insurance tomorrow," Thune said.
Democrats, who have repeatedly denounced the bill, particularly for cutting health care coverage for millions of poorer Americans, are expected to use all ten of their allotted hours of debate, while Republicans likely will not.
Senator Adam Schiff, a Democrat from California, called the bill "terrible".
He told the BBC he was unsure if Senate Republicans would meet Trump's 4 July deadline, adding that, even if they did, "who knows what happens in the House".
On Sunday, after weeks of public discussion, the Senate moved to open debate on the budget bill in 51-49 vote.
Two Republicans and all Democrats voted against opening debate, arguing for further changes to the legislation.
One of those Republicans, North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis, announced his retirement following that vote and said the legislation broke promises Trump and Republicans made to their voters.
"Too many elected officials are motivated by pure raw politics who really don't give a damn about the people they promised to represent on the campaign trail," Tillis wrote in his announcement.
The other Republican who voted against moving the bill was Kentucky Senator Rand Paul who objected to debt increases, and cuts to Medicaid, a healthcare programme that is relied on by millions of elderly, disabled and low-income Americans.
On Monday, Republican Senator Dan Sullivan sought to quell concerns about cuts to Medicaid, saying "we're going to be fine in this".
A look at the key items in Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'
The woman who could bust Trump's 'big beautiful bill
When the bill comes up for a full Senate vote - expected either late on Monday night or early Tuesday morning - Republicans can only afford three defections in order for the bill to pass.
If they lose three votes, Vice President JD Vance will have to cast a tie-breaking vote.
The bill will then return to the House of Representatives, where leadership has advised a full vote on the Senate's bill could come as early as Wednesday morning.
While Republicans control the House, they can also only lose a handful of votes. There are frustrations with the Senate version of the bill among some Republicans in the House, which could make for another close vote.
Democrats in both chambers have largely objected to the spending cuts and the proposed extension of tax breaks.
Meanwhile, Republican debate has focused on how much to cut welfare programmes in order to extend $3.8tn (£2.8tn) in Trump tax breaks. The proposed cuts would strip millions of America's poorest of health insurance.
The version of the bill senators will soon vote on contains tax cuts that Trump campaigned on, such as a tax deduction on Social Security benefits, and the elimination of taxes on overtime work and tips.
The bill also authorises $5 trillion in new borrowing which will add to a growing US debt load - a move that goes against what many conservatives have argued for and infuriated one-time Trump confidant Elon Musk earlier this summer.
The Senate version of the bill will add $3.3tn (£2.4tn) in debt, according to new estimates from the Congressional Budget Office, a non-partisan federal agency.
The national debt currently sits at $36 trillion, according to the treasury department.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has urged Congress to address the debt limit by mid-July and warned that if they do not, the US could be unable to pay its bills as early as August.
Senate Republicans advance Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' but final vote hangs in balance
The woman who could bust Trump's 'big beautiful bill'
Republican Senator Thom Tillis to leave Congress after clash with Trump
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
14 minutes ago
- Medscape
USAID Cuts May Cause Over 14 Million Additional Deaths by 2030
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Deep funding cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development and its potential dismantling could result in more than 14 million additional deaths by 2030, according to research published in The Lancet medical journal on Monday. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT President Donald Trump's administration, since taking office in January, has made funding cuts to USAID and its aid programs worldwide in what the U.S. government says is part of its broader plan to remove wasteful spending. Human rights experts and advocates have warned against the cuts. USAID funding has had a crucial role in improving global health, primarily directed toward low and middle-income countries, particularly African nations, according to the study. BY THE NUMBERS The study estimated that over the past two decades, USAID-funded programs have prevented more than 91 million deaths globally, including 30 million deaths among children. Projections suggest that ongoing deep funding cuts - combined with the potential dismantling of the agency - could result in more than 14 million additional deaths by 2030, including 4.5 million deaths among children younger than 5 years, the study in The Lancet said. Washington is the world's largest humanitarian aid donor, amounting to at least 38% of all contributions recorded by the United Nations. It disbursed $61 billion in foreign assistance last year, just over half of it via USAID, according to government data. KEY QUOTE "Our estimates show that, unless the abrupt funding cuts announced and implemented in the first half of 2025 are reversed, a staggering number of avoidable deaths could occur by 2030," the study said. CONTEXT U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in March the Trump administration canceled over 80% of all programs at USAID following a six-week review. The remaining approximately 1,000 programs, he said, would now be administered "more effectively" under the U.S. State Department and in consultation with Congress. (Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Washington;Editing by Mary Milliken and Jamie Freed)
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lawmakers move forward on bill banning common grocery store item: 'They add unnecessary costs'
Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek signed a bill into law banning thick, reusable plastic bags from being used at grocery stores, restaurants, and retail outlets, The Oregonian reported. State Sen. Janeen Sollman, a Democrat from Hillsboro and the bill's chief sponsor, explained that "wasteful disposable plastics like thick plastic checkout bags aren't just annoying for consumers, they add unnecessary costs to our Oregon businesses, and are contributing to an ever increasing pile of plastic trash that is harming the environment and public health." Plastic bags are, indeed, harmful to the environment. After typically being used just once, they end up in landfills, where they can take up to 1,000 years to break down. The intention behind the thicker reusable bags was to steer consumers toward using them multiple times, thus eliminating more single-use plastic bags, but few people reuse them. Critics of plastic bag bans are concerned that they may lead to an increase in the purchase and usage of other types of plastic bags, but studies have shown that bans are effective in cutting down the overall usage of plastic bags. The manufacturing of plastic bags contributes to planet-warming pollution, so demand for them increases the problem that bans are trying to solve. When plastic bags are not disposed of properly, they often end up in bodies of water or caught in tree branches, posing a threat to wildlife and causing additional harm to the environment. The Ocean Conservancy reported that plastic bags are the most common form of single-use plastics found by International Coastal Cleanup volunteers. In addition to the plastic bags harming marine life, microplastics that result from the bags breaking down can be ingested by marine animals, compounding the threat. The Oregon ban is part of efforts by individual states to reduce the environmental impact of plastic bags. California has banned all plastic grocery bags to encourage the use of paper bags or reusable bags. Twelve states have some form of statewide ban on plastic bags. Charging money for them is one deterrent that has reduced usage in the United Kingdom. The growing awareness of the negative effects of plastic bags on ecosystems has inspired individuals and governments to take action. By opting for reusable bags when we shop and helping spread the word about the harm single-use plastic bags bring to the environment, we can be part of the solution. Should the government ban gas stoves? Yes Only in new buildings Only in restaurants No way Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Stein signs P.A.V.E. Act into law, paving the way for transit transformation in Mecklenburg County
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, N.C. (QUEEN CITY NEWS) — Governor Stein officially signed six new bills into law on Tuesday morning, including one that could reshape transportation in Mecklenburg County for years to come. One of the most talked-about measures is , short for Public Access to Valuable Equity. This legislation opens the door for a November ballot referendum, where Mecklenburg County voters will decide whether to approve a one-cent local sales tax to invest in a more modern, accessible, and sustainable transportation system. MORE: NC Gov. Stein hosts news conference to sign 6 bills into law 'Today is a game-changer for our region,' Shannon Binns, Executive Director of Sustain Charlotte, said in a written statement. 'For years, we've dreamed of giving residents the chance to fund more frequent buses and trains, safer bike lanes, sidewalks, and safer streets for all. With Governor Stein's signature, that dream moves from the advocacy stage to the ballot box. When Mecklenburg County prospers with better mobility, every family, no matter their zip code or income, gains access to opportunity, cleaner air, and a higher quality of life.' 'This is more than a transportation bill, it's a generational opportunity to shape how ourregion grows and connects,' Shelly Cayette-Weston, President of Business Operations forCharlotte Hornets/Hornets Sports and Entertainment said in a written statement. 'This is a powerful example of how local and state leaders can work together to create bold solutions.' The P.A.V.E. Act gives Mecklenburg County the authority to: Put a one-cent sales tax proposal before voters this November Use funds to improve roads, expand public transit, and enhance bike/pedestrian infrastructure Tackle traffic congestion while reducing air pollution from vehicles It also makes changes to local tax laws, including updates to the county's 'U-Drive-It' vehicle tax and existing transportation-related sales tax rules, to support this effort. MORE: After Mecklenburg County's transportation bill passes Senate, do Charlotte residents support the tax hike? The measure was and earned bipartisan support in the General Assembly before arriving on Governor Stein's desk. If voters say yes this fall, the new tax could generate hundreds of millions of dollars for projects aimed at: Expanding bus and light rail service Building sidewalks and protected bike lanes Supporting Vision Zero initiatives to make streets safer Reducing tailpipe emissions, the leading source of local climate pollution For Mecklenburg County residents, that means shorter commutes, cleaner air, and more transportation options, especially in underserved neighborhoods. MORE: Officials detail plans to improve Mecklenburg County bus stops, but they need a one-cent sales tax to do it Now that the P.A.V.E. Act is law, it's up to the Mecklenburg Board of County Commissioners to place the referendum on the November 2025 ballot. If they do, voters will have the final say on whether to approve the sales tax and launch what advocates call a 'transformational investment.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
