Sir Keir Starmer's migration package is significant - but will it be enough?
That the ban on new care workers from overseas is causing angst in the sector is proof that it will make a difference, regardless of the arguments for and against the plan.
Increasing the educational qualifications and English language requirements simply squeezes the eligibility of potential migrants. The decision to double from five to 10 years the wait to become a permanent resident means a much tougher qualifying period than the US. This is a significant package.
But will it be enough, given we've had other substantial packages under previous administrations? Perhaps - but we will not know for years.
But as well as moving the policy debate, he's also changing the political terms of discussion.
Although he has previously made this argument, the latest announcement was the most emphatic rejection of a cornerstone of cross-party thinking that lasted up to and through the Brexit referendum.
The prime minister now says he knows better but what has he done about that?
An unspoken feature of our government since Brexit has been that successive chancellors have ended up as advocates for higher migration, knowing that any drop in numbers would also hit their growth projections.
There are those in Downing Street who believe that the interaction of fiscal rules and OBR forecasts do not capture the true net economic cost-benefit of migration.
But when I asked Sir Keir about this, and whether he could change the way of measuring the economic impact of migration, he dodged the question.
But does anyone have the answer?
Farage's approach
Most presume the toughest solutions come from Nigel Farage 's Reform UK, and he attacks the prime minister for fiddling around the edges. But how would he do it?
Last year's Reform manifesto promised a "freeze on non-essential immigration", claiming it has "pushed Britain to breaking point".
However, this still provides scope for migrants with "essential skills, mainly around healthcare, (which) must be the only exception".
But is this not exactly the sort of wiggle room that Mr Farage would criticise if another party exercised it?
I pressed Mr Farage on how big this exemption would be, and after dodging the question several times - saying that I was missing the point because most migrants do not work - he replied: "I can't tell you the numbers right now, I don't have all the figures.
"What I can tell you is anyone that comes in will not be allowed to stay long-term. That's the difference."
He added: "You ask me in four years' time, all right? Ask me in four years' time."
This is the first time Mr Farage has offered a numerical cap before the next election.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
The youth mobility scheme is just the start of a Brexit reversal
Will Britain continue to be dragged back closer and closer to the EU so that when we eventually rejoin, in say a decade's time, our politicians can present it as a mere exercise in regularising an arrangement which effectively already exists? At some point it must have dawned on most frustrated remainers that they were never going to reverse Brexit in one fell swoop. That would reopen old wounds, motivate a strong reaction from Brexiteers and a sense of ennui. Such an attempted move would probably be doomed by the 'Brenda from Bristol' effect alone (the elderly lady who reacted to the declaration of the 2017 election campaign by exclaiming to a reporter, 'What, another one?'). But what if Britain were to be drawn back into the bloc by degrees? It is easy to argue in favour of joining an EU youth mobility scheme for 18 to 30-year-olds. Use those words and people tend to think about university students and graduates gaining experience of living in other countries. As supporters are eager to point out, we already have such arrangements with 13 countries, from Japan to Australia to Uruguay, and no one goes around saying that we have 'free movement' with those countries. Then again, an EU scheme could end up with a very different balance. No one worries too much about our youth mobility scheme with Australia, for example, because more UK citizens take advantage of it than Australians – the latter of whom only filled 9,000 of the 45,000 places which were available last year (there is an argument for saying that the greater worry is why so few Australians want to come to Britain? Is it a symptom of national decline?). A European scheme, on the other hand, may have a very different effect. The demographic which would benefit – 18-30 year olds – rather matches the large numbers of Eastern Europeans who took advantage of free movement during Britain's membership of the EU. It would end up as just another source of cheap labour for employers, which ends up suppressing wages and opportunities for UK workers at the bottom end of the jobs market. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper does sound alive to the risks of entering into a youth mobility scheme. She is reported to be pressing for EU citizens using such a scheme to be limited to twelve months in Britain; any longer and they will appear in official migration figures. But it isn't just on free movement that Britain risks being drawn back into the EU's sphere of influence. Keir Starmer's reset in EU relations has already, quietly, led to Britain agreeing to mirror EU rules and regulations on food and agriculture. It could mean, unless Starmer succeeds in persuading the EU to allow Britain an exemption, the end of our newfound freedom to embrace gene-edited crops. EU regulations previously destroyed what had been a promising UK industry in genetically modified (GM) foods a quarter of a century ago by making it all but impossible to conduct field trials. We are heading towards the 'vassal state' which many Brexiteers feared. I don't think we have seen the end of this process. We should expect more initiatives to draw us back towards EU rules and regulations. An 'ever closer union' might be one way of describing it. So long as every step is small, the government's diehard remainers might just get away with it.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Exposed: Pakistani migrants using £50k fake visa documents to scam way into Britain
Migrants are scamming their way into Britain using forged visa documents bought from consultants boasting openly about weak border controls. Pakistani migrants are paying up to £50,000 for visa applications, which the Home Office is waving through despite being littered with errors and falsehoods. One application obtained by The Telegraph includes a job reference from a fake hospital that said staff would 'recommend her for any position she may to seeking. We wish her all the best in future'. The Telegraph also posed as a migrant seeking a UK visa from the consultant who had drawn up these fake documents. He boasted of a 98 per cent chance of successful entry into the UK within three months. Syed Kamran Haider, the chief executive of Mirpur Visa Consultant (MVC) in the Pakistan-administered region of Kashmir, was found to be operating openly online, where he advertises loopholes in the UK asylum system, which experts described as 'easy to manipulate'. The investigation raises further questions for Sir Keir Starmer, whose premiership has been partly defined by a growing migration crisis. The Prime Minister came under further pressure this month over details of his 'one in, one out' migration, which will only see 50 people per week sent back. While small boat crossings hit record highs, The Telegraph investigation found that migrants from Pakistan were also gaining backdoor entry into the UK. There were 10,542 asylum applications filed last year by Pakistanis – more than from any other country – representing an 80 per cent increase from the year before, government data show. But Pakistanis have never been among the top 10 nationalities arriving in the UK via small boats. Harjap Bhangal, a UK-based immigration lawyer, said: 'They don't need to come on small boats because they come on visas. They are one of the biggest groups that come on visas, and don't go back.' Mr Haider's MVC firm, identified by The Telegraph, is charging thousands of pounds to falsify their clients' documents, including fake CVs and bank statements, to use in their visa applications. These documents are required as applicants must demonstrate they fit a number of eligibility criteria, including the ability to support themselves in the UK. The Telegraph obtained falsified paperwork – a fake CV and letter attesting to employment history – that it understands was produced by MVC and submitted in a UK work visa application that was ultimately successful. A fake letter supporting the migrant's application purported to be from 'Riaz International Hospital' in Mirpur. It 'certified' that the Pakistani individual had worked from March 1 2019 to May 5 2020 as a nursing care assistant in the hospital. The letter had grammatical errors, including a line that read: 'During this period, her services were found to be satisfactory in caring out the job duties.' One of the responsibilities stated was nonsensical: 'Responsible to take and record of vital signs in takes outputs empty drains.' The Telegraph found that 'Riaz International Hospital' existed only for two years from 2012 to 2014, serving as a temporary location when the original Riaz Hospital Mirpur was undergoing renovations. Dr Riaz Ahmed, the chief executive of the real Riaz Hospital Mirpur since it opened in 1978, said that the letter The Telegraph reviewed was a 'bogus certificate', as it lacked an official hospital seal and a legitimate signature. He also confirmed that the letter listed an incorrect address and old phone numbers no longer in use by the hospital. Nobody picked up when The Telegraph called those numbers. A false CV created by MVC for the same visa applicant also claims past employment at Riaz International Hospital, and describes a range of responsibilities for the purported job, including 'treat emergency injuries' and 'record patients' medical records and monitor vital signs'. It lists educational certifications, all purportedly to be obtained in Mirpur, located in the disputed region of Kashmir – also where MVC is headquartered. With these fake documents, that person was granted a skilled worker visa that allowed her to enter the UK in 2023, according to documents reviewed by The Telegraph. She is understood to have remained in Britain ever since. In most instances, people claiming asylum cannot work in the UK while their cases are being decided – a process that can take more than a year, given a backlog of applications waiting to be reviewed. But there is a loophole – those who first enter the UK on a work visa can retain their right to work while waiting for a decision from the Home Office on their asylum claims. The Home Office also processes visa applications. Mr Bhangal said: 'If you claim asylum before that visa runs out, you can still work. The Home Office is a broken institution... They are not realising where the loopholes are [and] what is being done, what migrants are doing.' MVC fees vary depending on whether the 'consultant' is providing fake documents for a student or work visa, and for which country. For instance, support for a UK visa starts at £32,700, while a work visa to Bulgaria is £9,150. On top of that, there are extra fees for the consultant (£200), 'file-making' costs (£30) and a specific fee for creating fake bank statements (£2,615). Even an initial video call of a few minutes with the MVC director requires payment of about £15. Mr Haider, boasting of his success rate, told a Telegraph reporter posing as a potential client: 'I will do everything, I will support. Five to seven lakh Pakistani rupees (£1,300 to £1,800) will be spent on creating a bank statement… The bank statement will be from Mirpur. It is no problem, and no one will ask you why [the statement] is from Mirpur. 'God forbid, if the visa isn't approved, the costs for the bank statement, visa and my fees are non-refundable.' He also offered a more affordable option – a UK student visa application. 'In this way, a person can go for around 40 to 45 lakh Pakistani rupees (£10,500 to £12,000), and then find some way or solution after arriving there.' Mr Haider features in a vast series of videos posted on YouTube and other social media sites, in which he gives a broad overview of various visa loopholes – how to enter France as a tourist, Belarus for blue-collar work, Canada for construction jobs, Greece for farm labour and Bulgaria for work without prior education. 'Good news for people who want to study or get a work permit in the UK!' he said in a video posted a month ago. Mr Haider, seated behind a desk, then explains how people who cannot afford his high fees of £40,000 to support a UK work visa, or do not score well on the IELTS test – an international standardised test of English proficiency required for some visas – can instead sign up for a diploma in nursing and midwifery to obtain a student visa. He said: 'The fee for this is £2,000 to £2,500. [The application] does not require IELTS… These people, if you go to the UK, can then convert it into a work permit. Jobs are available with a minimum wage of £23 per hour.' Mr Haider does not give the full details in his videos – someone entering the UK on a student visa for a nursing diploma program could later be eligible to apply for a work visa, but there is no guarantee that it will be approved. All of the videos end with a plug for his services: 'Those who want to apply, the contact numbers of our staff are provided below.' After exhausting options within the UK to remain, including applying for asylum, some people then submit a second asylum application to the European Union, in order to extend their time in Britain. Current rules require applicants to have 'genuine ties' to the EU – past residence or employment, or family already there. Those without such connections, however, can still submit what is essentially a fake application, which can buy them additional time to work in the UK while the claim is processed, noted Mr Bhangal. 'These visa 'consultants' are 'selling them a dream,' said Mr Bhangal. He added: '[They are] selling a product essentially to people who don't want to come back [home]. They have found their market. [It's] quite a sophisticated scam.' In May, Sir Keir announced that skilled workers will be required to have a degree to get a job in the UK under new laws as part of the Government's effort to reduce net migration. However, Mr Bhangal said the UK has an 'easy system to manipulate' as the Home Office is 'broken'. He said: 'The trend for Pakistanis is to get a visa and come over, then claim asylum – so the asylum claims come from students who don't go to university, or people who come on dodgy healthcare visas and then don't find work; and visitor visas, as a large number are people who come as families. 'The situation back home is just dire for these people, and they need to get out, [but] they don't want to run the risk of traipsing all over Europe. 'Literally, they've been promised the idea of – you sit on a plane, get off, get through immigration and then you can claim asylum.' Pakistanis fleeing for Europe leave for a number of reasons – some are persecuted because of their religious beliefs, while others hope to find greater economic opportunity. The real GDP per capita in Pakistan ranks among the lowest tier in the world, at around £3,970, according to the CIA World Factbook. In the UK, GDP per capita is more than ten times, at £40,000. The Telegraph has contacted the Home Office and Mr Haider for comment.
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Michael Gove reacts to ex-wife's comments as she claims 'everyone thinks he's gay'
Ex Tory politician Michael Gove has shared his reaction to ex-wife Sarah Vine's latest book, in which she speaks about their relationship, divorce and rumours around his sexuality Former politician Michael Gove has reacted to ex-wife Sarah Vine 's comments about him and their relationship, following her recent claims that "everyone's always thought Michael was gay". Sarah, 58, opens up about her 21-year marriage and its downfall in her book How Not To Be A Political Wife, which came out earlier this year. Appearing on Good Morning Britain today, Michael Gove, 57, was asked by presenter Ed Balls how he felt about his "mixed write-up" in the book after she wrote about how Brexit was responsible for their divorce. "I think that's probably fair," Michael said. "I think that it's in the nature of Sarah's writing that she writes without fear or favour." He added: "Sarah very kindly sent me a copy of the book before it was published and said, 'Is there anything in it that you really object to?' and I thought, 'I'm not going to be a censor.' "There are some bits in it that inevitably any husband or any friend of Sarah's will read and their eyes will be out on stalks but it's her voice." When asked whether he would do anything different after reading her criticism about their marriage, Michael said: "I think the most important thing is to spend as much time as possible, more time being present with your family." The ex Conservative politician admitted that he would often spend "an extra half hour" perfecting an argument or convincing someone to back what he was doing, when he should have been with his family. "It's a half hour that's away from your wife and your children." It comes just weeks after Sarah opened up about rumours around her ex-husband's sexuality while appearing on Best's Suddenly Single podcast. 'There were always rumours about Michael's sexuality," she said. "When I went on the skiing holiday [where she met him], one of the senior executives said, 'oh Michael, he's lovely but he's gay'. That was 30 years ago. "Everyone's always thought Michael was gay. I married him. Maybe I'm just deluded, but from all my evidence – two children! – even if he was gay … It wouldn't bother me. "If he'd said I need to get divorced because I'm gay that wouldn't have upset me. I think people need to be their authentic self, and if that's who you are then that's who you should be.' She added that they chose to separate before the Covid pandemic and that while politics had "done some damage", it was Brexit that was the final straw. "The fall out was incredibly toxic and personal. People on the Remain side were so vicious. I just wanted to run away from the whole thing and Michael had this desire to try and make it right. "After Theresa May took over, she fired him, and there was a period when he wasn't a front-line politician and that was quite good. I felt he was coming back, because you do lose them to politics, and then she rang him and said did he want to be Environment Secretary, and he went back in. That's when I thought, we really don't want the same thing anymore.'
