
The youth mobility scheme is just the start of a Brexit reversal
It is easy to argue in favour of joining an EU youth mobility scheme for 18 to 30-year-olds. Use those words and people tend to think about university students and graduates gaining experience of living in other countries. As supporters are eager to point out, we already have such arrangements with 13 countries, from Japan to Australia to Uruguay, and no one goes around saying that we have 'free movement' with those countries.
Then again, an EU scheme could end up with a very different balance. No one worries too much about our youth mobility scheme with Australia, for example, because more UK citizens take advantage of it than Australians – the latter of whom only filled 9,000 of the 45,000 places which were available last year (there is an argument for saying that the greater worry is why so few Australians want to come to Britain? Is it a symptom of national decline?).
A European scheme, on the other hand, may have a very different effect. The demographic which would benefit – 18-30 year olds – rather matches the large numbers of Eastern Europeans who took advantage of free movement during Britain's membership of the EU. It would end up as just another source of cheap labour for employers, which ends up suppressing wages and opportunities for UK workers at the bottom end of the jobs market.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper does sound alive to the risks of entering into a youth mobility scheme. She is reported to be pressing for EU citizens using such a scheme to be limited to twelve months in Britain; any longer and they will appear in official migration figures.
But it isn't just on free movement that Britain risks being drawn back into the EU's sphere of influence. Keir Starmer's reset in EU relations has already, quietly, led to Britain agreeing to mirror EU rules and regulations on food and agriculture. It could mean, unless Starmer succeeds in persuading the EU to allow Britain an exemption, the end of our newfound freedom to embrace gene-edited crops. EU regulations previously destroyed what had been a promising UK industry in genetically modified (GM) foods a quarter of a century ago by making it all but impossible to conduct field trials. We are heading towards the 'vassal state' which many Brexiteers feared.
I don't think we have seen the end of this process. We should expect more initiatives to draw us back towards EU rules and regulations. An 'ever closer union' might be one way of describing it. So long as every step is small, the government's diehard remainers might just get away with it.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
India resists EU's oversight proposal on capital flows citing sovereignty concerns, sources say
July 24 (Reuters) - India has pushed back against a proposal by the European Union as part of free trade agreement talks which would give the 27-nation bloc a say in decisions related to capital flows, two Indian government sources said. The proposal, unusual in most free trade agreements, has raised concerns in New Delhi over limiting its ability to act unilaterally during crises, as both sides aim to conclude the deal by the end of 2025. India has in the past imposed restrictions on outflows, including during a currency crisis in 2013. In its proposal to India, the EU has suggested an oversight committee on trade in services and investment policies which would review policy actions, including those taken during financial or balance of payments crises. "India fears such oversight could allow the committee to question or reverse crisis-time policy measures taken by it, which compromises a sovereign's decision-making powers," one of the sources said. India, which trades $190 billion in goods annually with the EU, has also sought clarity on whether decisions taken during emergencies, such as restrictions on capital flows, could be overturned if the committee finds them inappropriate. While trying to limit India's control over capital account decisions, the EU proposes it would have the right to impose temporary restrictions on capital outflows during serious economic difficulties. India argues this creates an imbalance in safeguard powers and deviates from the EU's own practice in FTAs with Vietnam, Singapore, and South Korea, where both sides can apply such measures in exceptional circumstances, the source said. Both sources declined to be identified as they are not authorised to the media. Emails sent to the Reserve Bank of India, Ministries of Finance and Commerce and to the Prime Minister's Office requesting comment did not receive a response. India's opposition to the EU's proposal comes as it negotiates deals with other trading partners including the U.S. and Australia. Accepting oversight or unequal safeguards could limit India's powers on domestic policies and may weaken its push for balanced trade pacts in the future, the sources said. "India has not had an agreement on the FTA so far because of issues such as every country in the bloc wants their point of view or interest to be included," a source from the Ministry of External Affairs said. The European Commission, in its report, opens new tab following the July round of negotiations in Brussels, said "good progress" had been made on capital movements, payments, and transfers, with discussions focused on remaining areas of divergence. India-EU trade talks have faced hurdles over the EU's push to cut import taxes on cars and dairy while seeking stricter climate and labour rules. India wants to protect local farmers, avoid rigid green rules, and keep control over legal disputes.


BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Waterlooville asylum accommodation 'inappropriate'
Former home secretary Suella Braverman has labelled Home Office plans to house asylum seekers in a Hampshire town centre as "utterly inappropriate".In a letter to current Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, she described the proposal for the former retail premises in Waterlooville as "insulting to local people".Havant Borough Council has been granted a 10-day consultation period on the proposals and its leader is set to have a meeting with the Home government department said it was in "active dialogue" with the local authority. Ms Braverman, Conservative MP for Fareham and Waterlooville, wrote such facilities made town centres "no-go zones for the patriotic, common-sense majority"."This plan will dump further pressure on policing, healthcare and public infrastructure, all while ignoring the legitimate concerns of residents who have been left voiceless."The MP, who has started a petition against the proposal, also stated on her website: "This site, in the centre of our town, is utterly inappropriate for migrant accommodation. It must be stopped."Ms Braverman was sacked as home secretary in November 2023, after she defied then prime minister Rishi Sunak over an article accusing the Metropolitan Police of bias in the policing of protests. 'Headline-grabbing' Havant Borough Council said it had not initially been consulted on the plans after Clearsprings, a procurement company employed by the Home Office for the project, had used an "incorrect email address" in a bid to contact the council has now been granted a 10-day consultation period on the proposals and the Labour leader Phil Munday is to attend a meeting with the Home said: "Everything is being done to ensure our voice is heard whilst dealing with a challenge being felt nationally."I look forward to the council providing a response that reflects the concerns of the borough."Mr Munday also criticised Ms Braverman for referring to asylum seekers as "illegal migrants" on her said: "They are categorically not recognised by the state as illegal immigrants - regardless of the headline-grabbing title of Suella Braverman's petition - and I urge people to consider this in their views and actions."The Home Office said: "We are working to fairly disperse asylum seekers across the country, consulting closely with local authorities and listening to local concerns." You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.

Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
EU-China summit live: Tariffs, Ukraine and rare earths dominate talks amid tense relations
What's happening? Chinese and European Union leaders are holding a summit EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is in Beijing She hopes to 'advance and rebalance' the relationship European Council President Antonio Costa also attending Both met Chinese President Xi Jinping Von der Leyen wants to rebalance EU-China relations 00:16 EDT Von der Leyen has said it is essential to rebalance bilateral relations between the EU and China. She called relationship "one of the most important and consequential in the world." Still, she said the relationship has reached an inflection point, according to media footage of the summit. Xi says EU should make 'correct' choices 26 minutes ago 00:05 EDT Chinese President Xi Jinping has said the EU should "make correct strategic choices", state media reported. He also said the EU and China should increase mutual trust and cooperation. What we know about the summit 42 minutes ago 23:48 EDT The EU-China summit will likely feature trade talks regarding China's rare earth exports, and its impact. In an apparent response to the U.S. tariffs placed on Chinese imports, China implemented 'non-discriminatory' export controls that don't necessarily target a specific country. Yet the controls have had drastic effects on the European Union economy. Rare earth exports are necessary to make magnets for car engines and transmissions for EV, defence, and clean energy industries. As the tariffs has slowed exports to the U.S., the excess EV vehicles have been rerouted to the EU, causing a slow in demand for domestic producers. Moreover, because they do not have the materials they need to produce like batteries, they must rely on Chinese imports. China produces about 90% of the world's rare earth, and its export controls is a retaliatory card it's pulled in the past. In 2010, they instituted controls on Japan when there was a Pacific region conflict between a Chinese trawler and two Japanese Coast Guard ship. EU hopes to 'advance and rebalance' China ties at summit 44 minutes ago 23:46 EDT European Union Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa are meeting with Chinese leaders in Beijing. Thursday's EU-China summit is an opportunity to "both advance and rebalance our relationship", von der Leyen said hours before talks began. Von der Leyen and Costa will raise thorny issues such as the trade imbalance, rare earths and Ukraine during meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang. The EU defines China as a "partner, competitor and systemic rival", which frames its strategic approach to China policy. Other issues, including electric vehicles, market access and Chinese industrial overcapacity, will also be raised by European leaders at the summit marking the 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the EU and China.