&w=3840&q=100)
UN says terrorist use of AI is 'very likely', calls for urgent action
A new UN report outlines how artificial intelligence could aid terrorists across cyber, physical and propaganda domains, and urges governments to act now
New Delhi
Artificial intelligence may soon become a fixture in terrorist arsenals, warns a new joint report by the United Nations Counter-Terrorism Centre (UNCCT) and the United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI).
Titled Algorithms and Terrorism: The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence for Terrorist Purposes, the May 2025 report outlines how AI could be used in cyberattacks, autonomous weapons, deepfake propaganda, and terrorist financing. Though no confirmed cases of AI being used in terrorist attacks have emerged so far, the report urges immediate global action, citing signs of growing interest and experimentation.
Expert survey underscores perceived threat
The UN agencies highlight four core concerns: the availability of open-source AI tools; scalability of attacks; the asymmetric advantage terrorists enjoy due to fewer legal constraints; and society's increasing dependence on digital infrastructure.
ISIL's early experiments with emerging tech
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant's (ISILs) early efforts demonstrate the trajectory. In 2016, the group reportedly tested self-driving cars in Syria and later developed a drone unit called the 'Unmanned Aircraft of the Mujahedeen'. In 2020, an ISIL supporter shared a video showing how facial recognition might identify targets despite attempts to obscure identity—suggesting a basic awareness of AI's potential.
AI applications across cyber, finance and weapons
The report warns of AI being used to automate password cracking, enhance ransomware, and deploy drone swarms. In financial operations, deepfake videos could be used to impersonate trusted figures, while AI-powered bots may support fraudulent crowdfunding and obscure cryptocurrency flows.
Propaganda and recruitment in the age of AI
In the propaganda space, generative AI and social bots could reinforce extremist narratives by mimicking real users and amplifying echo chambers. These tools could improve online recruitment by simulating peer validation and ideological affinity.
Call for regulation and global coordination
'The potential for the malicious use of Artificial Intelligence for terrorist purposes merits the close attention of the international community,' the report concludes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir Issues Threats Against India, Repeats Kashmir Rhetoric After Pahalgam Terror Attack
Pakistan's Army Chief Asim Munir has once again threatened India and repeated his calls for a 'Free Kashmir' after his 'jugular vein' remark. He also backed terror and termed it a 'legitimate struggle.' read more With Munir's 'promotion', Pakistan now has two illegitimate power centres in military and civil domains. Image: X/ @NotCMShehbaz Pakistan's Army Chief and the self-proclaimed Field Marshal, Asim Munir, has once again issued threats against India and repeated his 'Free Kashmir' rhetoric following his full of hate 'jugular vein' remark. Speaking at the Pakistan Naval Academy in Karachi on Saturday, Munir blamed India — without offering any evidence — for the recent rise in tensions following the 22 April terror attack in Pahalgam. However, it is a blatant truth that Pakistan, through its proxy groups, continues its policy of terrorism against India. Whenever India retaliates in self-defence, Islamabad shifts the blame onto India. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Munir described Pakistan as a 'net regional stabiliser' and claimed that Islamabad had firmly responded to what he called 'unprovoked' Indian military actions. 'Despite provocations, Pakistan has shown restraint and maturity, reaffirming its commitment to regional peace,' he said. He accused India of deliberately stoking tensions in the region, especially as Pakistan claims it is close to eliminating terrorism. Fresh Kashmir rhetoric after 'Jugular Vein' remark In his speech, Munir once again raised the Kashmir issue, urging Pakistanis to remember the 'sacrifices of our Kashmiri brothers struggling against India's illegal occupation.' 'Pakistan strongly supports a fair resolution of the Kashmir dispute in line with UN resolutions and the wishes of the Kashmiri people,' he said. A few days before the Pakistan-backed terror attack in Pahalgam, Munir had stirred tensions by declaring Kashmir as Pakistan's 'jugular vein.' 'Kashmir is our jugular vein; it will remain our jugular vein; we will not forget it,' he told members of the Pakistani diaspora abroad. Though the reality is that Pakistan has long been facing insurgency in Balochistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and PoK after mass disappearances, human rights violations, and depriving people there of basic amenities. Less than a week after Munir's 'jugular vein' statement, Pakistan-backed terrorists killed over two dozen male tourists in Kashmir's scenic Pahalgam region. In response, India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, dealing a significant blow to Pakistan. It also launched Operation Sindoor, targeting and destroying terror launchpads deep inside Pakistani territory. Following this, India and Pakistan exchanged cross-border fire for four days. During the clashes, India carried out strikes on several Pakistani air bases, weakened the Pakistan Army's capabilities, and successfully defended itself against missile and drone attacks. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pakistan and its backed terror groups continue to launch attacks in India, killing innocent people. India has suffered greatly from Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, from the 26/11 attacks in Mumbai to the latest Pahalgam attack. Pakistan, and its de facto ruler, the deep-state army, cannot defeat India in a direct war, so they remain engaged in a proxy conflict, following the policy of 'bleeding India with a thousand cuts.' Since then, India has established a new normal of responding to Pakistan and terrorism with force. This has been evident since the Uri attack, after which surgical strikes were carried out. Notably, India also conducted air strikes inside Pakistan in Balakot following the Pulwama attack. The military actions and standoffs were visible to the world after the Pahalgam attack.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
'Can't undo knowledge, capacity': IAEA chief claims Iran could restart uranium enrichment 'in months'; says it didn't have nuclear weapons
Rafael Grossi (left), and excavators at tunnel entrances at the Fordo facility in Iran on Friday, June 27, 2025 (right) The head of the UN nuclear watchdog International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, has said Iran may be able to resume producing enriched uranium within months, despite recent airstrikes by the US and Israel on its nuclear sites. "They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that," Grossi, the director general of the IAEA said Friday, according to a transcript of his interview released Saturday by CBS News Grossi said Iran's capabilities and expertise in nuclear technology remain intact despite damage to several facilities. "Iran had a very vast ambitious program, and part of it may still be there, and if not, there is also the self-evident truth that the knowledge is there. The industrial capacity is there. Iran is a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology, as is obvious," he said. "So you cannot disinvent this. You cannot undo the knowledge that you have, or the capacities that you have. It's a huge country, isn't it? So I think this should be the incentive that we all must have to understand that military operations or not, you are not going to solve this in a definitive way militarily. You are going to have an agreement. You are going to have an inspection system that will give everybody… the assurances that we can definitely turn the page," he added. While Iran's nuclear capabilities remain a concern for several countries, Grossi made clear that Iran does not possess nuclear weapons. "Let me be clear here… they have all these capabilities, but for the agency, first of all, they didn't have nuclear weapons. Okay? This needs to be said," he said. He added that the IAEA had found unexplained traces of uranium at undeclared sites in Iran. "We had found traces of uranium in some places in Iran, which were not the normal declared facilities. And we were asking for years, why did we find these traces of enriched uranium in place x, y or z? And we were simply not getting credible answers. If there was material, where is this material? So there could be even more. We don't know,' he said. 'This is why… I think we need to go back.' He also said that the IAEA does not know the current location of Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium. "We don't know where this material could be," Grossi told CBS News. "So some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved. So there has to be at some point a clarification." Grossi added, "We need to be in a position to ascertain, to confirm what is there, and where is it and what happened." Iran has rejected Grossi's request to visit the damaged sites, including the Fordoo facility, and its lawmakers have voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA. Israel carried out a bombing campaign on June 13 targeting Iranian nuclear and military facilities, saying the strikes were to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, a claim Iran denies. The United States later struck three major sites linked to Iran's atomic program. US President Donald Trump said the attacks had set back Iran's nuclear capabilities "decades." Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi acknowledged the damage was "serious," though full details are still unknown. A major concern is whether Iran managed to move its stockpile of enriched uranium before the attacks. The country is estimated to have had about 408.6 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent. This is higher than levels used for civilian purposes but below weapons-grade. If further enriched, this amount could be used to produce over nine nuclear weapons. In an interview with Fox News, Trump said he did not believe the uranium stockpile had been moved. "It's a very hard thing to do plus we didn't give much notice," he said. "They didn't move anything."
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
5 hours ago
- First Post
IAEA chief warns Iran will likely go back to producing enriched uranium ‘in a matter of months'
Rafael Grossi, the head of the UN nuclear watchdog, warned that Iran is likely to go back to producing enriched uranium needed for making bombs in a 'matter of months,' despite strikes from Israel and the US read more The United Nations nuclear watchdog boss, Rafael Grossi, warned that Iran will likely be able to begin producing enriched uranium 'in a matter of months", despite damage it suffered due to Israeli and American strikes. West Asia was rattled after Israel launched Operation Rising Lion , targeting Iran's nuclear and military facilities on June 13. At that time, the Israeli authorities argued that the strikes were necessary since Iran was just a few weeks away from developing nuclear weapons, an ambition the Islamic Republic has consistently denied. The US government subsequently bombed three key facilities used for Tehran's atomic program, with the country's President Donald Trump assuring that the sites were completely 'obliterated'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that the extent of the damage to the nuclear sites is 'serious'. However, Iran has kept the details of destruction hidden. When asked how far Iran's nuclear ambitions have been pushed back, Trump said that Tehran's nuclear program had been set back 'decades'. Grossi issues a serious warning On Saturday, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency warned that some of Iran's nuclear infrastructure 'is still standing'. 'They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that,' Grossi said in an interview with CBS News. Grossi maintained that another key question that emerges in the aftermath of the conflict is whether Iran was able to relocate some or all of its estimated 408.6kg (900lbs) stockpile of highly enriched uranium before the attacks. Before the strikes, it was found that Iran's uranium is enriched to 60 per cent above levels for civilian usage but still below weapons grade. If it is further refined, it would theoretically be sufficient to produce more than nine nuclear bombs. 'We don't know where this material could be,' Grossi admitted. 'So some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved. So there has to be, at some point, a clarification," he furthered. Trump administration thinks otherwise In the midst of all this, Iranian lawmakers have voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, rejecting Grossi's request for a visit to the damaged sites. 'We need to be in a position to ascertain, to confirm what is there, and where it is, and what happened,' Grossi said. In a separate interview with Fox News, US President Donald Trump said he did not think the stockpile had been moved from the nuclear facilities. 'It's a very hard thing to do, plus we didn't give much notice,' the US president said, according to excerpts of the interview. 'They didn't move anything.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On Saturday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio reiterated Washington's support for 'the IAEA's critical verification and monitoring efforts in Iran,' commending Grossi and his agency for their 'dedication and professionalism.'
