Exposure to Antibiotics Preterm May Affect Lung Function
METHODOLOGY:
The study analyzed 3820 premature infants born between 22 and 36 weeks of gestation with low birth weights (< 1500 g); the infants were enrolled from 58 hospitals across Germany over an 8-year period starting in January 2009.
Researchers divided the infants into three groups: Low-risk, or those exposed via their mothers who were given surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the 30 minutes before delivery; intermediate-risk, or children exposed prenatally and after birth; and high-risk, or children who had been exposed within 7 days of delivery prenatally, again at 30 minutes prior to birth, and after birth.
The primary outcome was the lung function and the amount of air each infant exhaled in the first second of forced exhalation, measured at ages 5-7 years. Secondary outcomes included the total amount of air exhaled or forced vital capacity and asthma episodes during childhood.
The analysis included 3109 participants born by cesarean delivery, with 292 (9.4%) in the low-risk group, 1329 (42.7%) in the intermediate-risk group, and 1488 (47.9%) in the high-risk group.
TAKEAWAY:
Children with intermediate risk scores had poorer lung function than those with low risk scores, as shown by lower forced exhalation in one second outcomes (β, −0.31; 95% CI, −0.59 to −0.02; P = .03).
= .03). Those with high-risk antibiotic exposure vs intermediate risk had lower forced vital capacity scores (β, −0.23; 95% CI, −0.43 to −0.03; P = .02).
= .02). Children with the highest level of exposure to antibiotics had a higher risk for early childhood asthma episodes than those with intermediate risk (odds ratio, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.32-2.76; P = .001).
IN PRACTICE:
'Early identification of high-risk neonates may enable targeted strategies to support respiratory health and optimize long-term outcomes,' the study authors wrote.
SOURCE:
The study was led by Ingmar Fortmann, MD, of the Department of Pediatrics at the University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein at Campus Lübeck in Lübeck, Germany. It was published online on May 12 in JAMA Network Open .
LIMITATIONS:
The study had a low median follow-up rate that varied across clinics. The researchers did not have details on the dosage of antibiotics. Only children well enough to take lung function tests were included. Infants who received more antibiotics already had poor health status, which may have accounted for some of the findings.
DISCLOSURES:
One or more study authors reported receiving financial support fromthe Advanced Clinician Scientist Program and Section of Medicine at the University of Lübeck, personal fees from Chiesi, and grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. No other disclosures were reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
HRT ‘can raise breast cancer risk' in younger women
Hormone replacement therapy can raise the risk of breast cancer in some younger women, a Lancet study suggests. An international team of researchers found the treatment was not linked to young onset breast cancer overall. But oestrogen plus progestin therapy appears to increase breast cancer risk by 10 per cent. Meanwhile, oestrogen hormone therapy use appeared to decrease breast cancer risk by 14 per cent. Hormone replacement therapy is a treatment used to help menopause symptoms. There are different types of HRT, which is used to treat menopause symptoms, available. They contain different hormones: some are oestrogen products; others contain progestogen and other types have both. These medicines can be taken or used in different ways and work by replacing the hormones oestrogen and progesterone, which can fall to lower levels as women approach the menopause. Most studies examining links between hormone therapy and breast cancer risk have been explored in older women. Previous work, which has focused on women who have already been through the menopause, suggest that oestrogen plus progestin hormone therapy is a risk factor for breast cancer. The researchers, led by academics from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences in the US, wanted to explore the risks among younger women on hormone therapy – who may take these drugs after gynaecological surgery or during perimenopause. The new meta-analysis published in the journal, Lancet Oncology, examined data drawn from previous studies of 459,476 women aged 16 to 54 years old. Some two per cent of this group (8,455) developed young-onset breast cancer, which means the disease was diagnosed before they were 55 years old. And 15 per cent of women involved in the study reported using hormone therapy, with oestrogen plus progestin hormone therapy and oestrogen being the most common types. 'Although the strength of these associations might vary by age at first use, duration of use, gynaecological surgery status, and other factors, unopposed oestrogen hormone therapy use appears to decrease breast cancer risk and oestrogen plus progestin therapy appears to increase breast cancer risk,' the authors wrote. 'The findings can be used to augment clinical recommendations for hormone therapy use in young women, for whom guidance was previously scarce.' Dr Kotryna Temcinaite, the head of research communications at Breast Cancer Now, said: 'These results are largely in line with what we already know about taking HRT for menopausal symptoms and its effects on breast cancer risk – for most people, the risk of developing breast cancer because of taking HRT is small and is outweighed by the benefits. 'Taking HRT is a very personal decision and, as such, it's vital that everyone has the information they need on the benefits and risks, discusses them with their GP or specialist team and is supported to make the choice that's right for them.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dino disco: 100-million-year-old giant courtship arena discovered in Colorado
At Dinosaur Ridge, researchers uncovered a remarkable and unusual site where dinosaurs gathered and performed mating dances over 100 million years ago—and it might be the largest 'lekking' area ever found. A team of paleontologists recently published their groundbreaking discovery of possibly one of the most significant mating sites from the dinosaur age. 'Lekking' refers to the elaborate mating dances that male dinosaurs would present to females. Today, some modern birds carry on this ancient tradition as descendants of the dinosaurs. In these displays, males engaged in energetic movements while females observed and selected a partner based on the performance. Researchers had previously noted the existence of five fossilized scrape marks at Dinosaur Ridge. After a closer investigation, however, they discovered much more than a few traces of this ritual. Aerial images revealed 35 marks made by different dinosaurs, making this former wetland home to one of the largest mating destinations in the ancient world. Once upon a time, 100 million years ago, many species walked through this former wetland, such as duck-billed hadrosaurs and ostrich-like herbivores. They left track marks in the soft Earth. Nearby, researchers discovered that they marked solid rock on a slope with a more dynamic set of traces, suggesting they began their mating rituals here. Paleontologists gathered aerial images of the site, which is, in a humorous twist of fate, closed to foot traffic to preserve and protect the track marks. They did not expect to uncover what appeared to be a space more like a dance club where dinosaurs would gather and dance, hoping to secure a mate. Dr. Caldwell Buntin of Old Dominion University, the study's lead author, told IFLScience that Martin Lockley, who first identified the trace fossils, determined they were likely related to mating displays after ruling out other possibilities such as nesting, foraging, territorial marking, or water-seeking behavior. Buntin and his team wanted to evaluate the validity of Lockley's findings that these were, in fact, traces of a mating dance using a data-driven approach. High-resolution drone imagery revealed 35 Ostendichnus, the scientific name for this specific type of claw marks associated with the dance of sex, according to the study. Buntin told Science that he believed Ornithomimids, or ostrichlike herbivores, and Acrocanthosaurus, which looks like a both used this sacred ground to populate their species. These markings—bowl-shaped and long and thin as if the dinosaurs kicked back their feet—were clustered together at different layers of the rock. Researchers understood that the element of time was present. These dinosaurs returned to this site over generations to put themselves out there—to attract a female. 'These traces were generated by backward kicking movements repeated by both the left and right foot,' Buntin said. In interpreting the choreography, researchers understood that the dinosaurs turned clockwise and scraped their claws through the sand. The circular markings suggest that, later, they might have nested here. Scientists have only found three lekking sites worldwide. Already a rare discovery, the site at Dinosaur Ridge might be 'the clearest case yet of a dinosaur display arena,' according to Amy Atwater, the site's director of paleontology. Buntin told Science that future work might require the state of Colorado to allow researchers to visit it, so they can study the traces of mating up close, as they still cannot make any definitive statements as to who these markings belong to. Nonetheless, some of it is open to the public, so dinosaur lovers can visit one of the world's only and most popular hiking sites. This site stands to contribute to the field and provide new insights into the ancient beasts that once ruled the Earth—the dinosaurs. The discovery of 35 scrape sites offers new insight into dinosaur courtship, showing they likely performed display behaviors to attract mates. The study was published in the journal Cretaceous Research.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Non-alcoholic beer might also be bad for you, scientists find
In something of a dent to the usually healthy image attributed to non-alcoholic beer, researchers have found that such drinks mostly have "an unfavourable metabolic impact" on drinkers, a reason for concern to those trying to manage glucose levels. Following tests in which 44 "young men" drank around a pint of non-alcoholic beer (NAB) a day for a month, the researchers said they observed "metabolic alterations" that sent glucose and fat levels up. The rise in glucose and fat was likely caused by sugar and other "caloric content" in the buzz-free beers, according to the study, published in the journal Nutrients. The team led by Germany's Ruhr-University Bochum and including scientists from the University of California San Diego, St. Louis University and the University of the Basque Country, said they set out to investigate how "daily consumption" of NAB affected "glucose and fat metabolism, body composition and liver function." Of the three categories of booze-free beer studied, pilsener-type drinks were the least bad, the team reported, with wheat-based pints and mixed drinks — the kind with sweeteners or soda blended in — leading to metabolic effects similar to those of fizzy sweet drinks, which have long been a bête noir for health campaigners. Sales of drinks with little or no alcohol have grown in recent years, with the UK, known for its boozy culture, seeing a doubling of sales to almost 1.3 million hectolitres in 2023, going by data put together by drinks industry analysis company IWSR. The study is not the first to undermine the health credentials of booze-free beer, the recent market success of which follows decades of warnings about how alcohol can lead to liver disease and addiction, often with devastating consequences for families of the drinker. In 2023, researchers at Cornell Agritech published proof that zero-alcohol drinks are more susceptible to bacterial contamination than real beer, where the alcohol acts as an "antimicrobial hurdle."
