Kylie Moore-Gilbert was falsely imprisoned in an Iranian jail cell while her husband had an affair... now she has some incredible news to share
Kylie Moore-Gilbert was held in Evin and Qarchak prisons in Tehran from September 2018 after she was arrested by the intelligence arm of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard when she tried to fly out of the country after attending a conference.
Once she was finally freed and allowed to return home to Australia in November 2020, Dr Moore-Gilbert discovered her then-husband, Ruslan Hodorov, had started a new relationship with her University of Melbourne colleague and PhD supervisor, Kylie Baxter.
She divorced Mr Hodorov soon after.
Dr Moore-Gilbert then met her new partner, broadcaster and comedian Sami Shah, on a dating app before the pair had a daughter in 2023. Now they are expecting a baby boy in October.
'I knew I wanted to have kids when I was in prison,' she told the High Steaks podcast.
'You think at length about all kinds of life choices and what matters in your life.
'It was a source of great angst to me that I had this 10-year prison sentence and I could potentially be 41-years-old by the time I was released from prison and maybe I'd never have that opportunity to have a family.'
Dr Moore-Gilbert, the cousin of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, was arrested after two people she attended a conference alongside flagged her as 'suspicious'.
An Iranian Revolutionary Court judge sentenced her to 10 years' incarceration in a secret trial where no evidence against Dr Moore-Gilbert was presented.
Dr Moore-Gilbert believes she was a victim of hostage diplomacy.
Five years after her release, Dr Moore-Gilbert said she felt gratitude she had met Mr Shah, who has a 16-year-old daughter from a previous marriage.
'I never expected at the time to find someone so quickly,' she says.
'I'm really, really fortunate and, you know, maybe the universe owed me a round of good luck.'
Though she expressed trepidation at being a 'boy mum' in today's society, highlighting the need for boys to have male role models, particularly in online spaces where misogynistic views are prolific.
'It really concerns me,' she said.
'I think it's lucky that my partner, Sammy, is quite a feminist dad, and he's very open-minded, and having gender equality is important to him.
'That ethos coming through from the family and those values coming through from the family is really important.'
Dr Moore-Gilbert who survived being kept in a freezing, tiny cell and subject to psychological torture, said the task of parenting two kids under the age of three was still daunting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Terrorists teaching prisoners how to make bombs
Terrorists inside British prisons are teaching organised criminals how to make bombs, according to a study. In return, extremist inmates are learning from gang members how to launder money, use the dark web and obtain weapons that could be used in terror attacks. It comes amid increasing warnings about the rising threat of Islamist gangs following attacks on prison officers in jails. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said: 'Extremists and career criminals now operate with near impunity inside some of this country's highest-security prisons. 'That is a complete failure of leadership – and a dangerous abdication of one of the state's core duties: maintaining order behind bars. 'When Islamist terrorists and organised crime figures are left to forge alliances, we aren't just witnessing a security lapse – we're watching a national threat incubate in plain sight. This cannot be allowed to continue.' Prisons have often been thought of as operating like universities of crime, with inmates learning how to become more accomplished thieves, fraudsters and even drug dealers. But according to a new report, that knowledge exchange is starting to take place between ordinary criminals and terrorist inmates. Described as the prison crime-terror nexus, a study has found terrorists are learning illegal financial techniques to better fund their operations, while gang members and organised criminals are discovering how to assemble devastating new weapons to use against their rivals Drawing on interviews with prison officers, former governors, counter terror officials and prisoners, the research suggests divisions that may have once existed between terrorists and other inmates are beginning to break down. Dr Hannah Bennett, author of the study, said: 'Some prisoners are coming out knowing how to make a bomb. Others are learning how to use the dark web or commit financial crime. For many, it's about protection – but it's also about opportunity.' The study warns that a failure to identify and disrupt these exchanges risks allowing violent alliances to flourish both inside and beyond the prison walls. In some cases, released prisoners have continued hybrid activity – either joining gangs with ideological leanings or aiding terror networks in evading surveillance. The report points out how the terrorists behind the devastating 2004 Madrid bombings financed the operation through drug dealing while al-Qaeda operatives have also been known to raise money through sophisticated credit card fraud operations. Dr Bennett warned that the most fertile institutions for such a crossover are maximum security prisons where there is evidence of corruption, violence and a lack of oversight. She described these prisons as 'black hole' environments, adding: 'Where you have violent, chaotic prisons with no consistent regime and inmates who are co-located without proper oversight, the risk is exponentially higher.' One inmate who was interviewed for the study said the authorities seemed oblivious to what was going on. He said: 'We are blind to it. There are prisoners coming out more radicalised, more connected and more capable – and no one's clocking it.' Prof Ian Acheson, a former prison governor who also served in the Home Office as the director of community safety, said: 'We have several 'black hole' prisons where a combination of weak authority, inexperience and poor leadership means the state has effectively surrendered the environment to prisoners. 'The Chief Inspector of Prisons keeps identifying these places and it is extremely concerning to see some of our high-security prisons are in that number. 'Here, ideologically inspired offenders and organised crime leaders can mix freely. Where you have such lethal capacity cheek by jowl with people with the capability to obtain weapons and help escapes there is an enduring risk to national security. 'It's a perfectly rational partnership for those whose only interest is profit. And it can happen in prisons where ferocious violence and staff retreat is becoming the norm.' The findings come after several high-profile attacks on prison officers and reports of drones delivering drugs into prisons. In April, Hashem Abedi, the Manchester Arena bomber, who is serving life for 22 murders, attacked three officers in a separation unit at the high security HMP Frankland, in Co Durham. And in May, Axel Rudakubana, the Southport killer, allegedly threw boiling water from his kettle over an officer at HMP Belmarsh. Dr Bennett's report calls for urgent reform of prison intelligence strategy, including improved staff training, a clear operational definition of the prison nexus threat, and a structured assessment tool to identify high-risk jails. She concluded: 'The risk is not just ideological or criminal – it's both. If we continue to treat them in silos, we're going to miss what's happening in the overlap.' Ministers must pay attention to this insight into how terrorists and criminals work together in prisons By Prof Ian Acheson Prisons are traditionally places where alliances are made between criminals who see incarceration as an occupational hazard. Criminologists find this opportunistic behaviour, if distasteful, perfectly rational. When I worked in the prison service in the 1990s, an inordinate amount of my time was spent trying to disrupt and deter organised criminals and paedophiles from networking to extend their power on either side of the prison walls. This cosy old paradigm has been changed forever by the inclusion in the prison population of increasing numbers of terrorist offenders. People who kill for ideas are very different from those after money or sexual deviants. But the idea they cannot cooperate is dangerously naive and woefully under researched. This is why newly released research into the Prison Crime Terror Nexus by Dr Hannah Bennett is so significant. Dr Bennett is one of those rare researchers who combines theoretical and operational experience. We met at the University of Staffordshire and I have supported her work which I am glad to see published. Ministers should pay great attention to this study. Today's prison environment is poisoned by drugs and extreme violence. Terrorists attacks on prison staff have avoided death by millimetres and seconds. The potential for those with the capability to give support to those with the capacity for terrorism is not an abstract idea, it is a real and present danger. Dr Bennett has offered an insight into how terrorists and criminals work together in the prison environment for mutual benefit. Her findings are the result of multiple interviews with prisoners and prison professionals, many detailing a chilling degree of mutual cooperation and a high degree of dysfunction in intelligence collection and dissemination from the front line to the HQ boardrooms. In part this breakdown reflects the different objectives of the prison service and policing. I know from personal experience just how difficult it is to get senior officials at the headquarters level to understand their primary role in protecting national security. Too many prison professionals at senior levels subscribe to a kind of 'reclamation theology' that puts saving souls ahead of hard nosed threat management. This cultural blindness contributes to what Dr Bennett calls with rather more delicacy than I am capable as the 'intelligence capability gap'. This lack of appetite to join the dots and do something about it is most apparent in how Dr Bennett adopts and extends the theory of 'black hole prisons'. These places are akin to failed states where rampant instability, weak or absent authority, corruption, poor leadership and a rampant drugs economy create voids of power quickly filled an exploited by stronger forces such as gangs and extremists. Dr Bennett has taken this theory and applied it to identify the meeting points of organised crime and terrorism in some of our allegedly most secure prisons. These are places like HMPs Belmarsh, Long Lartin, Whitemoor and Frankland that hold the majority of our terrorist offenders in close proximity to crime family bosses and postcode gang leaders. These are not places where it possible to say the state is fully in control. Cooperation between these groups is likely when shared opportunities and goals transcend ideological differences or any adverse consequences. This is not an altogether new phenomenon. In 1994 at Whitemoor prison, shortly after it opened, IRA terrorists escaped the prison briefly with a London gangster Andy Russell. Russell was serving a sentence for hijacking a helicopter to spring two prisoners from HMP Gartree some years before. All had been held in the special security unit (SSU) a supposedly escape proof prison within a prison. Staff there had been so intimidated the gang was able to smuggle in weapons and explosives. In some of the high-security prisons I have listed today, cell window drone deliveries make it at least theoretically possible that the drugs payload they have controlled by organised criminals could have weapons and ammunition included. We are closer to ths reality than any official is prepared to admit. Dr Bennett has offered a framework for prison bosses to identify where this nexus is likely to emerge. 'Prisoners are in control' When I worked in prison order and control at a national level, our preoccupation was identifying the characteristics of prisoners who would cause riots and ensuring that there was a balanced mix across all establishments to prevent disorder. It is somewhat paradoxical that the threat or widespread disorder has receded today in large part because prisoners are in control of an environment where drugs are easily available and authority is in retreat. This Faustian pact will not hold where ideologically motivated prisoners are located. For many, not all of these terrorist offenders, the war against the state goes on and the targets have merely changed from civilians to the men and women in uniform looking after them. It is vital that meticulous research like Dr Bennett's is seen and considered by ministers and not through the lens of bureaucrats who have allowed this nexus to flourish. Terrorists and organised criminals have worked together before and will do so again. The stakes are very high.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Classified report to reveal full scale of Iranian threat to UK
Iran is still trying to assassinate dissidents on British soil, a parliamentary report based on classified intelligence is set to warn. A study by Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee will also show the damage caused by Tehran through cyber attacks aimed at UK companies. The Telegraph understands the findings will conclude that Iran remains one of the biggest state-based threats to the UK, in the same bracket as China and Russia. Continued attempts by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which has been crippled by Israeli assassinations in recent months, to meddle with the UK will also be laid bare. The report is more than 100 pages long and the result of two years of work. It has been compiled with interviews with Iranian experts at British intelligence services and access to classified documents. Starmer signed off the study Those familiar with the report's contents expect it to be a wake-up call for ministers about the persistent threat of Iran and its ability to act within the UK. Sir Keir Starmer has personally signed off the report. Unlike other parliamentary committees, the group's work is so sensitive the Prime Minister gets prior sight of conclusions. It comes at a time of heightened tensions in the Middle East following military action between Iran and Israel, and the US bombing of three Iranian nuclear facilities. Tehran had issued veiled threats that UK military bases in the Middle East could be targeted if there was British support for the Israeli air strikes that preceded the US bombing. The Prime Minister ended up not fully endorsing Donald Trump's military strike, refusing to admit whether it was legal or the right course of action. In January 2024, the UK Government imposed sanctions on Iranian officials it said were involved in threats to kill journalists. Last year Ken McCallum, the director-general of MI5, also used a rare public speech to reveal the scale of potential attacks being thwarted by the security services. Mr McCallum said over the last two years Iran had been behind 'plot after plot' in the UK, organised with 'an unprecedented pace and scale'. He added: 'Since January 2022, with police partners, we have responded to 20 Iran-backed plots presenting potentially lethal threats to British citizens and UK residents. 'As events unfold in the Middle East, we will give our fullest attention to the risk of an increase in – or a broadening of – Iranian state aggression in the UK. 'Like the Russian services, Iranian state actors make extensive use of criminals as proxies – from international drug traffickers to low-level crooks.' The Intelligence and Security Committee is expected to conclude in its report that Iran is continuing to make plots against people living in the UK. Dissidents of the regime on British soil will be singled out as being at risk. Threats of reprisal attacks on the European continent will also be flagged. The reports will also detail the IRGC's reach in Britain. The IRGC was founded as an ideological custodian of Iran's 1979 revolution but has since morphed into a major military, political and economic force in the country. There has been a long public debate about whether the IRGC should be formally declared a terrorist group and banned under a proscription process. Critics of the move, including those inside the Government, argue that it would limit the UK's ability to talk to and therefore influence senior Iranian political and military figures. The Intelligence and Security Committee is unlike other parliamentary committees in that all nine members are cleared to read confidential intelligence to help scrutinise the agencies. Its hearings are held in private. Reports with findings and recommendations are pulled together over a much longer timescale than other committees, with direct involvement from intelligence figures.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Iran's supreme leader the Ayatollah, 86, breaks cover with first appearance since Trump ordered Israel not to kill him
IRAN'S Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has broken cover for the first time since the 12-day war that saw the US and Israel strike Iran's nuclear sites. The 85-year-old appeared smiling on Saturday at a packed Tehran mosque - after reports he had spent days in a 'secure location'. 7 7 7 It was Khamenei's first live appearance since war broke out on June 13, when Israeli forces launched a sudden wave of airstrikes on Iran's nuclear sites. The US joined in days later, bombing three major sites on June 22 - including the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Facility. Top Iranian military commanders and nuclear scientists were reportedly killed in brutal Israeli strikes, forcing Khamenei to vanish from public view. Since the air war began, he has given only prerecorded speeches - sparking rumours about his safety. But footage aired by Iranian state media on Saturday showed the leader smiling and waving to a crowd of chanting supporters at a mosque. Dozens of people were seen attending the event to mark Ashura - the holiest day of the Shia Muslim calendar. His appearance comes 11 days after the ceasefire between Iran and Israel. Khamenei at the time appeared on state TV, boasting that Iran had dealt a 'slap to America's face' with a missile strike on a US airbase in Qatar. He said: 'The American regime entered a direct war because it felt that if it did not, the Zionist regime would be completely destroyed. "However, it gained no achievements from this war. Iran's Ayatollah breaks silence after WEEKS cowering in bunker during Israel's blitz and 'obliterating' Trump strikes 'Here, too, the Islamic Republic emerged victorious, and in return, the Islamic Republic delivered a severe slap to America's face.' US President Donald Trump took to social media to mock the claim and bragged that he had personally blocked an attempt to kill Khamenei. In a Truth Social post, Trump raged: "I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH. "And he does not have to say, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!' 7 7 7 7 "I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered, and would not let Israel, or the U.S. Armed Forces, by far the Greatest and Most Powerful in the World, terminate his life." Israeli officials had openly hinted that Khamenei was 'not off the table' as a potential target during the air war. But at the start of the war Trump claimed that while Khamenei was an "easy target", the US was "not going to take him out… at least not for now". The US president also blasted the supreme leader's claims that Iran won the war. He wrote: "Why would the so-called 'Supreme Leader,' Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, of the war-torn Country of Iran, say so blatantly and foolishly that he won the War with Israel, when he knows his statement is a lie, it is not so. "As a man of great faith, he is not supposed to lie." It comes as Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi - one of Iran's most hardline clerics - issued a religious fatwa calling for the deaths of both Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, branding them 'enemies of God'. What is a fatwa? By Sayan Bose, Foreign News Reporter A fatwa is a formal ruling or interpretation on a point of Islamic law issued by a Marja - a title given to the highest level of Twelver Shia religious cleric. It calls on Muslims, including the Islamic governments and individuals, to ensure its enforcement. In countries where Islamic law forms the basis of the legal system, a fatwa can be binding. A fatwa issued by Iran's first Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, in 1988 led to the mass execution of thousands of political prisoners - including some reportedly as young as 13 - during a two-month crackdown. The 1988 executions were revealed in the memoirs of Grand Ayatollah Hossein-Ali Montazeri, one of Ayatollah Khomeini's closest advisors who went on to condemn the act. In his memoirs, he accused prisoners of "waging war against God" and urged Death Commissioners in charge of the mass killings to "show no mercy". Another well-known Fatwa was issued against novelist Salman Rushdie in 1989 following the publication of his book, which was considered offensive by some within the Islamic community. In 2022, a man allegedly sympathetic to the Iranian regime attempted to attack Rushdie during a public event in New York.
