CR Nagpur Division holds seminar on ‘Combating plastic pollution'
1
2
Nagpur: Central Railway's Nagpur Division observed World Environment Day 2025 with a special seminar on the theme 'Combating Plastic Pollution' at Nagpur Railway Station. The event was aimed at promoting environmental awareness and encouraging sustainable alternatives to plastic use among passengers and staff.
As part of the awareness drive, cloth bags were distributed to passengers to discourage the use of single-use plastic. The initiative served as a practical example of individual contribution towards environmental protection.
Senior officials from various departments including engineering, medical, commercial, and security participated in the seminar. A large number of staff and passengers also attended, highlighting the collective commitment to building a cleaner, greener future.
During the seminar, railway officials spoke on the serious impact of plastic pollution on the environment and human health. They emphasised the urgent need to reduce plastic consumption and shift to eco-friendly habits in daily life. The event underlined Indian Railways' continued efforts to lead in sustainable practices and public engagement. Nagpur Division remains committed to adopting green initiatives and supporting the national movement for a plastic-free environment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
2 days ago
- India Today
6,238 technician posts to be filled by Railway Recruitment Board, apply by July 28
The Railway Recruitment Board (RRB) has kicked off the Technician Recruitment 2025 drive, with over 6,238 vacancies now open for application. If you're interested in becoming a Technician Grade-I Signal or Grade-III in Indian Railways, you can apply online at until July 28, RRB Technician recruitment 2025 application fee needs to be paid by July 30, and those who need to make corrections can edit their forms from August 1 to CAN APPLY FOR RRB TECHNICIAN JOBS?To apply, you must:Be aged 18–33 years for Technician Grade-I SignalBe aged 18–30 years for Technician Grade-III posts (as of July 1, 2025)RRB TECHNICIAN JOBS: SALARY AND VACANCIESTechnician Grade-I SignalPay Level: Level-5Monthly Salary: Rs 29,200Vacancies: 183Technician Grade-IIIPay Level: Level-2Monthly Salary: Rs 19,900Vacancies: 6,055RRB TECHNICIAN RECRUITMENT: DOCUMENTS YOU NEEDPassport-sized photo and signature (scanned)Valid ID (Aadhaar, PAN, Passport, etc.)Educational certificatesCaste/domicile certificate (if applicable)If you've already registered for any RRB exam in 2024, you don't need to sign up again. Just log in using the same TECHNICIAN RECRUITMENT: APPLICATION FEESRs 500 for General/OBC/EWSRs 250 for SC/ST/PH/Female candidatesFees must be paid online only—no offline applications are TO APPLY FOR RRB TECHNICIAN 2025Visit on 'CEN No. 02/2025 – Technician Recruitment 2025'Register and log inFill out the application formUpload your documentsPay the feeSubmit and download your confirmationadvertisementDirect link to apply for RRB Technician Recruitment 2025For zone-specific details, keep an eye on the regional RRB websites too.- Ends
Hindustan Times
5 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Aboard flagship Vande Bharat: Leaking coach roof soaks passengers; video sparks outrage
A journey aboard India's flagship Vande Bharat Express (22415) turned into a miserable experience for passengers on Monday when the roof of coach C7 began leaking during an eight-hour trip from Varanasi to Delhi, leaving several passengers drenched and fuming. The viral video shows water leaking from the AC duct of the train (Sourced) A video showing water pouring in through the coach ceiling went viral on social media, sparking widespread criticism of the Indian Railways and prompting a swift internal probe. The video was shared by Darshil Mishra, a final-year physical therapy student and one of the affected passengers, who alleged a lack of response from railway authorities despite repeated complaints. The Railways has placed V S Galhot, senior section engineer, Varanasi, under suspension for failing to ensure proper drainage during routine maintenance. 'On June 23, water leakage occurred in Coach C-7, 76 of Tr- 22415 (BSB–NDLS VB Exp) due to clogged drip tray holes, causing condensate seepage in the saloon area,' read DRM Lucknow X handle. It added, 'Punitive action has been taken against responsible staff and necessary modifications are underway to prevent recurrence.' Mishra said the onboard staff, instead of fixing the leak, switched off the AC near the affected berth, worsening the situation as passengers sat drenched in hot, humid conditions. He further claimed that the Railway Protection Force (RPF) personnel dismissed their concerns with a casual 'adjust kariye' and the Train Ticket Examiner never turned up. Despite tagging DRM Lucknow division on social media, Darshil said no assistance came. He has now filed a complaint with the consumer forum, seeking a refund. As criticism continues online, the railways have yet to issue a formal public statement. The incident has raised serious concerns about quality control and passenger safety aboard India's modern trains.
Indian Express
5 days ago
- Indian Express
The many wrong turns that led to Bhopal's infamous right-angle bridge
A newly constructed rail overbridge (ROB) in Bhopal, which made headlines for its almost 90-degree turn, has quickly gone from being the subject of memes to the subject of an investigation. And, as an enquiry gets underway to figure out what led to the peculiar construction, officials from the Madhya Pradesh Public Works Department (PWD) and the Indian Railways appear to be shifting blame. The 648-metre bridge in the Aishbagh area, which cost Rs 18 crore to build, was meant to eliminate long delays at railway crossings and shorten the commute for nearly three lakh people daily. KPS Rana, the engineer-in-chief of the PWD, told The Indian Express that the bridge's design was sanctioned in 2018 and was executed by a team originally from the bridge engineering department, comprising officials at the assistant engineer, superintendent engineer, executive engineer, and chief engineer levels. 'We have formed a committee to look into the role of these officials,' he said. Rana emphasised that the General Arrangement Drawing (GAD), a comprehensive layout plan necessary for all ROB projects, was prepared in collaboration with the Indian Railways and supervised within the PWD by the Chief Engineer (Bridges). G P Verma, the Chief Engineer (Bridges), refused to comment on the matter. Rana said the 'final approval' remained within the department of the Chief Engineer (Bridges), and 'the design did not escalate to higher authorities.' 'It was the bridge engineering department which had dealt with the design. The GAD was formulated with the help of railway officials and PWD officers. A private contractor was engaged to execute the work, and they also have a final role to execute the design in the later stages. If there had been better communication, we could have rectified the design or made an underbridge. The railway built its own ROB considering the space crunch,' he said. Rana said the project faced spatial constraints, and the issue of alignment should have been flagged earlier in the GAD formulation phase. 'There was a lack of communication between different departments over this. If we could have got this at the reception stage itself, the Railways could have denied giving approval to the project. Then we could have worked on a redesign,' he said. And so, the departments proceeded with the existing design, and alternatives such as an underground crossing or different alignment were not explored, Rana said. Railways spokesperson Naval Agarwal acknowledged that both departments had coordinated during the design phase and that Railways had raised early concerns about the alignment. 'We had done our job and built our portion of the ROB as per the GAD. We had communicated to the PWD through a letter some time ago on the design flaws. We did our job.' Anupam Awasthi, the Chief Project Manager, declined to comment in detail, stating only that he was not involved when the GAD was prepared and suggesting that any design flaws could have been addressed via a revision proposal at that time. 'If there was an approach problem, then there could have been a revision proposal. That was not done,' he said. The construction contract was awarded to M/s Puneet Chadha, a private firm based in Bhopal. Senior structure engineer Kailash Kushwaha, who worked on-site for two years, supervising a team of 60 people, said the design came directly from the PWD. He said that the bridge was constrained on one side by metro construction and on the other by an electrified railway line, limiting available space. He said they worked with the Chief Engineer (Bridges). 'The PwD had raised these issues of lack of space; it's mainly the railway department's fault that they did not coordinate with us,' Kushwaha alleged. The PWD has constituted a four-member committee, including two chief engineers and an executive engineer, on the orders of PWD Minister Rakesh Singh. This committee will assess the design, evaluate accountability, and recommend corrective measures. The safety measures under consideration include installation of speed breakers at five locations, mirrors for visibility at the 90-degree turn, reflective radium strips, speed limit signage, 20 new streetlights on the bridge, and widening the curve using girders at the triangle base of the ROB.
