Eastleigh river crash bus firm gives thanks to rescuers
The driver of the bus was hailed a "hero" on Friday by Dr John Fisher, who was one of the first to arrive on the scene.He helped rescue students and told the BBC: "It feels that he [the bus driver] tried to ditch it to avoid a head-on crash... it's a bit of a miracle."Another witness previously told the BBC the driver reported that his brakes and accelerator failed at the same time.
A spokesperson for Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary confirmed an investigation is ongoing.The force previously said the three students with serious injuries - two girls and one boy all aged 17 - were discharged from hospital.Of the 15 other passengers, aged between 16 and 18, three received hospital treatment.
Mr Tyldsley added: "As this is an ongoing police investigation, it would be inappropriate for anyone to comment on the cause of the crash."Along with the friends and families involved, we would like to extend our gratitude to those who witnessed the event and helped those in need at the scene."Thoughts right now are with all those who were injured."Police praised the bravery of members of the public and emergency services who helped rescue some of the trapped students and driver.Officers are continuing to urge any witnesses and anyone with relevant dashcam footage to come forward.
You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X, or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Parliament's chief bell ringer is hit with £100,000 court bill after ripping out banker neighbour's gate to his £2m west London home on day he moved in
Parliament's master bellringer has been hit with a £100,000-plus court bill after tearing out the front gates of his banker neighbour's £2m west London home. Retired financier Nicholas Partick-Hiley bought his mews cottage in Fulham, in August 2023, planning to make the property a dream home for his retirement alongside wife, Lisa. But the 64-year-old was shocked when he arrived on the day of completion to find his new neighbour bell-ringer neighbour, Adrian Udal, 65, demolishing the door and roller gate securing the front of his home. Mr Udal, who had lived next door to the couple's property for 30 years, insisted he had a right to do what he did as he owns the land the gate was on. However, the couple sued and won the case last month after Judge Nicholas Parfitt branded Mr Udal's actions 'wanton destruction' and 'carefully pre-planned'. And now Mr Udal - Secretary of the Belfry at St Margaret's Church, a medieval building next to Westminster Abbey which acts as place of worship for the Houses of Parliament - has been left facing a £100,000-plus bill after being ordered to pay the legal costs of the case. In a short hearing at Mayor's and City County Court, Judge Parfitt ordered him to pay £85,000 up front towards his neighbours' estimated £100,000-plus legal bill. He will also have to pay the couple £10,000 compensation for what he did, as well as his own lawyers' significant costs, which have not been revealed in court. Mr Udal is a veteran bell-ringer, whose Secretary of the Belfy role involves liasing with clergy when bellringing is needed for special church, state and parliamentary events, while he is proud to have 'rung in' the New Year almost every year since 2000. He also works as a broadcast editor and has a keen interest in antique clocks, while his wife, Helen, is also a campanologist, being bell tower captain at St Gabriel's Church Pimlico. Mr Partick-Hiley is a retired financier and former managing director and head of sales for North America investment banking specialists Panmure Gordon. During the trial last month, Judge Parfitt was told how the two neighbouring homes are in an unusual layout, with the Partick-Hileys' house located behind Mr Udal's property and reachable across a drive and through a passageway, which passes under part of his house and into their courtyard. The drive and passageway are owned by Mr Udal, but the Partick-Hileys have the right to pass over it to get to their house, the court heard. Explaining the background to the row, Mark Warwick KC, for the Partick-Hileys, said: 'On the day of completion, Mr Partick-Hiley arrived at the property at about 12.10. 'He was astonished to find Mr Udal and another man. The two men were in the process of destroying the door and gate. They were also disconnecting wiring that connected the property to various services. 'No advance warning of any kind had been given by Mr Udal, or anyone on his behalf, that such extraordinary behaviour was going to happen. 'Mr Partick-Hiley endeavoured to remain calm. He contacted his solicitors, he felt helpless. 'Mr Udal and (the other man) continued with their demolition work until about 5pm. 'His actions were plainly carefully pre-planned. No amount of persuasion, including the involvement of the police, has caused him to resile, or seemingly regret, his actions. 'The impact of these actions, and contentions, has been serious, their quiet enjoyment and actual enjoyment of their home has been disrupted.' The couple sued for an injunction against Mr Udal, claiming the right to put up new gates across the opening which leads to their house, citing 'security concerns' in the affluent street. They said they were aware of a conflict between their home's previous owner and Mr Udal before moving in, but thought it was settled until Mr Udal was witnessed dismantling the disputed gate. Through their solicitors, they had contacted him two months before the move, explaining that they planned to install 'better looking and more functional gates' once they moved in, although making clear they would welcome Mr Udal's input on the style and design of those gates. But in response, the couple alleged their new neighbour began to plot how to remove and install new gates, buying his own set of metal barriers on July 13, 2023, which Mr Warwick claimed showed that 'he was planning to carry out the destruction of the existing gates'. When the day of completion arrived, 'Mr Udal and his accomplice duly set about destroying the gates and disconnecting services running through the driveway', he added. Their barrister claimed Mr Udal had 'carefully planned' what he did and did so 'at a time to cause maximum disruption and distress.' Soon afterwards, the couple's lawyers wrote to Mr Udal insisting that the removed gates were their property and that it was up to them to decide what alternatives should be put in their place. 'Mr Udal disagreed,' said the KC, adding: 'On September 10, he began to hang metal gates, of his own choosing, right next to the pavement.' In court, the couple insisted they have the right to erect and site entrance gates 'on either side of the opening that runs under part of Mr Udal's house,' plus the right to park a car in the area. But Mr Udal insisted their right only extends to having the strip gated at the front of the property next to the pavement and they have no right to have a car on his land. He said that in removing the existing roller gate and door, and installing a new gate next to the pavement at the end of the driveway, he had done no more than assert his legitimate rights as freehold owner of the passage between the two homes. Handing victory to the bell master's neighbours, Judge Parfitt slammed his 'wrongful act of wanton any reasonable and objective person should have realised would cause considerable upset and discomfort' and ordered him to pay £10,000 damages. 'Mr Udal was a poor witness who came across as preferring his own perception of what might be helpful to his own case, regardless of any objective reality,' he continued. 'The overall impression was that truth for him, in the context of legal proceedings at least, was no obstacle to a clever argument about language or the other evidence. 'He referred to his destruction of the roller shutter and furniture as his having 'returned' it to (the former owner). 'This is also using expressions normally used to describe something helpful - getting something back to the owner - as a means of sugar-coating the reality of what he was doing: destroying part of the claimants' property on the very day they were moving in and would have expected to find the roller shutter and furniture providing a secure and private barrier between the road and their new house. 'On a balance of probabilities, the defendant had planned to destroy the roller shutter and furniture on the day of completion and perhaps hoped that it would be a fait accompli by the time the claimants arrived. 'In any event, he continued his actions even after they had arrived and it was clear that they objected.' The judge found that the gates Mr Udal removed were in the correct position and that the couple have a right 'to pass and re-pass either on foot, or with or without vehicles' down the drive and passage. He added: 'Mr Udal's actions in respect of the roller gates and furniture was an inappropriate and wrongful act of wanton destruction designed, in my view, to, at best, take advantage of the gap between owners occurring at completion, and conduct which any reasonable and objective person should have realised would cause considerable upset and discomfort to the new owners.' Returning to court last week to decide on matters consequential to his judgment, Judge Parfitt ordered Mr Udal to tear out the gate he installed within two weeks. He said the Mr Partick-Hileys would have the right to install their own, but that if it is to be lockable they must ensure that Mr Udal is able to get in if he wants to get to the back of his house. He also ordered him to pay £85,000 towards their lawyers' bills - estimated at over £100,000 - ahead of an assessment at a later date. His own lawyers' bills were not revealed in court papers. Representing himself via a video link, Mr Udal said he was planning to challenge the decision on appeal.
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Oisin Murphy has barely flinched since his involvement in a car smash that left a woman in hospital... his rap sheet makes for gruesome reading and this is an embarrassment for the sport, writes DOMINIC KING
How could Oisin Murphy do it? It was the question that kept being asked, over and over, on Monday, April 28 on one of those glorious evenings at Windsor, when sun shines and the crowd hums. It had been 41 hours since he had been involved in a car accident so serious a female passenger was hospitalised and Murphy was arrested, for 'causing serious injury by dangerous driving and failing to provide specimen for analysis'. Word travels quickly in an industry such as horseracing and upon hearing of Murphy's predicament, many expected the horses for which he'd been booked that night to require new riders. Sources allege the Champion Jockey had been at a party in Reading in the hours before the crash. Murphy, we learned during a hearing at Reading Magistrates Court, had 66mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood in his system when he was subsequently tested at police station at 7am; police had been called to the scene of the accident at 12.15am. It is astonishing detail. Had it been down to the British Horseracing Authority (BHA), Murphy wouldn't have been legged up on Sea Founder, a three-year-old trained by Richard Hughes for prominent owner Abdulla Al Mansoori in the one-mile maiden at 530pm, but their attempts to impose a suspension failed. Was Murphy physically in the right condition to be on board a thoroughbred? Racecourses have strict protocols that must be passed before jockeys go out to ride, including breathalysers, but there he was, in a set of yellow and black silks. He wasn't just on board – he won. All the shock of crashing the vehicle, all the trauma of understanding the female he had been travelling with was receiving urgent medical care – none of it was evident as he brought Sea Founder through with a perfectly-timed run, looking typically artistic in the saddle. 'Kieren Fallon talks about not being perfect but I'll ask you: how did he manage to win an Arc with the court case he was facing the next day?' Murphy asked me during an interview at Salisbury racecourse last October. 'It takes incredible mental strength. You need to be brazen, almost. 'You need to forget about the troubles in your life and the impact it could have on you to focus on a horse race. The Arc is the one race I want to win more than any other and him winning it on Dylan Thomas is the most memorable moment of my childhood, from a flat racing perspective.' He told me plenty that day. This particular excerpt came from a section when we talked about riders with demons and he immediately cited Fallon in 2007, when he conjured one of the greatest rides ever seen at Longchamp 24 hours before appearing at the High Court over race fixing charges. Reading it again, how revealing is it? Murphy has gone about his business in the last nine weeks, riding 64 winners – worth a combined total of £1.5million – from owners such as Sir Alex Ferguson, Michael Owen, Lady Lloyd-Weber and leading bloodstock operations. He's barely flinched. Even last Friday at Doncaster, the day after his charge became public, he was in the weighing room without a care. Some of his behaviour has been met with a growing sense of mystification by his colleagues. And remember: the £70,000 he's been fined will barely make a dent in his finances. Equally mystifying has been how some people have continued to book him for rides but as Peter Collier, owner of a handicapper called Annexation whom Murphy rode to finish second at Doncaster told me: 'He is the best. When I knew he was available, I wanted him. He was amenable to us.' Quite how he's been that way is hard to fathom. For this is the latest, self-inflicted storm to come howling into his town and his rap sheet makes for gruesome reading. In 2022, there was a 14-month ban after breaching Covid rules, misleading the BHA and two alcohol breaches. This has been an embarrassment for racing and nobody will forget his ability to self-destruct Events spiralled for him after he lied to racing's governing body about a trip he had taken in September 2020, telling them he had gone to Lake Como – which was then on the safe to travel list – when he had instead gone to Mykonos. That preceded him a pub fracas in October 2021 with a leading bloodstock agent. Murphy was stood down from riding the following day, having failed the breathalyser test at Newmarket. Having been embroiled in a battle to win the jockeys championship, he'd been using drink as a crutch. Alcohol made him a different person and, as we reflected on those misdemeanours that afternoon at Salsibury, he spoke with unexpected honesty. A fourth jockeys title was about to be presented to him, on Champions afternoon at Ascot, but he insisted sobriety was his biggest achievement. 'My focus while I was banned was staying sober, putting my life back together and using the time to make sure I was ready for when the BHA give me the green light,' he explained. 'I just know I can't have a drink. I don't want it to spiral out of control. 'When I do stop riding, I want to be happy with the way my career ended. Whether that is the next five years or 10 years, it won't be much longer than that. The only way I can do that is by staying sober. I genuinely believe that. I'm sorry. I'm jumping from loads of topics here.' The question only he can answer now is whether he has lost that focus and, if so, when did it happen? The industry is rife with rumours, none of which paint him in a good light but none of which can be committed to print because they cannot be substantiated. If he has slipped, he needs help. Still, he will carry on regardless. He rides in New York tonight and nobody has come out to condemn him. The BHA's inability to impose a sanction, too, is just as staggering. This has been an embarrassment for the sport. At his best, this 29-year-old had the capacity to get people engaged in the sport with his honest video appraisals on social media, following good and bad rides, well received. On horseback, he makes you think of the late, great Walter Swinburn with poise, skill and timing. The good stuff, though, doesn't get remembered when you plough a car into a tree or you fight or flout rules when the vast majority are playing it by the book. He had the ability to forget about his troubles on horseback. It's a shame nobody will forget his ability to self-destruct.
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Chilling moment hi-vis gunman shoots father-of-three dead outside gym 'for exposing illicit prison affair'
The chilling moment a gunman wearing hi-vis shot a father-of-three dead outside a gym for 'exposing an illicit prison affair' has been captured on CCTV. Lenny Scott, 33, who was the father of twins, was shot six times outside a gym on February 8 last year. Today the footage, with audible gunshots, was played to the jury who watched the tragic last moments of Mr Scott's life. The motive behind the killing lay in his former job at Altcourse prison in Liverpool nearly four years earlier, the murder trial jury was told. Mr Scott had searched inmate Elias Morgan's cell and found a mobile phone on March 26, 2020, Preston Crown Court was told. Not only was possession of the phone a criminal offence, but Morgan knew it contained evidence which would expose his sexual relationship with prison officer Sarah Williams, prosecutor Alex Leach KC said. Morgan, who denies murder, told Mr Scott to 'balls up the paperwork' and even offered him £1,500 not to report it, jurors were told. But the prison officer submitted the paperwork - and from that moment 'Elias Morgan told Lenny Scott that he would get him, he said he would bide his time, but that he would get him'. The motive behind the killing lay in Mr Scott's (pictured) former job at Altcourse prison in Liverpool nearly four years earlier, the murder trial jury was told Footage shows how Mr Scott left the gym shortly before 5:30pm and stood chatting to someone in the car park for a short time. A man, wearing orange hi-vis, could be seen loitering nearby, seemingly waiting for someone. As Mr Scott stood next to a car chatting, the man slowly approached him before suddenly rounding the corner with a gun, which he then opened fire with on the former prison officer. Mr Leach told jurors that on February 8, 2024, Mr Scott was leaving a gym in Skelmersdale, Lancashire 'when he was approached by a man wearing a high-visibility jacket and carrying a handgun'. 'The man shot him, six times, to the head and body,' he said. 'Lenny Scott died of his injuries. 'The murder was, the prosecution says, an act of retaliation.' He told jurors that the evidence would show that Morgan 'orchestrated' the murder and 'pulled the trigger himself'. Footage shows how Mr Scott left the gym shortly before 5:30pm and stood chatting to someone in the car park for a short time The court heard in the days after Mr Scott found the phone, he reported being threatened by Morgan. He told his father that Morgan had said words to the effect of 'I'll bide my time, but I promise I will get you' before making a gun gesture towards him. A 'visibly frightened' Mr Scott also told his former partner that Morgan had threatened him that his 'home would be blown up with his family inside'. Four days later he told a police call hander: 'I'm in fear for my family's life.' The jury heard he also reported the 'threats' to the Prison Service, saying Morgan had told him his family would be hurt if he did not 'drop' the illegal phone matter. Instead the phone was examined and Morgan was arrested, later being charged with unauthorised possession of the mobile phone. Williams, the officer with whom he'd had a relationship, later admitted three offences of misconduct in a public officer and a computer misuse offence.
