Should you be mad at your lawyer for using AI?
There's a reason lawyers get paid as much as they do, and why good lawyers get paid even more.
Knowing decades of precedent, the intricacies of each case and creatively patching ones which support your case together — that takes years of graft. As in all industries, even though there are thousands of lawyers out there, there's that special handful who really have mastered the craft.
Then you get the rest of us who aspire to be at that level. Some work toward it through personal development. Others have discovered artificial intelligence.
As with any tool, it's important that you understand how it works in order for it to deliver the results you want. How to read a book is pretty understandable. How to search through an index, equally so, but it's not the grandest of ideas to give a lawyer a child's picture book titled 'How Birds Fly' and expect them to be able to land a 747. You'd be within your rights to have an expectation that they'd have some sort of pilot training first.
Similarly, you don't just throw tech at a lawyer and say hey, your job, which you get paid above minimum wage to do, just got so easy that you can sit back and relax while Jarvis takes a break from building the next Iron Man to help your client settle their messy divorce.
ALSO READ: Lawyers who steal: R1.4bn trust fund theft ignored
It shouldn't take a rocket scientist to realise that typing 'write me an argument to win my case' and 'I have a client who caught their partner cheating with the pool guy and wants to divorce and take the three kids. What are similar cases in my favour?' will yield different results.
It's not that much of a leap to understand that the quality of your AI 'research' is only as good as the information you give it. And if you don't understand how AI works or, worse, understand that each AI is different and based on differently prioritised datasets, you're not going to know how to ask it for what you want.
To its credit, the legal fraternity is very welcoming of AI as a tool and globally, it's been adopted to create much more efficiency, especially in the mundane parts of the job. Is it prone to making up fictitious case law? Absolutely. And we've seen this in jurisdictions around the world.
ALSO READ: Will AI replace your psychologist?
You've got to admire the ballsiness of a lawyer who would approach a judge with a made-up case, but if we're honest, it's unlikely that they even knew what they were doing. Sounds right, looks right, everybody is claiming how awesome this tech is… let's just submit what it gives me.
And yet, it is not right when it comes to case law. That's not entirely surprising. It's one thing to teach a bot to string a couple of emotional sentences together using a global database. It's quite another to have it formulate a cohesive legal argument using jurisdiction-dependent and often elusive legal sources.
So if your lawyer gets busted for using AI to build your case and gets called out by a judge on it, then of course you should be upset about it. If your lawyer uses AI to get a bunch of cases together before they check them and put them together for argument themselves, that's just good sense.
Nobody expects a lawyer to build a time machine, go back to every case that they reference and witness the full proceedings first-hand. We have a tool to avoid doing that: the written record. Similarly, it's not expected that you restudy an LLB every time you do legal research, and if AI is going to get you the result faster, it may even save you some fees.
All you need to demand of your AI-using lawyer is that they compile and check the final product, because it would be pretty upsetting if you're sitting in court and the judge asks why you pleaded, 'click here for more information'.
NOW READ: AI-powered online lawyer now available in SA
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Should you be mad at your lawyer for using AI?
While the legal fraternity has used AI to make it more efficient, it is also prone to making up fictitious case law. There's a reason lawyers get paid as much as they do, and why good lawyers get paid even more. Knowing decades of precedent, the intricacies of each case and creatively patching ones which support your case together — that takes years of graft. As in all industries, even though there are thousands of lawyers out there, there's that special handful who really have mastered the craft. Then you get the rest of us who aspire to be at that level. Some work toward it through personal development. Others have discovered artificial intelligence. As with any tool, it's important that you understand how it works in order for it to deliver the results you want. How to read a book is pretty understandable. How to search through an index, equally so, but it's not the grandest of ideas to give a lawyer a child's picture book titled 'How Birds Fly' and expect them to be able to land a 747. You'd be within your rights to have an expectation that they'd have some sort of pilot training first. Similarly, you don't just throw tech at a lawyer and say hey, your job, which you get paid above minimum wage to do, just got so easy that you can sit back and relax while Jarvis takes a break from building the next Iron Man to help your client settle their messy divorce. ALSO READ: Lawyers who steal: R1.4bn trust fund theft ignored It shouldn't take a rocket scientist to realise that typing 'write me an argument to win my case' and 'I have a client who caught their partner cheating with the pool guy and wants to divorce and take the three kids. What are similar cases in my favour?' will yield different results. It's not that much of a leap to understand that the quality of your AI 'research' is only as good as the information you give it. And if you don't understand how AI works or, worse, understand that each AI is different and based on differently prioritised datasets, you're not going to know how to ask it for what you want. To its credit, the legal fraternity is very welcoming of AI as a tool and globally, it's been adopted to create much more efficiency, especially in the mundane parts of the job. Is it prone to making up fictitious case law? Absolutely. And we've seen this in jurisdictions around the world. ALSO READ: Will AI replace your psychologist? You've got to admire the ballsiness of a lawyer who would approach a judge with a made-up case, but if we're honest, it's unlikely that they even knew what they were doing. Sounds right, looks right, everybody is claiming how awesome this tech is… let's just submit what it gives me. And yet, it is not right when it comes to case law. That's not entirely surprising. It's one thing to teach a bot to string a couple of emotional sentences together using a global database. It's quite another to have it formulate a cohesive legal argument using jurisdiction-dependent and often elusive legal sources. So if your lawyer gets busted for using AI to build your case and gets called out by a judge on it, then of course you should be upset about it. If your lawyer uses AI to get a bunch of cases together before they check them and put them together for argument themselves, that's just good sense. Nobody expects a lawyer to build a time machine, go back to every case that they reference and witness the full proceedings first-hand. We have a tool to avoid doing that: the written record. Similarly, it's not expected that you restudy an LLB every time you do legal research, and if AI is going to get you the result faster, it may even save you some fees. All you need to demand of your AI-using lawyer is that they compile and check the final product, because it would be pretty upsetting if you're sitting in court and the judge asks why you pleaded, 'click here for more information'. NOW READ: AI-powered online lawyer now available in SA
TimesLIVE
5 days ago
- TimesLIVE
UKZN in bright idea partnership to find load-shedding solutions
The University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN) will become the first South African university powered mainly by renewable energy, with 10,000 solar panels across five campuses, in a pilot project that could help Eskom explore ending load-shedding nationwide. The university has signed a pioneering joint venture agreement with Hong Kong-based tech company Youtility to introduce cutting-edge, AI-driven technology to transform how electricity is managed and distributed, with payments handled through a blockchain billing platform. Eskom Distribution will participate in an observational and advisory capacity, positioning UKZN as a national test bed for 'this next-generation energy technology'. UKZN Eskom Power Engineering Programme acting director Prof Leigh Jarvis said the partnership was more than just an energy upgrade. 'It's a strategic transformation of the university's role in South Africa's energy future. Specifically, it means becoming a national leader in renewable energy: UKZN is on track to be the first predominantly renewable-powered university in South Africa, using solar energy, smart microgrids and real-time AI systems. 'One direct outcome is the creation of a UKZN spin-off company focused entirely on developing and supporting energy-related innovations. This venture will serve as a launch pad for commercialising student and staff ideas that address real-world energy challenges,' he said. Jarvis already has plans to feed advanced research into this ecosystem. He intends to incorporate an internationally patented concept involving liquid air energy storage and superconductor devices. 'Students won't just study energy, they'll help manage it, optimise systems and potentially become founders of new tech companies emerging from this initiative. UKZN becomes a living lab where energy solutions can be tested at scale, with national relevance and international export potential. In essence, this partnership makes UKZN not just a user of energy but an active architect of the future energy economy,' Jarvis said. He said the project could reshape the way electricity is generated, distributed and paid for across the country, offering real solutions to national problems such as load-shedding and grid failures. 'By decentralising energy production through microgrids, this approach reduces dependence on the national grid and minimises outages.' The project can also address electricity theft and nonpayment. 'The blockchain billing system makes tampering with meters nearly impossible and ensures people are billed fairly, discouraging illegal connections. In terms of tariff relief, when everyone pays what they should, the cost is spread fairly, and overall tariffs can remain lower. 'If successful, this model can be applied to schools, hospitals, and even rural villages — making energy access more inclusive and equitable. Why now? South Africa is in the middle of an energy crisis. This initiative is not just visionary — it's urgently practical, aligning with national goals for renewable energy, economic upliftment and digital innovation,' said Jarvis. Speaking at the launch event and signing ceremony held at UKZN's Westville campus, acting deputy vice-chancellor for research and innovation at UKZN, Prof Anil Chuturgoon, called it a 'defining moment' in addressing the country's long-standing energy challenges. 'This concept of green energy is going to transform the energy landscape in South Africa,' he said. Youtility director Wayne Mostert said: 'Wizdom is an evolving, AI-driven utility brain with enhanced capabilities which include real-time, decentralised decision-making and smart discharge of power into micro and macro grids.' Drawing parallels with past tech revolutions, Mostert likened Youtility's ambitions to the digital disruption of entertainment media. 'Where Blockbuster failed to adapt, Netflix scaled using data, agility and customer-centricity. Similarly, Youtility is poised to revolutionise the utility sector through sentient, decentralised, and user-empowered infrastructure, creating a new global standard,' he said.
IOL News
28-06-2025
- IOL News
A fleeting moment turns iconic with a click of the shutter
Independent Media photographer Leon Lestrade has been a photojournalist for more than 30 years. Image: Supplied For over three decades, Leon Lestrade has been a quiet observer of history, capturing defining moments through the lens of his camera. On a sunny Sunday in June at Durban's uShaka Beach, he stumbled upon a scene that would etch itself into the annals of South African history. A group of men carried a paraplegic man into the ocean, an act of camaraderie and strength that prompted Lestrade, armed with his trusted digital camera, to snap away, unaware that what he was capturing was more than just a heartwarming image. A week later, that moment gained significance when news emerged about Oscar Pistorius' participation in the IronMan competition—the paralympian's first public sporting event since his release on parole for the 2013 Valentine's Day murder of his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp. MAKING A SPLASH: Convicted killer Oscar Pistorius was in Durban participating in the Ironman 70.3 triathlon, his first public sporting event since being released on parole. Image: Leon Lestrade / Independent Media For Lestrade, the revelation left him in awe. 'I couldn't believe it," said Lestrade when reflecting on the moment. "I had unknowingly photographed a man with such a complex and controversial history, and it felt surreal." The encounter beautifully encapsulated the intersection of sport, redemption, and public perception. This year marked a significant milestone for Lestrade, as he celebrated 27 years with Independent Media, having embarked on his photography journey over 30 years ago as a freelancer. Largely self-taught, Lestrade developed his skills on the job, fostering a dedication to his work that has won him numerous awards. Growing up on the Cape Flats presented its own set of challenges which his family bravely faced, particularly his father, Jack, a professional photographer who navigated a racially segregated industry. Lestrade recalls, 'My father never wanted to discuss his career, and I can understand his reasons why, but we overcame those obstacles.' Lestrade's journey began at Independent Newspapers, initially working under picture editor Anne Laing at the Cape Times before transitioning to the Cape Argus, where Jim McLagan mentored him. His diverse experiences allowed him to hone his skill in various fields, including sports, politics, and feature stories. Throughout his career, he captured countless pivotal moments, but meeting Nelson Mandela stands out as a turning point.
