Canada cancels tax on US tech firms in hopes of Trump trade deal
Canada on Sunday announced that it cancelled a tax targeting US tech companies such as Amazon, ahead of resuming trade negotiations with the US. Talks between the countries stalled after Canada introduced the Digital Services Tax in response to steep tariffs set to be imposed by the US.
Canadawill rescind taxes impacting US tech firms that had prompted PresidentDonald Trumpto retaliate by calling off trade talks, Ottawa said Sunday, adding that negotiations with Washington would resume.
The digital services tax, enacted last year, would have seen US service providers such as Alphabet and Amazon on the hook for a multi-billion-dollar payment in Canada by Monday, analysts have said.
Washington has previously requested dispute settlement talks over the tax -- but on Friday Trump, who has weaponized US financial power in the form of tariffs, said he was ending trade talks with Ottawa in retaliation for the levy.
He also warned that Canada would learn its new tariff rate within the week.
But on Sunday, Ottawa binned the tax, which had been forecast to bring in Can$5.9 billion (US$4.2 billion) over five years.
Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne "announced today that Canada would rescind the Digital Services Tax (DST) in anticipation of a mutually beneficial comprehensive trade arrangement with the United States," a government statement said.
It added that Trump and Canadian Prime MinisterMark Carney"have agreed that parties will resume negotiations with a view towards agreeing on a deal by July 21, 2025."
There was no immediate comment from theWhite Houseor Trump.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC on Friday that Washington had hoped Carney's government would halt the tax "as a sign of goodwill."
Canada has been spared some of the sweeping duties Trump has imposed on other countries, but it faces a separate tariff regime.
Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has also imposed steep levies on imports of steel, aluminum and autos.
Canada is the largest supplier of foreign steel and aluminum to the United States.
Last week, Carney said Ottawa will adjust its 25 percent counter tariffs on US steel and aluminum -- in response to a doubling of US levies on the metals to 50 percent -- if a bilateral trade deal was not reached in 30 days.
"We will continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interest of Canadians," Carney said Friday.
He had previously said a good outcome in the talks would be to "stabilize the trading relationship with the United States" and "ready access toUS marketsfor Canadian companies" while "not having our hands tied in terms of our dealings with the rest of the world."
Carney and Trump met on the sidelines of the Group of Seven summit in Canada earlier this month. Leaders at the summit pushed Trump to back away from his punishingtrade war.
Dozens of countries face a July 9 deadline for steeper US duties to kick in -- rising from a current 10 percent.
It remains to be seen if they will successfully reach agreements before the deadline.
Bessent has said Washington could wrap up its agenda for trade deals by September, indicating more agreements could be concluded, although talks were likely to extend past July.
(FRANCE 24 with AFP)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada Standard
an hour ago
- Canada Standard
Canada withdraws Digital Services Tax following suspension of trade talks by Trump
Ontario [Canada], July 1 (ANI): Canada has officially withdrawn its proposed digital services tax, aiming to revive trade negotiations with the US, just days after US President Donald Trump halted discussions in protest of the levy, Al Jazeera reported on Monday. As per Al Jazeera, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney on Sunday announced that he and President Trump had reached an agreement to restart talks, targeting a July 21, deadline outlined at the recent G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis. The now-scrapped tax, which was set to take effect from Monday, would have imposed a 3 per cent levy on revenues earned by digital services companies from Canadian users above USD 20 million in a calendar year, retroactive to 2022, as per Al Jazeera. It was intended to target online platforms, digital advertising, social media, and data monetisation, impacting major US tech firms such as Apple, Google (Alphabet), Amazon, and Meta. President Trump denounced the tax on Friday, calling it 'a direct and blatant attack on our Country,' in defence of American tech giants, as reported by Al Jazeera. Criticism followed the Canadian government's decision to withdraw the tax. Tech analyst and journalist Paris Marx told Al Jazeera that the move signals Canada's vulnerability to US pressure, arguing that digital services taxes are crucial to ensuring large multinational tech firms contribute fairly to the countries in which they operate. Marx pointed out that the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) efforts to establish a global framework for digital taxation have stalled largely due to US resistance under both the Biden and Trump administrations, leading many countries to adopt their own taxes. 'It has been continually delayed for years in the hope that a diplomatic process in the OECD would create an international framework to ensure those companies pay more tax in countries around the world. But the United States, under [former US President Joe] Biden and Trump, has ensured it's been unable to move forward... More countries are enacting digital services taxes for that very reason, and Canada is wrong to back down,' he stated as quoted by Al Jazeera. Canada's Finance Ministry confirmed the suspension of tax collection and said Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne will introduce legislation to repeal the Digital Services Tax (DST) Act. The ministry reiterated that the DST was originally introduced in 2020 to address the low tax burden of large tech companies operating in Canada but emphasised Canada's preference for a multilateral solution, as reported by Al Jazeera. As per Al Jazeera, citing the US Census Bureau, Canada is a major trading partner for the US, second only to Mexico, and purchased USD 349.4 billion worth of American goods last year, while exporting USD 412.7 billion to the US. While Canada avoided sweeping US tariffs introduced in April, it still faces a 50 per cent duty on steel and aluminium exports to the US, Al Jazeera reported. (ANI)
Canada Standard
an hour ago
- Canada Standard
Canada scraps tax on tech giants in bid to revive US trade talks
US President Donald Trump had halted negotiations with Ottawa over what he called an "attack" on American companies Canada has shelved its plan to slap a digital services tax (DST) on tech companies in a bid to get trade talks with the US back on track, reversing course just as the measure was due to kick in. The 3% tax, passed into law last year by the government of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, was set to take effect on Monday and would have been applied retroactively to 2022-2024 profits. It would have primarily targeted US companies like Amazon, Google and Meta, costing them an estimated $3 billion. "Today's announcement will support a resumption of negotiations toward the July 21, 2025 timeline set out at this month's G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis," Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said in a statement on Sunday. "Canada's new government will always be guided by the overall contribution of any possible agreement to the best interests of Canadian workers and businesses," he added. Carney and Trump agreed to resume trade talks when they met earlier this month at the G7 summit, where the prime minister said they had agreed to finalizing a new economic agreement within 30 days. Canadian Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne wrote on X late on Sunday that dropping the levy would allow Ottawa "to make vital progress and reinforce our work to create jobs and build prosperity for all Canadians." On Friday, US President Donald Trump had denounced the tax hike as a "direct and blatant attack on our country" and threatened to terminate all trade negotiations that had been ongoing between the North American neighbors for months. He also vowed to impose new tariffs on Canadian goods within a week. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick welcomed the reversal, saying the tax "would have been a deal breaker for any trade deal with America." Tensions between the two countries have been mounting since February, when Trump imposed a 25% tariff on Canadian goods shortly after taking office. Ottawa responded with reciprocal duties, though Trump later suspended the measure, saying he was open to country-specific deals that benefit US businesses. Trump has long accused Canada of exploiting US trade and on several occasions suggested it should become America's 51st state. This fueled the ambitions of the country's Liberal Party and Carney's election campaign. Shortly before taking office as prime minister, he described Trump's tariffs as "unjustified" and stated that "Canada will win" the trade war with the US. On March 14, the day he was sworn in, he vowed that the country "will never, ever, in any way, shape, or form, be part of the United States." Canada is the US's second-largest trading partner after Mexico, and the top buyer of US exports. According to the US Census Bureau, it imported $349 billion in American goods last year and exported $412 billion to the US.
Canada Standard
an hour ago
- Canada Standard
How Canadian nationalism is evolving with the times - and will continue to do so
Tariffs imposed on Canada by the United States have fuelled a surge in nationalist sentiment that played a significant role in the outcome of April's federal election. Mark Carney's new Liberal government has signalled an interest in pursuing nation-building projects that hearken back to an earlier period in Canadian history. Economic, cultural and social policy in Canada has often served the purpose of building national unity to facilitate cohesion and collective action. But some commentators have cautioned Canadians to dampen their reinvigorated sense of pride in their nation. Read more: Canadians are more patriotic than ever amid Trump's trade war - but it's important not to take national pride too far Those on the right view Canadian nationalism as an obstacle to neo-liberal economic policies while the left perceives it as irredeemably flawed. For people on the right, free trade and globalization are thought to produce the best economic outcomes, and nationalism obstructs those outcomes. But those on the progressive left argue that Canada was founded on racist policies and settler colonialism, so nationalism should be rejected because of this original sin. Read more: This Canada Day, settler Canadians should think about 'land back' Both perspectives - and the public discussion of Canada's national identity more generally - remain mired in confusion over the nature of nations. As a political philosopher, I have worked to clear up this confusion by determining what nations are and how they evolve. In the 19th century, French scholar Ernest Renan outlined a definition of nation that has yet to be improved upon. For Renan, a nation consists of two things: the daily commitment of a people to continue to live and work together and a collective memory of a shared past together. In contemporary times, Irish social scientist Benedict Anderson described nations as "imagined communities," since the character of the nation is determined by the limits of the collective imagination of its citizens. These are subjective definitions of nations because they define national communities in terms of the identification of their members with the community. There are other, more common objective definitions of a nation involving identity, including shared ethnicity, religion or culture. But these definitions have long been criticized since many national identities transcend ethnicity, religion, culture or any other identity markers. A national community is distinct from a state. The state constitutes the formal political institutions of a society, while the nation is the community of people within that society who view each other as compatriots. This is why the phrase "the people" is often used as a synonym for the national community. While some nations are stateless, in other cases, multiple nations co-exist within a single state. In Canada, there is the Quebecois nation and many Indigenous nations within the Canadian nation. Although they are distinct, states and their governments will often build national identities around themselves to enable cohesion and collective action. Canada's national identity was systematically shaped by successive governments - from Confederation onward - to build the society that Canadians live in today. The character of a particular nation is not fixed. The beliefs, practices and culture of the people who choose to live and work together can be shaped into anything they collectively decide on. A nation can adopt new values, redefine its membership or have one of its definitive characteristics fade from prominence. Accordingly, there is no reason to think that moral failings of a national community's past must compromise it forever. A nation can, and sometimes does, recognize its past failures and become something better. A distinction is sometimes drawn between "patriotism" and "nationalism," with the most famous being made by English social critic and novelist George Orwell. For Orwell, patriotism is devotion to a particular way of life without the desire to force it on other people, while nationalism denotes an impulse to seek power for one's nation. Patriotism, then, is a benign, ethical form of partiality to one's nation. Other thinkers have sought to explain how national identities and communities can be cultivated in an ethical way, described by Israeli philosopher Yael Tamir as "liberal nationalism." The liberal nationalist, according to Tamir, seeks to construct a national identity that adopts the correct ethical values. They hope to harness the energy of nationalism to build a nation committed to liberty, inclusivity and progress. In 1867, George-Etienne Cartier described the Canadian identity that he and the other Fathers of Confederation sought to create as a "political nationality." He viewed Canadian identity as being defined by shared principles rather than language or ethnicity. More than 150 years later, political theorist Michael Ignatieff made a similar distinction between ethnic and civic nationalism. In an ethnic nation, citizens identify with each other because they belong to the same ethnic, religious or cultural community. Meanwhile, in a civic nation, the people unite behind certain civic principles, like a commitment to democracy. Cartier's concept of a political nationality was crucial to making sense of the political experiment that was Confederation. Having mostly abandoned their efforts to assimilate the French-Canadians, the British settlers in North America would now join with them to build a new national identity instead. In his recent book, historian Raymond Blake explains how Canada's post-Second World War prime ministers, through their speeches and public statements, reshaped Canada's national identity. Read more: 40 years later: A look back at the Pierre Trudeau speech that defined Canada Up through Louis St-Laurent, various prime ministers would refer to the "deux nations" origin of Canada as inspirational. British and French settlers had come together despite their differences to build a new society together, they pointed out. As time went on, it became clear this definition of Canada's national identity wasn't nearly inclusive enough, making no mention of Indigenous Peoples. The multicultural character of Canadian society was increasingly acknowledged by the government and Canadians at large until it was central to Canada's identity. Canada's national narrative has been reframed in recent years to recognize Indigenous Peoples as one of the three founding pillars of Canadian society. This evolution exemplifies exactly the change citizens should expect in a national community. This transformation in Canadian national identity shows that national communities can change over time - including, perhaps, in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's threats against Canada. In the end, Canadians decide what sort of nation they want to inhabit. Canada's political nationality has proven more resilient than even some of its founders might have anticipated, but not for lack of effort. There will always remain the work of building a better nation - and it's work worth doing.
