logo
America's kids are still behind in reading and math. These schools are defying the trend

America's kids are still behind in reading and math. These schools are defying the trend

NBC News11-02-2025
COMPTON, Calif. — Math is the subject sixth grader Harmoni Knight finds hardest, but that's changing.
In-class tutors and 'data chats' at her middle school in Compton, California, have made a dramatic difference, the 11-year-old said. She proudly pulled up a performance tracker at a tutoring session last week, displaying a column of perfect 100% scores on all her weekly quizzes from January.
Since the pandemic first shuttered American classrooms, schools have poured federal and local relief money into interventions like the ones in Harmoni's classroom, hoping to help students catch up academically following COVID-19 disruptions.
But a new analysis of state and national test scores shows the average student remains half a grade level behind pre-pandemic achievement in both reading and math. In reading, especially, students are even further behind than they were in 2022, the analysis shows.
Compton is an outlier, making some of the biggest two-year gains in both subjects among high-poverty districts. And there are other bright spots, along with evidence that interventions like tutoring and summer programs are working.
The Education Recovery Scorecard analysis by researchers at Harvard, Stanford and Dartmouth allows year-to-year comparisons across states and districts, providing the most comprehensive picture yet of how American students are performing since COVID-19 first disrupted learning.
The most recent data is based on tests taken in spring 2024. By then, the worst of the pandemic was long past, but schools were dealing still with a mental health crisis and high absenteeism — not to mention students who'd had crucial learning interrupted.
'The losses are not just due to what happened during the 2020 to 2021 school year, but the aftershocks that have hit schools in the years since,' said Tom Kane, a Harvard economist who worked on the scorecard.
In some cases, the analysis shows school districts are struggling, even though their students may have posted decent results on state tests. That's because each state adopts its own assessments, and those aren't comparable to each other. Those differences can make it impossible to tell whether students are performing better because of their progress, or whether those shifts are because the tests themselves are changing, or the state has lowered its standards for proficiency. For example, Wisconsin, Nebraska and Florida seem to have relaxed their proficiency cutoff in math and reading in the last two years, Kane said, citing the analysis.
The Scorecard accounts for differing state tests and provides one national standard.
Higher-income districts have made significantly more progress than lower-income districts, with the top 10% of high-income districts four times more likely to have recovered in both math and reading compared with the poorest 10%. And recovery within districts remains divided by race and class, especially in math scores. Test score gaps grew by both race and income.
'The pandemic has not only driven test scores down, but that decline masks a pernicious inequality that has grown during the pandemic,' said Sean Reardon, a Stanford sociologist who worked on the scorecard. 'Not only are districts serving more Black and Hispanic students falling further behind, but even within those districts, Black and Hispanic students are falling further behind their white districtmates.'
Tutors in class, after school and on Saturdays
Still, many of the districts that outperformed the country serve predominantly low-income students or students of color, and their interventions offer best practices for other districts.
In Compton, the district responded to the pandemic by hiring over 250 tutors that specialize in math, reading and students learning English. Certain classes are staffed with multiple tutors to assist teachers. And schools offer tutoring before, during and after school, plus 'Saturday School' and summer programs for the district's 17,000 students, said Superintendent Darin Brawley.
The district also now conducts dyslexia screenings in all elementary schools.
The low-income school district near downtown Los Angeles, with a student body that is 84% Latino and 14% Black, now has a graduation rate of 93%, compared with 58% when Brawley took the job in 2012.
Harmoni, the sixth grader, said tutoring has helped her grasp concepts and given her more confidence in math. She has 'data chats' with her math specialist that are part performance review, part pep talk.
'Looking at my data, it kind of disappoints me' when the numbers are low, said Harmoni. 'But it makes me realize I can do better in the future, and also now.'
Brawley said he's proud of the district's latest test scores, but not content.
'Truth be told, I wasn't happy,' he said. 'Even though we gained, and we celebrate the gains, at the end of the day we all know that we can do better.'
That could be more difficult in coming years. Federal pandemic relief money has ended; many schools used it for programs like tutoring. Going forward, schools must prioritize interventions that worked. Districts that spent federal money on increased instructional time, either through tutoring or summer school, saw a return on that investment, Kane and Reardon said.
Brawley said Compton hopes to maintain its tutoring programs using other funding sources. 'The question is, at what scale?'
Elsewhere in the country, reading levels have continued to decline, despite a movement in many states to emphasize phonics and the ' science of reading.' So Reardon and Kane called for an evaluation of the mixed results for insights into the best ways to teach kids to read. Schools also must engage parents and tell them when their kids are behind, the researchers said.
And schools must continue to work with community groups to improve students' attendance, they said. The scorecard identified a relationship between high absenteeism and learning struggles.
Tutors also help with attendance
In the District of Columbia, an intensive tutoring program helped with both academics and attendance, D.C. Public Schools Chancellor Lewis Ferebee said. In the scorecard analysis, the District of Columbia ranked first among states for gains in both math and reading between 2022 and 2024, after its math recovery had fallen toward the bottom of the list.
Pandemic-relief money funded the tutoring, along with a system of identifying and targeting support at students in greatest need. The district also hired program managers who helped maximize time for tutoring within the school day, Ferebee said.
Students who received tutoring were more likely to be engaged with school, Ferebee said, both from increased confidence and because they had a relationship with another trusted adult.
Students expressed that 'I'm more confident in math because I'm being validated by another adult,' Ferebee said. 'That validation goes a long way, not only with attendance, but a student feeling like they are ready to learn and are capable.'
Even now that federal pandemic relief money has ended, Ferebee said many of the investments the district made will have lasting impact, including the money spent on teacher training and curriculum development in literacy.
Christina Grant, the District of Columbia's superintendent of education until 2024, said she's hopeful to see the evidence emerging on what's made a difference in student achievement.
'We cannot afford to not have hope. These are our students. They did not cause the pandemic,' Grant said. 'The growing concern is ensuring that we can ... see ourselves to the other side.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As we race headlong into our glorious AI-powered future, are we on the road to Idiocracy?
As we race headlong into our glorious AI-powered future, are we on the road to Idiocracy?

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

As we race headlong into our glorious AI-powered future, are we on the road to Idiocracy?

As we race headlong into our glorious AI-powered future, a long-forgotten flick from the naughties is gaining cult status by posing a simple question: are we on the road to Idiocracy? In the tradition of Bill and Ted, Idiocracy, a 2006 American sci-fi comedy, depicts an average guy transported 500 years into the future to find he is the smartest man on earth. A wrestler is president, people worship 'the profit' and the world's biggest corporation is a sports drink company whose market strategy has taken humanity to the brink of collapse. Idiocracy is not a flawless film; it's jarring class eugenics and casual sexism seem more dated than its 20 years would suggest. But what it does brilliantly is challenge the assumption that the human race is on an uncontested journey to higher consciousness. This is a timely counterpoint to the zeitgeist about the self-evident benefits of machine learning built by large tech companies under the conceit of 'artificial intelligence'. Already we are seeing academic studies suggesting that Large Language Models are linked to cognitive decline, with a recent MIT study finding lower brain engagement among students using GPTs in writing essays. We've also seen AI chatbots accused of inducing vulnerable people to suicide and cheery predictions about the hollowing out of entry level knowledge economy jobs which loom as our next inter-generational betrayal. The question is whether these dumb outcomes are features or bugs of our emerging information ecosystem. Evidence is mounting it is the former. Exhibit A is OpenAI's Economic Blueprint for Australia, an embarrassing document seeking rapid government adaptation, investment and minimalist regulation for 'the most significant economic and strategic opportunity of our time' You could drive a truck through the holes in OpenAI's analysis: $115bn in predicted productivity improvements based on crude calculations of hours saved at work, with no trade-off for the costs of the jobs already being destroyed. To realise this promised dividend OpenAI says the government would need to lean into resource-sucking datacentres, socialising the costs of energy and water, steamrolling communities and putting new pressures on the grid and fast-tracking development at the cost of the energy transition. As our creativity is being stolen and repurposed, trading off our collective empathy for automated culture, OpenAI wants us to 'streamline and update copyright law', with industry groups already pushing hard for a general right to mine our data. But these self-serving policy asks are not the worst of the OpenAI blueprint; it is the very fact that this massive corporation purports to set our future agenda at all, defining rather than responding to our collective needs. This design principle could represent the inflection point between a smart future and an impending Idiocracy. It is true this technology carries amazing power to synthesise information and challenge higher order thinking in new and profound ways. OpenAI is right to describe the technology as 'like electricity' something that can illuminate the night sky. But would you get a power company to set the rules for electrical safety? The truth is OpenAI is nether open or intelligent: it's a play to dominate a new technology on commercial terms for its material benefit, using their copious venture capital as a shield against competitors and a sword against government to create a policy environment to suit them. We are witnessing the next phase of their corporate history. ChatGPT is a compelling shop front, but what if it is intellectual heroin? It tricks us to feel smarter, more seen and even loved, while actually providing the opposite by convincing us to commoditise our collective intelligence. Short of returning to a genuine not-for-profit mission, OpenAI can never be a good faith partner. Theirs is an operating model to be resisted but that relies on us having the time, the understanding and, yes, the leadership to do this intelligently. In the latest episode of my podcast Burning Platforms one of the godfathers of artificial intelligence, Prof Toby Walsh, differentiates between the richness of distributed intelligence and the homogeneity of the concentrated intelligence that chatbots serve up. High quality data is earned not stolen property; it is used mindfully to address problems humans identify, not commoditised to fill some market niche. While the tech broligarchs battle for world domination, maybe the smart money should be on the design and value of small data models, designed for purpose not for producing mainstream slop and brain rot, that chew up less energy and eradicate fewer jobs. Because of the power of the tech sector, all of whom have well-paid and well-positioned Canberra lobbyists, we also need to resist. Since shouting out the Luddites in my last column I've been delighted to discover there are people already doing this. Ben Zhao, a University of Chicago computer scientist has developed programs like Glaze which protects private photos being harvested to train facial recognition technology and Nightshade, a filter for artists that tricks AI into seeing a cat as a dog, like putting ink in a bag of stolen bank cheques. And Cloudfare, one of the dominant cybersecurity companies, has announced it will ban AI web crawlers from scraping content from their sites without paying compensation to the owner of those sites. As Cloudfare CEO, Matthew Prince, says: 'I go to war every single day with the Chinese government, the Russian government, the Iranians, the North Koreans, probably Americans, the Israelis, all of them who are trying to hack into our customer sites. And you're telling me, I can't stop some nerd with a C-corporation in Palo Alto?' In the battle for our future intelligence, we need to deploy all the grey matter at our disposal: workers' intelligence, cultural intelligence, collective intelligence and the power of technologists in the face of the artifice. Spoiler: in the movie the sports drink company, 'Brawndo' extends its market dominance in electrolytes by expanding into agriculture, poisoning the land in pursuit of 'The Profit'. Open AI's Blueprint for Australia would be a similar triumph of Idiocracy. Peter Lewis is the executive director of Essential, a progressive strategic communications and research company that undertook research for Labor in the 2025 election and conducts qualitative research for Guardian Australia. He is also the host of Per Capita's Burning Platforms podcast

Scientists discover new link between Mounjaro and BREAST cancer
Scientists discover new link between Mounjaro and BREAST cancer

Daily Mail​

time7 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Scientists discover new link between Mounjaro and BREAST cancer

Mounjaro could help slash the risk of breast cancer tumours developing, exciting new research has suggested. The game-changing weight loss jabs have ushered in a new era in the war on obesity, but have also been linked to other health benefits, such as reducing the risk of heart attacks, strokes and kidney disease. Now, scientists have discovered that tirzepatide—the ingredient behind Mounjaro—may 'significantly' slow the growth of breast cancer tumours. American scientists, who carried out the trial, said the findings on mice show the drugs have a 'beneficial impact' on women with the disease. However, they cautioned further research was necessary to confirm their findings. Researchers also didn't speculate why the drug, which belong to class of medications called GLP-1 agonists, might lower a patient's chances of cancer. It comes as breakthrough research in May revealed that GLP-1s could help ward off up to 14 types of cancer including breast. Studies have also suggested obesity is a major risk factor in breast cancer returning and weight loss could improve outcomes. The game-changing weight loss jabs have ushered in a new era in the war on obesity, but have also been linked to other health benefits, such as slashing the risk of heart attacks, strokes and kidney disease Amanda Kucinskas, a research fellow in obesity and breast cancer risk at the University of Michigan and study author, said: 'While it is very preliminary data, our studies in mice suggest that these new anti-obesity drugs may be a way to reduce obesity-associated breast cancer risk or improve outcomes. 'While these are very preliminary results, they suggest that this new anti-obesity drug may also have a beneficial impact on breast cancer outcomes,' In the study, researchers tracked 16 nine-week-old mice with breast cancer tumours who were fed a high-fat diet to induce obesity. At 32 weeks old—roughly middle age for a mouse—the obese animals were divided into two groups. One group received tirzepatide injections every other day for 16 weeks, and the other a placebo. Scientists then measured the mice's weight and tumour growth twice a week. They found mice on the medication lost around a fifth of their body weight—roughly the average weight lost by patients taking Mounjaro long term. The fat loss occurred mainly in adipose tissue, the body's fat-storing cells. Mice treated with tirzepatide also had significantly smaller tumors, the scientists said. There was a 'clear link' between lower body weight and smaller tumor size, while total fat mass was also 'strongly linked' to how large the tumors became, they added. However, they cautioned that exactly how tirzepatide slowed tumour growth was not yet understood and further tests, including in humans, would first be necessary. The findings were presented in full this week at ENDO 2025, the Endocrine Society's annual meeting in San Francisco. It comes as research presented at the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual conference in May suggested GLP-1s could slash the risk of 14 obesity-related cancer—including breast—for people with diabetes. US scientists found those on GLP-1s had a 7 per cent lower risk of developing an obesity-related cancer than patients on DDP-4 inhibitors, another diabetes medication. When other health benefits were factored in, these patients were also 8 per cent less likely to die over the 10-year period. In December, groundbreaking research presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium also suggested the jabs could also help protect against breast cancer returning. One study of more than 1,000 patients by the University of Texas found obese patients who took the drugs for just over a year after finishing treatment on average had a 'significantly improved' chance of living longer. However, surprisingly, they also found patients taking hormone drugs such as tamoxifen—given to many women to stop breast cancer recurrence—gained weight, despite using the jabs. At the time, experts told MailOnline they were unsure why this happened. But they suggested it may be because hormone therapy typically causes patients to gain weight, meaning the jabs aren't able to work effectively. For these patients, 'we may need to go up to a higher dose', Professor Neil Iyengar, then an oncologist at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, said.

Student overcomes severe spinal injury to graduate with first class degree
Student overcomes severe spinal injury to graduate with first class degree

South Wales Argus

time16 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

Student overcomes severe spinal injury to graduate with first class degree

Archie Wills-Johnson, 22, was a year into his biology degree when he suffered the life-changing injury while playing American football. During a tackle, he felt a pain down his right arm which became worse when he got home. Archie Wills-Johnson has graduated from the University of Bristol (Nim Jethwa/University of Bristol/PA) Scans revealed Mr Wills-Johnson had suffered a herniated disc in his neck. This meant the cartilage between two of his vertebrae had prolapsed, pushing against his spinal cord. 'The doctors told me that without treatment, the excruciating electric shocks would continue and I could end up paralysed if I risked playing contact sport again,' he said. 'It was hard to hear, but I had to face the reality of it.' He underwent emergency surgery and doctors removed the cartilage between his fifth and sixth vertebrae. 'They replaced it with titanium and screwed it in place. It was frightening but I knew I had no choice,' he said. Archie Wills-Johnson receives his master's degree (Nim Jethwa/University of Bristol/PA) The surgery stopped the progression of the injury but his recovery has been far from easy. Two and a half-years later, the University of Bristol student still suffers chronic nerve pain in his arm. Surgeons told him he could not play American football again, and he has moved into coaching. He returned as coach and vice president of the university's team, Bristol Barracudas. 'I couldn't play but I still loved being involved with the team,' he said. 'I became a coach, and I started the flag football team – a form of non-contact American football to help injured players back in so they could train doing something that's slightly less risky and get their strength back up. 'It wasn't the same as playing but I was able to stay connected to the sport and the community that meant so much to me.' Growing up in Gloucestershire, Mr Wills-Johnson was the first in his family to attend university and he has now graduated with a first class master's degree in biological sciences. 'I've loved my time at Bristol. I felt that I've fully taken part in all the different facets of university life,' he said. 'I want to thank all the people who made my university experience what it was. 'From the academics and coaches who helped me to the friends I made along the way, you've all been amazing. I will always be grateful for my time here. 'Life will always give you setbacks but by showing resilience you can bounce back from the challenges and make the most of your situation. 'From rock bottom, the only way is up.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store