NY Republicans push ‘Peanut's Law' after beloved pet squirrel was seized, killed by state agents
The bill, called "Peanut's Law: The Humane Animal Protection Act," would require a 72-hour waiting period before the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) can euthanize any seized animal. It would also give animal owners the chance for a hearing before the state takes or puts down their animals.
P'Nut and another pet squirrel named Fred were taken from Mark and Daniela Longo's upstate farm last October after someone filed an anonymous complaint. Both animals were killed and tested for rabies, and both tests came back negative. The squirrel had a huge following on social media, with P'Nut accruing nearly one million followers to watch content of the critter and his family.Owners Of Beloved Peanut The Squirrel Plan To Sue New York State Over Seizure And Killing By Authorities
Once news spread on P'Nut's Instagram page, backlash over DEC's actions spread like wildfire online. At the time, everyone from Elon Musk to President Trump weighed in on the killing of the dear family pets.Musk referred to the killing back in November as "the whole squirrel thing" while on Joe Rogan's podcast.
Assemblyman Jake Blumencranz (R-Nassau), who is sponsoring the bill, said it's about fairness. "This is about due process," he said, adding that animals should not be killed unless they're an immediate danger.
Peanut The Pet Squirrel Taken Away By New York State Officials From Adopted Home, May Be Euthanized
Read On The Fox News App
The Longos, who run an animal sanctuary, say they were never told why their pets were taken. They hope the new bill will stop similar cases from happening again. Mark Longo said of the new bill: "I sit here trying not to cry, but passing this law will be a movement to make sure that animal rights are not overlooked anymore."Peanut or "P'Nut" was only a baby when the Longos rescued him. The squirrel adapted to his adoptive human family after his real mother was run over by a car when he was just five weeks old.
"They were not dangerous. They were not sick. They were not wild threats roaming the streets," said Assemblyman Blumencranz. "They were rescues — loved, nurtured, and safe."
Supporters of the legislation say it's a common-sense move to protect both animals and their owners.
"Here is the cold, hard truth. It is too little, too late. Words don't save P'Nut and Fred, and words won't save the next animal, or the next family, unless we change the law."An attorney who represents the Longo family did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.Original article source: NY Republicans push 'Peanut's Law' after beloved pet squirrel was seized, killed by state agents
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fox News Had Only 3 Minutes of Epstein Coverage in the Last 4 Days – and 85 Minutes of Sydney Sweeney's Jeans Ad
The news channel mentioned the controversial American Eagle campaign 62 times since Monday, Media Matters reports The last four days have seen Fox News dedicate much more time to covering the 'woke mob' online outrage surrounding Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle jeans ad than the latest developments around President Donald Trump and his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein — 85 minutes compared to three minutes, to be exact. According to a Thursday report by Media Matters, the news organization logged 85 minutes of time breaking down the online reaction to the actresses' viral jeans ad. Comparatively, Fox News spent a meager three minutes talking about Epstein and new comments the president made about the disgraced financier during his trip to Scotland. More from TheWrap Fox News Had Only 3 Minutes of Epstein Coverage in the Last 4 Days – and 85 Minutes of Sydney Sweeney's Jeans Ad Shirley Halperin Exits Hollywood Reporter for Rolling Stone, Maer Roshan Becomes Sole EIC of THR Daily Beast Deletes Article Alleging Trump Met Melania Through Epstein Relations Bobbi Althoff Ends Her 'Really Good Podcast': 'Some Things Happen in Life for a Reason' | Video The minute count was gathered using SnapStream's video database and calculating mention count through Kinetiq and timing the segment. Fox News mentioned the jeans ad 62 times compared to only 14 mentions for Epstein. Other networks broken down for the two topics included Newsmax (180 for Epstein, 42 on Sweeney), CNN (638 for Epstein, six for Sweeney) and MSNBC (756 for Epstein, 0 for Sweeney). The report also points to how the two topics were discussed. Epstein's three minutes were reached in the brief in-passing mentions he received as part of smaller stories. Sweeney's American Eagle ad was a part of a number of larger discussions and segments that brought her count up to the 85 total minutes. Sweeney's jeans ad earned backlash after some online called the ad tone-deaf and even racist, saying it celebrates Sweeney's whiteness and physique. Many viral comments deriding the ad brought up arguments suggesting that it's not only supposedly promoting white supremacy, but also eugenics, nazism and master race propaganda. 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color,' Sweeney says in the ad. 'My jeans are blue.' After weeks at the center of the news cycle following the DOJ and FBI's memo that they would not be releasing any more information on Epstein, Trump's latest comments on the matter came during his trip to Scotland and had him theorizing that Epstein 'stole' accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre while she worked at his Florida estate, Mar-a-Lago. 'I think she worked at the spa,' Trump said. 'He stole her, and by the way, she had no complaints about us, as you know, none whatsoever.' The post Fox News Had Only 3 Minutes of Epstein Coverage in the Last 4 Days – and 85 Minutes of Sydney Sweeney's Jeans Ad appeared first on TheWrap.
New York Post
8 minutes ago
- New York Post
Dems' confirmation obstruction is an anti-democratic, dangerous stunt
Senate Democrats are throwing a hissy fit for the ages with an unprecedented drive to drag out the confirmations of President Donald Trump's nominees. Every new prez must get not just his Cabinet chiefs confirmed, but also hundreds of other top officials across the Executive Branch. After getting out of committee, these 'sub-Cabinet' picks are traditionally OK'd on the Senate floor in batches, often by unanimous consent. But Dems are instead now insisting on hours of 'debate' and a full roll-call vote for every single Trump nominee — making the process so time-consuming that countless federal agencies still lack permanent leadership as acting officials hold down the fort. This is pure spite: Republicans won the White House and control of Congress fair and square last fall; Democrats just don't want to honor the election results. Indeed, the party's base demands that its reps in Washington do all they can to frustrate the new president's agenda — no matter what price the country as a whole pays. No wonder Democrats' approval ratings are circling the drain. Dem partisans may feel like they're 'resisting fascism,' but they're really just defying the democratic process. Assuming (fingers crossed) that no harm is done because key desks at the Pentagon or State Department are needlessly vacant, this stall won't change anything in the long run: It's purely performative, the equivalent of when then-Rep. Jamaal Bowman pulled a fire alarm to delay a vote Dems were sure to lose. Heck, the real point may be to save Chuck Schumer: Progressives have been howling for the Senate minority leader's scalp ever since he followed his conscience to avoid a government shutdown a few months back. It's pretty sad that Schumer's reduced to these games just so he can keep trying to protect his party from the consequences of its demented turn to the hard left. Maybe it's time to take the risk of facing down the lunatics, Chuck: Appeasing them only makes all Democrats look bad.
UPI
9 minutes ago
- UPI
Illinois Rep. Danny Davis announces retirement
President Joe Biden talks with Rep. Danny Davis, D-Ill., after the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the Capitol on February 7, 2023. File Photo by Jacquelyn Martin/UPI | License Photo July 31 (UPI) -- Rep. Danny Davis, D-Ill., won't seek re-election after completing his 15th term next year and has endorsed an Illinois state representative to replace him. "We're not going to go away, but the time has come," Davis, 83, said while announcing his pending retirement at a Chicago press event on Thursday. "I want to thank the thousands of people who believed we could make a difference," Davis said, as reported by WTTW. "Chicago, Illinois, has done some marvelous things," he said. "The road has not always been the easiest, but ... I've had so much fun doing this job." Davis said he would have "done it for nothing" and "would pay to do it." Illinois state Rep. La Shawn Ford, D-Chicago, joined Davis at the press event, whom he introduced as his chosen successor. Davis said he will chair Ford's campaign, while his chief of staff, Tumia Romero, will serve as Ford's campaign manager. Davis described Ford, 53, as an experienced state representative, but he will face a crowded field. Several Illinois Democrats already have announced their candidacy to replace Davis during the 2026 election. Davis first won his seat in Congress in 1996 and is one of the oldest members of the House of Representatives. He previously served as an alderman for Chicago's 29th Ward from 1979 to 1990 and as a Cook County commissioner from 1990 to 1997. As the incumbent representative for Illinois' 7th District in the House of Representatives, Davis routinely secured 80% or more of votes despite rarely being mentioned by Chicago's daily newspapers. He defeated Republican challenger Chad Koppie with 83% of votes during the Nov. 5 election. The 7th District encompasses Chicago's downtown area, parts of the city's South Side and many western suburbs. Davis, like all House Democrats, opposed President Donald Trump's and Republicans' "one big, beautiful bill" in July. He called the budget bill a "big, bad, inhumane and ugly bill" and said it will "wreck health care delivery, take food from hungry children, sentence seniors to early deaths, eliminate jobs and destabilize the economy." The only thing the bill would accomplish is giving "the super-rich and wealthy more influence, more power [and] more wealth," Davis said.
