logo
3 Ways All-Boys Summer Camps Can Help Parents Keep Them on the Right Track

3 Ways All-Boys Summer Camps Can Help Parents Keep Them on the Right Track

Yahoo20 hours ago

Fact checked by Sarah Scott
A few recent notable trends among American boys include a decline in academics and close friendships, and an increase in disciplinary action and exposure to harmful influencer content. While not always a predictor of success, these trends still point to risks parents should be aware of.
But what if a way to help boys thrive is already available to us via all-boys summer camps?
Being in nature and regular exercise benefit everyone's mental health and are core to most camps. But according to experts, all-boys summer camps—many of which now embrace gender inclusivity—are uniquely suited to benefit boys in three ways:
They provide a safe, structured environment where boys can develop friendships.
They provide well-trained camp counselors who act as mentors.
They enforce rules that allow boys to practice ethics and morality.
Parents recently spoke with experts to better understand how these camps can actually help counteract troubling trends among boys, and how families can make the best decision for them.
Zac Seidler, clinical psychologist and global director of men's health research at the Movember Institute for Men's Health, explains that boys have shown a level of discomfort and uncertainty around making in-person connections, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic.
This likely contributes to an increase in screen time. But Seidler says residential summer camps' strict no-screen policies can help to make the reintroduction of in-person interactions more seamless.
'There's real power in filling that void with something healthy that builds an emotional muscle for them,' Seidler tells Parents. He also notes it's easier to place some structure around technology when everyone else at camp is going to be screen-free as well, adding, 'I think it's actually the healthiest way of getting boys offline."
Michael G. Thompson, PhD, a child developmental psychologist, who trains counselors and staff at several all-boys camps, notes the emphasis placed on selecting effective counselors is essential. Counselors who provide deep kindness and empathy to campers model healthier, more expansive examples of masculinity to boys.
'It's a magic combination,' says Dr. Thompson. 'There's nobody that an 11 or 12-year-old boy admires more than a 21-year-old young man.'
Thompson believes the magic lies in the dramatic difference in physical appearance and maturity levels between campers and counselors, but the relatively small gap in their ages.
'The boys think, 'I can be that in a few years,'' he says.
This is particularly important in light of a new study from the Movember Institute of Men's Health that found 60% of American boys engage with masculinity influencers (like Andrew Tate) on a regular basis.
Krista Fisher, one of Movember's researchers, explained that boys are likely drawn to this content because the influencers talk to their audience like a "cool big brother" and, as a result, boys end up seeing them as role models. But this hypermasculine content has also been found to increase feelings of worthlessness, depression, restlessness, sadness, and nervousness in boys who engage with it.
On the other hand, Seidler believes that having healthy, well-trained role models like a camp counselor, can have the opposite effect.
'There is a retraining and relearning that can happen when boys have a number of weeks with a 'real guy' in front of them,' he says.
When campers hear counselors talk about their own lives, relationships, and challenges it illustrates the multifaceted reality of masculinity: there is no single way to be a man.
'Boys need real-life offline figures who can speak to the messiness of manhood,' says Seidler.
The investment that camps make to educate counselors also reflects the moral and ethical guidance they provide to campers more broadly. Most camps have a set of mottos or rules that are meant to help campers navigate life's challenges at camp and in society.
Take for example Camp Becket YMCA, an all-boys summer camp in Massachusetts. The camp's mottos, which are posted all over the grounds include:
'Help the other fellow'
'Peace through understanding'
'Manners maketh the man'
These types of lessons can be foundational to how boys grow into men. Dr. Thompson interviewed two men in their 50s who attended Camp Becket as children and, decades after their camp days, still referred to themselves as 'Becket Boys.'
They said the moral lessons they learned at the all-boys camp became a foundational part of their moral compasses as adults.
An all-boys camp, of course, isn't going to be a good fit for every family. But if you do want to go that route, selecting one you're comfortable with takes a bit of research up front.
The American Camp Association lists 119 accredited all-boys camps nationwide. While parents can use the association's database to find camps that match certain criteria like location, cost, and special needs, Thompson suggests taking a simpler and more effective route: ask the people in your community for recommendations.
From there, he advises having a conversations with camp directors about their approaches and the values of their camps. If costs are a concern, it's also a good time to bring up financial aid, which is something that many camps now offer.
It is also worth noting that Dr. Thompson thinks boys should only be sent to single gender camps if they attend co-ed schools during the academic year, noting that both co-ed and single gender experiences are vital for children's development.
Choosing between sleepaway (or residential) camps and day camps can be important as well. Dr. Thompson says it certainly provides a more intensive and holistic experience while also giving boys the opportunity to fully disconnect from all technology for the length of their stay. But if they are not ready for the full experience away from home, Dr. Thompson says boys can still get some of the same benefits from day camps.
Providing boys with experiences like all-boys summer camps opens up an environment where boys and men are allowed to express the full breadth and depth of their humanity. Once this foundation is established, it becomes easier for parents and educators to build upon through supportive conversations.
'Boys can see that this [way of living] is something they want to fight for rather than feeling like it's thrust upon them,' says Seidler. 'If you provide them that sense of autonomy, they will find a way to make better choices.'
Read the original article on Parents

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Body fat predicts major health risk that BMI misses, researchers say
Body fat predicts major health risk that BMI misses, researchers say

Fox News

time31 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Body fat predicts major health risk that BMI misses, researchers say

Body mass index (BMI) may not be the most accurate predictor of death risk. A new study from the University of Florida found that BMI — a measurement that is commonly used to determine whether a person's weight is in a healthy range for their height — is "deeply flawed" in terms of predicting mortality. Instead, one's level of body fat is "far more accurate," concluded the study, which was published this week in the Annals of Family Medicine. To measure participants' body fat, the researchers used a method called bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), which uses a device to measure the resistance of body tissue to a small electrical current. Over a 15-year period, those who had high body fat were found to be 78% more likely to die than those who had healthy body fat levels, researchers found. They were also more than three times as likely to die of heart disease, the study noted. BMI — which is calculated by dividing weight by height, squared — was described as "entirely unreliable" in predicting the risk of death over a 15-year period from any cause. The study included 4,252 people in the U.S. and pulled data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. BMI should not be relied upon as a "vital sign" of health, according to senior author Frank Orlando, M.D., medical director of UF Health Family Medicine in Springhill. "I'm a family physician, and on a regular basis, we're faced with patients who have diabetes, heart disease, obesity and other conditions that are related to obesity," Orlando said in a press release for the study. "One of the routine measures we take alongside traditional vital signs is BMI. We use BMI to screen for a person having an issue with their body composition, but it's not as accurate for everyone as vital signs are," he added. BMI has been the international standard for measuring obesity since the 1980s, according to many sources, though some experts have questioned its validity. "I think the study shows it's time to go to an alternative that is now proven to be far better at the job." An individual is considered obese if their BMI is 30 or above, overweight if it is between 25 and 29.9, of "normal" weight in the range of 18.5 to 24.9, or underweight if lower than 18.5. While BMI is easy to calculate, one of its main limitations is that it cannot distinguish between muscle and fat mass, the researchers noted. "For example, people who are bodybuilders can really elevate their body mass index," Orlando said. "But they're healthy even with a BMI indicating that they're obese." "BMI is just so ingrained in how we think about body fat," Mainous added. "I think the study shows it's time to go to an alternative that is now proven to be far better at the job." Other methods, such as a DEXA (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) scan, may be even more accurate than BIA, but are much more expensive and not as accessible, the researchers noted. "If you talk to obesity researchers, they're going to say you have to use the DEXA scan because it's the most accurate," Mainous said in the release. "And that's probably true. But it's never going to be viable in a doctor's office or family practice." Dr. Stephen Vogel — a family medicine physician with PlushCare, a virtual health platform with primary care, therapy and weight management options — echoed the limitations of BMI. "It has been an easy measurement tool that helps us understand at-risk groups across various populations and demographics, but it doesn't provide accurate data from patient to patient," the North Carolina-based doctor, who was not involved in the study, told Fox News Digital. "These findings don't challenge the assumptions about BMI — they strengthen the message that new standards, delivered in a consistent and low-cost way, would provide better nuance for the individual when it comes to their overall physical health." "The main strengths of this study are a better correlation to an individual's risk of morbidity and mortality — however, the limitations lie in the fact that we don't have enough data to determine the right cutoff for these numbers, or to identify the right tools that will be both accurate and precise across the population," Vogel said. The researchers also acknowledged that body fat percentage thresholds haven't yet been as standardized as BMI and waist circumference. Also, the age range of the participants in the study was limited by the data source. "Future studies should extend this comparison of body fat to BMI in older adults," the researchers wrote. The study was also limited by focusing only on mortality as an outcome, they noted, without taking into account any developing diseases — such as heart failure or cancer — that could deepen the understanding of body fat as a risk factor. The goal, according to Vogel, is to have a cost-effective, consistent method that can be used across the population with reliable accuracy. "These data will drive better discussions in the doctor's office, as well as public health initiatives with the goal of improving the health of all." "Benefits would come in the form of a more detailed list of information that helps providers and patients make informed decisions about the patient's health, which is ideal," Vogel noted. "I'm hopeful there's enough buzz around these measures that steps will continue to be taken toward regular implementation." For more Health articles, visit The researchers are hopeful that once standards are validated, measuring body fat percentage with bioelectrical impedance analysis could become standard of care. They added, "These data will drive better discussions in the doctor's office, as well as public health initiatives with the goal of improving the health of all."

Citi Expresses Optimism for Eli Lilly and Company (LLY)
Citi Expresses Optimism for Eli Lilly and Company (LLY)

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Citi Expresses Optimism for Eli Lilly and Company (LLY)

Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) is one of the 13 Best Long Term Growth Stocks to Invest in Right Now. On June 25, Citi reported that 'compelling' data shows that Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) and Novo Nordisk (NVO) have turned obesity into a treatable disease from a lifestyle-based condition. The firm models more than $40 billion in obesity sales by 2030, well above the consensus estimates of $25 billion. Citi stated that as the obesity space evolves from injectables to convenient orals, such as orforglipron, the emergence of a 'dynamic' consumer-centric market is possible, and LillyDirect by Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) is well-positioned to connect high consumer visibility for orforglipron with global access. In a research note, Citi further stated that it estimated penetration rates via income-based tiers for pricing and out-of-pocket costs in low- and mid-body mass index patients. The results place Eli Lilly and Company's (NYSE:LLY) consumer platform opportunity at $15B, which is not assumed in the firm's model. It thus believes that Eli Lilly and Company's (NYSE:LLY) is in a position to expedite access outside the US, employing a centralized out-of-pocket payment model instead of the traditional country-by-country launch. It contended that an 'income-based tiered pricing of orforglipron via LillyDirect could unlock unprecedented volume, all the while allowing it to maintain overall pricing power.' Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) develops, manufactures, discovers, and sells pharmaceutical products. These products span oncology, diabetes, immunology, neuroscience, and other therapies. Investors are bullish on Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) due to its in-demand GLP-1 drugs, used to treat diabetes and obesity, which are still in their early growth stages, and the company's strong financials. While we acknowledge the potential of LKQ as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio

Why a G.O.P. Medicaid Requirement Could Set States Up for Failure
Why a G.O.P. Medicaid Requirement Could Set States Up for Failure

New York Times

time36 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Why a G.O.P. Medicaid Requirement Could Set States Up for Failure

The strict Medicaid work requirement at the center of the Republicans' major policy bill wouldn't just require millions of poor Americans to prove they are employed to sign up for health insurance. It would also require dozens of states to quickly build expensive and complex software systems to measure and track who is eligible. This new responsibility for states, whose existing Medicaid computer systems are often outdated, would be accompanied by reduced federal funding through other changes in the bill. The result, according to state officials, software developers and policy experts, could be major failures in state systems for enrolling people in Medicaid. 'That's how happens,' said Julie Brinn Siegel, a former top Biden administration budget official, referring to the Obama administration's botched launch of the online Affordable Care Act enrollment portal in 2013. Ms. Siegel and others familiar with Medicaid systems envision problems like websites that don't load or incorrectly tell applicants they are not eligible. And Medicaid workers may be overwhelmed as they try to run call centers and process applications. The fallout could mean eligible Americans will have their coverage dropped. Republicans contend that the work requirement achieves twin goals: It ensures that the government directs resources to Americans who are contributing to society, while saving money to help finance an extension of President Trump's tax cuts. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store