McMurdock says ‘business dealings' compliant after he resigns Reform whip
The Sunday Times published a story on Saturday which alleged two businesses connected to Mr McMurdock took out Covid-19 loans totalling £70,000 during the pandemic.
A statement from Lee Anderson, Chief Whip Reform UK. pic.twitter.com/hsT4cm5SsN
— Reform UK (@reformparty_uk) July 5, 2025
In a statement posted on X on Saturday afternoon, Mr McMurdock said that he had been contacted by a journalist.
'I confirmed to the journalist that all my business dealings had always been conducted fully within the law and in compliance with all regulations and that appropriately qualified professionals had reviewed all activity confirming the same.'
He added: 'As a precautionary measure, and for the protection of ReformUK, I have asked to have the whip suspended temporarily.'
Reform's chief whip Lee Anderson had earlier said that the allegations against Mr McMurdock which led to him removing the whip 'relate to business propriety during the pandemic and before he became an MP'.
Mr Anderson said that Mr McMurdock has 'agreed to co-operate in full with any investigation'.
In a statement published on Reform's X account on Saturday afternoon, Mr Anderson said: 'I have today received a call from James McMurdock who has advised me, as chief whip, that he has removed the party whip from himself pending the outcome of an investigation into allegations that are likely to be published by a national newspaper.
'The allegations relate to business propriety during the pandemic and before he became an MP,' Mr Anderson said.
The statement also said that Reform would not be commenting further for the moment.
Mr McMurdock has represented South Basildon and East Thurrock since last July's general election.
He won the seat by 98 votes, beating Labour into second place, and taking the seat from the Conservatives.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Groomers and child abductors could be jailed without juries in major shake-up
More than 150 offences - such as sexual grooming, child abduction or causing death by careless driving - would no longer be tried by a jury under a major proposal People charged with more serious crimes could lose their automatic right to a trial by jury under major proposals to overhaul the courts system. More than 150 offences - such as sexual grooming, child abduction or causing death by careless driving - would be tried in a new courts division, with two magistrates and a judge, instead of in front of a jury. The new 'Crown Court (Bench Division)', which could reduce the time of a hearing by at least 20%, would mark the most dramatic shake-up of criminal courts in a generation. The change is proposed in a landmark review of the courts, which has been published today. In his almost 400-page review, Sir Brian Leveson laid out a system in deep crisis, which is leaving victims, witnesses and defendants waiting years for their cases to go to trial. He warned it could not be fixed with more money or court sitting days, writing: 'The system is too broken. A radical and essential package of measures is therefore required to prevent total collapse of the system.' He said the increasing complexity of criminal law, including the emergence of DNA and mobile phone evidence, the Covid pandemic, and strike action by barristers were all among reasons for its deterioration. Currently offenders facing shorter sentences for cases known as 'summary offences' are tried by a magistrate, without a jury, while the Crown court handles more serious cases. Almost 77,000 cases are currently waiting on the Crown courts backlog, with some being listed as far away as 2029. To slash the backlog, Sir Brian recommended some 32 offences, including possession of some class B and class C drugs and vehicle theft, be reclassified as 'summary offences' and face lower penalties. He also wants more cases to be settled outside of court, with an increased use of cautions. And he said offenders should get up to 40% knocked off their sentence for a guilty plea - up from the maximum of a third currently - to speed up case resolutions. Sir Brian also recommended that complicated fraud and money laundering trials be heard by a judge only, to stop a jury having to decide a verdict on a topic they might not understand. But he said work was ongoing to improve diversity among magistrates, who are also members of the public - not legally trained - and work in the courts on a voluntary basis. Speaking to reporters, the former senior judge said he does not "rejoice" in the recommendations, but added: "I do believe that they are absolutely essential if we are to prevent our system from collapse." Courts minister Sarah Sackman has previously backed plans to establish a new division in the court, where offences would be tried without a jury. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood is actively considering all the measures, including the reduction of jury trials. She is expected to comb through the policy in detail, considering each offence on a case-by-case basis to assess whether they could be tried without a jury, before making any decisions. Ms Mahmood said today 'swifter justice requires bold reform', adding: 'I will do whatever it takes to bring down the backlog and deliver swifter justice for victims.' Baroness Newlove, Victims' Commissioner for England and Wales, said: 'This Review rightly recognises the scale of the challenge. It sets out bold, radical proposals to overhaul our criminal courts and bring them back from the brink, and deliver swifter justice for victims. I welcome this, though not without reservation. For many victims, plans to increase sentence discounts for guilty pleas and expand out-of-court disposals will feel like justice being diluted once again.' Law Society president Richard Atkinson: 'This root and branch review shines a light on how decades of neglect of the criminal justice system mean this vital service is failing the public. Justice delayed is justice denied.' He added that the establishment of a new division, without juries, would undermine 'our historic jury system' without investment in the system, as a whole. Mark Beattie, national chair of the Magistrates' Association, welcomed the review but said plans needed to be put in place to boost magistrate recruitment and retention, with the number of magistrates likely needing to increase by more than a third if a new division is implemented. 'Magistrates are ready and willing to support these and other initiatives aimed at reducing the pressure on crown courts,' he said. 'We urge the government to implement Leveson's recommendations as soon as possible. Every day that they aren't in place, is a day when victims, witnesses and defendants have to wait for justice.'
Daily Record
7 hours ago
- Daily Record
Inquiry into Covid care home mistakes must give bereaved closure
People across the UK will look back on the pandemic as the most traumatic moment of their lifetime. A deadly virus forced the suspension of everyday life and created turmoil on an unprecedented level. The country was plunged into lockdown, workers' jobs were furloughed and tens of thousands of poor souls died. It was only when the vaccine was developed that we turned the corner and beat Covid. Nowhere was the pain felt more acutely than in our care homes. With older people at more risk, Covid ripped through care homes and thousands died. Deadly blunders like discharging patients into homes without a Covid test only added to the heartbreak. The UK Covid Inquiry will this week look at the impact of the pandemic on care homes and the agony felt by residents and their families. Visits were heavily curtailed and elderly relatives died without getting to say their goodbyes. At the same time, Boris Johnson and his Downing Street cronies flouted the rules by partying hard. It was this contrast – demanding obedience from voters while ignoring social distancing in No10 – that set in train the Tory defeat last year. Families want politicians, whether they were in London or Edinburgh, to be held accountable for their actions. The key mistakes in Scotland were made by the SNP government and the UK inquiry is unlikely to pull its punches. And the UK Government aggravated the pain by the disgrace of party-gate. The bereaved want to move on, but to do so they need answers. Time for a reset It is nearly 12 months since Labour and Keir Starmer beat the Tories after a thrilling general election win. Starmer is a good man who wants to make the country a better place, but his start has been mixed. Cutting winter fuel payments was a disaster and the plan for welfare cuts continues to cause anxiety. The common denominator in both policies is Labour taking money away from people who need it, rather than boosting incomes. The wider problem has been the lack of a positive story to tell voters about the type of society the Prime Minister wants to build. Left-wing Labour MP Brian Leishman does not get every call right, but he is correct to say Starmer needs to listen to his MPs more. The welfare debacle could have been sorted long ago had ministers taken the concerns of MPs easy. Starmer's first anniversary is an opportunity for a reset and a chance to show the difference Labour policies can make for ordinary people.
Rhyl Journal
7 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
James McMurdock says he will not return to Reform UK after Covid loan questions
The MP for South Basildon and East Thurrock 'removed the party whip from himself' last week pending the outcome of an investigation relating to allegations around 'business propriety during the pandemic'. The Sunday Times published a story on Saturday which alleged two businesses connected to Mr McMurdock took out Covid-19 loans totalling £70,000 during the pandemic, one of which had no employees. On Tuesday, the MP said he 'had a chance to take specialist legal advice from an expert in the relevant field' since the loans came to light. Writing on social media site X, he added: 'In light of that advice, which is privileged and which I choose to keep private at this time, I have decided to continue my parliamentary career as an independent MP where I can focus 100% on the interests of my constituents.' Further to my statement tweeted on 5th July 2025. I have now had a chance to take specialist legal advice from an expert in the relevant field. In light of that advice, which is privileged and which I choose to keep private at this time, I have decided to continue my… — James McMurdock MP (@JMcMurdockMP) July 8, 2025 According to Companies House, Mr McMurdock is listed as the current director of Gym Live Health and Fitness Limited, and a former director of J A M Financial Limited, a position he resigned in 2021. Both firms are shown to have overdue accounts and confirmation statements, and both have an 'active proposal to strike off'. Mr McMurdock insisted when the Sunday Times news story broke that 'all my business dealings had always been conducted fully within the law and in compliance with all regulations and that appropriately qualified professionals had reviewed all activity confirming the same'. He said he had asked for the Reform whip to be suspended temporarily as a 'precautionary measure'. The chairwoman of the Labour Party said Nigel Farage 'sat on his hands' over the allegations and that the Reform UK leader should 'come clean with the public about what he knew and when'. 'After these serious allegations surfaced, Nigel Farage sat on his hands. He took no action against James McMurdock and instead outsourced the problem – that's not leadership,' MP Ellie Reeves said. She added: 'Farage's Reform has proven once again that they simply cannot uphold the high standards expected in public life.' Of the five MPs elected under the Reform UK banner in July 2024, two now sit as Independents. Rupert Lowe, who represents Great Yarmouth, was suspended earlier this year following allegations about his conduct which he has denied. Sarah Pochin won the Runcorn by-election in May, meaning that Reform now has four MPs.
