ED restores ₹3.82 crore worth assets to Ktaka Waqf Board
The money laundering case stems from a state police FIR filed against two Vijaya Bank officials and a man named Syed Siraj Ahmed, a first division assistant with the Waqf Board.
The Waqf Board issued two cheques of ₹ 4,00,45,465 to open fixed deposit accounts in the Vijaya Bank. However, instead of opening the accounts, the money was "siphoned off" by transferring to fictitious entities, the federal agency said in a statement.
It was found, the ED said, that ₹ 4 crore was transferred to the account of a company named Verkeys Realities Pvt. Ltd., which spent ₹ 1.10 crore in purchasing a Mercedes car while ₹ 2,72,74,444 was transferred to another account.
The agency had attached assets worth more than ₹ 3.82 crore in 2017 as part of this investigation and later in March that year it filed a chargesheet against six individuals and entities including Verkeys Realities.
This prosecution complaint was filed before a special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court located in Bengaluru.
In line with the PMLA and its "core objective" of ensuring the "restitution" of the proceeds of crime to the legitimate victims, the ED said no objections were raised by it when the additional sessions judge considered the release of the funds to the Karnataka State Waqf Board, the rightful claimant in this case.
The agency issued a banker's cheque of ₹ 3,82,74,444 to the Wakf Board on July 1, which it said, was a "significant" step forward in the ED's ongoing mission to restore the misappropriated funds to those who have been wronged.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Rs 3.8 crore swindled by Karnataka waqf board staff restituted by ED
ED NEW DELHI: Enforcement Directorate provided a big relief to Karnataka waqf board by restituting Rs 3.8 crore worth of assets to the board with the court's permission in a fraud case in which one of its employees cheated the board by depositing its money in his personal account instead of making a fixed deposit in the waqf account. The accused bought a Mercedes car from the laundered money besides creating other assets. ED investigation, which began in 2017, led to attachment of assets of the accused. In a recent order, an additional sessions judge of Bengaluru court allowed restitution of the assets to the rightful claimant, the Karnataka waqf board . After the court order, ED, on July 1, facilitated the release of the entire amount. A banker's cheque of Rs 3.8 crore was handed over to board CEO Jeelani Mokashi. "This release underscores ED's commitment to ensuring justice for victims of financial crimes," the agency said Tuesday, adding that it will ensure that the proceeds of crime are returned to their rightful owners.
India Gazette
3 hours ago
- India Gazette
National Herald case: No transparency in shares, says ASG Raju on argument of respondents
New Delhi [India], July 8 (ANI): The Rouse Avenue court on Tuesday heard the rebuttal arguments by Additional Solicitor General (ASG) SV Raju on the cognisance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and others. ASG Raju submitted that there was no transparency and that other shareholders were dummies for Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi. 'Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi may not be getting a dividend today, they may get their due share the moment they quit,' he contended. The Special Judge, after hearing part of the arguments, listed the matter for July 12 for hearing the remaining arguments by the ASG. At the outset, ASG submitted that as per the Companies Act, a 'not-for-profit company' can undertake commercial activities. 'They got the shares at a cheaper price...,' ASG said. It was also submitted by the ASG that shares held by Congress leaders Motilal Vohra and Oscar Fernandes, who have passed away, were transferred. He said that their shares were not sold in open market as it would have disclosed the actual price of share. It was also argued that there was a criminal breach of trust, adding that any property acquired by a criminal breach of trust is stolen property. The possession of stolen property attracts section 411 of IPC, which is a scheduled offence under PMLA. ASG submitted that there was a criminal breach of trust by AICC and AJL in relation to Rs 90 crore. Young Indian had also obtained a loan from a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC), identified as Dotex. During the pre-lunch session, Senior Advocate Pramod Kumar Dubey, appeared for Dotex Merchandise Pvt Ltd. He submitted that Dotex was registered as a Non-Banking Financial Company by the Reserve Bank of India in February 2010. 'There is no cancellation of my registration. When RBI has given a recognition. The ED can't overreach by calling Dotex a sham accommodation entry operator,' Dubey said. For the day-to-day functioning of the Young Indian company, a loan was required. A loan was obtained from Dotex, the Senior Advocate stated. 'Is this written anywhere that the loan was given to acquire the property of AJL. My knowledge was that the loan was taken for the day-to-day function of the company,' Dubey added. There is no criminal intent on the part of Dotex, no role in alleged offence, he said. The Senior Advocate rejected allegations of conspiracy. 'Jiske khilaf koi case nahi, uske khilaf Conspiracy hai.' (the ones who have no case against them, they have a conspiracy) As per the judgment of the Supreme Court, the theory of conspiracy is not applicable in the cases of PMLA, the Senior Advocate argued. The ED's claim of the cheque of Rs 1 crore being dated as October 24, 2010 was also disputed with the claim that the cheque was of December 24, 2010. It was also submitted that loan was given on the basis valid documents though it was not on stamp paper. 'Dotex got interest at the rate of 14 percent. The repayment of loan was also done. Every information was given to ED, it was not considered,' said Dubey. 'Dotex has not committed any offence, then where is the question of Sunil Bhandari doing offence being a director. He has done nothing, they (ED) cannot connect me with the other accused,' the Senior Advocate said. 'My act is not a part of criminal activity, my giving loan is not a criminal activity,' he added. Advocate Soujanya Sankaran appeared for Sunil Bhandari, whose name is in the ED chargesheet, and submitted that this court has no jurisdiction to take cognizance. 'The foundational fact has to be produced by the ED,' she added. She also submitted that this case is based on a complaint filed by Subramaniam Swamy. There is no foundational basis to proceed against accused Sunil Bhandari, who is director of Dotex, she submitted. (ANI)
India Gazette
3 hours ago
- India Gazette
ED releases Rs 3.82 cr assets to Karnataka State Waqf Board in money laundering case
New Delhi [India], July 8 (ANI): In a significant move to restore the Proceeds of Crime (POC) to the rightful claimants, the Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Bengaluru Zonal Office, has taken a significant step by releasing properties valued at Rs 3.82 crore to the victims of money laundering and the legitimate claimants in the case of Shusheela Chintamani & Others, currently under investigation by the ED, the agency said. According to the ED, it initiated investigation on the basis of an FIR filed against two Vijaya Bank officials and Syed Siraj Ahmed, a First Division Assistant with the Waqf Board. In this case, the Waqf Board issued two cheques amounting to Rs 4,00,45,465/- to open Fixed Deposit accounts at Vijaya Bank. However, instead of opening the fixed deposits, the money was siphoned off by transferring to fictitious entities. Further, Rs 4 Crore was transferred to M/s. Verkeys Realities Pvt. Ltd., which spent Rs 1.10 Crore purchasing a Mercedes car from Ghatge Motors Pvt. Ltd. Further, Rs 2,72,74,444/- was transferred back to the account of M/s. Ajay Sharma Trading Corporation, the agency said. The Enforcement Directorate said that upon uncovering these illicit financial transactions and a proper money trail of Proceeds of Crime (POC), ED issued a Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) totalling Rs 3,82,74,444/-. On March 31, 2017, ED filed a Prosecution Complaint (PC) before the Special PMLA Court in Bengaluru, against six individuals and entities, including M/s. Verkeys Realities Pvt. Ltd. In line with the PMLA and its core objective of ensuring the restitution POC to the legitimate victims, the ED did not raise any objections when the Additional Sessions Judge considered the release of the funds to the Karnataka State Waqf Board, the rightful claimant in this case, the agency said. On July 1, 2025, in a further demonstration of its commitment to justice, ED facilitated the release of the entire amount. A banker's cheque of Rs 3,82,74,444/- was handed over to Jeelani H. Mokashi, CEO (Additional Charge), of the Karnataka State Waqf Board. This marks a significant step forward in the ED's ongoing mission to restore the misappropriated funds to those who have been wronged, the ED said. This release underscores the ED's commitment to ensuring justice for victims of financial crimes. ED remains resolute in its dedication to combating money laundering and ensuring that the Proceeds of Crime are returned to their rightful owners, the agency emphasised. (ANI)
