logo
The Wagner Group's dealings are darker than we thought

The Wagner Group's dealings are darker than we thought

Telegraph20-05-2025
The Central African Republic may be Africa's most failed state. Since the 1979 overthrow of its self-declared emperor Jean-Bédel Bokassa, the country has seen coups, insurgencies and full-blown civil wars. It has hosted nearly a dozen United Nations-backed peacekeeping missions, most of which have cost hundreds of millions of dollars. None has achieved lasting results.
So when, in 2019, Yevgeny Prigozhin, the late leader of Russia's mercenary group Wagner, helped to broker an accord in the CAR, he at least got value for money. Having won a contract to act as military advisors to the CAR's government, Wagner dished out bribes to persuade rebel leaders to end seven years of fighting. One leader received $60,000, a box of Turkish pistols and 200 Android phones. The total price of these sweeteners was only $1 million or so. As the US journalist John Lechner notes in Death is Our Business, his new book on Wagner, 'it was a clear foreign-policy win for Moscow and a boon for Russia's international image.'
Prigozhin was no Russian version of Mandela, however, as Lechner's book makes clear. The one-time street-food seller is best known for Wagner's brutal operations in Ukraine: in 2023, he recruited nearly 50,000 Russian ex-prisoners for the 'meat-grinder' battle of Bakhmut, and around 20,000 of them died. Many would argue that the nearest he came to bringing about world peace was when he launched an armed mutiny against the Kremlin that same summer, during which, for a matter of hours, Putin's regime looked like imploding.
But Prigozhin retreated, having apparently lost his nerve, and died two months later in a plane crash, which was widely blamed on a Putin-sanctioned bomb – a victim, then, of the very thuggery he'd epitomised. Wagner continues to operate today, but it's now under much closer Kremlin control.
Lechner's book covers some similar territory to Downfall, last year's excellent Prigozhin biography co-written by Mark Galeotti and Anna Arutunyan, but where it adds value is in Lechner's journalistic shoe-leather. Not only has he interviewed around 30 ex-Wagner members – itself no easy task – but he has conducted extensive ground reporting on Wagner operations in Africa. This would be a hazardous assignment even for the major news outlets, let alone a freelancer such as Lechner. Wagner's African ventures are, by definition, in places where Western intervention has failed: the jihadist-plagued ex-French colonies of the Sahel, for example. And Wagner doesn't like scrutiny. In 2018, three Russian journalists were shot dead in the CAR while reporting on the group, a hit that some commentators linked to Prigozhin.
But Lechner dives in headlong, visiting the CAR, Libya, Mali and Ukraine. Already fluent in Russian and French, he learns Sango, the CAR's lingua franca, and he interviews everyone from pro-Wagner locals to the head of the group's operations, who holds court in a luxury hotel in the CAR's capital, Bangui. The result is a vivid snapshot of Africa's modern soldiers of fortune, far darker than anything in Frederick Forsyth's novel Dogs of War.
The key to Wagner's success in the likes of CAR and Sahel is brutally simple: it has brought order through the use of what Lechner calls 'extremely harsh but effective military force'. Human-rights groups decry this, but locals tell Lechner that they appreciate being able to travel around their country safely for the first time, unmolested by murderous gangs. 'While there were countless people with good intentions working for the UN in places like CAR,' Lechner writes, 'it was well-known that UN peacekeeping missions often failed to keep the peace and protect.' Prigozhin's 'troll factories' also played a role, churning out online propaganda that depicted Wagner as saviours, righting centuries of French imperial wrongs.
The reality, however, was that Wagner's presence was as rapacious as anything from the colonial era. In exchange for keeping local leaders in power, they have taken concessions on gold and other natural resources. Little thought is given to governance, development or any of the other knotty issues to which more benign partners might attend, nor do human rights remotely figure on their agenda). Lechner cites a massacre in central Mali in 2022, when Wagner and Malian government forces executed 300 villagers on suspicion of being jihadists. He himself was later arrested by Mali's secret police, who didn't want foreign journalists digging into the affair. 'Prigozhin's men,' Lechner writes, 'were often force multipliers; they increased the capacity of governments to commit abuses against their citizens.' In the long term, such violent methods may well backfire.
Lecher's narrative thread is occasionally patchy. This is an occupational hazard of writing about dangerous people in dangerous places, who don't always oblige authors by helping to fill in the gaps. But Death is Our Business is still a fine account of Russia's new private mercenary forces, and deserves a place on the bookshelves not just of military buffs but of diplomats and aid workers in Africa. For, even if Wagner's presence on the continent promises only long-term disaster, its short-term success is owed, in part, to the failure of the West.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump said he ordered 2 nuclear subs moved after Russia nuclear threat
Trump said he ordered 2 nuclear subs moved after Russia nuclear threat

The Herald Scotland

time3 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Trump said he ordered 2 nuclear subs moved after Russia nuclear threat

President Donald Trump said on Aug. 1 he ordered two nuclear submarines to "appropriate regions" in response to Russia's nuclear threats. "Based on the highly provocative statements" of Russian spokesperson Dmitry Medvedev, "I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances."

History will judge monsters who enabled a genocide
History will judge monsters who enabled a genocide

The National

time4 hours ago

  • The National

History will judge monsters who enabled a genocide

Keir Starmer's announcement that Britain will recognise the State of Palestine in September if Israel doesn't agree to a ceasefire and a two-state solution sums up his political project. Starmer himself is an empty vessel, a mere frontman for Labour's most reactionary and self-serving political faction: his own advisers briefed that he thinks he's driving a train, but they had placed him in front of London's driverless District Light Railway. This faction is defined by its cynicism, lacking not just a vision for our disunited kingdom, but a moral core. They saw that growing numbers of MPs were demanding Palestinian recognition, including some of the drones they parachuted into the parliamentary party, whose blind loyalty has been frayed by the realisation they're heading towards electoral apocalypse. READ MORE: Gaza detainees 'tortured and raped' by Israeli forces, United Nations hears The SNP were preparing to force a parliamentary vote on statehood, which would leave Labour exposed. And indeed other European states, like Spain, have already taken this step, with the likes of France making clear they will too. But all Starmer's aides care about is political game playing, rather than what happens to be the right thing to do. And here's the thing – they're not even good at it. They scrapped the universal Winter Fuel Payment because they thought it would win respect as a 'tough decision'. Alas, they project their lack of a heart on to the electorate, who shocked Labour goons by being averse to freezing their grans. They decided to wage war on disabled people with cuts which would drive hundreds of thousands into hardship, and were again shocked at being stopped in their tracks by the consequent revulsion, including from the malfunctioning androids who benefited from their rigged parliamentary selections. In this case, their ruse is as cackhanded as it is morally bankrupt. Any move which recognises the humanity of Palestinians is going to provoke the pro-Israel lobby, who long sank into a sewer of genocidal depravity, and so it proved. What about everyone else – that is, popular opinion, given the polling shows overwhelming public support for recognition of a Palestinian state, an arms embargo on Israel, as well as the arrest of its leader, Benjamin Netanyahu, for war crimes and crimes against humanity? Starmer's team are essentially arguing that if Israel tones down its genocide, then it will withdraw support for Palestinian statehood. The inalienable right of a people to be free is reduced to a crude bargaining chip, a chess piece on a board to be discarded for a greater strategic cause. So who is this supposed to please, exactly? Here's the gruesome truth. Obviously, Britain should have supported Palestinian national self-determination many moons ago. But there won't be any Palestine left to recognise at this rate. Here is the most symbolic gesture on offer, and even that is reduced to a cynical ploy. There is growing pressure on the Government, because they are facilitating what the former UN aid chief, Martin Griffiths, calls the 'worst crime of the 21st century'. Here is an attempt to deflect from action they could be taking, like ending all arms sales to Israel, including crucial components for F-35 jets that are exterminating Palestinians, or imposing sweeping sanctions on Israel. Indeed, earlier this year, Britain joined other Western states in imposing sanctions on two particularly extreme Israeli ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich. They are both genocidal maniacs who belong in jail, sure, but it is easy to make them the bogeymen in order to absolve the wider guilt of the Israeli state. Notably, the sanctions were justified on the grounds of their incendiary comments, rather than their actions, because the latter implicates the British government. Nothing our government has done remotely meets the scale of the crime. A consensus of genocide scholars – including Israeli scholars – long ago concluded this is genocide. B'Tselem was one of two Israeli human rights organisations to reach the same conclusion this week, alongside Israeli author David Grossman, who won Israel's top literary prize in 2018. Gaza has been plunged into deliberate famine by an Israeli state which repeatedly broadcast to the world that it was intentionally starving the strip. More hungry Palestinians have been massacred at aid points alone since late May than the total number of Israeli civilians and soldiers killed on October 7. And even the BBC is now having to report that Palestinian children are being systematically shot in the head or chest – evidence which points in only one direction: that the Israeli army is deliberately shooting kids. The depravity is so extreme, documented and confessed to, that it is difficult to know either where to begin or end. The British government had a choice when confronted with an incontrovertible criminal reality: to make itself complicit in this historic abomination, or to abide by the most rudimentary building blocks of international law. It chose the former, and now it seeks to wash away its guilt by publicly agonising over Israel's crimes while making tokenistic gestures about a Palestinian nation it has literally helped to massacre. You would have to be either terminally gullible, or a dupe, to be beguiled by this. Throughout history, monsters didn't realise that that is what they are, but they were still monsters. The same applies to Westminster's rulers – and that will be the definitive conclusion of history and, we can hope, the courts, too.

'Russia stunned into silence' by Donald Trump's nuclear subs move
'Russia stunned into silence' by Donald Trump's nuclear subs move

Daily Record

time7 hours ago

  • Daily Record

'Russia stunned into silence' by Donald Trump's nuclear subs move

Donald Trump announced the deployment of two nuclear submarines following "foolish and inflammatory statements" by former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev Russia has been left seemingly speechless after US President Donald Trump's decision to deploy two nuclear submarines in response to Moscow's rhetoric. The move, which saw the subs dispatched to "in appropriate regions" came after "foolish and inflammatory statements" by Russia 's ex-President Dmitry Medvedev. ‌ Mr Trump refrained from disclosing the exact location of the submarines or clarifying if they were nuclear-powered or armed. ‌ BBC's Russia Editor Steve Rosenberg reported a lack of immediate response from Russian officials, noting on BBC News: "Interestingly, there has been no reaction so far from the Kremlin, from the Foreign Ministry, from the Defence Ministry - anyone here, really. ‌ "I think everyone is trying to work out what on earth is going on and what, if anything, has changed in relations to where these nuclear subs are being positioned." Rosenberg observed that the announcement had unsettled Moscow's stock market, following over three years of "bombastic and provocative" commentary from Medvedev, reports the Express. ‌ He further noted: "There has been reactions from the Moscow stock market, which has fallen sharply. Judging by the reactions in the local media here, Russians are surprised to say the least by President Trump's post. "I suspect that nobody is more surprised than Dmitry Medvedev himself, because for more than three years he has been tweeting and posting some very bombastic and provocative social media posts - most of which have gone unnoticed, I have to say. "But now suddenly he has been noticed and he has gone under the skin of the President of the United States in a big way." ‌ Mr Trump revealed the submarine deployment on his Truth Social platform. He posted: "Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!". This followed Medvedev's warning to the US president about Russia's Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities that could be deployed as a final option.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store