
Coquitlam councillors vote to advance development, despite opposition
A development in a Coquitlam neighourhood straddling Burnaby is closer to moving ahead following a Monday night vote.
Coquitlam city council voted unanimously to give first, second and third readings to a proposal to replace a dozen single-family homes with three buildings – one seven-storey building and two six-storey buildings –near Roy Stibbs Elementary school.
One after another, councillors shared their reservations with the project proposed by the developer Anthem, but also expressed concern that if they voted 'no' on Monday, the developer could come back with something larger, which it would be entitled to do.
For residents opposing the project, the fact they weren't able to voice their opposition through a public hearing isn't going down well.
'We've had individual councillors come into our neighbourhood, walk around, and us explain to them what our concerns are, and they're all sympathetic, but nobody seems to think there's anything they can do about it,' said Janet Krgovich with the Roy Stibbs Residents group.
It's the latest example of frustrations in a municipality over rules imposed by the provincial government, which is aiming to speed up home construction amid record-breaking population growth.
'We need to have the government back off, let us do our own planning, and let us do it the way the community needs to grow, because we were doing a really good job before they stepped in and messed things up for us,' said Cheryl Andrichuk with the Roy Stibbs Residents group.
Members of the group had a range of concerns, but insisted it's not about density, stating not enough of the units are intended for families.
There are also environmental concerns, which include fears about mature trees being removed.
'The provincial government is talking about calling for transit-oriented development,' said Kathleen Wallace-Deering with the group Protect Coquitlam Urban Forests. 'And what these residents and what we're all saying, is have transit-oriented living. Livable neighbourhoods, healthy urban forest, tree canopy and the right kind of housing – affordable housing.'
Ultimately the lack of a public hearing or the sense of meaningful consultation has rubbed the neighbourhood the wrong way.
'We talked to the city planners and they said, well, city council tells us what to do,' Andrichuk said. 'And then we talked to city councillors, and they said, well, the province makes the rules. So we keep going around and around and around in this circle, and we're shut out of this whole process.'
On the topic of a public hearing, Coquitlam Mayor Richard Stewart says it's out of his control.
'About 90 per cent of our developments comply with the OCP, the Official Community Plan, and the province has said we're not allowed to hear from the public on those ones, because they believe it will speed [the process],' Stewart told CTV News on Monday. 'These residents have every right to be frustrated, that they don't perceive that council gets to listen – we don't get to listen.'
The developer, Anthem, declined an interview but said in a statement it met with residents, even though it had no obligation to do so, noting its proposal was within the limits set out in the community plan.
During a public question period session as the meeting stretched into early Tuesday morning, councillor Dennis Marsden responded to comments made by Andrichuk, saying he would send a video of her statement to the provincial government, and raise the issue in September when council hopes to meet with new Housing Minister Christine Boyle.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
5 days ago
- CTV News
Coquitlam councillors vote to advance development, despite opposition
The debate over density has become a common theme in Metro Vancouver and now a group of Coquitlam residents have taken their fight to city hall. A development in a Coquitlam neighourhood straddling Burnaby is closer to moving ahead following a Monday night vote. Coquitlam city council voted unanimously to give first, second and third readings to a proposal to replace a dozen single-family homes with three buildings – one seven-storey building and two six-storey buildings –near Roy Stibbs Elementary school. One after another, councillors shared their reservations with the project proposed by the developer Anthem, but also expressed concern that if they voted 'no' on Monday, the developer could come back with something larger, which it would be entitled to do. For residents opposing the project, the fact they weren't able to voice their opposition through a public hearing isn't going down well. 'We've had individual councillors come into our neighbourhood, walk around, and us explain to them what our concerns are, and they're all sympathetic, but nobody seems to think there's anything they can do about it,' said Janet Krgovich with the Roy Stibbs Residents group. It's the latest example of frustrations in a municipality over rules imposed by the provincial government, which is aiming to speed up home construction amid record-breaking population growth. 'We need to have the government back off, let us do our own planning, and let us do it the way the community needs to grow, because we were doing a really good job before they stepped in and messed things up for us,' said Cheryl Andrichuk with the Roy Stibbs Residents group. Members of the group had a range of concerns, but insisted it's not about density, stating not enough of the units are intended for families. There are also environmental concerns, which include fears about mature trees being removed. 'The provincial government is talking about calling for transit-oriented development,' said Kathleen Wallace-Deering with the group Protect Coquitlam Urban Forests. 'And what these residents and what we're all saying, is have transit-oriented living. Livable neighbourhoods, healthy urban forest, tree canopy and the right kind of housing – affordable housing.' Ultimately the lack of a public hearing or the sense of meaningful consultation has rubbed the neighbourhood the wrong way. 'We talked to the city planners and they said, well, city council tells us what to do,' Andrichuk said. 'And then we talked to city councillors, and they said, well, the province makes the rules. So we keep going around and around and around in this circle, and we're shut out of this whole process.' On the topic of a public hearing, Coquitlam Mayor Richard Stewart says it's out of his control. 'About 90 per cent of our developments comply with the OCP, the Official Community Plan, and the province has said we're not allowed to hear from the public on those ones, because they believe it will speed [the process],' Stewart told CTV News on Monday. 'These residents have every right to be frustrated, that they don't perceive that council gets to listen – we don't get to listen.' The developer, Anthem, declined an interview but said in a statement it met with residents, even though it had no obligation to do so, noting its proposal was within the limits set out in the community plan. During a public question period session as the meeting stretched into early Tuesday morning, councillor Dennis Marsden responded to comments made by Andrichuk, saying he would send a video of her statement to the provincial government, and raise the issue in September when council hopes to meet with new Housing Minister Christine Boyle.


Global News
03-06-2025
- Global News
Victoria city councillors want to preserve downtown movie theatres
Three Victoria councillors are trying to save the handful of movie theatres that remain in the downtown area for fear of losing key cultural spaces and experiences. Councillors Matt Dell, Dave Thompson and Krista Loughton will bring forward a motion at the Committee of the Whole meeting on June 5 'Downtown cinemas play a vital role in supporting local culture, walkability, and economic vitality,' the motion reads. 'Unlike suburban mall movie theatres, downtown cinemas bring people into the city centre where they can walk, bike, or take transit. Moviegoers grab dinner before the show or drinks afterward, supporting local restaurants and shops. This activity helps businesses and keeps downtown lively. Losing downtown theatres means losing both cultural experiences and economic benefits for local businesses.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Victoria City Council's 2023 to 2026 Strategic Plan committed to supporting small businesses and the visitor economy, while investing in artistic, theatrical and musical spaces to keep the downtown culturally vibrant. Story continues below advertisement MOVIES! We have a motion at council this week asking staff to look into preserving downtown movies theatres, incentivizing new theatres, and supporting film. We're at risk of losing all our large downtown theatres in Victoria – bad for culture, vibrancy and the economy! #yyj — Matt Dell (@mattdellok) June 2, 2025 The three councillors would like to see stronger policy tools as part of the new Official Community Plan and an updated Downtown Core Area Plan to provide additional tools such as zoning incentives, leveraging Development Variance Permits to fast-track or relax requirements for projects that retain or integrate theatres, explore if any city-owned land downtown could be future theatre space and strengthening heritage tools by exploring protections for theatres in historic buildings. Councillors will be looking for council's support to direct staff to 'report on additional options to support cinema in Victoria, including incentivizing the construction of new movie theatres, assisting in maintaining existing theatres, incorporating the support of cinema into its broader strategy for supporting arts and culture in the city, or any other potential policy options.'


Vancouver Sun
27-05-2025
- Vancouver Sun
A proposed development that could triple its population has divided this B.C. village
A proposal to build 2,200 housing units in Anmore has some residents concerned about over-extended infrastructure and a lack of exit routes in case of wildfire. The development, known as Anmore South and undertaken by real estate developer Icona Properties, would take about 25 years to reach completion in the village of 2,300, just across the water from Port Moody. The proposed development covers 61 hectares of forest adjacent to Belcarra Regional Park. Stay on top of the latest real estate news and home design trends. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Westcoast Homes will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'It would potentially triple our population — we don't know,' said Harriette Chang, who has lived in Anmore for 17 years. 'I think development is inevitable, but that's not what we are concerned about, so much as the planning. 'I'm a resident in Anmore, and I would love to have some say in what that's going to look like.' Chang is one of many residents who have posted 'Pause Anmore South' signs, most of them calling for a referendum — 'Change this big demands one,' 'Back to the drawing board,' 'Process tainted,' and, 'The studies are wrong. What now?' A group calling itself the Anmore Neighbours Community Association hired a lawyer to write village council a letter on May 16 stating that the development process is 'flawed' and criticizing the 'suppression of political expression' in Anmore. 'My client and its many members and supporters have serious concerns about the manner in which Anmore's council is proceeding with the proposed amendment to the Official Community Plan that will allow the Anmore South development to proceed,' lawyer Sean Hern wrote. There are two overarching problems, he stated: A majority of the five-member council have already made up their minds, and that the village council 'has been violating Anmore residents' rights of free expression in an unacceptable manner, suppressing and silencing voices that wish to be heard in relation to the Anmore South development.' For Chang, her biggest concern is the thought of escaping during a wildfire. She pointed to the Paradise, Calif., fire of 2018 that destroyed the California town, killing 85 people and destroying about 19,000 buildings. 'They had a great evacuation plan, but the road infrastructure was insufficient to sustain that amount (of people trying to flee in their cars),' Chang said. 'I think about that, and I think about our hot, dry summer that we just about always get, what could that potentially look like. 'It's terrifying.' Greg Moore , the CEO of Icona Properties, disagrees that there has been no opportunity for Anmore residents to voice their opinions. The former councillor and mayor of Port Coquitlam for 16 years, and a city planner before that, said community engagement began four years ago. Over that period, there have been 28 public engagements and community meetings, he said, on top of open houses, focus groups and neighbourhood meetings. 'I've been in local government for 25 years and I've never seen this level of community engagement for land-use planning,' Moore said. He added that he appreciates that some residents don't want any development at the site, that they would like to keep it the way that it is, or they would like single-family homes. 'But it isn't for the lack of community engagement that we've got to this point to try to find a balance between a diversified housing stock, bringing in some commercial, some recreation, and some other amenities that Anmore just doesn't have right now.' Addressing infrastructure concerns, Moore said Icona is committed to hooking Anmore up to Metro Vancouver's water supply and sewer system. For now, Anmore gets its water from Port Moody and has no sewer infrastructure. Ioco road would need upgrades, Moore said, and Anmore's volunteer firefighting service would, as well. 'We have done a full wildfire study,' he said. 'The biggest challenge there now is there is no water, not even wells, to fight a fire.' A trunk line from Metro Vancouver would mean fire hydrants, which may even extend to Belcarra Regional Park, he said. 'You would create, actually, a safer environment to be able to fight fires when they start.' As for transportation, Moore said Icona will seek a community sponsorship or partnership with TransLink, a case-by-case program the transportation authority has in which new projects may be funded under a 10-year investment plan. As it stands, Anmore is an eight-minute drive from a SkyTrain station. Anmore Mayor John McEwen said the village did all the requisite traffic analysis, as well as financial and environmental impact studies. Holding a referendum is only allowed by local governments for disposal of certain utilities such as water or sewage, disposal of specific parkland, municipal boundary extensions, and municipal loan-authorization bylaws, he pointed out. Anmore resident Leslie Hannigan said she has heard it all before. 'At first glance, you may be convinced that Anmore South is a perfect place for 2,200 homes and an ideal response to the housing crisis,' she said. 'But take another look.' The Anmore Neighbours Community Association's consultant disputed Icona's traffic study, Hannigan said, finding that only 40 per cent of the proposed dwellings could be built without exceeding road capacity. 'More worrisome, there is no evacuation plan in the event of an emergency. We are surrounded by forests at the end of one-lane roads.' Residents aren't against development, she said. 'We are against high-density development with unknown consequences. We want a well-planned community, with solid information on how we will be affected, and a clear, coordinated voice in the future of our village. 'It's time we stood up to the chaos.' gordmcintyre@