NHS: Why are doctors striking in England?
What is a strike?
A strike is when a group of workers come together and agree to stop working.Employees do this when they want to protest against something they think is unfair where they work.Many strikes are organised by something called a union.A trade union is an organisation of workers from a particular job type or company. They aim to help improve conditions for their members where they work.You can read more about what strikes are here.
Who are resident doctors?
Resident doctors are fully qualified doctors who are either currently in postgraduate training or gaining experience as locally-employed doctors.They may have many years of experience.Resident doctors may also be training to specialise in a particular area of medicine.They work under supervision of a senior doctor, and make up to half of doctors currently working in the NHS.
Why are resident doctors striking?
The union that represents two-thirds of resident doctors – the British Medical Association (BMA) - says a recent increase to resident doctors' pay does not go far enough.The pay rise was proposed by the new Labour government in July 2024.BMA members agreed to the pay deal after an 18-month dispute with the previous Conservative government, which included 11 resident doctor strikes.Resident doctors received a 5.4% pay rise this financial year, with a 22% increase to their pay over two years.
Earlier in July, a vote called a ballot was held among BMA's members, and a majority voted to strike.The BMA is calling for a salary rise of 29.2%, to bring salaries back in line with what they say was the value of resident doctors' salaries in 2008.BMA resident doctor co-leaders Dr Melissa Ryan and Dr Ross Nieuwoudt said: "Resident doctors are not worth less than they were 17 years ago."Restoring pay remains the simplest and most effective route toward improving our working lives."
What has the government's response been?
Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the BMA was "rushing" into the strikes, in an article in the newspaper, The Times.Health secretary Wes Streeting called the strikes "irresponsible".Mr Streeting praised NHS workers who weren't striking and who were cancelling holiday plans or working extra hours during the strikes."I'm really proud of the way that NHS leaders and frontline staff have prepared and mobilised to minimise the disruption and minimise the risk of harm to patients," he told PA News on Friday.
What has the reaction been elsewhere?
Conservative shadow health secretary Stuart Andrew blamed Labour for the strikes, saying they had been too generous to the doctors last year."They handed out inflation-busting pay rises without reform and now the BMA is back for more," he said.NHS bosses have said that strike action is "bad for patients, for staff and for the NHS".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Wes Streeting warned alcohol measures ‘are not sufficient' to stop harm
Government plans to tackle problem drinking 'are not sufficient to address the scale and complexity of harm', leading health experts have warned. Academics, medics and charities from around the country have urged ministers to take 'ambitious' action to tackle the 'scale of the current crisis'. The Government recently set out plans to improve the health of people in England over the next decade. But in a letter to Health Secretary Wes Streeting, shared with the PA news agency, experts said that the public 'want and deserve' more action to tackle the harms. 'As experts from across alcohol policy, health and treatment, we urge you to revisit the current approach to tackling alcohol harm and commit to an ambitious, evidence-based strategy that reflects the scale of the current crisis,' the letter states. 'The 10-Year health plan for England offered a once-in-a-generation opportunity to shift gear and deliver genuine preventative action that would reverse the rising rates of alcohol-related hospitalisations and deaths we have seen in recent years. 'While the introduction of mandatory alcohol labelling and increased support for community-led schemes is welcome, these measures alone are not sufficient to address the scale and complexity of harm.' The letter has been signed by 34 health leaders from leading health organisations including the Alcohol Health Alliance; the Royal College of Physicians; the Royal College of General Practitioners and the Royal College of Emergency Medicine. The 10 Year Health Plan for England, which was published last month, sets out plans to tackle harmful drinking through alcohol labelling, which will include health warning messages. The document also sets out proposed changes to no and low (NoLo) alcohol products and pledged support for community-led schemes to reduce alcohol harm. Before the 10 Year Plan was released there was speculation over whether the plan would include a ban on alcohol advertising. It was also reported that ministers were exploring the possibility of minimum unit pricing (MUP), a policy which sets the lowest price an alcoholic drink can be sold for. In the new letter, experts have called for a series of measures to tackle alcohol harms, including: – A call for the introduction of MUP in England, as seen in Scotland and Wales. Minimum unit pricing for alcohol was associated with a 13% decrease in deaths from alcohol consumption in Scotland, according to a new study. Read this and more in our latest issue: — The Lancet (@TheLancet) April 21, 2023 – Giving local authorities the power to regulate hours of sale and online deliveries of alcohol. – For advertising regulations for alcohol to be 'aligned' with those for foods high in fat, salt and sugar. – A change to alcohol tax, linking duties to inflation and ending 'cider exceptionalism'. – More funding and support for local alcohol care teams. The group stresses that 'alcohol is not just the problem of a few'. It points out that every year alcohol contributes to more than a million hospital admissions. And the experts said that across the UK, 30% of the adult population engage in 'risky drinking', and almost one in 25 of all new cancers are estimated to be linked to alcohol. The 10 Year Plan states: 'While many people enjoy a drink in moderation, 4% of people drink as much as 30% of alcohol consumed each year.' But it adds that the estimated total 'societal cost' of alcohol harm in England was £27.4 billion per year in 2021/22. The authors conclude: 'The public want and deserve action, and we stand ready to work with Government to deliver real progress. 'By taking meaningful and co-ordinated action now, the burden of alcohol harm can fall significantly within the term of this Government, with visible results for families, the NHS, crime, and the economy.' The Department of Health and Social Care said it will continue to consider the most effective interventions to reduce alcohol harms. A spokesperson said: 'As we shift from sickness to prevention through our 10-Year Health Plan, we will make it mandatory for alcoholic drinks to display health warnings and nutritional information. 'To improve drug and alcohol treatment services and recovery support in England, the Government has also provided an additional £310 million in 2025/26, on top of the public health grant.' A spokesperson for the Portman Group said: 'Whilst overall alcohol consumption and harms such as binge drinking, underage drinking and anti-social behaviour continue to fall, and the vast majority of people drink within the chief medical officer's low-risk guidance or not at all, we share concerns around rising deaths and those who continue to drink to harmful levels. 'We support further targeted and tailored measures aimed at this group to manage the complex, often interrelated issues underlying harmful consumption and back calls for the further rollout of alcohol care teams and greater integration of care pathways. 'As the alcohol industry regulatory body for marketing, we welcome the chance to work constructively with the Government on the proposals within its 10 year plan to help more consumers make an informed choice and drink moderately.' – Other signatories on the letter include representatives from: the Institute of Alcohol Studies; Alcohol Change UK; the Royal College of Surgeons of England; the Royal Society for Public Health; the British Society of Gastroenterology; World Cancer Research Fund; the Association of Anaesthetists; the Association of Directors of Public Health; the British Association for the Study of the Liver; the Medical Council on Alcohol and the British Medical Association.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
OpenAI stops ChatGPT from telling people to break up with partners
ChatGPT will not tell people to break up with their partner and will encourage users to take breaks from long chatbot sessions, under new changes to the artificial intelligence tool. OpenAI, ChatGPT's developer, said the chatbot would stop giving definitive answers to personal challenges and would instead help people to mull over problems such as potential breakups. 'When you ask something like: 'Should I break up with my boyfriend?' ChatGPT shouldn't give you an answer. It should help you think it through – asking questions, weighing pros and cons,' said OpenAI. The US company said new ChatGPT behaviour for dealing with 'high-stakes personal decisions' would be rolled out soon. OpenAI admitted this year that an update to ChatGPT had made the groundbreaking chatbot too agreeable and altered its tone. In one reported interaction before the change, ChatGPT congratulated a user for 'standing up for yourself' when they claimed they had stopped taking their medication and left their family – who the user had thought were responsible for radio signals emanating from the walls. In the blog post, OpenAI admitted that there had been instances where its advanced 4o model had not recognised signs of delusion or emotional dependency – amid concerns that chatbots are worsening people's mental health crises. The company said it was developing tools to detect signs of mental or emotional distress so ChatGPT can direct people to 'evidence-based' resources for help. A recent study by NHS doctors in the UK warned that AI programs could amplify delusional or grandiose content in users vulnerable to psychosis. The study, which has not been peer reviewed, said the programs' behaviour could be because the models were designed to 'maximise engagement and affirmation'. The study added that even if some individuals benefited from AI interactions, there was a concern the tools could 'blur reality boundaries and disrupt self-regulation'. OpenAI added that from this week it would send 'gentle reminders' to take a screen break to users engaging in long chatbot sessions, similar to screen-time features deployed by social media companies. OpenAI also said it had convened an advisory group of experts in mental health, youth development and human-computer-interaction to guide its approach. The company has worked with more than 90 doctors, including psychiatrists and paediatricians, to build frameworks for evaluating 'complex, multi-turn' chatbot conversations. 'We hold ourselves to one test: if someone we love turned to ChatGPT for support, would we feel reassured? Getting to an unequivocal 'yes' is our work,' said the blog post. The ChatGPT alterations were announced amid speculation that a more powerful version of the chatbot is imminent. On Sunday Sam Altman, OpenAI's chief executive, shared a screenshot of what appeared to be the company's latest AI model, GPT-5.
South Wales Argus
3 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Treatment for advanced womb cancer ‘major step forward'
Just 15% of women live for five years if they have been diagnosed with advanced (stage four) endometrial cancer – a cancer which usually starts in the lining of the womb. The treatment, pembrolizumab, can slow down cancer growth and improve survival odds, health officials said. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) estimates that around 2,100 women will benefit from the treatment each year. It said that its approval of the treatment for the NHS in England marks a 'major step forward' in treatment for women with this type of cancer. The treatment, also known as Keytruda and made by Merck Sharp and Dohme, is an immunotherapy drug and is delivered in a drip alongside chemotherapy drugs carboplatin and paclitaxel and can be given for up to two years. Nice said that clinical trials show the combination of treatments reduced the risk of death by 26% compared to chemotherapy alone. The treatments can also slow down cancer progression, it added. 'For people with advanced endometrial cancer, this innovative combination offers a powerful new treatment option,' said Helen Knight, director of medicines evaluation at Nice. 'It marks a major step forward, and we're pleased to recommend it as part of our commitment to getting the best care to people, fast, while ensuring value for the taxpayer.' Around 9,700 women are diagnosed with endometrial cancer each year, Nice said, making it the most common gynaecological cancer in the UK. Helen Hyndman, lead nurse at the charity Eve Appeal's information service Ask Eve, said: 'Primary advanced or recurrent womb (endometrial) cancer has a huge impact on the quality of life for those diagnosed. 'It is great news that this new treatment has been approved. 'It will offer hope, a better quality of life and improve outcomes for those affected.' Professor Peter Johnson, NHS England's national clinical director for cancer, said: 'Getting this treatment to many more NHS patients as quickly as possible will help thousands of women live longer, allowing them to spend more time with loved ones and give them a better quality of life. 'Thanks to the NHS's Cancer Drugs Fund, it is now being fast-tracked into routine use, with treatment available to more patients from today.'
