Rajnath Singh slams Pakistan at SCO meet: ‘No place for double standards'
In a scathing attack on Pakistan at SCO meet in presence of Pakistani defence minister Khwaja Asif, Rajnath Singh on Thursday asserted, 'peace cannot co-exist with terrorism'
Singh said, "...Some countries use cross-border terrorism as an instrument of policy and provide shelter to terrorists. There should be no place for such double standards. SCO should not hesitate to criticise such nations. "
"On 22 April 2025, the terror group 'The Resistance Front' carried out a dastardly and heinous attack on innocent tourists at Pahalgam in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir. 26 innocent civilans, including a Nepali national, were killed. Victims were shot at after they were profiled based on religious identity. The Resistance Front which is a proxy of UN designated terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba claimed responsibility for the attack."
"Any acts of terrorism are criminal and unjustifiable regardless of their motivation whenever, wherever and by whom-so-ever committed. SCO members must condemn this evil unequivocally."
"We reiterate the need to hold the perpetrators, organizers, financiers and sponsors of reprehensible acts of terrorism, including cross border terrorism accountable and bring them to justice," said Singh
Talking about Operation Sindoor, he said, "The pattern of Pahalgam terror attack matches with LeT's previous terror attacks in India. In exercising its right to defend against terrorism and pre-empt as well as deter further cross border terrorist attacks, India on 7th May 2025 successfully launched Operation Sindoor to dismantle cross border terrorist infrastructure."
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on Wednesday arrived in the Chinese port city of Qingdao to attend a conclave of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO).
It is the first visit to China by a senior Indian minister after the ties came under severe strain following the military standoff along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in eastern Ladakh that began in May 2020.
Singh was received at the Qingdao airport by Indian ambassador Pradeep Kumar Rawat.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
19 minutes ago
- News18
Xi Jinping's Public Absence Fuels Speculation Amid Power Shake-Up In China
Xi's absence from official engagements, state media coverage, and high-profile diplomatic meetings coincided with a wave of top-level purges in PLA and mounting economic challenges Chinese President Xi Jinping's unusual disappearance from public view between May 21 and June 5 this year has sparked intense speculation about internal political adjustments at the highest levels of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), CNN-News18 has learnt. According to multiple media reports, Xi's sudden absence from official engagements, state media coverage, and high-profile diplomatic meetings coincided with a wave of top-level purges in the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and mounting economic challenges in core sectors of China's economy. Observers suggest that behind closed doors, Beijing is undergoing a quiet yet significant recalibration of power. Notably, Xi was absent from the front pages of People's Daily and Xinhua—the CCP's primary propaganda outlets—from June 2 to 5, a rare break from his consistent daily coverage since 2017. During this period, high-stakes diplomatic meetings with foreign delegations were instead handled by Premier Li Qiang and Vice Premier He Lifeng, suggesting a temporary shift in the presentation of state leadership. In his absence, public appearances by second-tier party officials and respected party elders have added to speculation that the internal command structure of the CCP is being reworked, possibly to stabilise growing dissent or manage factional tensions. The People's Liberation Army has also seen sweeping changes. Since early 2023, key figures such as General He Weidong (Vice-Chairman of the Central Military Commission), General Miao Hua (Chief of Political Work), and General Lin Xiangyang (Commander of the Eastern Theater Command) have been removed. The PLA's powerful Rocket Force and Western Theater Command have also undergone major leadership reshuffles, hinting at systemic unease within China's military hierarchy. On June 6, a constitutional loyalty ceremony organised by China's State Council—attended by over 50 ministers and top department heads—was conspicuously held without Xi's presence. Meanwhile, at international forums, delegates were seen reciting 'Xi Jinping Thought" in the President's absence—a symbolic move that drew attention to his physical nonappearance even as his ideological presence was reinforced. Analysts are divided over the implications: some view this as a calculated pause by Xi to recalibrate political structures amid crisis, while others suggest potential internal challenges to his authority, following a year of economic setbacks and increased scrutiny of his centralisation of power. While the Chinese government has offered no explanation for Xi's reduced public visibility, the convergence of diplomatic stand-ins, military purges, and symbolic omissions has led many to believe that China's political landscape may be entering a sensitive transitional phase. About the Author Manoj Gupta Location : Beijing, China First Published: June 30, 2025, 09:07 IST
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trade war: 'Not planning to extend tariff pause after July 9', says Donald Trump; India's trade team extends US stay
US President has said he does not plan to extend the 90-day pause on additional global tariffs beyond July 9, even as India's trade delegation extended its stay in Washington in a final push to iron out differences before the deadline. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The in-person negotiations between Indian and US officials, initially scheduled to run through June 27, were extended by a day, raising hopes of an interim trade agreement, Bloomberg reported, quoting officials. India is seeking full exemption from the additional 26 per cent reciprocal tariff announced by the US on April 2. While the tariff was suspended for 90 days, the 10 per cent baseline tariff imposed by Washington remains in place. Meanwhile Trump, in an interview with Fox News said he does not plan to extend the pause. "I don't think I'll need to," he said. "I could, no big deal." Letters notifying countries of the upcoming tariffs will begin going out "pretty soon," he said. "We'll look at how a country treats us — are they good, are they not so good — some countries we don't care, we'll just send a high number out," Trump told Fox News. Those letters, he said, would state: "Congratulations, we're allowing you to shop in the United States of America, you're going to pay a 25 per cent tariff, or a 35 per cent or a 50 per cent or 10 per cent." The high tariffs, first announced on April 2, are set to be enforced unless individual countries reach trade agreements with the US. "There's 200 countries, you can't talk to all of them," Trump said. The Trump administration had set a goal of reaching 90 trade deals in 90 days Meanwhile, the Indian side continues to resist key US demands, including Washington's push to open India's agricultural market to genetically modified crops — an ask New Delhi has rejected, citing risks to farmers. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now India is also unwilling to sign a deal that doesn't address both sectoral access and reciprocal tariffs on its exports, Bloomberg earlier reported. Despite the challenges, Trump said last week that "a very big" deal with India was likely soon. Why deal matters For India, the goal is to protect sensitive sectors while gaining entry into the US market, the largest for global consumers. For the United States, the focus is on narrowing trade deficits, increasing its exports, and strengthening ties with a strategic partner as trade frictions with China continue. What are USA's demands The United States is urging India to open up sectors such as agriculture, dairy, and energy, and to reduce tariffs on products like soy, wheat, corn, ethanol, and apples, many of which are significant US exports to China. Washington is also seeking market access for genetically modified (GM) crops in India. India, however, is resisting these demands, particularly in agriculture and dairy, citing the importance of safeguarding farmers and maintaining the Minimum Support Price (MSP) mechanism. Negotiations have at times been marked by tension, as TOI reported earlier. What India wants At the beginning of the negotiations, the Indian government aimed to secure zero-duty access for several key export items, including textiles, leather products, pharmaceuticals, certain engineering goods, and auto parts. As TOI reported earlier that while American negotiators have shown interest in concluding the deal, they have conveyed to their Indian counterparts that the Trump administration is not in a position to offer zero tariffs immediately. Separately, India has also sought protection from any future tariff measures once an agreement is reached. Moreover, agriculture and dairy sectors are difficult and challenging areas for India to give duty concessions to the US. India has not opened up dairy in any of its free trade pacts signed so far.
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
Indian Embassy clarifies Navy officer's remark on IAF ‘losses' during Operation Sindoor: ‘Misrepresented'
The Indian Embassy in Indonesia issued a clarification on Sunday, addressing reports concerning comments made by its Defence Attaché, Navy Captain Shiv Kumar, regarding Indian Air Force losses during Operation Sindoor. The embassy stated that the captain's remarks had been taken out of context and misrepresented by the media. In a statement posted on X, the embassy emphasised that the presentation delivered by Captain Kumar at a recent seminar was misunderstood. 'We have seen media reports regarding a presentation made by the Defence Attaché at a seminar. His remarks have been quoted out of context and the media reports are a misrepresentation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker,' the embassy said. The statement further clarified that the presentation highlighted the principle that the Indian Armed Forces operate under civilian political leadership, unlike some other countries in the region. It also explained that the objective of Operation Sindoor was to target terrorist infrastructure, and that India's response was deliberately non-escalatory. During a presentation on 10 June, India's Defence Attaché to Indonesia, Captain Shiv Kumar of the Indian Navy, disclosed that the Indian Air Force (IAF) lost 'some aircraft' during Operation Sindoor, the May 7 strikes targeting terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). He claimed that these losses occurred because the political leadership had instructed the armed forces not to target Pakistani military infrastructure or air defences in the initial strike. 'Only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishment or their air defences,' Captain Kumar said, clarifying why the IAF suffered fighter jet losses. He further stated that following these losses, the Indian armed forces adjusted their tactics. 'We went for the military installations... we first achieved suppression of enemy air defences and then... all our attacks could easily go through using BrahMos missiles,' he added. The Defence Attaché's candid remarks sparked criticism from the opposition Congress party, which accused the BJP-led government of misleading the nation. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh questioned, 'Why is the PM refusing to preside over an all-party meeting and take the Opposition into confidence? Why has the demand for a special session of Parliament been rejected?' Senior Congress leader Pawan Khera also took to X, calling the defence attaché's comments a 'direct indictment.' He asserted, 'They know they've compromised national security, and they're terrified of what the Congress Party will expose before the people of India.' Captain Kumar's statements came during a seminar titled 'Analysis of the Pakistan-India Air Battle and Indonesia's Anticipatory Strategies from the Perspective of Air Power'.
