Opinion - How did Republicans pass that spending bill? Credit Speaker Johnson
With a government funding deadline looming, and the slimmest of majorities, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Trump pushed through a six-month spending bill to avert a partial government shutdown.
In a solid lesson of political gamesmanship, Johnson gave them the ole 'triple dog dare' from the famous scene from the movie 'A Christmas Story,' where an anxious Flick is dared to stick his tongue to a frozen flag pole.
In this case, after passing the bill, the Speaker immediately sent members home for a two-week recess, daring Senate Democrats to let the government shut down.
Keeping our federal government open should have been a much easier decision for Senate Democrats than the intense back-and-forths that 9-year-olds face on the playground. But it turns out, not so much.
Because at this juncture, shutting down our government versus giving Trump any kind of victory is the ultimate Hobson's Choice for Democrats.
In one fell swoop, Democrats who spent years lecturing Republicans on the necessity of keeping government open whatever the cost declared that Trump, the man 77 million voters just elected to be president, is so bad they must now shut it all down.
Yet they could not outline what they wanted or would do if they did shut down the government.
From screams in private meetings to a complete meltdown over Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) declaring he would (gasp!) vote with Republicans to advance the spending bill, Democrats' doom loop seemingly knows no end.
Following the president's lead, Johnson continues taking advantage of a Democratic Party living with a pre-Nov. 5 mindset.
House bills popular with the public, such as tougher penalties for illegal immigrants who commit crimes or banning biological males from playing in girls' and women's sports, are forcing many Democrats to choose between their left-wing base and the 80 percent of voters who support these issues.
When it arrived in the Senate, 45 Democrats voted to block the bill banning boys from girls sports. That might explain why the Democratic Party is the most unpopular it has been at any point since at least 2008.
It's not as if Johnson does it alone or bats 1.000. He's got the full backing of the White House, which certainly helps in those crunch moments. But managing 200-some members in a slim majority requires a level of skill and leadership that Johnson rarely gets credit for inside the Beltway.
Analyzing the last 16 months of his speakership, some of those leadership traits are obvious.
He allows members to publicly share their concerns about big pieces of legislation, giving them room to breathe without strong pushback.
While some have argued he takes in too many opinions, hearing more as opposed to less makes sense and appears to be working, given this Republican caucus.
Today's House GOP is a far cry from the days when former House Majority Leader Tom 'The Hammer' DeLay (R-Texas) wielded a big stick.
Johnson is also quick to credit others when bills pass, particularly his leadership team — a trait not often found in politicians. This culminates in an ability to deliver Trump's agenda.
It's no surprise the president fought to keep him in the Speaker's chair.
Johnson's victories likely won't earn him the headlines he deserves among the mainstream media, which will continue the hair-on-fire stories and the second-guessing of whether he can get such-and-such bill over the line.
There are many more fights ahead, but Johnson has so far risen to meet the moment.
And about that whole government funding thing? Johnson's triple dog dare paid off — it turns out a few Democrats weren't about to stick their tongue to the proverbial frozen flagpole.
Lance Trover served as spokesman for Doug Burgum's 2024 presidential campaign.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


WIRED
19 minutes ago
- WIRED
Trump's AI Action Plan Is a Crusade Against ‘Bias'—and Regulation
Jul 23, 2025 10:52 AM The Trump administration's new AI policy blueprint calls for limited regulation and lots of leeway for Big Tech to grow even bigger. Photo-Illustration:On Wednesday, the Trump Administration unveiled its new artificial intelligence action plan geared at keeping US efforts competitive with China. With over 90 policies recommended, it's a wide-ranging document that, if followed, would give Silicon Valley's most powerful companies even more leeway to grow. 'We believe we're in an AI race,' White House AI czar David Sacks said on a call ahead of the action plan's release. 'We want the United States to win that race.' The Office of Science and Technology Policy drafted the plan, which focuses on three key 'pillars' for AI strategy: accelerating AI innovation, building infrastructure, and leading international diplomacy and security. The report opens by stressing that 'AI is far too important to smother in bureaucracy at this early stage, whether at the state or Federal level.' It recommends a series of policies designed to loosen regulations and burdens on the tech companies developing artificial intelligence products, like encouraging the Federal Communications Commission to 'evaluate whether state AI regulations interfere with the agency's ability to carry out its obligations and authorities under the Communications Act of 1934.' 'We need to build and maintain vast AI infrastructure and the energy to power it. To do that, we will continue to reject radical climate dogma and bureaucratic red tape, as the Administration has done since Inauguration Day,' the report reads. 'Simply put, we need to 'Build, Baby, Build!'' In addition to releasing this report, President Donald Trump is expected to sign several executive orders later this afternoon that are expected to map onto the priorities outlined in the action plan. AI has been a priority for the past two US administrations, but Trump's second term has been characterized by major calibrations as the sector has exploded in prominence. In October 2023, the Biden Administration introduced an AI Executive Order designed to address numerous risks posed by rapidly advancing AI models. The order focused on issues like the potential for AI models to be used as cybersecurity weapons or to help produce chemical or biological weapons, as well as algorithmic bias. This new action plan explicitly seeks to undo efforts undertaken during the Biden Administration, like reviewing all of the Federal Trade Commission investigations it commenced 'to ensure that they do not advance theories of liability that unduly burden AI innovation.' The plan builds on the Trump Administration's previous approach to AI. Shortly after Trump took office, Vice President JD Vance gave a speech at a major AI meeting in Paris where he laid out the new administration's priorities. 'We believe that excessive regulation of the AI sector could kill a transformative industry just as it's taking off, and we'll make every effort to encourage pro-growth AI policies,' Vance said, adding, 'we feel strongly that AI must remain free from ideological bias, and that American AI will not be co-opted into a tool for authoritarian censorship.' The AI Action Plan continues this crusade against 'woke' AI, recommending that federal procurement guidelines are updated so that only AI companies that 'ensure that their systems are objective and free from top-down ideological bias' are given contracts. Trump has also taken steps to help build out US AI capacity domestically and abroad. A day after his inauguration, the president announced a joint venture between Softbank, Oracle, and OpenAI called Stargate that promised to build at least $100 billion in datacenter capacity in the US. In May, Trump and an entourage of tech leaders traveled to several gulf nations to announce a series of deals involving the construction of AI infrastructure across the region. Trump's desire to advance US AI interests is also reshaping foreign policy. During his first administration the president imposed export controls on Huawei and other Chinese firms aimed at slowing their ability to develop AI. Last week, the US government reversed restrictions on certain cutting-edge Nvidia and AMD chip sales to China, apparently shifting its focus towards helping US companies compete globally. A variety of tech, consumer protection, and civil society organizations are already speaking out with concerns about the action plan. Sarah Myers West and Amba Kak, the co-executive directors of the AI Now Institute, characterized the plan in a statement to WIRED as 'written by Big Tech interests invested in advancing AI that's used on us, not by us.' This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.


New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Top NY Dems ‘freaking out' over ‘absolute insanity' of Mamdani taking over NYC, Mike Lawler says
Hudson Valley Rep. Mike Lawler believes that House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and other top New York Democrats are 'freaking out' over socialist Zohran Mamdani's victory in the mayoral primary. Lawler (R-NY) said he believes reporting from journalist Mark Halperin that Jeffries (D-NY) quietly feels that if Mamdani becomes mayor, Democrats won't be able to take back control of the House. 'I think that's right,' Lawler told 'Fox & Friends' Wednesday when asked about Halperin's report. 'I think they are betwixt and between. You see Kathy Hochul, Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries freaking out about the prospects of having a Marxist lead the financial capital of the world.' 'They understand this is a disaster, not only for Democrats, but for the country.' Halperin had claimed this week that 'Hakeem Jeffries strongly believes that if Mamdani wins, he [Jeffries] can't win the majority' and cited 'people who've spoken directly with the leader.' 3 House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has refrained from endorsing Zohran Mamdani. AP 3 Rep. Mike Lawler announced Wednesday that he won't run for governor. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Spokespeople for Jeffries have called that report 'patently false.' So far, Jeffries has declined to endorse Mamdani, who once compared the minority leader to notorious segregationist George Wallace and questioned his progressive bona fides. The two Democrats met in person last week and Jeffries plans to have another confab with Mamdani after he returns from his marriage celebration in Uganda. Lawler, who announced Wednesday that he will vie for his swing seat again in 2026 rather than challenge Gov. Kathy Hochul, gloated over the predicament mainstream Democrats face. 'This is absolute insanity to have somebody who says that he wants to seize the means of production, that he wants to ban private property ownership, that he wants to freeze the rent, that he wants free bussing and mass transit, and he wants government-run grocery stores,' he said of Mamdani. 'They understand this is a disaster in the suburban districts like mine that determine the outcome of control of Congress, and that's why they haven't yet endorsed him. But at the same token, they can't run too far away from him.' 3 Zohran Mamdani's shock victory has rocked the Democratic Party in New York. Getty Images Jeffries has been crusading to flip control of the House, where Republicans have a threadbare 219 to 212-seat majority. Historically, the party in control of the White House loses a chunk of House seats during the midterms. This has been the trend in every midterm election since 1938, with two main exceptions: 1998 and 2002. Republicans are hoping that other factors, such as Mamdani, could change that dynamic. Mamdani is the clear favorite to become mayor of the Big Apple, but he still must win a general election, though some polls show a tightening race.


Chicago Tribune
20 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
More than 100 aid groups warn of starvation in Gaza as Israeli strikes kill 21 overnight
DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip — More than 100 charity and human rights groups said Wednesday that Israel's blockade and ongoing military offensive are pushing Palestinians in the Gaza Strip toward starvation, as Israeli strikes killed another 21 people overnight, according to local health officials. The Trump administration's Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff was meanwhile set to meet with a senior Israeli official about ceasefire talks, a sign that lower-level negotiations that have dragged on for weeks could be approaching a breakthrough. Experts say Gaza is at risk of famine because of Israel's blockade and offensive, launched in response to Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack. Israel says it allows enough aid into the territory and faults delivery efforts by U.N. agencies, which say they are hindered by Israeli restrictions and the breakdown of security. Hamas has said it will only release the remaining 50 hostages it holds, around 20 of them believed to be alive, in exchange for a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal, while Israel has vowed to recover all the captives and continue the war until Hamas has been defeated or disarmed. In an open letter, 115 organizations, including major international aid groups like Doctors Without Borders, Mercy Corps and Save the Children, said they were watching their own colleagues, as well as the Palestinians they serve, 'waste away.' It blamed Israeli restrictions and 'massacres' at aid distribution points. Witnesses, health officials and the U.N. human rights office say Israeli forces have repeatedly fired on crowds seeking aid, killing more than 1,000 people. Israel says its forces have only fired warning shots and that the death toll is exaggerated. 'The government of Israel's restrictions, delays, and fragmentation under its total siege have created chaos, starvation, and death,' the letter said. Israel's Foreign Ministry rejected the criticism and accused the groups of 'echoing Hamas' propaganda.' It said it has allowed around 4,500 aid trucks to enter Gaza since lifting a complete blockade in May, and that more than 700 are waiting to be picked up and distributed by the United Nations. That's an average of around 70 trucks a day, the lowest rate of the war and far below the 500-600 trucks a day the U.N. says are needed, and which entered during a six-week ceasefire earlier this year. The U.N. says it has struggled to deliver aid inside Gaza because of Israeli military restrictions, ongoing fighting, and a breakdown of law and order. An alternative system established by Israel and an American contractor has been marred by violence and controversy. An official familiar with ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas said Ron Dermer, a top adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was travelling to Rome to meet Witkoff on Thursday to discuss the state of the talks. The official spoke Wednesday on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the sensitive negotiations. U.S. officials said Witkoff planned to head to Europe this week. The State Department spokesperson said he was headed to the Middle East in a sign that momentum may be building toward a deal. The evolving deal, which is still being hammered out, is expected to include a 60-day ceasefire in which Hamas would release 10 living hostages and the remains of 18 others in phases in exchange for Palestinians imprisoned by Israel. Aid supplies would be ramped up and the two sides would hold negotiations on a lasting truce. Israel has continued to carry out waves of daily airstrikes against what it says are militant targets but which often kill women and children. Israel blames civilian deaths on Hamas because the fighters operate in densely populated areas. Strikes overnight and into Wednesday killed at least 21 people, more than half of them women and children, according to local health officials. One of the strikes hit a house in Gaza City, killing at least 12 people, according to Shifa Hospital, which received the casualties. The dead included six children and two women, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. The Israeli military said it struck an Islamic Jihad militant, and that the incident was under review because of reports of civilian casualties. Another strike hit an apartment in northern Gaza, killing at least six people. Among the dead were three children and two women, including one who was pregnant. Eight others were wounded, the ministry said. A third strike hit a tent in Gaza City late Tuesday and killed three children, Shifa Hospital said. There was no immediate comment from the military on those strikes. Hamas-led fighters abducted 251 people in the Oct. 7 attack, and killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians. More than 59,000 Palestinians have been killed during the war, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Its count doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians, but the ministry says that more than half of the dead are women and children. The U.N. and other international organizations see it as the most reliable source of data on casualties.