Why The Russian Earthquake Caused A Weaker Tsunami Plus 4 Other Facts
They Are Not Weather Phenomena
As a meteorologist, I am often asked about tsunamis by the media and the public. I think the word 'tsunami' sounds meteorological to many people. However, tsunamis are geologic and oceanographic hazards. What is a tsunami anyhow? The NOAA Tsunami Warning Center website stated, 'It is a series of extremely long waves (multiple waves tens-to-hundreds of miles between crests) caused by a large and sudden displacement of the ocean.' That displacement of the ocean is typically caused by an earthquake, landslides or volcanic eruption. The site went on to say, 'Tsunamis radiate outward in all directions from the point of origin and can move across entire ocean basins. When they reach the coast, they can cause dangerous coastal flooding and powerful currents that can last for several hours or days.'
How This Tsunami Ranks Historically
The memes have already started on social media as many people perceived that the tsunami threat did not match the level of warnings. I am of the 'better safe than sorry' mentality when it comes to hazards, but I digress. Previous strong earthquakes in that region have generated significant tsunami hazards. Because of its location in the ring of fire, the region is known for earthquakes. In fact, the fifth strongest earthquake in history (magnitude 9.0) happened there in 1952. Two weeks ago, Kamchatka had a magnitude 7.4 earthquake, according to Science News. Preliminarily, this earthquake ranks as the sixth strongest of all time, according to the BBC.
In this seismic hot spot, the dense Pacific Plate is trying to thrust itself beneath the North American Plate. Geologists have referred to this particularly tremor as a 'megathrust earthquake." Earthquakes Canada website defined that type of seismic activity as, 'A very large earthquake that occurs in a subduction zone, a region where one of the earth's tectonic plates is thrust under another.'
Why The Recent Tsunami Was Relatively Weak
A tsunami certainly happened, but why was it relatively muted? Gauges in Hawaii measured wave heights in the 4 to 5 feet range. U.S. Geological Survey expert Rich Briggs told Science News writer Nikk Ogasa, 'To push a big wave all the way across the Pacific, you really need a monster source, and this one is just knocking on the door of that.' Other factors that may have suppressed the tsunami include seafloor characteristics, coastline attributes, and the interaction of waves.
University of Southhampton expert Lisa McNeill told the BBC, "The height of the tsunami wave is also affected by local shapes of the seafloor near the coast and the [shape]
of the land where it arrives." Some studies have shown that if the quake is at shallow depth the tsunami is larger than if the shock is deeper. McNeill also said that with this earthquake, warning models may have been conservative with the depth information.
They Don't Look Like Large Breaking Waves At The Coast
According to NASA, 'Between 1998 and 2017, the global death toll from tsunamis exceeded 250,000, according to the WHO. 227,000 of those deaths came from the devastating Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004.' Perceived risk from a tsunami can vary because of dangerous misperceptions about them.
I often use the visual of throwing a rock in a pond and watching waves ripple away from the center as an analogy to a tsunami. However, with a tsunami, the waves are traveling beneath the water. It becomes apparent when it reaches a coastline. NOAA noted, 'When a tsunami reaches the coast, it may look like a fast-rising flood, or a wall of water (bore). Its appearance may differ at different points along a coast. It will not look like a normal wind wave.' One dangerous misperception is that tsunamis will look like large breaking waves seen at surf competitions. That misperception is also associated with hurricane storm surge. NOAA cautioned, 'Sometimes, before the water rushes on land, it will suddenly recede, showing the ocean floor, reefs, and fish like a very low, low tide.'
Multiple Observation Systems And Models Track And Predict Tsunamis
So how do scientists track and predict tsunamis? The Tsunami Warning Centers uses seismic networks to determine magnitude, depth, location, and other earthquake characteristics. Water-level networks such as the Deep-ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunami (DART) system and a system of coastal water-level stations detect changes in water level. Satellites with special altimetry instruments can also detect subtle changes in wave heights from space.
In the same way that meteorologists like me use numerical models to predict changes in the atmospheric fluid in time (a forecast), scientists feed information about earthquake magnitude, depth, and location into forecast models to predict tsunami motion across the ocean and potential coastal impacts. Information from seismic and water-level networks are important to the forecast models. For more information on the warning, watch and advisory messaging process, the NOAA Tsunami Warning Center FAQ page is a great resource.
There Are Meteotsunamis, But They Are Different
By the way I joked earlier about people asking meteorologists about tsunamis. There is actually something called a meteotsunami. I wrote about one in Florida many years ago. Meteotsunamis are caused abrupt jumps in atmospheric pressure often associated with strong weather fronts or other mesocale storm systems.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Just Launched the First Quantum Computer Into Space
The world of quantum computing has barged into a new frontier: space. A tiny quantum computer housed in a satellite is now in orbit around Earth, ScienceNews reports, residing some 330 miles above our planet after being launched aboard a SpaceX rocket last month. It's a trailblazing experiment intended to test how well these delicate devices can survive the extreme conditions of space, where they could allow satellites to quickly and efficiently perform intense calculations on their own. The experiment is also a ripe opportunity to put some fundamental physics principles to the test, according to project lead Philip Walter, a physicist at the University of Vienna. "Being the first here also means we have the duty and privilege to investigate if things operate in the way as we'd be used to on the ground," Walther told ScienceNews. Built in just eleven days, the idea behind the device was to "shrink a whole quantum laboratory down to the size of a satellite payload," Walter said in a statement before the launch. It's safe to say that they delivered on that premise. At a size befitting its quantum ambitions, the finished device is less than a gallon in volume, weighs just 20 pounds and some change, and will on average use only 10 watts of power, and no more than 30. The potential — and we stress potential — advantage of using a quantum computer in space is that it can perform "edge computing," or process data directly on the satellite. Otherwise, that data needs to be beamed down to Earth, put through calculations on a ground-based computer, and sent back up, which expends extra time and energy. Most importantly, they can theoretically perform specific types of calculations faster than classical computers, making them an enticing option in fields such as machine learning. Or at least, that's what they promise to do eventually. This device in particular is a photonic quantum computer, which uses individual photons — the massless particles that make up light — to represent units of information called qubits. A qubit, unlike a classical, electron-based bit, can be a 1 or 0 at the same time using a spooky quantum property known as superposition. As an added bonus, quantum computers have shown that they can potentially be more energy efficient. That's great news for satellite missions, which operate with extremely tight energy budgets. The fuel they launch with is essentially what they work with. Quantum computing in space may sound like a no-brainer, then — we've been testing quantum communications up there for years now — but it's important to remember that it still highly experimental tech with a whole lot unrealized potential and few applications outside of a laboratory. Though there have been pretenders to the throne in the past, no one has yet achieved clear "quantum supremacy," a point where a quantum computer can perform calculations that a classical one can't. One of the biggest issues in the field is that a quantum computer typically require a meticulously controlled environment to function, because even the slightest disturbance can cause a qubit to lose its quantum state, and thus, its information. In space, where there's no protective atmosphere, the computer's electronics are at the mercy of extreme temperature swings and blasts of cosmic radiation. The good news is that Walter's team has confirmed that its hardware is now operational, he told ScienceNews. Its long-term resilience will have to be borne out, but it's an encouraging start. Once its work is finished, the satellite will make a controlled re-entry into the Earth's atmosphere, where it will meet a fiery — but safe — end. Until then, it'll hopefully keep itself busy by taking images of Earth and crunching the numbers. More on quantum computing: Chinese Hackers Use Quantum Computer to Break Military Grade Encryption
Gizmodo
2 days ago
- Gizmodo
The Pacific Dodged a Monster Tsunami After One of the Biggest Quakes Ever. Here's Why
The earthquake near the east coast of the Kamchatka Peninsula in Russia on July 30, 2025, generated tsunami waves that have reached Hawaii and coastal areas of the U.S. mainland. The earthquake's magnitude of 8.8 is significant, potentially making it one of the largest quakes ever recorded. Countries around much of the Pacific, including in East Asia and North and South America, issued alerts and, in some cases, evacuation orders in anticipation of potentially devastating waves. Waves of up to 4 meters [13.1 feet] hit coastal towns in Kamchatka near where the earthquake struck, apparently causing severe damage in some areas. But in other places waves have been smaller than expected, including in Japan, which is much closer to Kamchatka than most of the Pacific Rim. Many warnings have now been downgraded or lifted with relatively little damage. It seems that for the size of the earthquake, the tsunami has been rather smaller than might have been the case. To understand why, we can look to geology. The earthquake was associated with the Pacific tectonic plate, one of several major pieces of the Earth's crust. This pushes northwest against the part of the North American plate that extends west into Russia and is forced downwards beneath the Kamchatka peninsula in a process called subduction. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) says the average rate of convergence—a measure of plate movement—is around 80 millimeters [3.15 inches] per year. This is one of the highest rates of relative movement at a plate boundary. But this movement tends to take place as an occasional sudden movement of several meters. In any earthquake of this type and size, the displacement may occur over a contact area between the two tectonic plates of slightly less than 400 kilometers [249 miles] by 150 km [93 miles], according to the USGS. The Earth's crust is made of rock that is very hard and brittle at the small scale and near the surface. But over very large areas and depths, it can deform with slightly elastic behavior. As the subducting slab—the Pacific plate—pushes forward and descends, the depth of the ocean floor may suddenly change. Nearer to the coastline, the crust of the overlying plate may be pushed upward as the other pushes underneath, or—as was the case off Sumatra in 2004—the outer edge of the overlying plate may be dragged down somewhat before springing back a few meters. It is these near-instantaneous movements of the seabed that generate tsunami waves by displacing huge volumes of ocean water. For example, if the seabed rose just one meter [3 feet] across an area of 200 by 100 km [124 by 62 miles] where the water is 1 km [0.6 miles] deep, then the volume of water displaced would fill Wembley Stadium to the roof 17.5 million times. A one-meter rise like this will then propagate away from the area of the uplift in all directions, interacting with normal wind-generated ocean waves, tides, and the shape of the sea floor to produce a series of tsunami waves. In the open ocean, the tsunami wave would not be noticed by boats and ships, which is why a cruise ship in Hawaii was quickly moved out to sea. The tsunami waves travel across the deep ocean at up to 440 miles per hour [708 km/hr], so they may be expected to reach any Pacific Ocean coastline within 24 hours. However, some of their energy will dissipate as they cross the ocean, so they will usually be less hazardous at the farthest coastlines away from the earthquake. The hazard arises from how the waves are modified as the seabed rises towards a shoreline. They will slow and, as a result, grow in height, creating a surge of water towards and then beyond the normal coastline. The Kamchatka earthquake was slightly deeper in the Earth's crust (20.7 km, 12.9 miles) than the Sumatran earthquake of 2004 and the Japanese earthquake of 2011. This will have resulted in somewhat less vertical displacement of the seabed, with the movement of that seabed being slightly less instantaneous. This is why we've seen tsunami warnings lifted some time before any tsunami waves would have arrived there. Alan Dykes, Associate Professor in Engineering Geology, Kingston University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
Why The Russian Earthquake Caused A Weaker Tsunami Plus 4 Other Facts
An 8.8 magnitude earthquake was a major hazard in Russia this week. Scientists believe it is the most powerful earthquake in the Kamchatka Peninsula in over seventy years. The quake also prompted tsunami warnings throughout the Pacific region, but thankfully, it was weaker than expected. Over my three decades as an atmospheric scientist, I have noticed a lot of interest and misunderstanding about tsunamis. Here are five things that you should know about them, including expert analysis on why the recent once was rather muted. They Are Not Weather Phenomena As a meteorologist, I am often asked about tsunamis by the media and the public. I think the word 'tsunami' sounds meteorological to many people. However, tsunamis are geologic and oceanographic hazards. What is a tsunami anyhow? The NOAA Tsunami Warning Center website stated, 'It is a series of extremely long waves (multiple waves tens-to-hundreds of miles between crests) caused by a large and sudden displacement of the ocean.' That displacement of the ocean is typically caused by an earthquake, landslides or volcanic eruption. The site went on to say, 'Tsunamis radiate outward in all directions from the point of origin and can move across entire ocean basins. When they reach the coast, they can cause dangerous coastal flooding and powerful currents that can last for several hours or days.' How This Tsunami Ranks Historically The memes have already started on social media as many people perceived that the tsunami threat did not match the level of warnings. I am of the 'better safe than sorry' mentality when it comes to hazards, but I digress. Previous strong earthquakes in that region have generated significant tsunami hazards. Because of its location in the ring of fire, the region is known for earthquakes. In fact, the fifth strongest earthquake in history (magnitude 9.0) happened there in 1952. Two weeks ago, Kamchatka had a magnitude 7.4 earthquake, according to Science News. Preliminarily, this earthquake ranks as the sixth strongest of all time, according to the BBC. In this seismic hot spot, the dense Pacific Plate is trying to thrust itself beneath the North American Plate. Geologists have referred to this particularly tremor as a 'megathrust earthquake." Earthquakes Canada website defined that type of seismic activity as, 'A very large earthquake that occurs in a subduction zone, a region where one of the earth's tectonic plates is thrust under another.' Why The Recent Tsunami Was Relatively Weak A tsunami certainly happened, but why was it relatively muted? Gauges in Hawaii measured wave heights in the 4 to 5 feet range. U.S. Geological Survey expert Rich Briggs told Science News writer Nikk Ogasa, 'To push a big wave all the way across the Pacific, you really need a monster source, and this one is just knocking on the door of that.' Other factors that may have suppressed the tsunami include seafloor characteristics, coastline attributes, and the interaction of waves. University of Southhampton expert Lisa McNeill told the BBC, "The height of the tsunami wave is also affected by local shapes of the seafloor near the coast and the [shape] of the land where it arrives." Some studies have shown that if the quake is at shallow depth the tsunami is larger than if the shock is deeper. McNeill also said that with this earthquake, warning models may have been conservative with the depth information. They Don't Look Like Large Breaking Waves At The Coast According to NASA, 'Between 1998 and 2017, the global death toll from tsunamis exceeded 250,000, according to the WHO. 227,000 of those deaths came from the devastating Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004.' Perceived risk from a tsunami can vary because of dangerous misperceptions about them. I often use the visual of throwing a rock in a pond and watching waves ripple away from the center as an analogy to a tsunami. However, with a tsunami, the waves are traveling beneath the water. It becomes apparent when it reaches a coastline. NOAA noted, 'When a tsunami reaches the coast, it may look like a fast-rising flood, or a wall of water (bore). Its appearance may differ at different points along a coast. It will not look like a normal wind wave.' One dangerous misperception is that tsunamis will look like large breaking waves seen at surf competitions. That misperception is also associated with hurricane storm surge. NOAA cautioned, 'Sometimes, before the water rushes on land, it will suddenly recede, showing the ocean floor, reefs, and fish like a very low, low tide.' Multiple Observation Systems And Models Track And Predict Tsunamis So how do scientists track and predict tsunamis? The Tsunami Warning Centers uses seismic networks to determine magnitude, depth, location, and other earthquake characteristics. Water-level networks such as the Deep-ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunami (DART) system and a system of coastal water-level stations detect changes in water level. Satellites with special altimetry instruments can also detect subtle changes in wave heights from space. In the same way that meteorologists like me use numerical models to predict changes in the atmospheric fluid in time (a forecast), scientists feed information about earthquake magnitude, depth, and location into forecast models to predict tsunami motion across the ocean and potential coastal impacts. Information from seismic and water-level networks are important to the forecast models. For more information on the warning, watch and advisory messaging process, the NOAA Tsunami Warning Center FAQ page is a great resource. There Are Meteotsunamis, But They Are Different By the way I joked earlier about people asking meteorologists about tsunamis. There is actually something called a meteotsunami. I wrote about one in Florida many years ago. Meteotsunamis are caused abrupt jumps in atmospheric pressure often associated with strong weather fronts or other mesocale storm systems.
