logo
Dubai Retains Global Top Spot for Attracting Greenfield FDI Projects in Cultural and Creative Industries in 2024

Dubai Retains Global Top Spot for Attracting Greenfield FDI Projects in Cultural and Creative Industries in 2024

Yahoo02-06-2025

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates, June 02, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--(Dubai Culture) Dubai has maintained its first place as the world's leading destination for greenfield foreign direct investment (FDI) in the cultural and creative industries (CCI), topping the Financial Times' fDi Markets ranking for the third consecutive year.
The 2024 report, which assessed 233 cities under the 'Creative Industries Cluster' classification, placed Dubai ahead of global hubs such as London and Singapore. During the year, the emirate attracted 971 CCI projects—an 8% increase from 2023—bringing in AED 18.86 billion in capital inflows, up nearly 60% from 2023, and generating 23,517 new jobs, a 9% year-on-year rise.
All major CCI subsectors saw stronger performance, with notable growth in advertising and PR, film and media production, gaming, education, and advanced software design. According to the Dubai FDI Monitor, greenfield, wholly-owned ventures made up 76.5% of all projects, while new forms of investment represented 15.4%, reinvestment 5.6%, and mergers & acquisitions (2.4%).
Data from the Dubai FDI Monitor and the Dubai Framework for Cultural Statistics show that the United States accounted for the largest share of capital inflows in 2024, at 23.2%, followed by India (13.4%), the United Kingdom (9.4%), Switzerland (7.6%), and Saudi Arabia (4.8%). India led in both the number of projects (18.8%) and jobs (18.5%), while the UK, US, Germany, Italy, and France also featured prominently across both metrics.
Investor confidence continues to be driven by Dubai's pro-business reforms, including Executive Council Resolution 11 of 2025, which enables free zone businesses to operate onshore, expanding commercial flexibility. The city's Zero Government Bureaucracy programme is also reducing red tape across more than 2,000 federal procedures.
Combined with strong intellectual property protections and advanced digital infrastructure, these initiatives have helped establish a regulatory framework marked by efficiency, transparency, and ease of doing business.
Insights from the 'Creative Dubai: Navigating Tomorrow's Creative Landscape' report illustrate how this ecosystem is scaling with demand, pinpointing investment opportunity hotspots in design, immersive media and AI-driven production. Dubai continues to offer investors access to top-tier talent, competitive setup costs, and strategic connectivity. The 2024 FDI results underscore the city's rise as a global hub for innovation and one of the world's most attractive environments for creative enterprise.
*Source: AETOSWire
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250601200478/en/
Contacts
Antoine Boghos, +971503310001antoine@cbpr.me

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lotus considering shifting UK production to US
Lotus considering shifting UK production to US

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Lotus considering shifting UK production to US

Sportscar maker Lotus is considering ending production at its home in the UK in favour of setting up a new plant in the US, the BBC understands. Such a move would put 1,300 jobs at risk at its headquarters in Hethel, Norfolk. Lotus refused to comment when asked about any plans, which were first reported by the Financial Times, but sources within the company told the BBC the situation is under review and taking production to the US was under consideration. It comes after production in Hethel was temporarily suspended due to disruption caused by the introduction of tariffs on cars being imported to the US. America is a major market for Lotus but tariffs threaten its business, with US sellers required to pay taxes of 25% on imports of cars and car parts. Figures released on Friday for the UK's car industry revealed exports to the US had halved as President Donald Trump's tariffs caused some car makers to halt shipments. The UK government and Trump administration have agreed a deal to lower tariffs on UK-made cars entering the US to 10%, but it is not due to come into force until the end of June, meaning manufacturers have had to pay the higher rate to date. Lotus is majority owned by the Chinese group Geely, which is in the process of reorganising its diverse portfolio of car brands, which also include Volvo, Polestar and Lynk and Co. The company currently builds cars in Norfolk and in Wuhan, China. Lotus was founded in the early 1950s by engineer Colin Chapman, moving to Norfolk in the 1960s. In April, the carmaker announced 270 jobs would be cut "amid volatile and evolving market conditions including the US tariffs". The decision followed previous job losses last year, but the company said it remained "committed to the UK" and that the restructuring was "vital to enhance our competitiveness". President Trump has raised taxes on various goods entering the US in recent months in an attempt to encourage businesses and consumers to buy more American-made goods. Car shipments to the US already incurred a 2.5% tariff, but now face higher rates. However, if a deal with the US had not been reached, UK exports would have been taxed at 27.5%, as opposed to 10%. The lower tariff only applies to 100,000 British cars being imported to the US per year, which matches the number of vehicles the UK exported across the Atlantic last year. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump Is Doing Crypto Corruption With a Billionaire Leader of Fake Country: Report
Trump Is Doing Crypto Corruption With a Billionaire Leader of Fake Country: Report

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Is Doing Crypto Corruption With a Billionaire Leader of Fake Country: Report

One of the many ways that Donald Trump's first presidential term was unprecedented is that his brazen self-dealing triggered multiple federal lawsuits alleging violations of the Emoluments Clause, or the provision of the U.S. Constitution that bars federal officials from accepting money and gifts from both foreign and domestic actors. But two of those suits were dismissed after Trump lost the 2020 election, while a third was dismissed by the Supreme Court, overturning lower court rulings that let the case against Trump proceed. In the opening months of his second term, Trump has been more aggressive than ever about cashing in on his powerful position, particularly in the cryptocurrency space. And new research from the anti-corruption watchdog group shared exclusively with Rolling Stone, suggests that he is flouting the federal law against receiving emoluments in a new way. Trump isn't only cozying up to foreign governments, including the United Arab Emirates, through deals with his family's burgeoning crypto empire. He is also increasingly entangled with a major investor who claims the title of prime minister for a tiny European nation that doesn't technically exist — yet. More from Rolling Stone Supreme Court Hands Trump 'GIANT WIN' in Birthright Citizenship Case Trump and Hegseth Are Melting Down Over Leaked Iran Strike Intel Scarlett Johansson, Sheryl Crow, Zayn Malik Urge Congress Not to Cut Food-Assistance Programs The crypto industry backed Trump in 2024 — becoming the biggest corporate spender of the election cycle — and the president's family has been substantially enriched by their new crypto plays, including collectible meme coins and the crypto exchange World Liberty Financial. Their combined net worth has soared by billions, crypto now accounts for a majority of Trump's personal fortune, and his administration has made every effort to deregulate the digital asset economy. The situation has created obvious opportunities for individuals from within the U.S. and abroad to try to get close to the president by backing the Trumps' digital asset ventures. Last month, for example, Eric Trump and Zach Witkoff, a co-founder of World Liberty Financial, announced an eyebrow-raising deal. The United Arab Emirates-backed venture firm MGX, they said, would use the World Liberty digital coin USD1 for a $2 billion deal with Binance, the world's largest crypto exchange. The Trumps and Witkoffs — Zach is the son of billionaire Steve Witkoff, the World Liberty co-founder emeritus and White House envoy to the Middle East — stand to reap tens of millions from the transaction. What's more, in 2023, Binance pleaded guilty to an array of financial crimes, including money laundering, paying a fine of $4 billion. A separate Securities and Exchange Commission civil suit against the company was formally dropped in May as the agency abandoned a spate of enforcement actions against crypto firms. Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Jeff Merkley warned in a letter that the creation of the USD1 token had 'set the stage for a new level of public corruption by creating a fuss-free mechanism for foreign governments to provide [Trump] with kickbacks and bribes.' The lawmakers also noted that the MGX deal 'may provide a template for other foreign governments to curry [Trump's] favor.' Trump's ties to one crypto magnate in particular may raise similar emoluments concerns, according to That would be Justin Sun, a Chinese-born crypto billionaire who until recently could not travel to the U.S. for fear of arrest for alleged financial crimes. Sun no longer has any problem attending events on American soil — including events with the president, or the ultra-MAGA Bitcoin 2025 conference in Las Vegas — because after he invested $75 million into $WLFI, the first digital token from World Liberty, the SEC froze its fraud case against him. Now Sun is an official advisor to (and prolific promoter of) World Liberty, and his own digital asset platform, Tron, which the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crimes has called a 'preferred choice for crypto money launderers' in Asia. Tron is set to go public in the U.S., with Eric Trump taking a role at the company. Sun has separately spent an estimated $40 million on $TRUMP, the meme coin the president launched two days before taking office, making him the largest investor in the gimmick token; he and approximately 200 other top buyers were invited to an exclusive dinner banquet at Trump's golf club outside Washington, D.C. last month. That's not all. In October, Sun was elected prime minister of Liberland, a globally unrecognized micronation. Founded in 2015 by the Czech libertarian activist Vít Jedlička on about 2.5 square miles of land in Croatia next to the Danube, it remains mostly forested and has no permanent residents. But a website for the project claims that it has more than 1,000 citizens and has received nearly 800,000 applications for citizenship. The country's theoretical economy and administrative functions are all blockchain-based, with one token used for business transactions and another for voting. There is no gun control, and taxes are voluntary, though only those who contribute them can vote on political candidates and legislative policy. Its motto: 'To Live and Let Live.' Sun serves as a de facto ambassador from the theoretical country and is campaigning along with Jedlička, the president of Liberland, to legitimize it in the eyes of other nations — the U.S. included. In May, Jedlička shared a video of Sun entering the White House complex with the caption 'Prime minister of @Liberland in White House today!' Speaking about his initial investment in World Liberty ahead of Trump's inauguration, Sun called it 'a very precious opportunity for Liberland in 2025' and mentioned meeting with Steve Witkoff, who has retained a stake in World Liberty even while working for the White House. 'I think if we have a very good stand on U.S. policies we will have a big breakthrough in the diplomatic relationship,' Sun said in a video shared on the Liberland YouTube account. Sun, Jedlička, and Liberland vice president Bogie Wozniak were all VIP guests for Trump's inauguration festivities. Richard Painter, a lawyer and professor and vice-chair of the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, thinks Sun is probably 'living in fantasyland' when it comes to turning Liberland into a real country. But he says that a 'real, genuine effort to set up a sovereign nation' — which Sun represents as a head of state — could put the emoluments question in play. Such a separatist campaign could encompass Sun claiming 'his own financial regulations in this country,' says Painter, who served as George W. Bush's chief White House ethics lawyer, asserting that 'you can do things in crypto in [Liberland] that you couldn't do in Croatia, because [Sun] can make the rules. This sort of becomes what Bermuda is for tax havens.' Likewise, Sun and his fellow ministers could signal a serious attempt to break away from existing governance by defying the financial regulations of the European Union, to which Croatia belongs. In this type of scenario, Painter explains, Sun might indeed be seen as a foreign leader, and Trump profiting from his investments would be improper under constitutional law. 'The Emoluments Clause applies to foreign princes and heads of state of foreign governments, but would also apply to those who claim to be foreign governments who claim sovereignty, whether or not the United States recognizes that,' he says. 'We don't formally recognize Taiwan anymore, but if something came in from the government of Taiwan, we'd see it as an emoluments violation.' Having the Trump administration acknowledge Liberland as a distinct state outside Croatian and EU law would throw this corruption issue into sharper relief — yet Sun and his allies clearly stand to gain from such a diplomatic development. Running their own blockchain-based sovereign country as a cabal of crypto kingpins, they would no doubt make the most of the freedom from regulatory oversight there. Neither World Liberty Financial nor Sun returned requests for comment about the ethics of the business relationship between Sun, the president, and the crypto ventures controlled by the Trumps. White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly did get back to Rolling Stone with a statement. 'The President is working to secure good deals for the American people, not for himself,' she wrote. 'President Trump only acts in the best interests of the American public — which is why they overwhelmingly re-elected him to this office, despite years of lies and false accusations against him and his businesses from the fake news media.' Executive Director Tony Carrk disagrees about Trump's priorities. 'In total disregard for the Emoluments Clause and every presidential ethical standard, Trump and Steve Witkoff are using a barely regulated crypto scheme to grab up tens of millions from an accused Chinese crypto fraudster whose riches seemingly helped elevate him to be leader of his own micronation — and now wants recognition from the U.S. government,' Carrk said in a statement shared with Rolling Stone. 'While Sun and many other foreign investors with hidden agendas were invited to buy first-class access to the president, Trump has yet to make time for any one of the millions of Americans about to lose their health coverage and food aid under the 'beautiful' Trump tax giveaway for the rich,' added Carrk. 'Wearing corruption on his sleeve seems to be President Trump's strategy for avoiding congressional scrutiny. But his allies in Congress shouldn't wait around for Trump's many self-enrichment schemes leveraging the power of the White House to leave American working people and our national security worse off.' Representatives for World Liberty Financial have not been shy about advertising how major investments in the firm can secure a line to the president, who until recently was listed as the company's 'chief crypto advocate' and is the first person featured on its website, as a co-founder emeritus, alongside his sons. He also, of course, effectively dictates U.S. crypto policy. World Liberty has approached a wide range of foreign businesses in looking to establish relationships that raise its profile and, as of March, had sold more than half a billion dollars worth of its tokens. When it comes to the conflicts of interest Trump has embraced in this field, and the scale of these possible emoluments violations, both have absolutely dwarfed the repeated allegations of foreign governments paying Trump through his hotels and restaurants in his first term — the deals that brought the unsuccessful emoluments suits against him in his first term. Liberland did once get in on the Trump hotel scheme, though. In 2018, a year after a delegation from the tiny region attended the president's first inauguration, its leadership threw an exclusive reception for American lawmakers at Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C., spending at least $750,000 on accommodations. The Trump Organization sold the hotel in 2022, and today, the first family sees far bigger windfalls from its crypto partners. After more than a century as real estate moguls, the dynasty has found greener pastures. Best of Rolling Stone Every Super Bowl Halftime Show, Ranked From Worst to Best The United States of Weed Gaming Levels Up

OpenAI's Unreleased AGI Paper Could Complicate Microsoft Negotiations
OpenAI's Unreleased AGI Paper Could Complicate Microsoft Negotiations

WIRED

time18 hours ago

  • WIRED

OpenAI's Unreleased AGI Paper Could Complicate Microsoft Negotiations

Jun 27, 2025 3:35 PM The partnership between OpenAI and Microsoft in many ways hinges on the definition of artificial general intelligence, creating a tension that has spilled over into OpenAI research that has not been made public. Sam Altman, chief executive officer of OpenAI Inc., during a Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee hearing in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, May 8, 2025. Photograph:A small clause inside OpenAI's contract with Microsoft, once considered a distant hypothetical, has now become a flashpoint in one of the biggest partnerships in tech. The clause states that if OpenAI's board ever declares it has developed artificial general intelligence (AGI), it would limit Microsoft's contracted access to the startup's future technologies. Microsoft, which has invested more than $13 billion in OpenAI, is now reportedly pushing for the removal of the clause and is considering walking away from the deal entirely, according to the Financial Times. Late last year, tensions around AGI's suddenly pivotal role in the Microsoft deal spilled into a debate within OpenAI over an internal research paper, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter. Titled 'Five Levels of General AI Capabilities,' the paper outlines a framework for classifying progressive stages of AI technology. By making specific assertions about future AI capabilities, sources claim, the paper could have complicated OpenAI's ability to declare that it had achieved AGI, a potential point of leverage in negotiations. 'We're focused on developing empirical methods to evaluate AGI progress—work that is reproducible, measurable, and useful to the broader field,' OpenAI spokesperson Lindsay McCallum said in a written comment to WIRED. 'The 'Five Levels' was an early attempt at classifying stages and terminology to describe general AI capabilities. This was not a scientific research paper.' Microsoft declined to comment. In a blog post describing its corporate structure, OpenAI notes that AGI 'is excluded from IP licenses and other commercial terms with Microsoft.' OpenAI defines AGI as "a highly autonomous system that outperforms humans at most economically valuable work.' The two companies have been renegotiating their agreement as OpenAI prepares a corporate restructuring. While Microsoft wants continued access to OpenAI's models even if the startup declares AGI before the partnership ends in 2030, one person familiar with the partnership discussions tells WIRED that Microsoft doesn't believe OpenAI will reach AGI by that deadline. But another source close to the matter describes the clause as OpenAI's ultimate leverage. Both sources have been granted anonymity to speak freely about private discussions. According to the Wall Street Journal, OpenAI has even considered whether to invoke the clause based on an AI coding agent. The talks have grown so fraught that OpenAI has reportedly discussed if it should publicly accuse Microsoft of anticompetitive behavior, per the Journal. A source familiar with the discussions, granted anonymity to speak freely about the negotiations, says OpenAI is fairly close to achieving AGI; Altman has said he expects to see it during Donald Trump's current term. That same source suggests there are two relevant definitions: First, OpenAI's board can unilaterally decide the company has reached AGI as defined in its charter, which would immediately cut Microsoft off from accessing the technology or revenue derived from AGI; Microsoft would still have rights to everything before that milestone. Second, the contract includes a concept of sufficient AGI, added in 2023, which defines AGI as a system capable of generating a certain level of profit. If OpenAI asserts it has reached that benchmark, Microsoft must approve the determination. The contract also bars Microsoft from pursuing AGI on its own or through third parties using OpenAI's IP. Bloomberg previously reported on the existence of the 'Five Levels' paper, and that OpenAI was planning to share the scale with its outside investors, though it was considered at the time as a 'work in progress.' OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and chief research officer Mark Chen have spoken about the five levels of AI capabilities in various interviews since. A version of the paper dated September 2024 viewed by WIRED details a five-step scale for measuring how advanced AI systems are, citing other research that claims many of OpenAI's models at that point were at Level 1, defined as 'An AI that can understand and use language fluently and can do a wide range of tasks for users, at least as well as a beginner could and sometimes better.' It notes that some models at the time were approaching Level 2, which the authors define as 'An AI that can do more advanced tasks at the request of a user, including tasks that might take an hour for a trained expert to do.' The paper deliberately avoids giving a single definition of AGI, arguing the term is too vague and binary, and instead opts for using a spectrum of capabilities to describe increasingly general and capable AI systems. The paper doesn't predict when OpenAI's systems will reach each of the five levels, but it does predict how each step up in capabilities could change different facets of society, including education, jobs, science, and politics, warning about new risks as AI tools become more powerful and independent. In a podcast with YCombinator president and CEO Garry Tan in November, Altman said that the company's o1 model could be defined as Level 2, and he expects they'll reach Level 3 'faster than people expect.' Last July, a coauthor of the paper gave a presentation of the research at an internal event where teams highlighted their most important projects for research-wide awareness, according to multiple sources. The research was well received by other staffers, one source added. Sources also believe that the paper seemed to be in final stages, and the company had hired a copy editor to finalize the work late last year along with generating visuals for a blog announcing the paper. OpenAI's partnership with Microsoft was cited internally as one reason to hold off on publishing the paper, according to multiple sources who spoke to WIRED on the condition of anonymity as they were not permitted to speak to the press. Another source says that discussions with Microsoft were often 'mentioned as a blocker for putting the paper out.' McCallum said in a comment to WIRED that 'it's not accurate to suggest we held off from sharing these ideas to protect the Microsoft partnership.' Another source familiar with the matter said that the paper wasn't released because it didn't meet technical standards. 'I think mostly the question of what AGI is doesn't matter,' Altman said at a conference in early June 'It is a term that people define differently; the same person often will define it differently.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store