
Brain implants that are helping people with Parkinson's
It involved a pacemaker delivering electrical pulses via electrodes implanted in specific spots in the brain. This treatment has been used to treat advanced Parkinson's since the early 2000s. However, until today, the stimulator settings had to remain constant once they were set by a specialised doctor or nurse and could only be changed when the patient was next seen in the clinic.
Accordingly, most researchers and doctors thought of stimulation as merely an adjustable and reversible way of lesioning. But these days the field is undergoing a revolution that challenges this view. Adaptive deep brain stimulation was approved earlier this year by the US and European health authorities. It involves a computer interpreting brain activity and deciding whether to adjust the stimulation amplitude up or down to achieve the best relief of a patient's symptoms. Parkinson's is a complex disorder with fluctuating symptoms that are greatly affected by the drugs a patient takes several times a day. While for some patients' constant stimulation does a good job controlling their symptoms, for others it is too strong some of the time and overly weak at other times. Ideally, the treatment should only kick in when it is most helpful.
The discovery that made adaptive stimulation possible was made by scientists at University College London over two decades ago, around the time when the first patients with Parkinson's started getting electrodes implanted in the UK National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery.
When recording deep brain activity from these electrodes shortly after the surgery, the scientists noticed that a particular kind of brain wave appeared when a patient stopped medication, the symptoms worsened. The waves went away when the patients took their medication and started feeling better. It took a decade of further research before the same team of scientists first attempted to use the brain waves to control stimulation. The idea is akin to a thermostat controlling an air conditioner.
When the waves (temperature) reach a certain threshold, an electronic control circuit turns the stimulator (A/C) on. This reduces the waves and when they go away the stimulation can be turned off for a while until the waves re-emerge. The original setup was bulky and could only be used in the hospital, and it took another decade to make it fit inside a device smaller than a matchbox that could be implanted in a patient's chest.
New challenges
While the option to make brain stimulation adaptive gives new tools to doctors and nurses to fit stimulation to a patient in the best possible way, it comes with new challenges. Even with the original fixed settings, there are many parameters that doctors must set to ensure effective treatment with minimal side-effects.
Making stimulation adaptive adds another layer of complexity and puts extra demand on a clinical team's time and attention. In the case of Parkinson's, stimulation effects are almost immediate, so it is relatively easy to see how well particular constant settings work. But an adaptive setting must be tested over at least a few days to see how well it copes with the patient's daily routine and medication cycles.
Adaptive stimulators also come with sensing abilities. They can record the harmful brain wave levels over days and weeks so that the clinical team can review them and see how well they are controlled. These possibilities are new in the treatment of Parkinson's, although similar implanted devices have been in use for years by cardiologists and epileptologists (neurologists who specialise in epilepsy).
Studying brain waves recorded by the smart stimulators in Parkinson's patients opens new doors for understanding other diseases. Many patients suffer from problems such as depression and cognitive decline. Researchers could search for features in their brain signals that track the severity of these symptoms using AI tools to find relations too subtle or too complex for a human observer.
A parallel branch of deep brain stimulation research is focused on precisely mapping out the brain circuits responsible for different neurological and psychiatric symptoms. Several recent studies reported successes in treating depression, OCD and severe headaches. Stimulating in the right place at the right time considering what the patient is doing is where the field is heading. With the basic technology now in place, progress could be rapid.
(The writer is a Professor of Translational Neurophysiology, UCL)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
Dementia diagnosis takes over 3 years: Study reveals why that's a problem
When we talk of dementia, it is one of the most frightening neurodegenerative diseases in the world. And, not to mention, among the fastest growing neurological conditions. Known as a brain-shrinking disease, dementia is an umbrella term for a variety of symptoms causing various brain includes memory, thinking, reasoning, changes in behaviour and also personality. Alzheimer's disease is the most common type of what makes it so frightening is that the diagnosis takes years, in fact, three years on average, a new study has found. The research led by University College London (UCL) has found that people with dementia are often diagnosed three and a half years after symptoms first appear, and the delay is even longer, 4.1 years, for those with early-onset in the International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, the study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of global data examining how long it typically takes for dementia to be researchers reviewed data from 13 previous studies conducted in the US, Europe, Australia, and China, covering 30,257 participants. They looked at the average time between the first symptoms noticed by patients or their family members and the final medical study highlights how delays in diagnosis can affect patients and families, and why improving early detection must be a global Vasiliki Orgeta, lead author from the UCL Division of Psychiatry, spoke to Science Direct and said, "Timely diagnosis of dementia remains a major global challenge, shaped by a complex set of factors, and specific healthcare strategies are urgently needed to improve it. Other studies estimate that only 50-65% of cases are ever diagnosed in high-income countries, with many countries having even lower diagnostic rates. Timely diagnosis can improve access to treatments and for some people prolong the time living with mild dementia before symptoms worsen."The researchers found that younger people and those with frontotemporal dementia (changes in personality, behaviour and language) tended to experience longer delays in getting study also found that Black patients had a longer wait before diagnosis, although data on racial differences was Phuong Leung, also from UCL, explained why delays often happen: "Symptoms of dementia are often mistaken for normal aging, while fear, stigma, and low public awareness can discourage people from seeking help."Although future large-scale studies may provide different estimates, according to the authors, their meta-analysis was based on studies of moderate quality, giving us reasonable confidence in the reported reduce the time it takes to diagnose dementia, it is essential to understand the social, clinical, and healthcare-related factors that delay diagnosis.- EndsTrending Reel


Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
'World-class care, at home': Kuwait seals landmark collaboration with five elite French hospitals in Paris
TL;DR: Kuwait 's Minister of Health, Dr Ahmad Al‑Awadhi, signed memoranda of understanding on July 18, 2025 with five elite French medical institutions. Participating organizations: Almaviva Santé, Institut Curie , Hôpital Foch, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris , and Rothschild Foundation Hospital. The MoUs enable specialist consultations, telemedicine, international fellowships, on-shore training, and joint clinical research in key areas: oncology, cardiology, organ transplantation, and diagnostics. Patient benefits include access to world-class expertise without overseas travel; health professionals gain advanced training through international exchange programs. On July 18, 2025, Kuwait's Minister of Health, Dr Ahmad Al‑Awadhi, formalized a series of strategic memoranda of understanding with five premier French medical institutions during a ceremony in Paris as reported by KUNA. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The move marks a new chapter in Kuwait's healthcare collaboration with France, aimed at advancing medical expertise, expanding training opportunities for Kuwaiti professionals, and enhancing patient access to world‑class care through remote and local channels. The agreements were executed in alignment with Kuwait's leadership vision, as expressed by Amir Sheikh Meshal Al‑Ahmad Al‑Jaber Al‑Sabah. A Strategic Vision Rooted in National Development The MoUs reflect a broader vision championed byAmir Sheikh Meshal Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, emphasizing international partnerships to uplift Kuwait's healthcare quality and self-reliance. According to Dr Al-Awadhi, this move represents a 'new beginning' in bilateral cooperation that will not only strengthen patient care infrastructure but also position Kuwait as a regional hub for specialized medical services. By aligning Kuwait's healthcare goals with the expertise of global leaders in medicine, the Ministry aims to expand local treatment capabilities, particularly in oncology, cardiology, organ transplantation, and complex diagnostics—while also improving knowledge exchange mechanisms through fellowships and dual training programs. Top-Tier French Institutions on Board The five French entities involved include: Almaviva Santé: a leading private hospital group across France, known for surgical excellence. Institut Curie: globally recognized for cutting-edge oncological research and treatment. Hôpital Foch: a pioneer in organ transplantation and thoracic surgery. Institut Mutualiste Montsouris: acclaimed for high-precision cardiology and urology services. Rothschild Foundation Hospital: a Paris-based reference center in neurology and ophthalmology. Each institution brings decades of proven expertise and world-class infrastructure to the collaboration. These partnerships aim to offer Kuwaiti patients specialist tele-consultations, expert second opinions, and remote care options, all within Kuwait's borders, reducing travel costs and patient fatigue. What the Agreements Cover: From Training to Telemedicine The MoUs are multifaceted in scope and tailored to address both clinical and capacity-building needs in Kuwait's healthcare ecosystem. Among the key pillars: Specialist Telemedicine Services French physicians will provide virtual consultations for complex cases, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and offering patients access to second opinions from leading European experts. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now This reduces Kuwait's reliance on outbound medical travel while maintaining high standards of care. Physician Training & Clinical Fellowships Healthcare professionals from Kuwait will benefit from structured training programs, including short-term fellowships, clinical observerships, on-site placements in France, and joint workshops in Kuwait. This hands-on learning model is expected to upskill frontline medical staff, particularly in areas where Kuwait lacks in-house specialization. On-Site Diagnostics Support The French institutions will send diagnostic experts to Kuwait on rotational visits to conduct complex medical tests, improve lab capabilities, and support local clinicians with advanced case management. Focus areas include oncopathology, cardiac imaging, and genetic testing. Joint Research & Innovation Both sides have committed to launching clinical trials and collaborative research projects, particularly targeting diseases prevalent in the Gulf region such as diabetes, hypertension, and cancer. The aim is to co-develop innovative treatment protocols that could later be scaled for regional application. Why This Matters to Kuwait's Healthcare Future These MoUs go beyond symbolic cooperation, they signify a functional model for technology-driven, collaborative healthcare that integrates global expertise with local needs. By leveraging France's longstanding medical legacy, Kuwait hopes to: Reduce medical travel costs and improve in-country care Develop specialist medical talent through international mentorship Advance diagnostic infrastructure and patient outcomes Promote research culture and knowledge production within national institutions The Ministry of Health views these collaborations as a strategic investment in both human capital and system resilience. Kuwait's new healthcare agreements with elite French hospitals are a calculated step toward building a globally competitive medical ecosystem. As implementation begins, the MoUs are expected to deliver both immediate benefits to patients and long-term advantages for professional development. With stronger institutional ties and shared scientific goals, Kuwait is not only addressing present-day healthcare gaps but also future-proofing its medical services for generations to come. FAQ 1. What are the new healthcare MoUs Kuwait signed with France? Kuwait signed memoranda of understanding with five top French medical institutions to enhance diagnostics, treatment, training, and research. 2. Which French hospitals are involved in the agreements? The MoUs involve Almaviva Santé, Institut Curie, Hôpital Foch, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, and Rothschild Foundation Hospital. 3. Will Kuwaiti patients be sent to France for treatment? While some critical cases may still go abroad, the focus is on bringing French expertise to Kuwait and expanding local services. 4. How will Kuwaiti doctors benefit from this deal? Doctors will receive training, attend fellowships in France, and collaborate on research and clinical programs with French specialists. 5. When will these agreements take effect? The agreements were signed in July 2025 and are expected to be rolled out in phases starting later this year.


Indian Express
13 hours ago
- Indian Express
Living in the age of diagnoses
I am writing about something that has been on my mind for a long time. There are questions that have churned me, kept me awake at night and knocked around in my head. What is wrong with our culture that there is so much yearning for psychiatric diagnoses? How did we reach this stage? Who does it harm and how? Can we be innocent bystanders in this, or do we need to question this idea or trend, a potentially dangerous one, that has become the zeitgeist of how we live, relate and understand ourselves and each other? Let me step back a little and give a little context. Mental health has a dark history, and I will cite a few examples. Many celebrated psychiatrists played a significant role in carrying out the atrocities of eugenics in Nazi Germany. The pioneer of frontal lobotomy (a discredited and damaging neurosurgical treatment that spanned over 40 years) was awarded the Nobel Prize. More than 30 years ago, when I began my journey as a clinical psychologist, homosexuality was considered a sexual deviance and conversion therapy was standard practice. I am sure variations of these dark practices still persist. I got into trouble for questioning then, and despite the ripples it has created, I persist in questioning to date. Because, as the French philosopher, Michel Foucault commented, 'People know what they do; frequently, they know why they do what they do. But what they don't know is what what they do does.' I am sure, unwittingly, I have participated and gained in building of this 'mental health industrial complex' (an idea I borrow from child & adolescent psychiatrist, Sami Timimi). I heard an astute young man recently comment, 'Nowadays everyone has some 'thing'. … It is as if we are seeking labels as a way to fit in a world that is so broken.' What happens when we or our children do not fit into the normative measures of worthiness, success or productivity? We find solace in diagnoses, as then we can explain why we are not measuring up to some unreasonable standards. We cannot even point a finger as we are all part of the policing system – mental health professionals, social media, academia and so on. We are surveilling each other and ourselves. The high yearning for self-diagnosis is a clear sign that the 'industry' is thriving. 'I am Borderline Personality Disorder. I also have Bipolar, PTSD, Generalised Anxiety disorder, and maybe Autism,' Shania counts them on her fingers while sharing this with me. Something in the way she shares it with me makes me wonder if this is something she has had to do multiple times. After all she has been to so many psychiatrists and therapists. Each one adding a new diagnosis to the list. 'They have all given up on me. There is no hope for me.' After understanding some of her struggles, I was curious to know, 'What would it be like if there were no diagnosis?' Head bent down, deep in thought, she sighed and said, 'Without them, I would have no excuse for being such a failure in life.' Shania had been sexually abused as a child. She lived in silence about it for years, and finally, when she did share with her parents, they tried their best to get her help. She was in Grade 12 and struggling to manage her academics and navigate the complexities of high school life. Her teachers had declared that she would not pass her boards, and no college would accept her. Recently, she had taken to cutting herself and raging against her parents. Shania's distress is real. She is not failing the system; the system is failing Shania. Every time I ask a young person, 'How does getting a diagnosis help?', their answer ranges from 'It is such a relief that it is not my fault,' or 'I finally have a label for what I am going through,' or 'I feel seen and understood.' Imagine if we lived in a culture where children and young people did not need diagnoses to be seen, understood or believed in. Where they could access help or get accommodations without first getting a diagnosis. Where they could opt out of the rat race without internalising it as their failure. As Suzanne Sullivan puts it in her book, Age of Diagnoses, 'Wellness culture has made us expect a lot from our bodies and our minds…Perhaps what they need from a diagnosis is a permission to do less in a world that only values a particular type of success.' How can Shania believe that she has the ability to influence her own life, make decisions with confidence when she sees herself as an assortment of all these diagnoses? In therapy, we gently unpacked Shania's belief that 'something is inherently wrong with me.' And how diagnoses rarely change, but humans do. We could zoom out and look at the gender politics behind the diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder, and that maybe the rages and self-harm were responses to the abuse and adversity she had experienced and not due to 'mental illness.' We worked together as a team, along with her family, to support her through her board exams. As she claimed agency of her own life, she decided to take a gap year and work in an animal rescue centre. I marvel at the robustness of the human spirit that shines through every time she talks about her work with sparkling passion. I would also like to clarify that it is fine if you are living with a diagnosis that works for you. My only hope is that you will not take it as the ultimate truth about yourself. Maybe you could poke holes in it, let it sit beside you as you carry on with your life and not let it define you or make predictions about your future. Keeping history in mind, today's so-called science can be dismissed as quackery tomorrow. Resistance is building, change is happening, and there is a movement that is growing across the world against pathologising, dehumanising 'doings'. Narrative practice, Power Threat Meaning Framework, Soteria Model, Open Dialogue, and in India – Mariwala Health Initiative and other organisations are questioning the dominant and expert-led 'mental health industry'*. We have to question the system that makes us believe we are sick. I often think of Jiddu Krishnamurti's quote, 'It is no measure of health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society.' Composite stories and pseudonym are used to maintain confidentiality.