logo
AI and automated decision making in government

AI and automated decision making in government

Robodebt has shown that relying on automated decision making tools can be disastrous. And there are other examples where AI has had terrible consequences. But there is no doubt that there are some efficiencies and positives to its use. What checks and balances could be developed to guide the safe and ethical use of AI in government operations, policy making and service delivery?
A panel focus on practical outcomes at the recent Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society's annual symposium hosted by Damien Carrick.
This program is edited highlights from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society Symposium 2 July 2025 Automated Social Services – Building Inclusive Digital Futures, University of Queensland St Lucia Campus
Guests
Kate Allingham, CEO of Economic Justice Australia
Alexandra Sinclair, Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the University of Sydney
Professor Kimberlee Weatherall, a member of the Federal Governments AI Advisory Council
Emeritus Law Professor Terry Carney, University of Sydney, former member of the AAT and who played a very significant role is alerting Australia to the robodebt disaster.
Further Information
A Map of Automated decision-making in the NSW Public Sector, March 2024, A special report under Section 31 of the NSW Ombudsman Act 1974
Use of automated decision making by government, Consultation Paper November 2024 Attorney-General's Department
Robodebt Royal Commission Final Report, July 2023
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ATM suppliers atm2go and Next Payments in battle for tobacco crime figure's business, court filings reveal
ATM suppliers atm2go and Next Payments in battle for tobacco crime figure's business, court filings reveal

ABC News

time40 minutes ago

  • ABC News

ATM suppliers atm2go and Next Payments in battle for tobacco crime figure's business, court filings reveal

When Iraqi-born businessman Hasheem Jamal Al Deleymi ramped up an illegal tobacco operation in Queensland, police weren't the only ones taking notice. Two major private automated teller machine companies, atm2go and Next Payments, also appeared to have clocked the contraband enterprise. The ATM suppliers went on to became entangled in a turf war to supply their machines to tobacco shops associated with Al Deleymi. Nine months after Macquarie Group-backed Next Payments supplied their machines, Al Deleymi was stopped in a silver Ford Ranger utility in NSW with $530,000 cash — leading to him facing a NSW Crime Commission investigation over alleged handling of proceeds of crime. The dealings have been uncovered by an ABC investigation into how private ATMs are fuelling the violent illegal tobacco trade and can be used by criminals to launder money. The machines, which rake in transaction fees, are being sited inside tobacco shops to enable cash-only transactions for illegal tobacco facilitating tax evasion. Shop operators can also do deals with suppliers to load the machines with their own cash — potentially laundering proceeds of crime. ATM suppliers and the shop owners can receive a commission on every transaction. The ABC has obtained court documents from a legal action sparked by the turf war between the ATM suppliers over Al Deleymi's business. The documents reveal the normally secret returns generated by ATMs in tobacco shops, including how in some cases such machines do triple the business of a normal ATM. Atm2go had entered into a deal to supply Al Deleymi with six machines in several south-east Queensland tobacco stores between February 2021 to March 2022, the documents allege. But by June 2022, the deal appeared to sour, with all six atm2go machines switched off and unbolted. Atm2go alleged Al Deleymi was then responsible for replacing their machines with eight ATMs from rival operation Next Payments. In response, atm2go launched legal action against Al Deleymi claiming a breach of a five-year agreement for their machines. Atm2go alleged it lost tens of thousands of dollars in business and faced costs for removing the machines — an amount totalling around $74,000. Al Deleymi is alleged to have ignored atm2go's demand to remove Next Payments machines and reinstall theirs. Do you know more about this story? Email or To prove how much revenue was lost, atm2go offered up details of how fee deals for private ATMs are structured. Atm2go stated it charged customers $2.50 for each cash withdrawal and that Al Deleymi would earn a cut of each transaction fee of up to $1.30. One machine at a Caboolture tobacco store recorded 165 transactions daily throughout May 2022, while a second racked up 155. Together, they reaped daily average fees of $408.79. This transaction rate dwarfs that of typical Australian ATMs, which record an average of only 38 cash withdrawals a day, according to Reserve Bank of Australia figures. This high transaction rate came despite the presence of other ATMs nearby. Al Deleymi did not file any defence in atm2go's lawsuit, and a default judgment was entered against him for almost $64,000. The documents allege atm2go and Next Payments cut deals with the stores linked to Al Deleymi after May 2021 in Queensland. At that time, he had been charged with offences in Queensland including conveying of tobacco products and dealing with property worth less than $100,000 suspected of being proceeds of crime. He was convicted in 2024 and received a two-year good behaviour bond. Following a 2022 raid on a Bundaberg tobacconist and vape store linked to him, Al Deleymi was also fined $4,000 for offences including unlawful supply of medicines and possession of a weapon. Efforts to contact him have been unsuccessful. Just four months after atm2go sued to recover money, Al Deleymi was stopped in in a silver Ford Ranger utility in New South Wales and was allegedly found with $530,000. The seizure triggered the NSW Crime Commission to freeze funds in bank accounts linked to other tobacco shops tied to Al Deleymi and he faced charges of dealing with the proceeds of crime. In June, Al Deleymi was found by a Sydney magistrate to have recklessly dealt with the proceeds of crime worth more than $100,000. He had pleaded not guilty. He is due to be sentenced later this year. Atm2go did not answer questions about the deals while Next Payments chief executive Tim Wildash declined to answer specific queries relating to Al Deleymi. Mr Wildash previously said his company cooperated with authorities and was assisting a "live investigation". He has rejected concerns about money laundering with his company machines but acknowledged issues involving the ATM industry and tobacco stores. "This issue is bigger than any of us could have imagined three weeks ago," Mr Wildash said. Al Deleymi, 29, was listed in 2023 court documents as living at a now derelict Morayfield property just north of Brisbane. The address is also listed as a contact point for 21-year-old Mostafa Al Deleymi who was supplied with Next Payments ATMs, despite facing charges relating to illegal tobacco possession. After he was caught with illegal tobacco in 2023 in Ingham, Mostafa Al Deleymi went on to establish a company called Replenishatm, which signed deals with Next Payments. When the ABC visited the 1.8 acre Morayfield property last month, the brick home was empty and derelict with a large skip bin left in the front yard. Piled up in the skip bin were empty cardboard boxes. Some were labelled with Chinese brands of cigarettes sold in tobacco shops.

Unreleased documents reveal new Australian twist to ship bombing case
Unreleased documents reveal new Australian twist to ship bombing case

SBS Australia

timean hour ago

  • SBS Australia

Unreleased documents reveal new Australian twist to ship bombing case

Forty years ago, Alan 'Kissard' Buffett was looking out an aeroplane window on the approach to land at Norfolk Island when he noticed a lonely yacht moored at Cascade Bay. As the island's collector of customs in 1985, it was Buffett's job to know where the yacht was from and who was on it. After touching down, he immediately went to one of his officers at the airport to ask about the yacht. "He said, 'I smell a rat'," Buffett said. "And in Norfolk, that means you think there's something fishy going on." "Sure enough, he was on the money. "The crew sort of stood out a fair bit because they had really nice gear. They didn't look like rough-type yachties." The 11-metre yacht named Ouvea had been chartered by four Frenchmen who had just sailed from New Zealand en route to New Caledonia. Alan 'Kissard' Buffett was Norfolk Island's collector of customs in 1985. Source: Supplied The Frenchmen said they were on a South Pacific diving and pleasure cruise. But Buffett and other officials on Norfolk Island soon received warning from the Australian government that the Frenchmen were not who they claimed to be. New SBS Audio investigative podcast Fallout: Spies on Norfolk Island has uncovered previously unreleased confidential Australian government documents which reveal concerns the men were actually French secret service agents suspected of being involved in the bombing of environmental group Greenpeace's flagship Rainbow Warrior in Auckland harbour days earlier. France initially denied any involvement, but then-prime minister Laurent Fabius months later admitted French agents had been ordered to bomb the ship. What the documents reveal The bombing — the 40th anniversary of which was this week — killed photographer Fernando Perriera, made global headlines and sparked one of the biggest police investigations in New Zealand history. The Rainbow Warrior was preparing to lead a flotilla of protest boats in an attempt to blockade a French nuclear weapons test at Mururoa Atoll in the Pacific Ocean. The documents detail how Norfolk Island's three-man police force was authorised by then-prime minister Bob Hawke to shadow the Frenchmen until a party of New Zealand detectives arrived. Dennis Murray, a federal police officer stationed on Norfolk Island at the time, said his orders were simple. "Make sure they don't leave the island. Make sure they don't get on a plane," Murray said. "That was the biggest thing.' Norfolk Island's administrator at the time, former Australian naval commodore and defence intelligence agency head, John Matthew, cabled Canberra to express "strong doubts" about police approaching the Frenchmen's yacht because of the possibility of "armed retaliation". LISTEN TO SBS Audio 09/07/2025 45:12 English Matthew ordered Murray and his police colleagues to remove the Frenchmen's dinghy and hide it so they could not leave the island to reach their yacht, which was moored a distance from the shore. Nearing midnight on 15 July, it was decided that Norfolk Island police and the New Zealand detectives would conduct a raid on the motel rooms where the Frenchmen were sleeping and take them into custody. Murray told the podcast that nerves were running high ahead of the raid. "When you hit those doors, you don't know what's going to happen on the other side ... it could be firearms, it could be anything," he said. In the end, the French agents played it cool and cooperated with the police. They'd been well trained by France's foreign intelligence agency, the Directorate-General for External Security, to withstand interrogation and maintain their cover stories. An impossible deadline? On the morning of 16 July 1985, New Zealand detectives who had flown to Norfolk Island got a shock when they learned the Australian government had set them a deadline of 2pm that day to find enough evidence to charge the Frenchmen with a crime or they would be let go. The detectives had to wait until daylight to search the Frenchmen's yacht. They seized dozens of documents and receipts that needed to be analysed. More importantly, they had taken samples from the yacht's bilge to test for traces of explosives. These needed to be taken to Auckland for analysis because Norfolk Island did not have any laboratory facilities. Fallout: Spies on Norfolk Island investigates why this deadline was set and whether it was necessary. Senior police in Auckland decided they did not have enough evidence to charge the Frenchmen before the Australian deadline expired despite the strong feelings of their detectives on Norfolk Island who believed they had the right men in custody. Murray said he felt for his New Zealand police colleagues. "It's got to be done in 24 hours or 'stiff shit' sort of thing. When you think about it, they didn't give them much time," he said. The French secret agents sailed away from Norfolk Island later on 16 July. Their yacht, the Ouvea, was never seen again and the agents are believed to have been picked up by a French submarine. The 11-metre yacht Ouvea had been chartered by four Frenchmen who had just sailed from New Zealand en route to New Caledonia. Source: Supplied The samples from the Ouvea's bilge returned positive results for traces of explosives. And documents taken from the yacht proved a connection between the Frenchmen on Norfolk Island and two other French secret agents already in custody in New Zealand. Forty years later, Buffett is still puzzled by Australia's decision to impose such a tight deadline on the New Zealand police. "It did appear really short to us, really given the fact that someone was killed," he said. "I just wonder whether Australia was pressured by France or some other power. Because it, as I say, it seemed pretty strange that they only gave them that really small window of time to try and find evidence to keep those fellas in under the police guard." Despite it being beyond doubt that the Rainbow Warrior was blown up by limpet mines smuggled into New Zealand by French agents Roland Verge, Gerald Andries, Jean Michel Bertholet and Dr Xavier Maniguet onboard the Ouvea, none of the men ever faced prosecution after being allowed to sail away from Norfolk Island.

xAI apologizes for Grok's offensive posts
xAI apologizes for Grok's offensive posts

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

xAI apologizes for Grok's offensive posts

Elon Musk's startup xAI apologized Saturday for offensive posts published by its artificial intelligence assistant Grok this week, blaming them on a software update meant to make it function more like a human. After the Tuesday upgrade, Grok praised Nazi leader Adolf Hitler in the posts on social media platform X, and suggested that people with Jewish surnames were more likely to spread online hate. X deleted some of those posts several hours later, amid growing outrage. "We deeply apologize for the horrific behavior that many experienced," the company posted on X Saturday, adding that it had modified the system "to prevent further abuse." The company said the change occurred after the chatbot was prompted to "reply to the post just like a human" as well as "tell like it is and you are not afraid to offend people who are politically correct." As a result, Grok became susceptible to users' "extremist views," which made it produce "responses containing unethical or controversial opinions to engage the user." Grok, which Musk promised would be an "edgy" truthteller following its launch in 2023, has been mired in controversy. In March, xAI acquired X in a $33 billion deal that allowed the company to integrate the platform's data resources with the chatbot's development. In May, Grok ignited controversy by generating posts with unbacked right-wing propaganda about purported oppression of white South Africans that it termed "white genocide."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store