Unreleased documents reveal new Australian twist to ship bombing case
"Sure enough, he was on the money.
"The crew sort of stood out a fair bit because they had really nice gear. They didn't look like rough-type yachties."
The 11-metre yacht named Ouvea had been chartered by four Frenchmen who had just sailed from New Zealand en route to New Caledonia.
Alan 'Kissard' Buffett was Norfolk Island's collector of customs in 1985. Source: Supplied The Frenchmen said they were on a South Pacific diving and pleasure cruise. But Buffett and other officials on Norfolk Island soon received warning from the Australian government that the Frenchmen were not who they claimed to be. New SBS Audio investigative podcast Fallout: Spies on Norfolk Island has uncovered previously unreleased confidential Australian government documents which reveal concerns the men were actually French secret service agents suspected of being involved in the bombing of environmental group Greenpeace's flagship Rainbow Warrior in Auckland harbour days earlier.
France initially denied any involvement, but then-prime minister Laurent Fabius months later admitted French agents had been ordered to bomb the ship.
What the documents reveal The bombing — the 40th anniversary of which was this week — killed photographer Fernando Perriera, made global headlines and sparked one of the biggest police investigations in New Zealand history. The Rainbow Warrior was preparing to lead a flotilla of protest boats in an attempt to blockade a French nuclear weapons test at Mururoa Atoll in the Pacific Ocean. The documents detail how Norfolk Island's three-man police force was authorised by then-prime minister Bob Hawke to shadow the Frenchmen until a party of New Zealand detectives arrived. Dennis Murray, a federal police officer stationed on Norfolk Island at the time, said his orders were simple. "Make sure they don't leave the island. Make sure they don't get on a plane," Murray said. "That was the biggest thing.'
Norfolk Island's administrator at the time, former Australian naval commodore and defence intelligence agency head, John Matthew, cabled Canberra to express "strong doubts" about police approaching the Frenchmen's yacht because of the possibility of "armed retaliation".
LISTEN TO
SBS Audio
09/07/2025 45:12 English Matthew ordered Murray and his police colleagues to remove the Frenchmen's dinghy and hide it so they could not leave the island to reach their yacht, which was moored a distance from the shore. Nearing midnight on 15 July, it was decided that Norfolk Island police and the New Zealand detectives would conduct a raid on the motel rooms where the Frenchmen were sleeping and take them into custody. Murray told the podcast that nerves were running high ahead of the raid. "When you hit those doors, you don't know what's going to happen on the other side ... it could be firearms, it could be anything," he said. In the end, the French agents played it cool and cooperated with the police.
They'd been well trained by France's foreign intelligence agency, the Directorate-General for External Security, to withstand interrogation and maintain their cover stories.
An impossible deadline? On the morning of 16 July 1985, New Zealand detectives who had flown to Norfolk Island got a shock when they learned the Australian government had set them a deadline of 2pm that day to find enough evidence to charge the Frenchmen with a crime or they would be let go. The detectives had to wait until daylight to search the Frenchmen's yacht. They seized dozens of documents and receipts that needed to be analysed. More importantly, they had taken samples from the yacht's bilge to test for traces of explosives. These needed to be taken to Auckland for analysis because Norfolk Island did not have any laboratory facilities. Fallout: Spies on Norfolk Island investigates why this deadline was set and whether it was necessary. Senior police in Auckland decided they did not have enough evidence to charge the Frenchmen before the Australian deadline expired despite the strong feelings of their detectives on Norfolk Island who believed they had the right men in custody. Murray said he felt for his New Zealand police colleagues. "It's got to be done in 24 hours or 'stiff shit' sort of thing. When you think about it, they didn't give them much time," he said.
The French secret agents sailed away from Norfolk Island later on 16 July. Their yacht, the Ouvea, was never seen again and the agents are believed to have been picked up by a French submarine.
The 11-metre yacht Ouvea had been chartered by four Frenchmen who had just sailed from New Zealand en route to New Caledonia. Source: Supplied The samples from the Ouvea's bilge returned positive results for traces of explosives. And documents taken from the yacht proved a connection between the Frenchmen on Norfolk Island and two other French secret agents already in custody in New Zealand. Forty years later, Buffett is still puzzled by Australia's decision to impose such a tight deadline on the New Zealand police. "It did appear really short to us, really given the fact that someone was killed," he said. "I just wonder whether Australia was pressured by France or some other power. Because it, as I say, it seemed pretty strange that they only gave them that really small window of time to try and find evidence to keep those fellas in under the police guard." Despite it being beyond doubt that the Rainbow Warrior was blown up by limpet mines smuggled into New Zealand by French agents Roland Verge, Gerald Andries, Jean Michel Bertholet and Dr Xavier Maniguet onboard the Ouvea, none of the men ever faced prosecution after being allowed to sail away from Norfolk Island.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
10 minutes ago
- ABC News
Reputation hit from 2021 state election caused WA Electoral Commission to outsource polling day staff recruitment, documents suggest
The WA Electoral Commission took the unprecedented step of outsourcing almost all of its election workforce recruitment, in part because it was concerned the previous state election had damaged its reputation. In reality, the 2025 poll experienced far more reported issues, including reports of long wait times at polling booths and some locations running out of ballot papers. Those problems were so great the government ordered a special inquiry to probe what went wrong and why the commission contracted labour hire company PERSOLKELLY. Documents released to the ABC under Freedom of Information laws show, for the first time, why that decision was made. The documents also highlight how the WAEC and PERSOLKELLY downplayed the scale of the outsourcing in the days following the election. It comes after the ABC revealed the chaos inside the commission in the lead-up to the state election, with one senior official saying they had warned of issues with the labour hire company as much as four months before the poll. In a procurement plan compiled in the first half of 2023, the WAEC set out its reasons for wanting to outsource its temporary election workforce. It noted an audit after the 2021 election, which found there were "some issues", including with a different labour hire company used in a limited capacity under a government-wide contract. "Service delivery expectations were not met, [temporary election workforce] staff expressed deep dissatisfaction and the WAEC's reputation and performance suffered," it reads. The plan noted the commission did "not have the internal resources available (human resources and systems) to best manage projects of this size". "The aim of this [tender] is to address the recommendations made to the WAEC … to ensure that elections are run cost effectively and to a high standard into the future," it reads. But a senior WAEC source who worked both the 2021 and 2025 elections said the earlier poll was "positively functional". "Delivery of materials was underdone, the logistical side of things," they said. WA's Shadow Electoral Affairs Minister Shane Love agreed while there were a few issues in 2021 it was "nothing like the collapse that we saw in 2025". "What I can see here is a commission just outsourcing, washing their hands and saying, not our problem. Well, it is your problem," Mr Love said. In the days after the election, as the full scale of problems came to light, both the WAEC and its contractor sought to play down the role outsourcing could have played. "There have been a number of election events where the WAEC has engaged contractors for the provision of recruitment services," a spokesperson told the ABC about a week after the election. Do you know more about this story? Contact Keane Bourke. "This is not a new or uncommon practice. Previous state and federal electoral commissions have appointed recruitment companies to provide support staff in a similar way," a PERSOLKELLY spokesperson said the following day. But the procurement plan shows that was not the full picture. While it noted other states have had similar issues trying to staff elections themselves, none had outsourced the entire job. "The approach of the WAEC to outsource a significant part of the requirement is new and is not currently being undertaken in any other jurisdiction," the plan reads. In a statement to the ABC, PERSOLKELLY maintained its position that the scale of outsourcing was not new or uncommon. The WA Electoral Commission said it would be inappropriate to comment until the special inquiry report was released publicly. The tender document rated the overall risk of outsourcing as "low/moderate". But it noted one of the most significant risks was "contractor unable to provide sufficient staff at relevant locations" and that potential impacts included "public unable to vote" — with some voters complaining that long delays and a shortage of ballot papers discouraged voting. The plan identified one of the controls for that risk was "the contractor has experience in an electoral process, preferably in WA", which it said would help reduce the risk from "significant" to "moderate". PERSOLKELLY said it had supported the Australian Electoral Commission to run federal elections in WA in 2013, 2017 and 2025, as well as the New South Wales state election in 2015, on top of decades of experience providing staff to all levels of government. "This includes support to government agencies, including elections, locally and nationally along with similar experience in multiple countries outside of Australia," the company said. In a statement following the election, the WAEC said PERSOLKELLY had "deployed the personnel requested … in line with the project's requirements" and that all 682 polling locations were staffed and operational. It said its role was limited to recruiting and onboarding staff. The document also indicated "appropriate funding has been confirmed by Robert Kennedy — Electoral Commissioner" to cover the estimated total value of $30 million. But government records show the value of the contract awarded was more than double that at $86.9 million. The WAEC said the initial figure "reflected all relevant information available to the Western Australian Electoral Commission at that time". "The final contract award estimate … reflects the maximum value of the contract if all extension options are exercise based on the agreed pricing structure with PERSOLKELLY Australia." An earlier version of the procurement plan, also released to the ABC, shows the commission had initially planned to offer a six-year contract for the outsourcing, which would run until after the 2029 state election. However, a Department of Finance staffer managing the tender noted that would require an "internal exemption" to go over a five-year limit. Future versions of the document refer to a four-year contract with the option of a two-year extension. The future of the contract is uncertain though, with the Acting Electoral Commissioner telling budget estimates earlier this month the contract would be reviewed after local government elections in October. "Part of that process will involve looking at what the future looks like with PERSOLKELLY," Dennis O'Reilly said. On Monday, Premier Roger Cook confirmed the contract was "addressed in the context of the report" without providing specific details. "We certainly need to make changes to ensure that the WA Electoral Commission can conduct the local government elections which will take place in October this year, but we'll table the report first and then our response," he told reporters. Questions have been raised about the commission's ability to conduct those elections after its Director of Election Operations resigned. Commissioner Robert Kennedy and Deputy Commissioner Courtney Barron are on leave. Both commissioners have been temporarily replaced by senior public servants, with staff brought in from the Australian Electoral Commission to help run local government elections. "We look forward to the outcome of the special inquiry into the planning and delivery of the 2025 WA state election, and welcome learnings that will come as a result," a PERSOLKELLY spokesperson said. That report is expected to be released when parliament next sits in mid-August.
News.com.au
19 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Anthony Albanese stares down tough talks with Xi Jinping
The big moment of Anthony Albanese's state visit to China is upon him — a face-to-face with Xi Jinping. The Prime Minister has had a cruisy two days being wooed by Chinese officials and business leaders in the glitzy beauty of central Shanghai. He and his hosts have been keen to boast the boons of deep bilateral trade and tourism ties, emerging from meetings starry-eyed about the future of an economic partnership despite the spectre of an increasingly militaristic regional rivalry. But when Mr Albanese meets the Chinese President on Tuesday, there will be no escaping the touchy topics. The Chinese have already indicated they will raise the Port of Darwin, which is leased to Chinese logistics giant Landbridge Holdings. A former state media propagandist-turned influencer warned of 'countermeasures' if the Albanese government follows through with its election vow to break the 99-year lease. But speaking to reporters on Monday, Mr Albanese doubled down on the promise, saying his government has 'a very clear position' and that Mr Xi 'is very clear and knowledgeable of that'. 'We have a very clear position that we want the port to go into Australian ownership,' he said before departing for Beijing. 'We've been clear about it, we've been orderly about it, and we will go through that process.' Mr Albanese has been careful not to pre-empt how his meeting with the world's second-most powerful leader will go. 'I'll treat him with the respect that I would any leader of another country and not foreshadow everything today,' he said in his Monday remarks. But he did give some hints on what touchy topics he might have of his own, such as the detention of detention of Australian writer and pro-democracy activist Yang Hengiun. Mr Yang was given a suspended death sentence last year after spending five years behind bars on espionage charges – charges he denies. 'We always raise issues of Australian citizens, and if you look at my record, it's not too bad,' Mr Albanese boasted when asked about Mr Yang. 'I'll put my record there of successfully advocating for Australian citizens, some of which has been criticised when we've been successful.' Human rights more broadly could also be on the agenda. Aside from detaining Australians on trumped-up charges, Canberra has protested China's enslavement of Uighur Muslims in its Xinjiang province and demanded it implement recommendations made in a UN report. Speaking on Chinese soil in the presence of Chinese officials, Mr Albanese simply repeated his China mantra, saying his government 'will co-operate wherever we can' and 'disagree where we must'. 'We disagree where we must and we put forward our position clearly where we have disagreements,' he said. He flatly refused to say if he would mention the Chinese warships that carried out live-fire drills as they circumnavigated Australia earlier this year. He also would not comment on whether he would bring up China's support for Russia in its years-long war on Ukraine. There will be space for positives, though, with Mr Albanese eager to quell concerns of a future conflict through trade – an approach Europe took with Russia under Vladimir Putin. He said it was 'important to recognise … that the economic relationship is obviously based on upon a stable and secure region'. 'We've seen the disruption that occurs when there is conflict in the world,' Mr Albanese said. 'That's why we need to make sure that we do everything we can to promote peace and security in the region.' He added building people-to-people ties was key to keeping the peace. It is a stark contrast to warnings from Washington that China could up-end regional peace by invading Taiwan as early as 2027.
ABC News
25 minutes ago
- ABC News
Erin Patterson mushroom deaths trial raises family pain of four poisoned children
The high-profile trial of mushroom poisoning killer Erin Patterson has brought up 160-year-old scars of four tragic deaths in SA's south east. In May 1861, at Hynam — east of Naracoorte — Sophia, Charles, Emma and Susan Norris, aged between seven and one, died from poisoning after eating foraged wild mushrooms. They were believed to have eaten Galerina marginata or funeral bell, which were commonly mistaken for edible honey mushrooms. Noel Norris, whose grandfather was a sibling of the Norris children, said the tragedy stayed with the family for decades. "It wasn't discussed very much for many years, because it was still pretty raw and tender, even after 100 years," he said. "My grandfather would never speak of it. "I did know about it but I didn't take it too seriously. "It was almost told to me like a bit of a children's story." Mr Norris and his wife searched for where the children were buried, eventually finding them in the Hynam cemetery in 2017. The grave was marked out with a fence and a plaque telling the children's story. "It must've been absolutely horrific and I think it left a scar on the Norris family, until now where we've been able to find the graves," he said. Mr Norris said the recently completed trial of Erin Patterson in Victoria brought up some of the emotions. "It brings it back to mind, but our story has been basically put to rest," he said. "We've gone through all the agonies of putting the children to rest, so whilst it does it bring it back, it's at arms length." In South Australia, 932 mushroom-related calls were made to the Poison Information Centre in the decade from 2015 until 2024, most of which were children aged less than five. Of those, 319 cases were referred to hospital. Mr Norris said his great aunts and uncle's stories should serve as a reminder for people of how dangerous mushrooms could be. "Even back from those years of when my family members died, there was still no real realisation of how deadly they can be," he said. "It's only this trial that's brought it back to people's mind to be a bit more aware. "It's a cautionary tale what happened to those beautiful children, but it hasn't stood up and people forget." Hynam Heritage Group secretary Lyn Schinckel said it had long been rumoured the children were buried at Hynam. "Nobody seemed to know where," she said. "There were stories that they weren't allowed to be buried here because it was a private cemetery. "One of the members decided to get the ground-penetrating radar here to actually find if and where they were." Mrs Schinckel was among the attendees at the ceremony in 2017. "We were pretty excited that we'd found something useful that no one else really knew," she said. "It was a very moving little ceremony, particularly for Noel and his wife. "We always knew what had happened but not really how it had finished or where it had finished."
