Trump Effect Starting to Show Up in Economic Data - What's News
Full Transcript
This transcript was prepared by a transcription service. This version may not be in its final form and may be updated.
Luke Vargas: Hey, it's Luke Vargas, and before we start the show today, I've got a little announcement, which is that I'm going on parental leave, or should I say I'm actually already on it, which means you won't be hearing from me for a few months. While I'm out, Azhar Sukri will be filling in for me until early winter. You're in great hands until then, and I'll be back before you know it. And with that, over to the What's News team for today's episode.
Azhar Sukri: It's being called the Trump Effect. The President's policies are starting to show up in inflation and employment. Plus, the Trump Administration is planning on making it easier for your retirement plan to invest in private markets and Europe's charm offensive. We look at how flattery and backchanneling with Washington could help Ukraine.
Bojan Pancevski: Mark Rutte, the chief of NATO, he sent flattering text messages to Trump. The president of Finland, he's a great golf player, so they played this tournament in Trump's golf club in Florida, and ever since, they've been actually talking on the phone, communicating quite intensely.
Azhar Sukri: It's Wednesday, July the 16th. I'm Azhar Sukri for The Wall Street Journal. Here is the A.M. Edition of What's News, the top headlines and business stories moving your world today. New data show that President Trump's policies, particularly on tariffs and immigration, are starting to be reflected in the economy. As we reported on our P.M. show yesterday, the June inflation report, one of the key measures that economists and investors watched closely, was up in line with analysts' expectations of a 2.7% annual increase. However, Journal markets reporter, Caitlin McCabe, says that under the surface there are signs that Trump's policies are beginning to bite.
Caitlin McCabe: There were price bumps on what Americans pay for key imports such as furniture and clothing. Meanwhile, another closely-watched indicator of economic health is the labor market, and that is starting to show some cracks too. Employment growth appears to have slowed in industries that rely heavily on workers who entered the country illegally, and the foreign-born labor force has shrunk significantly since March.
Azhar Sukri: Despite these cracks, Americans are still spending and employers are continuing to add jobs. But Caitlin says the big question now is whether this will hold.
Caitlin McCabe: Amid all of these tariff announcements, it's important to keep in mind that the full effect of tariffs might not be felt for a little while longer. So much of this situation remains in flux. The tariff rates that we've seen, and the announcements that we've seen, by no means are those final. But economists and others are actually projecting that we could see price increases feed through to households at some point. The Yale Budget Lab, for example, projects that the resulting price increases could amount to the equivalent of a $2,800 hit in yearly household income. And you could see that show up in certain parts of the services sector. Already, Tuesday's inflation report found that services inflation has softened, particularly for shelter, airfares, and hotel rates were also weak. And to bring this conversation full-circle, that could actually soften inflation down the road.
Azhar Sukri: Canadian Prime Minister, Mark Carney, has said it may not be possible for Canada to escape U.S. tariffs even if the countries reach a new economic and security pact that has been under negotiation. Trump has given Canada until August the first to reach a deal with the White House on trade or face a higher 35% levy on imports not compliant with the USMCA trade pact. Currently, Canadian goods are subject to Trump's sectoral tariffs, including a 25% tariffs on vehicles made north of the border and a 50% levy on steel and aluminum, of which Canada is the largest foreign supplier. Canada is also a major foreign supplier of copper, which Trump also plans to impose a 50% duty on. In markets news: shares of Dutch chip-making equipment supplier ASML are falling after it said it could no longer guarantee growth in 2026, amid U.S. tariff uncertainty. The stock is down more than 30% over the past 12 months. The warning from ASML comes days after Trump sent a letter to the European Union, threatening 30% tariffs on imports from the bloc, beginning August the first as trade talks between Brussels and Washington continue. A group of EU trade negotiators are in Washington today. On Monday, the bloc proposed retaliatory tariffs targeting U.S. imports in a bid to revive talks, including on aircraft and alcohol, but said it doesn't plan any countermeasures before Trump's deadline. In the U.K., inflation rose unexpectedly in June, echoing the situation in the U.S. where prices rose among items sensitive to Trump's tariffs, such as toys and clothes. The rise will likely keep policymakers at the Bank of England cautious despite a limping economy, stoking fears of entrenched higher inflation. And earnings season continues today with reports expected from Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, and Johnson & Johnson. After yesterday's consumer price index, print will also get another U.S. inflation gauge for June. This time for producer prices. We are exclusively reporting that President Trump is expected to sign an executive order to help make private market investments more available to U.S. retirement plans. That's according to people familiar with the matter, who added that the order would instruct the Labor Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission to provide guidance to employers on including investments like private assets in 401 (k) plans. Although retirement plan sponsors can already put some investments in private funds, many companies have been concerned about being sued by employees over higher fees associated with private market investment products. The details of the order aren't yet final and are still subject to review. Coming up, how a surprise late-night phone call on German Chancellor Friedrich Merz cell phone signaled a turn in U.S.-European relations over Ukraine. That story after the break. A European charm offensive aimed at getting Trump to toughen his stance against Russia seems to be working. Earlier this week, Trump set a fifty-day deadline for Putin to begin negotiating in earnest; announced a major arms package for Ukraine to be financed by NATO countries and threatened to impose additional economic sanctions on Moscow if it didn't move to end the war. And now we report that European back-channel contacts with the Trump Administration, direct diplomacy and a multi-billion-dollar deal for U.S. weapons have helped align Washington and Europe on arming Ukraine. Bojan Pancevski is the Journal's chief European political correspondent. Bojan, talk us through what we know about how European leaders have steered Trump's thinking on Ukraine.
Bojan Pancevski: Well, they worked really hard in the past couple of months or so to essentially get him to acknowledge that Putin is not really interested in negotiating peace in Ukraine and is only interested in grabbing land. This is an early bet that the European leaders made when Trump came into office in January. They worked at all levels. The finance minister of Germany was working with the Secretary of Treasury, kind of back-channeling. The Secretary of Treasury, Bessent, emerged as actually a proponent of the sanctions and of a tougher stance towards Putin. So he seems to have worked behind the scenes to persuade President Trump to take that tougher stance. They worked with Congress, they worked with the Senate, they worked with Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State, who's also kind of positively predisposed towards Kyiv, I suppose. And at the end, I think we saw on Monday when Trump, for the first time, openly threatened Putin with a specific measure that in 50 days he would impose these very heavy economic measures on every country that buys energy from Russia. And he also pledged to open the floodgates for exporting American weapons to Ukraine, provided that NATO countries pay for them.
Azhar Sukri: You mentioned about the money there. That's absolutely crucial, I think, to this deal, but also, the different European countries have been taking slightly different approaches, haven't they?
Bojan Pancevski: Yes, exactly. You've got Mark Rutte, the chief of NATO. He's a former Dutch prime minister of many years, and now he's head of the military alliance. And he sent flattering text messages to Trump, praising his role in getting the Europeans to spend more on defense, which they did. All of them pledged to spend around 5% of their GDP on defense, which is a major boon for Trump. The president of Finland visited Trump, and he's a great golf player. So they played this tournament in Trump's golf club in Florida and apparently won the tournament in doubles, Trump and President Stubb. So that was a great thing for Trump. He tweeted extensively about it. And, ever since, they've been actually talking on the phone, communicating quite intensely.
Azhar Sukri: And you report that Germany's leader has also been key to all of this.
Bojan Pancevski: So, Merz has emerged as the kind of new leader in Europe, and he's also got access to much more money than his predecessor because they changed the German constitution and made themselves able to borrow from the markets in order to give Ukraine what it needs to defend itself. He made certain fortune in the private sector. He pilots his own airplane. So he's a figure that I think Trump understands. Last Friday, the 11th of July, Trump was watching television apparently, and he saw some footage of this horrible destruction wrought by Russian aerial attacks on Ukraine. And he picked up his mobile phone, and he just called Friedrich Merz out of the blue, and he immediately agreed to an offer that Merz had previously made to buy American Patriot system, the famous aerial defense that Ukraine desperately needs. So that was a great success and things like that eventually led to this change of tack that we are seeing now. So, for my report, the White House spokeswoman said that Trump is now exporting weapons to Ukraine in order to stop the killing. That's a major, major shift in rhetoric because I think a couple of months prior they were saying that weapons will bring nothing and that diplomacy is required. And I think now they've come to the conclusion that Putin is not really interested in diplomacy, he's interested in winning more land, and therefore they've changed to a position that's much closer to that of the Europeans. And, of course, all of that must be followed with a ginormous caveat that we don't actually know what Trump will do next. So this week it seems like the Europeans feel fairly triumphant, with the caveat that you never know what happens next.
Azhar Sukri: Bojan Pancevski, thank you so much.
Bojan Pancevski: Thank you for having me on.
Azhar Sukri: And that's it for What's News this Wednesday morning. Today's show was produced by Kate Bullivant. Our supervising producer was Daniel Bach. I'm Azhar Sukri for The Wall Street Journal. We'll be back tonight with a new show. Until then, thanks for listening.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Google hit with Digital Markets Act complaint over user choice restriction
Google's parent company Alphabet has been hit with a complaint by five privacy advocacy groups over potential breaches of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) related to restricting users' ability to switch between different software applications. European Digital Rights, Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE), Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte e.V. Homo Digitalis and ARTICLE 19 have asked the European Commission to open an investigation into Alphabet as they claim that Android's core platform service is designed in a way to 'deliberately hide from end users the possibility to even disable the pre-installed gatekeeper apps'. 'Android also goes to great lengths to intimidate end users who have found that possibility – displaying a warning message that 'if you disable this app, Android and other apps may no longer function as intended',' the complaint adds. The complaint follows Alphabet's latest DMA compliance report, and discussions with Alphabet's representatives during a workshop hosted by the Commission on 1 July. The DMA – which aims to regulate the gatekeeper power of the largest digital companies – became applicable in May 2023. In September that year the EU executive designated six gatekeepers – Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, ByteDance, Meta, Microsoft. was added in 2024. On 23 April, the Commission fined Apple and Meta respectively €500 million and €200 million for not complying with the new EU rulebook. The investigations found that Apple was preventing developers from steering consumers outside its ecosystem to alternative channels for offers and content and that Meta's 'pays or consent' advertising model forced users through a binary choice to consent to give their personal data to target advertising unless they pay a subscription.
Chicago Tribune
5 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Columbia University agrees to pay more than $220M in deal with Trump to restore federal funding
NEW YORK — Columbia University announced Wednesday it has reached a deal with the Trump administration to pay more than $220 million to the federal government to restore federal research money that was canceled in the name of combating antisemitism on campus. Under the agreement, the Ivy League school will pay a $200 million settlement over three years, the university said. It will also pay $21 million to resolve alleged civil rights violations against Jewish employees that occurred following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, the White House said. 'This agreement marks an important step forward after a period of sustained federal scrutiny and institutional uncertainty,' acting University President Claire Shipman said. The school had been threatened with the potential loss of billions of dollars in government support, including more than $400 million in grants canceled earlier this year. The administration pulled the funding because of what it described as the university's failure to squelch antisemitism on campus during the Israel-Hamas war. Columbia has since agreed to a series of demands laid out by the Republican administration, including overhauling the university's student disciplinary process and applying a contentious, federally endorsed definition of antisemitism not only to teaching but to a disciplinary committee that has been investigating students critical of Israel. Wednesday's agreement — which does not include an admission of wrongdoing — codifies those reforms while preserving the university's autonomy, Shipman said. Education Secretary Linda McMahon called the deal 'a seismic shift in our nation's fight to hold institutions that accept American taxpayer dollars accountable for antisemitic discrimination and harassment.' 'Columbia's reforms are a roadmap for elite universities that wish to regain the confidence of the American public by renewing their commitment to truth-seeking, merit, and civil debate,' McMahon said in a statement. As part of the agreement, Columbia agreed to a series of changes previously announced in March, including reviewing its Middle East curriculum to make sure it was 'comprehensive and balanced' and appointing new faculty to its Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies. It also promised to end programs 'that promote unlawful efforts to achieve race-based outcomes, quotes, diversity targets or similar efforts.' The university will also have to issue a report to a monitor assuring that its programs 'do not promote unlawful DEI goals.' In a post Wednesday night on his Truth Social platform, President Donald Trump said Columbia had 'committed to ending their ridiculous DEI policies, admitting students based ONLY on MERIT, and protecting the Civil Liberties of their students on campus.' He also warned, without being specific, 'Numerous other Higher Education Institutions that have hurt so many, and been so unfair and unjust, and have wrongly spent federal money, much of it from our government, are upcoming.' The pact comes after months of uncertainty and fraught negotiations at the more than 270-year-old university. It was among the first targets of Trump's crackdown on pro-Palestinian campus protests and on colleges that he asserts have allowed Jewish students be threatened and harassed. Columbia's own antisemitism task force found last summer that Jewish students had faced verbal abuse, ostracism and classroom humiliation during the spring 2024 demonstrations. Other Jewish students took part in the protests, however, and protest leaders maintain they aren't targeting Jews but rather criticizing the Israeli government and its war in Gaza. Columbia's leadership — a revolving door of three interim presidents in the last year — has declared that the campus climate needs to change. Also in the settlement is an agreement to ask prospective international students 'questions designed to elicit their reasons for wishing to study in the United States,' and establishes processes to make sure all students are committed to 'civil discourse.' In a move that would potentially make it easier for the Trump administration to deport students who participate in protests, Columbia promised to provide the government with information, upon request, of disciplinary actions involving student-visa holders resulting in expulsions or suspensions. Columbia on Tuesday announced it would suspend, expel or revoke degrees from more than 70 students who participated in a pro-Palestinian demonstration inside the main library in May and an encampment during alumni weekend last year. The pressure on Columbia began with a series of funding cuts. Then Mahmoud Khalil, a former graduate student who had been a visible figure in the protests, became the first person detained in the Trump administration's push to deport pro-Palestinian activists who aren't U.S. citizens. Next came searches of some university residences amid a federal Justice Department investigation into whether Columbia concealed 'illegal aliens' on campus. The interim president at the time responded that the university was committed to upholding the law. Columbia was an early test case for the Trump administration as it sought closer oversight of universities that the Republican president views as bastions of liberalism. Yet it soon was overshadowed by Harvard University, which became the first higher education institution to defy Trump's demands and fight back in court. The Trump administration has used federal research funding as its primary lever in its campaign to reshape higher education. More than $2 billion in total has also been frozen at Cornell, Northwestern, Brown and Princeton universities. Administration officials pulled $175 million from the University of Pennsylvania in March over a dispute around women's sports. They restored it when school officials agreed to update records set by transgender swimmer Lia Thomas and change their policies. The administration also is looking beyond private universities. University of Virginia President James Ryan agreed to resign in June under pressure from a U.S. Justice Department investigation into diversity, equity and inclusion practices. A similar investigation was opened this month at George Mason University.
The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
Why are data nerds racing to save US government statistics?
The data nerds are fighting back. After watching data sets be altered or disappear from U.S. government websites in unprecedented ways after President Trump began his second term, an army of outside statisticians, demographers and computer scientists have joined forces to capture, preserve and share data sets, sometimes clandestinely. Their goal is to make sure they are available in the future, believing that democracy suffers when policymakers don't have reliable data and that national statistics should be above partisan politics. 'There are such smart, passionate people who care deeply about not only the Census Bureau, but all the statistical agencies, and ensuring the integrity of the statistical system. And that gives me hope, even during these challenging times,' Mary Jo Mitchell, director of government and public affairs for the research nonprofit the Population Association of America, said this week during an online public data-users conference. The threats to the U.S. data infrastructure since January have come not only from the disappearance or modification of data related to gender, sexual orientation, health, climate change and diversity, among other topics, but also from job cuts of workers and contractors who had been guardians of restricted-access data at statistical agencies, the data experts said. 'There are trillions of bytes of data files, and I can't even imagine how many public dollars were spent to collect those data,' Jennifer Park, a study director for the Committee on National Statistics, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, said during the conference hosted by the Association of Public Data Users (APDU). 'But right now, they're sitting someplace that is inaccessible because there are no staff to appropriately manage those data,' Park added later. 'Gender' switched to 'sex' In February, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) official public portal for health data, was taken down entirely but subsequently went back up. Around the same time, when a query was made to access certain public data from the U.S. Census Bureau's most comprehensive survey of American life, users for several days got a response that said the area was 'unavailable due to maintenance' before access was restored. Researchers Janet Freilich and Aaron Kesselheim examined 232 federal public health data sets that had been modified in the first quarter of this year and found that almost half had been 'substantially altered,' with the majority having the word 'gender' switched to 'sex,' they wrote this month in The Lancet medical journal. One of the most difficult tasks has been figuring out what's been changed since many of the alterations weren't recorded in documentation. Beth Jarosz, senior program director at the Population Reference Bureau, thought she was in good shape since she had previously downloaded data she needed from the National Survey of Children's Health for a February conference where she was speaking, even though the data had become unavailable. But then she realized she had failed to download the questionnaire and later discovered that a question about discrimination based on gender or sexual identity had been removed. 'It's the one thing my team didn't have,' Jarosz said at this week's APDU conference. 'And they edited the questionnaire document, which should have been a historical record.' Among the groups that have formed this year to collect and preserve the federal data are the Federation of American Scientists' which monitors changes to federal data sets; the University of Chicago Library's Data Mirror website, which backs up and hosts at-risk data sets; the Data Rescue Project, which serves as a clearinghouse for data rescue-related efforts; and the Federal Data Forum, which shares information about what federal statistics have gone missing or been modified — a job also being done by the American Statistical Association. The outside data warriors also are quietly reaching out to workers at statistical agencies and urging them to back up any data that is restricted from the public. 'You can't trust that this data is going to be here tomorrow,' said Lena Bohman, a founding member of the Data Rescue Project. Experts' committee unofficially revived Separately, a group of outside experts has unofficially revived a long-running U.S. Census Bureau advisory committee that was killed by the Trump administration in March. Census Bureau officials won't be attending the Census Scientific Advisory Committee meeting in September, since the Commerce Department, which oversees the agency, eliminated it. But the advisory committee will forward its recommendations to the bureau, and demographer Allison Plyer said she has heard that some agency officials are excited by the committee's re-emergence, even if it's outside official channels. 'We will send them recommendations but we don't expect them to respond since that would be frowned upon,' Plyer, chief demographer at The Data Center in New Orleans, said. 'They just aren't getting any outside expertise … and they want expertise, which is understandable from nerds.'
