8 hours and 46 minutes: Hakeem Jeffries slams Trump's bill in longest U.S. House speech
Mr. Jeffries' speech, at 8 hours and 46 minutes, marked Democrats' last chance to prosecute their case against the $3.4 trillion package. Lacking the votes to defeat the measure in a chamber that Republicans control by a slim 220-212 margin, Mr. Jeffries, 54, railed against legislation that he characterized as a giveaway to the wealthy that would strip low-income Americans of federally-back health insurance and food aid benefits.
"It's not the type of leadership that this country needs right now. But that's what we're getting. Chaos. Cruelty. And corruption," he said.
Mr. Jeffries began speaking at 4:53 a.m. and wrapped up at 1:38 p.m.
That broke a 2021 House record sent by then-House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy, who spent 8 hours and 32 minutes lambasting Democratic President Joe Biden's clean-energy and domestic-spending package. Shortly after Mr. Jeffries concluded his speech, the House voted 218-214 to pass the bill. Every Democrat and two Republicans opposed it.
His speech recalled that of another Democratic lawmaker, Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey, who broke the record for the longest Senate speech in April with a 25-hour, five-minute attack on Trump's unilateral firings of federal workers.
Booker's performance drew cheers from Democratic voters who have been frustrated by their party's powerlessness in Washington and have accused the party's leaders of being too meek.
Mr. Jeffries used his status as Democratic leader to stretch his customary 60-second speaking time, known as a "magic minute," for hours. Jeffries made clear he also had his eye on a prize further down the road. Voters, Jeffries said, "will get even" in the November 2026 midterm elections "because of these cuts being unleashed on the American people."
If Democrats win control of the House, Mr. Jeffries would be positioned to make history again by becoming the first Black House speaker in the Congress that convenes at the start of 2027.
Early into his speech, Mr. Jeffries showcased sick children in Republicans' home districts who might eventually lose Medicaid coverage under the legislation. It was a maneuver that could increase coverage of his speech in local media across the country.
Mr. Jeffries pulled no punches.
He said the bill was "ripping healthcare" from Americans and called it "shameful," "disgusting" and "reckless."
"This is a crime scene and House Democrats want no part of it," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Big, Beautiful Bill: From Tax cuts to mass deportations; key policies to know Trump's megabill
After hours of debate, negotiations and stalemate, Republicans in the US Senate have narrowly passed Donald Trump's mega-bill on tax and spending. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed with Vice-President JD Vance casting a tie-breaking vote after more than 24 hours of debate. The bill now heads back to House, where it still faces more opposition. The tax and spending bill is projected to cost more than $3 trillion during that time, but would be partially paid for with about $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid. Almost 12 million lower-income Americans would lose their health insurance by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Show more Show less
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Why China isn't lecturing Trump about his costly bill
As one of the largest holders of US debt for the past two decades, China has not shied away from lecturing the United States about its financial behavior. Like a parent scolding a child for racking up credit card bills, China needled Washington to protect its assets during the 2013 debt ceiling impasse and blamed Americans for setting off the 2008 global financial crisis with their profligate spending. But as American lawmakers debated, and ultimately passed, a giant domestic bill championed by President Donald Trump that is projected to add more than $3 trillion to the federal debt by 2034, China has remained largely silent despite the potential long-term risk it poses to its holdings. China's main concerns about its holdings has long been over the dollar's value and whether the United States will fail to pay its obligations, said Yasheng Huang, an economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 'These two concerns are far more material today,' he said. 'The dollar has already depreciated, dragging down the Chinese holdings. In terms of the other concern, I personally do not trust this administration to uphold rule of law and debt obligations.' In covering the debate, Chinese state media have emphasized how divisive the bill has been and the seeming futility of the American democratic process to reflect popular will. Reports described the debates as a 'political circus,' while Chinese pundits said the vote highlighted 'increasing polarization' in the United States. But Chinese officials have not yet publicly criticized the Trump administration and could be focused on other considerations. China probably sees no reason to antagonize Trump by publicly criticizing his bill when it is in a shaky truce with his administration in a trade war that had earlier seen both sides impose sky-high tariffs on each other's goods. The two sides have agreed to lift certain countermeasures, and keep working toward a deal. Momentum may even be building toward a meeting between Trump and China's top leader, Xi Jinping. Beijing, which is trying to revive economic growth, can ill afford an extended trade war. Concerns over its treasury holdings are not top of mind. More pressing are the tariffs and efforts by the Trump administration to persuade other countries to restrict their own trade with China. 'China is still trying to maintain a fragile trade truce with the United States,' said Joe Mazur, an analyst at Trivium, a research firm. 'Criticizing Trump's signature piece of legislation could anger him and torpedo recent diplomatic understandings.' From China's perspective, rather than fuel American economic growth, the measure could push Washington closer to a fiscal cliff and undermine its ability to compete with Beijing. 'The chances of Trump's success are at best uncertain,' said Shen Dingli, a scholar of international relations in Shanghai. Instead, the measure 'could indirectly help make China great again' by weakening the United States, he said. Crises and chaos in the United States feed into one of Xi's primary assertions about the state of the world, that the East is rising and the West is declining. China has highlighted the Trump administration's alienation of US allies and partners and disregard for global norms. On social media, one popular hashtag read: 'Big, Beautiful Bill will make 17 million people lose their health insurance.' Internet commenters also cheered on Elon Musk, who has described the bill as 'insane.' In contrast, Chinese analysts said, China has raised its debt levels, in part, to build infrastructure and to loan money to developing countries — spending that is geared toward expanding China's influence. China is also struggling with a growing mountain of debt because of borrowing by local governments, their investment vehicles and real estate developers. Yao Yang, an economist at Peking University, was skeptical that China stood to gain from any disruption caused by Trump's bill. He said the United States could continue to borrow for years to come as long as it remained the world's biggest consumer market. 'America's financial dominance can't be easily overturned, and the same goes for the dollar's supremacy,' he said. Beijing has long complained that Washington has printed more money to serve its domestic needs without considering how it devalues the dollar, and, by extension, foreign countries' holdings of US assets. But it has also been gradually reducing its holdings of US Treasury bonds, from a peak of $1.3 trillion more than a decade ago, to about $750 billion now, investing instead in other assets like gold. China is also invested in weakening what it calls the US dollar's hegemony as the world's leading currency for trade. That power fuels the world's dependency on American consumers, making major exporting nations like China 'more submissive' to the United States because of the threats of tariffs, said Henry Huiyao Wang, president of the Center for China and Globalization in Beijing. 'The United States is using the greenback and its large deficit financing to sustain its global power,' he said.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Trump's use of a word sparked an antisemitism row. Here's why
United States President Donald Trump said he was unaware that the word 'shylock' is considered antisemitic when he used it in a recent speech. Speaking to reporters early Friday after returning from a trip to Iowa, Trump said: 'I've never heard it that way. I've never heard that,' when asked about the word's meaning. 'To me, a shylock is somebody that's a money lender at high rates. You view it differently than me,' he added. The word 'shylock' comes from Shakespeare's play The Merchant of Venice, where it refers to a Jewish moneylender who demands a pound of flesh as payment. Over time, the term has come to be seen as a harmful stereotype. The Anti-Defamation League, which works to fight antisemitism, criticised Trump's use of the word. In a statement reported by the Associated Press (AP), the group said the term 'evokes a centuries-old antisemitic trope about Jews and greed that is extremely offensive and dangerous.' It added, 'President Trump's use of the term is very troubling and irresponsible.' This is not the first time a US politician has faced criticism for using the term. In 2014, Joe Biden, who was vice-president at the time, apologised and called it a 'poor choice' after using the word in a speech. While Trump's administration has taken steps it says are aimed at fighting antisemitism, including adding new checks for antisemitic activity when granting immigration benefits, the president has also been criticised for comments some have called harmful. In 2015, Trump told a group of Jewish Republicans, 'you want to control your politicians,' suggesting they used money to gain influence. He also drew criticism last year for dining with a Holocaust denier at his Florida club and for saying Jewish Americans who vote for Democrats are disloyal, comments that many said repeated an old stereotype about Jews having divided loyalties. On Thursday night, during his speech in Iowa, Trump used the word while talking about estate taxes and borrowing from banks. He said: 'No death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing some from, in some cases, a fine banker and in some cases shylocks and bad people.' The Anti-Defamation League said the president's use of the word shows that 'lies and conspiracies about Jews remain deeply entrenched in our country.' It added: 'Words from our leaders matter and we expect more from the President of the United States.'
