Elon Musk says 'America Party' is formed in further break from Trump
A day after asking his followers on his X platform whether a new U.S. political party should be created, Musk declared in a post on Saturday that "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom."
"By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!" he wrote.
The announcement from Musk comes after Trump signed his self-styled "big, beautiful" tax-cut and spending bill into law on Friday, which Musk fiercely opposed.
Musk, who became the word's richest man thanks to his Tesla car company and his SpaceX satellite firm, spent hundreds of millions on Trump's re-election and led the Department of Government Efficiency from the start of the president's second term aimed at slashing government spending.
The two have since fallen out spectacularly over disagreements about the bill.
Musk said previously that he would start a new political party and spend money to unseat lawmakers who supported the bill.
Trump earlier this week threatened to cut off the billions of dollars in subsidies that Musk's companies receive from the federal government.
Republicans have expressed concern that Musk's on-again, off-again feud with Trump could hurt their chances to protect their majority in the 2026 midterm congressional elections.
Asked on X what was the one thing that made him go from loving Trump to attacking him, Musk said: "Increasing the deficit from an already insane $2T under Biden to $2.5T. This will bankrupt the country."
He referenced the growth of Greece from subjugation to preeminence in the ancient world in another tweet, saying: "The way we're going to crack the uniparty system is by using a variant of how Epaminondas shattered the myth of Spartan invincibility at Leuctra: Extremely concentrated force at a precise location on the battlefield."
There was no immediate comment from Trump or the White House on Musk's announcement.
The feud with Trump, often described as one between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful, has led to several precipitous falls in Tesla's share price.
The stock soared after Trump's November reelection and hit a high of more than $488 in December, before losing more than half of its value in April and closing last week out at $315.35.
Despite Musk's deep pockets, breaking the Republican-Democratic duopoly will be a tall order, given that it has dominated American political life for more than 160 years, while Trump's approval ratings in polls in his second term have generally held firm above 40 percent, despite often divisive policies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
an hour ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: In election, parties should discuss Japan's role in restoring rules-based order
With the return to power of U.S. President Donald Trump, who champions an America First policy, international order is being shaken, putting pressure on Japan to restructure its diplomatic and security policies. Each political party in Japan needs to present its strategy through debate in the upcoming House of Councillors election. Postwar Japan has relied on U.S. deterrence for security, and achieved economic growth under a free trade system. However, the Trump administration views alliances as liabilities rather than assets, and the relationship that has been the linchpin of the alliance is creaking under the strain. Washington has imposed high tariffs on even allies and has also demanded increased defense spending. The security environment surrounding Japan is becoming increasingly severe. China has continued with its military expansion, and is boosting its maritime advancements into the East and South China seas. Meanwhile, North Korea, which is accelerating its development of nuclear weapons and missiles, has formed a military alliance with Russia, which is continuing its war in Ukraine. The threat toward Japan is only increasing. Strains in the Japan-U.S. alliance A concern is that it remains uncertain just how much the U.S. aims to get involved in stabilizing East Asia. A U.S. Department of Defense spokesperson suggested that Asian allies, including Japan, should raise their defense-related spending to 5% of gross domestic product, similar to NATO member countries. Due to Russia's prolonged invasion of Ukraine, most European countries belonging to NATO have complied with U.S. requests. Japan has decided to increase its defense spending to 2% of GDP by fiscal 2027. Both the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan have pledged to "fundamentally strengthen defense capabilities," but they have not provided a blueprint showing how far they intend to go. Japan should not be preparing defense capabilities based on numerical targets in the first place. Rather, it is essential to first accurately assess the military capabilities and intentions of neighboring countries and identify threats. Strategies should then be developed to address these threats, and the necessary equipment and other items should be selected accordingly. Addressing personnel shortages in the Self-Defense Forces due to Japan's declining birth rate is another urgent matter. Increasing defense spending could impact other policies like social security. There should be in-depth discussions about the appropriate scale relative to national strength. In light of China's moves to increase military pressure, such as its deployment of two aircraft carriers in the Western Pacific, it is important to maintain deterrence. But rather than just strengthening defense capabilities, efforts need to be made to build a stable relationship with repeated talks so as not to heighten tensions. Negotiations between Tokyo and Washington over high tariffs have cast a shadow over Japan's upper house election. Trump's approach not only undermines Japan's national interests but also threatens to disrupt global supply chains for goods and services. A strategy to uphold the free trade system is necessary. The European Union is cooperating with member countries of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership to establish new trade rules. Japan, having benefited from free trade, should take an active role. Strategy to strengthen alliance needed The goal should be multilateral diplomacy. To restore international order damaged by ongoing wars in Europe and the Middle East and Trump's high-handed tariff policies, it is essential for middle powers like Japan and Europe to band together. Japan must further strengthen ties with countries sharing values of freedom and democracy, such as Australia and South Korea, as well as with members of emerging and developing countries collectively known as the Global South, including India and those in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). While the words and actions of Trump, who is prioritizing his own country, have shaken the prestige of the United States, China is increasing its presence in Asia. It is leveraging geoeconomic strategies like the Belt and Road Initiative and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank to draw in ASEAN countries targeted by high tariffs. Japan has built trust with Asian countries since the postwar period through economic assistance and other such measures. It is crucial to leverage this experience to contribute to regional stability. There is concern that Japan's commitment to the rule of law, which it has valued, and other principles is weakening. If Japan cannot bring itself to criticize the self-righteous actions of Trump, who believes in "peace through strength," out of consideration for him, it will only lose the trust of the Global South. While maintaining its important relationship with the U.S., which is crucial for Japan's security and economy, efforts to restore a rules-based international order are indispensable. Each party should engage in robust discussions on the role Japan should play in achieving this.
The Mainichi
2 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Tokyo stocks end lower amid caution over U.S. tariffs
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Tokyo stocks ended lower Monday as investors cautiously waited for developments over U.S. tariffs after President Donald Trump said letters with new unilateral rates will be sent to some countries this week. The 225-issue Nikkei Stock Average lost 223.20 points, or 0.56 percent, from Friday at 39,587.68. The broader Topix index finished 16.23 points, or 0.57 percent, lower at 2,811.72. On the top-tier Prime Market, decliners were led by bank, nonferrous metal and iron and steel issues. The U.S. dollar climbed to the lower 145 yen range in Tokyo after directionless trading in the absence of fresh trading cues, dealers said. The Nikkei stock index traded mostly lower as many investors refrained from trading actively amid uncertainty over whether Japan is among the countries the letters are to be sent to this week, with a pause on so-called reciprocal tariffs set to expire on Wednesday. "President Trump may be reluctant to reduce tariff rates" as he needs to secure revenues through levies after his tax cut bill was passed by Congress, said Masahiro Yamaguchi, head of investment research at SMBC Trust Bank. "The market's current atmosphere appears a bit optimistic, thus facing the risk of a sharp slide," he added. The market was also dragged down by concern over the adverse impact of U.S. tariffs on the performance of Japanese companies as robotics company Yaskawa Electric tumbled after revising down on Friday its earnings outlook for the business year through February, citing demand uncertainty.
Asahi Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: Trading rules that served the world so well must be rebuilt
A mine for rare-earth metals in Inner Mongolia, northern China (Reuters) Although the United States and China reached an agreement to mutually rescind high tariffs, there is still a potential for flareups. Avoiding further negative ramifications on the global economy is paramount. Ministerial-level discussions between the two nations in London in early June led Beijing to lift its restrictions on rare-earth metal exports to the United States. For its part, Washington partially removed restrictions on semiconductor-related exports to China. During the discussions, the focus was on China's restrictions on exports of rare-earth metals. Rare-earth metals are used in high-performance magnets and optical equipment. They are also indispensable to a wide range of products, from automobiles and home appliances to missiles and fighter jets. China has about a 70-percent share of the global market in rare-earth metals. From April, Beijing implemented a system to regulate rare-earth metal exports on grounds they could be used not only for commercial products but also military purposes. But China did not explain the standards it uses for the assessment. That led to concerns being raised by both the United States and Europe. In Japan, Suzuki Motor Corp. has had to stop production of some models. Beijing began restricting exports of rare-earth metals after a Chinese fishing boat collided with a Japan Coast Guard cutter close to the disputed Senkaku Islands in 2010. The move was seen as retaliation against Japan. However, China said it was simply protecting its resources. In 2012, Japan, the United States and Europe filed a complaint with the World Trade Organization, which ruled against China. Even with its latest move, Beijing has not retracted its explanation that restrictions were needed because the metals could be used for both military and commercial purposes. This is not an issue that involves only criticizing China. Since his first term, U.S. President Donald Trump has intensified restrictions on semiconductor exports to China. It was intended to thwart China from gaining the advantage in a sector that has direct national security implications. China's restrictions on rare-earth metals can be seen as tit-for-tat for the U.S. semiconductor restrictions. Whatever the reason, excuses for limiting or preventing trade should not be permitted. After two world wars, the global economy operated on the common understanding that a relationship based on free trade provides national security benefits to all. But that recognition now stands on the brink of collapse. An action plan was compiled at the June Group of Seven summit to diversify the sources of rare-earth metals. The intention was to move away from dependence on China, but doing so will likely be difficult in the near term, given the overwhelming share controlled by China. Every nation has national security considerations. But with the deeper mutual economic dependence now in place, nations need to figure out rules that protect the free trade order. In the background to the United States and China sitting down at the negotiating table lies the condition of mutual dependency, which differs from what existed between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War. We call on both superpowers to fulfill their responsibility. --The Asahi Shimbun, July 7
