IT Services Sector Witness Lack of Urgency to Spend by Clients: InCred Equities
You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.
Indian IT services companies are witnessing a lack of urgency to spend by clients as they remain cautious in an uncertain business environment, and are still hesitant to take long-term decisions, according to a report from InCred Equities.
"But the reconciliatory stance, especially on reciprocal tariffs, has helped de-escalate the situation. Deal conversations are underway but advisory-led proposals (RFPs) with long-term road-maps have complex constructs and are elongating the decision timeframe. Pipeline opportunity could be at its peak but the pertinent question for investors is the quantum of conversion book and rate," the report said.
However, enterprises are using the current uncertainty to right-size their organization/spending, given the inflationary pressure. The global conflicts have impacted client visits to Centres of Excellence (CoEs) and has elongated deal closure.
The India-Pakistan conflict impacted travel plans of clients. "We heard instances of less client meetings in the month of May 2025 as travel advisory led to cancellation or postponement of visits to CoEs in India. This, in turn, added a new vector to decision-making delay, especially for global capability centre or GCC-led deals," the report said.
AI-led productivity is the big elephant in the room. According to InCred Equities, the deflationary impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on revenue, led by productivity pass-back, is unlikely a near-term phenomenon. "We have been highlighting that clients continue to seek 'doing more for less' to optimize legacy projects to fund small-ticket AI-led ones. This, in turn, is driving vendor consolidation, driving the competitive intensity higher, creating staffing challenges, and pressurizing the margin profile of deals. Hence, building margin expansion for FY26F could be aggressive."
As economic downturns change technology adoption and consumption patterns, this cycle is likely to favour mid-sized IT companies. The report cites similar views from CEO of Zensar Technologies who believes tier-II have the opportunity to capture incremental mind and market share as the current technology (AI) change has made the field level-playing.
Infosys Chairman Nandan Nilekani alluded to the uncertain business environment in its latest annual report. "As we contemplate the developments of the last few months, we know we are in an era of uncertainty that we have never seen before. Multiple trends are colliding and leading us to reexamine the fundamentals of our businesses," he said.
N. Chandrasekaran, Chairman, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) also agreed that financial year 2025 was a year of profound global disruption. "Widespread geopolitical conflicts, military escalations, and uncertain trade dynamics severely impacted global supply chains. Over 60 nations went to the polls, stalling policy continuity and reform agendas across several key markets. As a result, businesses worldwide faced significant shocks— ranging from falling production volumes and rising costs to suboptimal asset utilization, impacting profitability and cash flows," he said in the company's latest annual report.
The InCred Equities report indicated of a potential budget flush in 2H FY26F, given the current procrastination in spending, delay in decision-making and/or ramp-ups, and tepid spending pattern in 1H CY25. "That said, it may not be a true reflection of structural recovery as AI-led deflationary pressure could outweigh the near-term tailwinds, if any," the report said.
The demand trend across banking, healthcare, energy, mining, and insurance verticals appear to be better than manufacturing, hi-tech, and retail. "That said, there appears to be no real urgency to spend, even within the segments having a better demand trend."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
The upside of missing deadlines
With help from Camille von Kaenel and Jordan Wolman SILENCE IS GOLDEN: California regulators' reluctance to implement the state's nation-leading climate disclosure laws could be their saving grace in court. The California Air Resources Board was supposed to finish writing rules for SB 253 and SB 261 — the contentious laws that will require large companies to disclose their carbon footprint and climate-related financial risks — on Tuesday, under an agreement lawmakers hashed out with the agency and Gov. Gavin Newsom last year. CARB Chair Liane Randolph made it clear in an exclusive interview last week that those rules won't be finalized until the end of the year and that the agency isn't planning to put out any updates in the short term. That's potentially a potent — if unintentional — legal strategy. State attorneys were in a Los Angeles federal courtroom Tuesday morning, arguing against the U.S. Chamber, the California Chamber of Commerce, the Farm Bureau and other groups' request that Judge Otis D. Wright II immediately block the two laws as the case over whether they violate the First Amendment plays out. The crux of Deputy Attorney General Caitlan McLoon's argument is that the rules businesses will need to follow haven't even been finalized yet, so there's no reason to put the laws on hold. 'If there is no requirement to speak, there can be no First Amendment harm,' McLoon said. If Wright buys that argument — and there's reason to think he could, after he dismissed two claims earlier this year that the laws violate Congress' authority to regulate interstate commerce, in part because companies hadn't proved any immediate harm — it would be an ironic twist in the years-long fight between CARB, Newsom and the laws' authors over how quickly and aggressively to implement what will be first-of-their-kind standards in the United States. Focus on SB 253 and SB 261 has been heightened since President Donald Trump's victory in November and his promise to immediately roll back climate rules. California's laws could offer a model for other Democrat-led statehouses, after Trump's Securities and Exchange Commission announced in March that it would stop defending a Biden-era federal disclosure law in court. But Trump's win wasn't enough to defuse tensions with Sen. Scott Wiener, the influential Senate Budget Committee chair who wrote SB 253, who slammed CARB in December for telling companies covered under the law that they'll get a break from having to perfectly tally their greenhouse gas emissions during the first year of the rule. Wiener and CARB are playing nice at the moment. Wiener said in an interview Tuesday that he's been in communication with the agency and that he understands officials need more time. 'My hope was to get it done July 1, but that's not feasible for them,' Wiener said. 'It's fine, because it's not going to impact the disclosures themselves, which are the most important thing.' CARB has told companies to start getting ready for when the disclosure laws take effect in 2026, a point that Eugene Scalia, the lead attorney (and son of former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia) representing the plaintiffs, highlighted in his oral arguments. 'My client members are incurring costs, and are on the cusp of having to engage in unconstitutional speech,' he told the judge. Both sides also offered arguments on the merits of the First Amendment debate: McLoon said that the state has the right to regulate emissions disclosures and that the vast majority of companies that already disclose emissions as part of their business strategies do so in a way that is incomplete or misleading. Scalia countered that companies have a First Amendment right to remain silent and picked apart the studies CARB has cited to bolster their claims of misleading business practices. That fight to untangle those arguments could stretch into next year, but Wright's decision on the preliminary injunction — which he didn't offer a specific timeline for — is expected to come much sooner. — AN Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! INSIDE THE BILL: The California Chamber of Commerce is taking its swing at one of the boogeymen of the year: electric bills. The business group released a study Tuesday by the Blue Sky Consulting Group that determined that the costs of wildfire mitigation and rooftop solar represent 13 and 14 percent of the average residential monthly bill from an investor-owned utility, with another 7 percent coming from state public purpose programs like one to subsidize low-income customers. (The study largely reflects the findings of legislative analysts in January.) The Chamber is touting its new numbers as a reason to support its preferred policy fixes, which include reducing rooftop solar incentives, as proposed by Assemblymember Lisa Calderon. It's also arguing against limiting the infrastructure costs utilities can recoup from ratepayers and creating a new financing authority for transmission projects — measures proposed by energy chairs Assemblymember Cottie Petrie-Norris and Sen. Josh Becker as part of their energy affordability packages. — CvK RAKE TIME: Newsom trolled Trump from a fire lookout tower near Colfax on Tuesday morning, challenging the White House to adopt a 'model executive order' to increase firefighter pay and staffing. It's not the first time either of them have tried to score political points by criticizing the other on wildfire management. But Newsom's dig reflects his fraying relationship with the president over federal immigration enforcement raids in California. It also comes as peak fire season is ramping up, with red flag warnings blanketing Northern California on Tuesday and evacuations underway in the San Jacinto Mountains of Riverside County, where a fire has grown beyond 2,000 acres. Newsom hammered the point that the federal government owns 57 percent of the forested land in California, compared to the state's 3 percent. And he attacked the Trump administration's job cuts at federal land management, science and disaster response agencies. 'The president of the United States needs to do more to back up his rhetoric with investments and resources,' Newsom said. The White House did not respond to a request for comment by publication time. — CvK AROUND THE CAMPFIRE: Water agencies, Big Tech and timber companies are banding together to ask state lawmakers for more money for wildfire prevention. The Association of California Water Agencies, the Bay Area Council and the California Forestry Association are all members of a new coalition called the 'Wildfire Solutions Coalition,' along with more than a dozen conservation groups. Their ask: As part of the slated reauthorization of the state's landmark cap-and-trade program this year, they want ten percent of future revenues to go to 'regionally appropriate wildfire resilience strategies, as part of a larger set of dedicated investments for nature-based solutions.' They'll be fighting with transit agencies and various energy groups for the pot of money. — CvK AND FIRETECH TOO: Fire Aside, a company that sells software streamlining defensible space inspections, has signed contracts with a series of new Bay Area fire agencies, including municipal departments in El Cerrito, Hayward, Fremont and Richmond, it told POLITICO exclusively this week. It's one of a number of companies making inroads as both the Newsom and Trump administrations try to claim the growing sector for their own. MEGA MEGA: The U.S. Senate softened its phase-out of a tax credit for wind and solar projects to get holdouts on board with the massive tax and spending bill it passed on Tuesday. But renewable energy groups are still fuming, with American Clean Power Association CEO Jason Grumet calling the bill 'an intentional effort to undermine the fastest-growing sources of electric power [that] will lead to increased energy bills, decreased grid reliability, and the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs.' The last-minute compromise, as POLITICO's Josh Siegel and Kelsey Tamborrino report, strikes a proposed added excise tax on wind and solar projects. But it still requires most solar and wind energy projects to be placed in service by the end of 2027 to get the tax credit, potentially derailing hundreds of planned projects. The bill also kills the $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles that automakers have been trying to save. The megabill is now back in the House, where California Reps. David Valadao and Young Kim are among the few Republicans who have stumped for clean energy tax credits and have said they'll vote against it. — The NYT has a deep dive on the former EPA employee whom Project Veritas recorded calling federal climate funding 'gold bars.' — It's not just California — the Sunbelt is also starting to experience a house-building slowdown. — Farmers can sell their groundwater rights to urban developers desperate for water in Arizona under a new state law.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
What made the cut in Senate's nearly 1,000-page policy megabill?
Senate Republicans on Tuesday jammed through a major package advancing President Trump's tax priorities, paid for by a host of cuts to the social safety net, including Medicaid and food assistance. The bill also slashes green energy and includes changes to student loan programs. The nearly 1,000-page package, released Friday, has undergone notable changes since initial pieces of the plan first came into view weeks ago. Republicans have also sought to make several tweaks to the bill in the past several days. The expansive bill now awaits consideration in the House, where leaders hope to push it across the finish line before a self-imposed July 4 deadline. Live updates: Senate sends tax bill to House; Trump visits 'Alligator Alcatraz' Here are some of the most significant changes that made the cut through a frenzied 27-hour debate — and what didn't. A centerpiece of the legislation is making permanent the expiring provisions in Trump's signature tax law — which nonpartisan scorers and think tanks estimate would cost trillions of dollars over the next decade. One of the most costly proposals is extending the individual rate reductions in the 2017 law. The bill would also seek to cement existing federal tax brackets, boost the standard deduction and maintain the termination of personal exemptions. It also seeks to deliver on several key promises the president made on the campaign trail last year. That includes deductions for taxes on tips, overtime pay and car loan interest. However, the measures are not fully deductible. Republicans setting up tax cliff at end of Donald Trump's term The final version of the legislation includes restrictions on Medicaid, the joint state-federal program that provides health care for more than 70 million low-income and disabled Americans. Like the House-passed version, the Senate bill will require beneficiaries to prove they are working or in school at least 80 hours a month to keep their health insurance starting Dec. 31, 2026. The Senate version extends the work requirement to low-income parents of children older than 14, in addition to childless adults without disabilities. It also requires more frequent eligibility checks. But the Senate parliamentarian said a measure cutting federal funds to states that use their own money to provide health care coverage to immigrants lacking permanent legal status, along with a provision banning Medicaid from covering gender transition services, weren't in compliance with Senate rules. The steep cuts to taxes levied by Medicaid expansion states on hospitals and other providers remained in the bill despite objections by some Republicans in the Senate and House, though they will now be delayed by a year, to start in 2028. The bill also requires people above the poverty line to pay out-of-pocket copays for most Medicaid services, like lab tests or doctor visits. States will be allowed to charge up to 5 percent of a person's income per year, though some Democratic-led states may opt for a smaller amount. The Senate made sweeping cuts to climate-friendly energy tax credits — especially for wind and solar — that were passed as part of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. The final legislation does not allow a project to get the tax credit if it does not begin producing electricity by 2028. This is stricter than an earlier Senate version, which would have allowed projects that begin construction in the next few years to qualify for the credits. The bill would require some states for the first time to cover a share of the cost of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits — which are currently completely funded by the federal government — if they have a payment error rate above 6 percent. If the error rate is 6 percent or higher, states would be subject to a sliding scale that could see their share of allotments rise to a range of between 5 percent and 15 percent. The proposal in the megabill would also allow states with rates below that level to continue paying zero percent. Republicans say the proposal is aimed at incentivizing states to get their payment error rates down, while Democrats have argued the measure could lead to states having to cut benefits. However, last-minute changes have been made to the plan that would allow for delayed implementation for states with the highest payment error rates after concerns from Republican senators in Alaska, which had the highest rate in fiscal 2024. The final bill would introduce numerous changes to student loans, including limits on borrowing and consolidation into only two repayment plans. Republicans want to cap graduate-level federal student loans at $20,500 a year, at $50,000 for law or medical school government loans, and at$20,000 for Parent PLUS loans for undergraduate students. If passed, student loan borrowers will have two repayment options: a new standard plan and a new income-driven repayment plan. Under the latter, starting in 2028, borrowers will have access to the Repayment Assistance Plan and the income-based repayment option. It would also eliminate economic hardship and unemployment deferments. The bill does allow loans to be rehabilitated twice, up from once before. Pell Grants would get additional funding in 2026 and exclude students who received full-ride scholarships to a school. It also establishes workforce Pell Grants offering help to students who enroll in short-term work programs that don't end with a college degree. The bill would add $5 trillion the nation's debt limit, which caps how much money the Treasury Department can owe to pay the country's bills. Congress last acted on the debt limit in 2023 as part of a deal that suspended the ceiling through 2024. Since January, the Treasury Department has been implementing 'extraordinary measures' to buy time for lawmakers to raise or suspend the debt limit and stave off the threat of a national default. The national debt stands at more than $36 trillion. Republicans passed a tax credit refund that would go to individuals or companies that donate to organizations that provide K-12 school choice scholarships. The provision is a major win for the school choice movement, as it will create a national program to bypass Democratic states that have been resistant to school choice initiatives. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) had been pushing for a provision that would have required the sale of hundreds of thousands of acres of public land, but he abandoned that effort over the weekend. In a post on social platform X, he said, 'Because of the strict constraints of the budget reconciliation process, I was unable to secure clear, enforceable safeguards to guarantee that these lands would be sold only to American families — not to China, not to Blackrock and not to any foreign interests.' 'For that reason, I've decided to withdraw the federal land sales provision from the bill,' he added. Lee had originally proposed to sell up to 3.3 million acres of land owned by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and Forest Service, but he later revised his proposal to pertain to up to 1.2 million acres of the BLM land. He said he was pushing the measure to build more affordable housing. He received opposition from not only Democrats but also members of his own party, some of whom said they would vote against the bill if it contained public land sales. The legislation omits a contentious change that floated over the weekend — an excise tax on new solar and wind projects if they contain Chinese components. This surprise provision met pushback from moderate lawmakers who did not want to add an additional tax on these industries. The Senate stripped a provision barring states from regulating artificial intelligence (AI). The most recent version of the provision would have barred states from regulating AI for five years if they wanted access to $500 million in AI infrastructure and deployment funding. It cut in half the timeline of the original provision, which sought to bar state AI regulation for 10 years. Tobias Burns and Julia Shapero contributed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Senate Republicans pass Trump's sweeping policy bill, clearing major hurdle
Senate Republicans on Tuesday passed a major tax and spending bill demanded by Donald Trump, ending weeks of negotiations over the comprehensive legislation and putting it another step closer to enactment. But it remains unclear whether changes made by the chamber will be accepted by the House of Representatives, which approved an initial draft of the legislation last month by a single vote. While Republicans control both houses of Congress, factionalism in the lower chamber is particularly intense, with rightwing fiscal hardliners demanding deep spending cuts, moderates wary of dismantling safety-net programs and Republicans from Democratic-led states expected to make a stand on a contentious tax provision. Any one of these groups could potentially derail the bill's passage through a chamber where the GOP can lose no more than three votes. The bill's passage is nonetheless an accomplishment for Senate Republicans who faced their own divisions in getting it passed, and saw one lawmaker announce his retirement after clashing with Trump over the bill. The push to get the legislation done intensified on Saturday when the chamber voted to begin debate, then continued with amendment votes that began on Monday and stretched all night. The vote for passage came just after noon on Tuesday, and required the vice-president, JD Vance, to break a tie that resulted after three Republicans joined with all Democrats in voting against it. In a joint statement, the speaker, Mike Johnson, and the House Republican leadership said: 'Republicans were elected to do exactly what this bill achieves: secure the border, make tax cuts permanent, unleash American energy dominance, restore peace through strength, cut wasteful spending, and return to a government that puts Americans first. This bill is President Trump's agenda, and we are making it law.' Related: What's in Trump's major tax bill? Extended cuts, deportations and more The Senate majority leader, John Thune, said Republican senators and staff began laying the groundwork for this budget bill more than a year ago, planning how they would extend tax breaks if they had the votes. He said: 'Since we took office in January, Republicans have been laser-focused on achieving the bill before us today. And now we're here, passing legislation that will permanently extend tax relief for hard-working Americans.' The lower chamber will take up the measure on Wednesday, before a deadline Trump has imposed to have it on his desk by Friday, the Independence Day holiday. But the president has recently made comments indicating the bill could arrive later, saying at a press conference on Friday 'we can go longer', before writing on Truth Social that 'the House of Representatives must be ready to send it to my desk before July 4th'. Trump has described the bill as crucial to his presidency, and congressional Republicans made it their top priority. It will extend tax cuts enacted during the president's first term in 2017, and includes new provisions to cut taxes on tips, overtime and interest payments for some car loans. It funds Trump's plans for mass deportations by allocating $45bn for Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities, $14bn for deportation operations and billions of dollars more to hire an additional 10,000 new agents by 2029. It also includes more than $50bn for the construction of new border fortifications, which will probably include a wall along the border with Mexico. To satisfy demands from fiscal conservatives for cuts to the US's large federal budget deficit, the bill imposes new work requirements on enrollees of Medicaid, which provides healthcare to low-income and disabled Americans. It also imposes a limit on the provider tax states use to fund their program, which could lead to reductions in services. Finally, it sunsets some incentives for green-energy technologies created by Congress under Joe Biden. Nonetheless, the bill would add $3.3tn to the US budget deficit through 2034, according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a non-profit focused on fiscal responsibility, called the bill 'a failure of responsible governing' because it will add to the federal debt and includes budget gimmicks that disguise how much debt it is adding. The group estimated it would add more than $4tn to the national debt through 2034, and said that if some 'arbitrary expirations' were made permanent, they would add $5.4tn. 'The Senate reconciliation bill fails almost every test of fiscal responsibility,' said Maya MacGuineas, the group's president. 'Instead of worrying about arbitrary deadlines or sparing the Senate another vote-a-rama, fiscal conservatives should stand up for what's right and reject the Senate plan to explode our debt.' While it was formally titled the one big beautiful bill act, the Senate's Democratic minority leader, Chuck Schumer, managed to get the name stricken minutes before the vote for passage, though that is not expected to change how many lawmakers refer to it. Because it was passed using the budget reconciliation procedure that requires legislation only affect spending, revenue and the debt limit, Democrats were unable to use the filibuster to block its passage in the Senate. Schumer called the bill a 'big, ugly betrayal', pointing to the millions who will lose health insurance, job losses and debt increase done in favor of tax breaks for the wealthy and corporate special interests. He also decried the process Republicans used to pass the bill, saying they pushed the rules and norms of the chamber in a way that did 'grave damage' to the body. 'Today's vote will haunt our Republican colleagues for years to come as the American people see the damage that is done – as hospitals close, as people are laid off, as costs go up, as the debt increases. They will see what our colleagues have done and they will remember it, and we Democrats will make sure they remember it,' Schumer said. In the lead-up to the bill's passage, several moderate Republicans signaled unease with its cuts to the social safety net, including North Carolina's Thom Tillis. After saying on Saturday he would not vote for the bill, Trump publicly attacked him, and the senator announced he would not run for re-election next year, potentially improving Democrats' chances of picking up the purple state's seat. 'It is inescapable this bill will betray the promise Donald Trump made,' Tillis said on Sunday. Pointing to a forecast that the bill would cost 663,000 North Carolinians their Medicaid coverage, Tillis said: 'What do I tell 663,000 people in two years or three years, when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off of Medicaid because the funding's not there any more, guys?' Related: Thom Tillis won't seek re-election after clash with Trump over 'big beautiful bill' In addition to Tillis, Rand Paul of Kentucky voted against passage, criticizing the bill's impact on the budget deficit and national debt. Susan Collins, who is expected to face a fierce re-election challenge next year from Democrats for her seat in Maine, also opposed it, saying the measure would 'threaten not only Mainers' access to healthcare, but also the very existence of several of our state's rural hospitals'. The Alaska moderate Lisa Murkowski expressed similar concerns about its effect on Medicaid, but ended up voting for passage. Now that the legislation is back in the House, Johnson faces a difficult task in getting the Senate's changes cleared by his conference's competing factions. Moderates remain concerned about the safety-net cuts, while rightwing Republicans have railed against the bill's expensive price tag. Last week, David Valadao, a Republican representative whose central California district has one of the highest Medicaid enrollment rates in the nation, said he would not support the measure over its funding changes to the program. On Monday, before the bill's passage, the Democratic National Committee announced the launch of an organizing campaign to capitalize on the unpopularity of the budget plan's provisions. Ken Martin, the chair of the DNC, shared in a press briefing that when he was growing up, his family relied on the kinds of safety-net programs that are being cut. Martin said in a statement on Tuesday that the bill helps billionaires at the expense of American families – the sort of messaging the party will rely on as it hits the road to turn out voters for the midterms and special elections. 'It's a massive scheme to steal from working folks, struggling families and, hell, even from nursing homes – all to enrich the already rich with a tax giveaway,' Martin said. 'Billionaires don't need more help – working families do. Democrats will stand shoulder to shoulder with working families to kick these Republicans out of their seats in 2026.' The rightwing House Freedom caucus has also criticized the bill for its price tag. 'The Senate must make major changes and should at least be in the ballpark of compliance with the agreed upon House budget framework. Republicans must do better,' they wrote on Monday, as amendments were being considered. In a Tuesday press conference, the House minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries, said the bill represents the 'largest cut to Medicaid in American history'. He expects his caucus will uniformly oppose the bill and will be making the case to vote it down in the rules committee and on the House floor. When asked whether House Democrats would use any procedural moves to delay passage of the bill, Jeffries said: 'All procedural and legislative options are on the table.'
