Pope Francis could've been paid as much as the president, but instead gave his substantial salary away to the poor and needy
Pope Francis was known for rejecting the salary owed to him as the powerful leader of the Catholic Church, but were he to have accepted it he would've been paid just as much as the president.
The late Francis, born Jorge Mario Bergoglio, joined the Jesuits in the 1950s, and in doing so, took a vow of poverty. When he joined the largest of the religious orders in the Catholic Church, which also includes Franciscans and Dominicans, Francis had to sign over all his property and possessions to the order. To cover his living expenses, Francis received a small stipend.
For much of his life, Francis lived under a vow of poverty, and even when he rose to become the archbishop of Buenos Aires in the late '90s and was technically relieved of this obligation, Francis was known for cooking his own meals, riding public transportation, and living in a small apartment instead of the archbishop's palace.
So it was no surprise that once he became pope, Francis rejected the lavish salary on par with the pay of the U.S. president at around 30,000 euros per month, said Daniel Rober, a professor of Catholic studies at Sacred Heart University. Instead, he opted to have the money donated to charity and others in need.
'He's somebody who lived as a Jesuit for decades before becoming a bishop and continued to live in the style that he's been accustomed to as a religious throughout the rest of his life,' Rober told Fortune.
As the conclave, which will pick the next pope, begins on May 7, it's unclear whether the next pope will choose to accept the salary he is owed or not.
Unlike other popes such as John Paul II, who often took breaks to go skiing, Francis never took a vacation, Rober said. In August, when Rome empties as people take their holidays, Francis stayed put. He also never visited the hilltop Papal Palace of Castel Gandolfo overlooking Lake Albano, which is often used as a summer retreat for popes, Rober said. Instead, Francis opened the residence as a museum to tourists in 2016.
'He would get some criticism for this, even from people sympathetic to him, who would say, for his own health and well being—and also to follow healthy workplace behaviors for other Catholics—maybe he should take a vacation now and then, that that might actually be healthy,' Rober said. 'But he just didn't see it that way.'
Even when he became the most powerful figure in the Catholic church, Francis spurned the trappings of the office, preferring to live in the Vatican guesthouse, the Casa Santa Marta, instead of the Papal apartments.
During previous pontificates, access to the pope's morning mass and the papal apartments was offered to big donors in a sort of pay-for-play situation facilitated by the pope's handlers, Rober said, but that situation changed under Francis.
'By not living in the apartment and by living very simply in Casa Santa Marta, he kind of cut off that access that people had had under previous pontificates,' he said.
At the end of his life, despite his humble ways, Francis had accumulated a small sum of about 200,000 euros in his personal account, Rober said, and following his death he allocated the money to juvenile prisoners of Rome's Casal del Marmo prison.
Even in death, Francis remained modest. His will stated he was to be buried not under St. Peter's Basilica—built on top of the burial site of the original pope, St. Peter, and where an estimated 140 other popes are buried—but in the Basilica of Saint Mary Major, where he would pray before and after his official trips abroad.
'The tomb should be in the ground; simple, without particular ornamentation, bearing only the inscription: Franciscus,' Francis' testament reads.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Florida should listen to Miami archbishop: Detained migrants need spiritual comfort
Miami Archbishop Thomas Wenski is raising a powerful moral question: Should the hundreds of people detained inside the Alligator Alcatraz immigration detention center — many awaiting deportation — be denied spiritual comfort as they face sudden family separation, isolation and the end of their life in America? His answer, and ours, is clear: No. Whether undocumented or facing criminal charges, these detainees deserve access to prayer, confession and Mass — just like inmates in state and federal prisons across the United States. As Wenski says, it's the humane thing to do. We agree. Yet state officials have ignored the letter from Wenski requesting that priests be allowed inside the detention facility at the edge of the Everglades. So Wenski — the leader of 1.3 million Catholics in South Florida — recently made an unannounced visit to Alligator Alcatraz, riding up in a Harley-Davidson as part of the Knights on Bikes, a religious motorcycle ministry. Clad in denim and a leather vest, he and 25 riders showed up to make the point that religion must be allowed inside the tents of this controversial pop-up facility because it is the right and humane thing to do. These detainees are experiencing one of the darkest times in their lives. There's no denying it. They deserve more than due process. They deserve compassion. Barred from going inside last weekend, Wenski and the other bikers knelt outside the barbed wire as the archbishop led a prayer for the people inside. 'Common decency demands that chaplains and pastoral ministers be able to serve those in custody — for their benefit and for the benefit of the staff,' he told reporters. 'The people detained here are fathers and mothers, brothers and sisters of anxious family members.' He's absolutely right. Backed by decades of advocacy immigrants, Wenski's call to conscience deserves full support — and a swift positive response. Spiritual care isn't a luxury. It's a human need, especially when people are facing exile, fear and profound loss. Yes, supporters of mass deportation may argue that religion has no place at Alligator Alcatraz. That those who end up there deserve no special treatment or comfort because they are undocumented. But to deny access to chaplains is to strip those detained of their dignity — and reduce them to something less than human. Wenski's unexpected appearance at Alligator Alcatraz was more than a photo op. He used his standing as the highest-ranking Catholic in South Florida to defend those inside. For Wenski — long known for his activism during his early years in the Miami clergy — this was a continuation of his long record of championing Haitians, Cubans and all immigrants in Miami-Dade. He also condemned the cruel rhetoric used by some politicians, who have described the detainees as being guarded by 'pythons and alligators.' He called it plain mean. He's right. He's also right to fight for spiritual care inside Alligator Alcatraz. Reports from visitors describe overcrowded, sweltering tents, people held in cages and limited medical access. In this bleak scenario, faith can bring peace of mind and human comfort — and it doesn't interfere with the government's immigration enforcement. We support Wenski's call for humanity and spiritual guidance at Alligator Alcatraz. Wenski is showing moral and spiritual leadership. We should listen.


Fox News
11 hours ago
- Fox News
Woman learns fate after DOJ guilty plea admitting she helped North Korean tech workers infiltrate US companies
An Arizona woman is headed to prison for nearly a decade after perpetuating a fraudulent foreign worker scam that benefited the North Korean government. Christina Marie Chapman, 50, was sentenced to 102 months in a federal lockup for an elaborate scheme that involved helping North Korean residents pose as U.S. citizens and helping them get remote IT jobs at 309 American companies, according to the Department of Justice (DOJ). The identities of 68 Americans were stolen in the process. Chapman's scam generated more than $17 million for herself and the government of North Korea and was perpetuated from 2020 to 2023. In furtherance of the operation, Chapman received and hosted laptops in her home from the companies she defrauded, which included a Fortune 500 company, a major TV network, a Silicon Valley tech company and others. Those companies believed they had hired the Americans whose identities Chapman stole. Instead, the workers were North Koreans barred from working in the U.S. According to the DOJ, Chapman shipped 49 devices to a Chinese city that borders North Korea. More than 90 laptops were recovered from her home upon the execution of a search warrant in 2023. She pleaded guilty in February to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, aggravated identity theft and conspiracy to launder monetary instruments. Along with the prison sentence, she is required to forfeit $284,556 that was to be paid to the North Koreans and pay a judgment of $176,850. "North Korea is not just a threat to the homeland from afar. It is an enemy within. It is perpetrating fraud on American citizens, American companies and American banks. It is a threat to Main Street in every sense of the word," U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro said. "The North Korean regime has generated millions of dollars for its nuclear weapons program by victimizing American citizens, businesses and financial institutions," added FBI Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Roman Rozhavsky. "However, even an adversary as sophisticated as the North Korean government can't succeed without the assistance of willing U.S. citizens like Christina Chapman, who was sentenced today for her role in an elaborate scheme to defraud more than 300 American companies by helping North Korean IT workers gain virtual employment and launder the money they earned."

Miami Herald
13 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Miami Beach condemns ‘dehumanizing rhetoric' surrounding Alligator Alcatraz
City commissioners in Miami Beach are condemning the recent barrage of 'rhetoric that dehumanizes immigrants and promotes violence, cruelty and wrongful detention,' particularly surrounding the controversial Everglades detention site known as Alligator Alcatraz. An official statement unanimously approved by the commission on Wednesday said the city's elected leaders on the nonpartisan board felt compelled 'to speak out clearly and unequivocally against the growing use of violent and dehumanizing rhetoric directed at immigrants — rhetoric that threatens the safety, dignity and well-being of thousands of families who call Miami Beach home.' It also rejected 'statements by national leaders' and the promotion of 'hunting down, caging, wrongful detention, or celebrating harm against immigrants, including the use of deadly wildlife such as alligators in the Everglades.' The statement makes Miami Beach one of the first Florida cities to formally oppose Alligator Alcatraz and the national political discourse supporting the detention center. But it comes amid a loudening chorus of criticism from individual political and religious leaders in South Florida. Miami-Dade's top Catholic official, Archbishop Thomas Wenski, earlier this month condemned the rhetoric surrounding Alligator Alcatraz as 'intentionally provocative' and 'corrosive of the common good.' Wenski recently visited the detention facility to pray for detainees held there and has said that 'unbecoming' comments from public officials portraying migrants as prey or criminals are 'making America mean.' Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava has also expressed concerns about the facility. While the Miami Beach City Commission unanimously passed the statement of condemnation, what's officially called a 'resolution,' commissioners did not actually discuss the matter or comment further during the meeting. Sponsored by Commissioners Alex Fernandez and Tanya K. Bhatt, the resolution was endorsed by the city's Hispanic Affairs Committee and immigrant rights groups. Fernandez, the son of an immigrant family, told the Miami Herald on Thursday that the opening of Alligator Alcatraz earlier this month spurred him to draft the resolution. 'The rhetoric has escalated beyond a debate on border policy. There's a conscious effort to dehumanize immigrants. This resolution draws a moral line,' Fernandez said. 'We won't be silent in the face of cruelty. This is a normalization of hate and violent rhetoric.' The Herald has previously reported on the 'gator bait' trope in Florida's history, a Jim Crow-era joke that dehumanized Black people, depicting them as bait to lure and kill alligators. 'Basically, the same kind of anger, the same kind of resentment is now being transferred to immigrants,' historian Marvin Dunn told the Herald. The resolution details comments President Donald Trump made around Alligator Alcatraz as 'echoing historically dangerous language used to justify exclusion and violence' and notes 'the real-life consequences' for local residents. Specifically mentioned was the case of Josué Aguilar Valle, a Honduran immigrant and 2018 Miami Beach High School graduate with no criminal record who was arrested by authorities after an appointment at a Kendall immigration office and deported. Fernandez said it was the first time in recent memory his colleagues on the commission had stood together behind a social issue with 'no questions asked.' 'For months, I've carried the frustration of wanting to do more for those in our community who are afraid to call 911, go to the hospital or use basic city services,' Fernandez said. 'That has been one of the hardest parts of serving as a Hispanic elected official — knowing the limits of what I can legally do, even when in my heart I want to do more.' The Miami Beach resolution carries no legal power, but city officials said it affirmed Miami Beach's values, upholding the dignity of immigrants amid the current climate of fear. 'It opens up the conversation,' said Bhatt, the resolution's co-sponsor, who refuses to use the name Alligator Alcatraz. 'It's offensive to give it a catchy name. Call it what it is — an internment center. It's exactly what we saw in World War II, with the internment of Japanese citizens,' she told the Herald. 'We can't effect change at that facility, but we can exert pressure by empowering people to speak up about what they know is correct.'