At four-years-old, Willoughby is Australia's youngest landlord. Here's why her parents bought her a unit
Mark and Alana Kensley purchased the property for their daughter, a one-bedroom unit in a ritzy Willoughby development on Sydney's north shore, earlier this year.
The couple wanted to support their daughter, also named Willoughby, in getting a foot on the property ladder before she's even started school.
'The market is incredibly tough right now - especially for younger generations,' Mr Kensley told Domain.
'Property prices continue to outpace wage growth, and we just didn't want our daughter facing that same uphill battle in 20 years.'
The couple plan to rent the property out until their daughter celebrates her 18th birthday, at which point they will transfer it into her name.
They opted for a garden-level apartment in the Willoughby Grounds development, where one-bedroom units start about $1million.
Median rent in the area is about $750 a week.
Her parents hope she will live in the apartment while studying or rent it out to fund an overseas trip.
Purchasing the property, located on Willoughby Road, was a full-circle moment for the couple who named their daughter after the suburb where they once lived.
Both said they would not have considered making the investment in the past, when home ownership was more accessible.
Though Willoughby is still coming to grips with the acquisition, her parents claim she has begun telling her friends she is a homeowner.
Last year, the average first home buyer in Sydney and Melbourne was in their mid 30s, according to Digital Data Analytics.
This is about a decade older than the average entrant for both cities in 2004.
However, the Kensleys aren't alone in bucking the trend.
Recently, eight-year-old Ruby McLellan pooled her hard-earned pocket money with her two siblings to help fund the purchase of a four-bedroom home in Victoria.
The trio managed to raise $6,000 towards the deposit, with the rest contributed by their parents.
They purchased the $670,000 home in Clyde, Victoria three years ago and, within two years, it was worth nearly $1million.
Other families have found less extreme ways to assist their youngest members to buy homes.
A recent survey commissioned by real estate agency LJ Hooker found up to 82 per cent of Aussie parents were open to helping their kids buy a property.
LJ Hooker research group head Mathew Tiller said parents wanted their kids to enjoy the same financial security they felt as property owners.
'There are many ways they can go about this, from giving them a cash gift, acting as a co-guarantor, or even letting them stay at the family home rent-free until they have saved a deposit,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Australia politics live: Cheney pushes bill to ban AI child abuse apps; Georgie Purcell announces pregnancy with Labor's Josh Burns
Update: Date: 2025-07-27T21:23:50.000Z Title: Emma McBride Content: The government has said the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) is 'not a bargaining chip' as it introduced legislation to fulfil its election promise of making PBS prescription medicines cheaper. Last week the government announced some regulations would be lifted to allow more beef from the US to be imported to Australia, something the Trump administration had been publicly calling for. Labor said biosecurity laws wouldn't be weakened in the process, and said there was no coincidence in the timing of the ten year review with the US administration's calls. The US pharmaceutical lobby has been calling for the Trump administration to also slap tariffs on the PBS. Assistant minister for mental health, told ABC News Breakfast this morning the government's position that the PBS isn't on the negotiating table, hasn't changed. The PBS is not up for negotiation, it is not a bargaining chip. Labor introduced the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme to make sure that essential medicines were available to all Australians. Update: Date: 2025-07-27T21:23:50.000Z Title: Anthony Albanese Content: The government will progress another of its election commitments this week, introducing legislation into parliament for cheaper medicines on the PBS. Fulfilling a key campaign pledge, the new legislation will mean prescription on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme will be capped at $25 from January. The government has spruiked this as a key cost of living measure, building on a similar measure introduced in 2023. The change will mean a 20% cut in the maximum cost of medications on the PBS, which Labor says will save $200 million per year. Prime minister said: The size of your bank balance shouldn't determine the quality of your healthcare. My Government will continue to deliver cost of living relief for all Australians. Health minister Mark Butler added: Cheaper medicines are good for the hip pocket and good for your health. For general patients medicines haven't been this cheap since 2004. Update: Date: 2025-07-27T21:23:50.000Z Title: MPs Georgie Purcell and Josh Burns announce pregnancy Content: Victorian upper house MP Georgie Purcell has announced she is expecting a baby girl in early 2026 with her partner, federal Labor MP Josh Burns. Purcell, an MLC for the Animal Justice party representing the northern Victorian region, made the announcement on social media on Sunday night and said she will still be contesting the 2026 state election. She wrote: I'll be working right up until the end of the parliamentary year, and I'll return to sitting weeks as usual in February, with every intention to campaign and contest the 2026 election. I am more committed to animals, people and the planet than ever before, and this is just one more path I am choosing. And I am ready to call out any suggestion otherwise. Not just for me, but for everybody else who may face conscious or unconscious bias when choosing to have a career and a family. She also shared that due to her autoimmune condition, she is considered a high-risk pregnancy and will require weekly hospital visits. Purcell said while 'two members from two different parliaments having a baby is a bit unique, and there is bound to be interest in it' they have requested respect and privacy. She wrote: While we are indeed in public life, pregnancy is an incredibly personal experience, so I ask that we're granted respect and privacy just like anybody else (but I do look forward to sharing the parts with you that we are willing to share). Burns also posted on social media: Georgie and I are so excited to share with you that we're expecting a baby girl in the very first few days of 2026. Our little baby already has the most excited and loving big sister in Tia. And she'll have a home full of animals, love, and fun. Next year, my team and I will keep working hard for the community we love, but I also plan on being a present and involved dad every step of the way. The couple made their official public debut at Canberra's 2024 Midwinter Ball. You can read more about them in this profile on Purcell from January: Update: Date: 2025-07-27T21:23:50.000Z Title: Good morning Content: Krishani Dhanji here with you, and we are locked in for another busy sitting week here in Canberra. Independent MP Kate Chaney will introduce a new bill today targeting AI tools that create or facilitate the production of child sexual abuse material. It's not too often you get really happy news around parliament, but Victorian MP Georgie Purcell and federal Labor MP Josh Burns are expecting a baby together. Purcell shared the news on her social media – we'll have more details on that shortly. And the government's childcare bill will continue its passage through parliament this week. Guardian Australia has new data showing the depth of reports of abuse in childcare centres – you can read that report here.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Is THIS the most overpriced semi-detached in Britain? House hunters stunned after couple put three-bed home on sale for £2M over average asking price... but neighbours say it is worth it
A couple have infuriated house hunters online after listing their home for almost £2million over the average sale price of their street. Residents reacted with 'shock' and 'disbelief' after the ordinary looking property in Hove, East Sussex was put on the market for a staggering £2.5million. The asking price for the smartly presented property has caused consternation among potential buyers who have claimed it is 'overpriced.' They claim that although the red-brick home has a sought-after seaside location, it actually backs onto a block of high rise flats and sits on a busy road which has a high crime rate. The owners - who are in their late 80s - bought the property in East Sussex in 2010 for £750,000 but have now put it on the market for more than three times that amount. According to property experts Purple Bricks, the average cost of a house on the street where the couple are looking to sell is £600k. One resident told MailOnline: 'I'm shocked. It's incredible how much house prices have risen in the last 15 years but I'd never expect a house to be on the market for so much - it's a King's ransom. 'It's unbelievable really. I understand it is in a desirable location but this road is very busy all the time and the back garden looks out over the flats - not exactly a beautiful view.' The house sits just 100 yards from the pebble beach. The elderly couple are understood to be selling it so they can downsize away from the seafront. Hove is a well-heeled and desirable location to live where the average price of a detached house is £846,600. Neighbour Barbara Crafts, said: 'They are a lovely couple but they're getting on. 'Although the house only has three bedrooms it is deceptively large and the bedrooms are huge and have walk-in dressing rooms.' Mrs Crafts, who is in her 70s, who lives in a spacious three-bedroom flat on the street, said: 'Although it looks quite ordinary from the front it is a lovely house and very spacious and they've spent some money doing it up. 'I've lived here for around eight years and my children who live up north are always telling me to sell. They tell me I could buy a fantastic property near them for just a fraction.' The house, which boasts a drive and a garage, also has a study, dining room, sitting room, four bathrooms and an attic games and media room. Rachel Dent, a mother-of-two who lives in a two-bedroom flat on the street, said: 'That is an awful lot of money but that house is like a tardis - it is absolutely massive on the inside. There is 250sqm of living space, which is huge. 'It is deceptive as from the outside it looks like it could be in any street in Britain but it goes back a long away and is really very big. It might not have the wow factor on the outside but the inside is a different story.' The property is immaculately turned out inside with a host of homely fittings Viewers checking the online listing questioned how the 'modest' home could command such a high price. One said: 'Those flats overlooking the back would be an instant no for me even if dirt cheap. Half the house is the master suite. Seems unnecessary.' Another said: '£2.5m is insane money for this. Surely its not worth even close to that. Even at half, it would be steep, no?' Another viewer said: 'How much!? And why does that main bedroom need two dressing rooms and such a huge bathroom?! Should have just made one of the dressing rooms a guest room instead.' Yet another said: 'Faaaaar too of property faces west, back faces east. Front faces a row of guest houses/hotels including a God awful 60's(?) 5 story guest house directly opposite. 'Back faces an 11 story block of flats. So, no privacy and no sunlight in the morning or evening.' It's an ambitious asking price, but not the most audacious in recent memory. Last year, a Russian millionaire who tried to sell a London 'council house' for £3.5m was forced to concede defeat and make a drastic u-turn. The ordinary-looking four-bed suburban property had attracted widespread mockery due to its eye-watering price tag when it was listed last year. But owner Lukov Nikolov refused to bow down claiming the fee was justified because he spent £1.4m renovating the property. When MailOnline visited the house, more than a year after it was put on the market, neighbours revealed the wealthy businessman had been forced 'move in himself' after failing to find a buyer. The house was built in the late 1950s and used by police officers relocating to work in London for the Met Police. But in every other respect it's equivalent to nearby council housing in style and size. Despite being unable to find househunters with deep enough pockets, Mr Nikolov then listed another property on the same road for £3m. One resident told MailOnline: 'He's got another one too, just up the road, which has been on the market for a while. 'The [second property] is huge. It's got a basement, a cinema and all the rest of it. They've probably doubled the square footage. 'I think he probably moves between them.' Mr Nikolov bought the first property for £1.2m in 2015 and began to renovate inside. He was able to dig down and create a new spacious basement 'flooded with natural light', which increased the properties' square footage by a third. The home now deceptively spreads over 3650sq ft of interior space and has four floors as well as its own cinema room, which, in the view of Mr Nikolov justified the £2.3million increase in value. Mr Nikolov's second property was bough for the cheaper fee of £878,000 before renovating it too. Properties in Canonbury sold for an overall average price of £934,290 in the last few years, according to RightMove, with the majority of sales being flats, which sold for an average price of £633,512. Terraced properties sold for an average of £1,659,972, with semi-detached properties fetching £3,873,333 - placing Mr Nikolov's property slightly below average.
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
Reaction to US and EU trade deal
TURNBERRY, Scotland, July 27 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday said the United States and the European Union had reached agreement on a trade deal that includes a 15% tariff on EU goods entering the U.S. and significant EU purchases of U.S. energy and military equipment. The deal also calls for $600 billion in investments in the U.S. by the European Union, he told reporters. This follows a U.S. deal with Japan on July 23 that cut tariffs on auto imports and other goods in exchange for a $550 billion package of U.S.-bound investment and loans. Major financial markets were still closed. The euro ended last week around three-week highs at $1.1738, while the STOXX 600 <.STOXX > hit its highest since early June last week as optimism built for an EU/U.S. trading deal. Following are comments from business leaders and companies, and market reaction to the announcement. COMMENTS: MICHAEL BROWN, SENIOR RESEARCH STRATEGIST, PEPPERSTONE, LONDON: "The EU is going to be hit with a 15% tariff which is pretty punchy but it's half of the 30% they were threatened with and it's well off the 50% that Trump had been throwing around at the start of the month so that's good news." "This is more a case of the risk of no deal being removed as opposed to whether it's 15%-20%, I'm not entirely sure that matters so much at least not in terms of how markets are going to trade in an hour or so when things get up and running for the week." "The two obvious reactions that you would expect are upside in the euro and upside in equity futures. I don't think equities in particular needed much of an excuse to rally and now they've got one." ERIC WINOGRAD, CHIEF ECONOMIST, ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN, NEW YORK: "This is very similar to the deal we reached with Japan." "We will need to see how long the sides stick to the deal. From a market perspective, it is reassuring in the sense that having a deal is better than not having a deal." RICK MECKLER, PARTNER, CHERRY LANE INVESTMENTS, NEW VERNON, NEW JERSEY: "It's really in line with the Japan deal, and I assume investors will view it positively as they viewed the Japan deal. The reality is there will be higher tariffs, which may lead to more inflation, depending on how much of it is absorbed by the manufacturers and how much of it is passed on to consumers. I think from the administration's point of view, they probably have begun to address the balance of trade issues. The question remains whether using tariffs as a way to address these imbalances is positive for the global economy or just a tax that helps with jobs here in the U.S."
