
Asian stocks muted, yen calms as BOJ stands pat on rates
The yen was last at 149.33 per dollar, little changed on the day after a choppy initial reaction as policymakers sought to spend more time gauging how mounting economic risks from higher U.S. tariffs could affect Japan's fragile recovery.
Rising odds of the Japanese central bank raising interest rates have helped push the yen 5% higher against the dollar so far this year, with it touching a five-month high of 146.545 per dollar last week.
Having just raised interest rates in January, the BOJ board voted unanimously to maintain the bank's short-term policy rate at 0.5% at a two-day meeting that ended on Wednesday.
"In the end, however, it is a question of 'when' not 'if' the BoJ will hike again," said Fred Neumann, chief Asia economist at HSBC.
"The next move could come as early as June, as more evidence of wage increases trickles in. The uncertain global trade outlook, however, could even push the next BoJ rate hike well into the second half of 2025."
The focus will now be on Governor Kazuo Ueda's post-meeting press conference at 0630 GMT for clues on how soon the bank could next raise rates, a decision complicated by the contrast between benign domestic data and uncertainty caused by U.S. President Donald Trump's trade policies.
Charu Chanana, Saxo's chief investment strategist, said without stronger signals from Ueda, expectations for a May move by the BOJ could weaken, reinforcing near-term yen softness.
Japan's Nikkei was 0.69% higher, staying near the levels it traded at before the decision.
The euro remained close to the five-month high it reached on Tuesday after Germany's parliament approved plans for a significant increase in spending, handing conservative leader and the chancellor-in-waiting Friedrich Merz a huge boost.
Geopolitical tensions escalated as Israeli airstrikes pounded Gaza and killed more than 400 people on Tuesday, shattering nearly two months of relative calm since a ceasefire began, unnerving investors.
Adding to the unease, Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to temporarily stop attacking Ukrainian energy facilities but refrained from endorsing a full 30-day ceasefire.
"While Russia-Ukraine ceasefire talks are ongoing, most feel that we're no closer to anything truly tangible and a lasting agreement," said Chris Weston, head of research at Pepperstone.
That left investor sentiment fragile and market moves muted, with MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan down 0.11%.
Indonesian shares swung between gains and losses in choppy trading on Wednesday, a day after the stock market there clocked its sharpest fall in nearly three years on Tuesday, on concerns over the government's fiscal strategy.
U.S. stocks fell sharply on Tuesday as investors exercised caution ahead of a monetary policy decision from the Federal Reserve, while gauging the potential impact of Trump's tariff policies.
FED UP NEXT
The BOJ's decision came hours before the policy decision from the Fed, where the U.S. central bank is expected to hold interest rates steady. The focus will be on new economic projections from policymakers as well as comments from Fed Chair Jerome Powell.
The dollar index, which measures the U.S. currency against six rivals, was steady at 103.34, hovering near the five-month low it touched in the previous session.
"The Fed, just like the market, desperately needs some visibility on trade, tariffs and overall policies, and we expect Powell to avoid ifs and buts and instead continue to advocate for a data-dependent approach," said Julien Lafargue, chief market strategist at Barclays Private Bank and Wealth Management.
Traders are pricing in 58 basis points of easing this year from the Fed, with the first cut fully priced in for July, LSEG data showed.
In commodities, Brent crude futures eased 0.24% to $70.39 a barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude slipped 0.2% to $66.75 in early trading.
Gold prices eased to $3,029 per ounce, just below the record high touched on Tuesday as geopolitical jitters led to safe-haven flows. (Reporting by Ankur Banerjee in Singapore; Editing by Jacqueline Wong and Jamie Freed)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Etihad
4 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Fundamentals of GCC policy on conflicts in Middle East
22 July 2025 00:27 MARIAM MOHAMED ALJNEIBIThe columnist is a writer with the think-tank firm TRENDS Research & AdvisoryThe Middle East continues to face a web of overlapping tensions that shape its political and security landscape. While the risk of escalation remains real, these challenges also present an opportunity for regional actors to promote dialogue and Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries have adopted a measured approach rooted in neutrality, balanced diplomacy, and a commitment to international law. They maintain relations with all parties involved in regional disputes – and internationally, too – while rejecting any attempts to impose dominance through diplomatic efforts, the Gulf states continue to enhance their security readiness, contributing to broader regional and global initiatives aimed at de-escalation. Their refusal to engage in retaliatory military action reflects a deliberate choice to prevent further in Gaza, Lebanon and Israeli-Iranian tensions are stark reminders of the volatility. For the Gulf states, geographic proximity makes the stakes especially high. Their populations and economies are directly exposed to the fallout of any navigating these interconnected challenges, the GCC's consistent focus on diplomacy and stability offers a pragmatic path in a region often at risk of spiraling deeper into conflict in any part of the region can send shockwaves across the entire Middle East and may drag in actors with no direct stake in the original dispute. This is particularly true when global economic interests are at risk or when armed proxy groups resort to violence under the pretext of linking the interests of one party to another. Such dynamics endanger critical infrastructure, including energy facilities, civilian sites, industrial zones, and logistical networks, while disrupting transportation and trade position of GCC states is based on a fundamental pillar, which is maintaining security and stability. The region cannot afford further attrition, having already endured a series of wars that impeded its economic development. For this reason, Gulf countries prioritise building and the use of state resources for growth and sustainable amid complex regional dynamics and ongoing conflicts, they remain committed to advancing prosperity and improving the quality of life for their people, with a clear and ambitious outlook towards the this focus on development, Gulf countries use their foreign policies as tools to defuse conflict zones, diversify their alliances with Eastern and Western partners, and intensify diplomatic efforts to contain the scope of conflict in the Middle such as the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Oman often lead de-escalation efforts through regional and international mediation, seeking calm and stability to facilitate the success of economic diversification plans and to ensure peace, security, business, trade, tourism and GCC does not shy away from thorny issues or obstacles. They actively pursue every opportunity to stabilise the region, whether through economic partnership agreements or reconciliation with regional actors, in pursuit of calm and also apply diplomatic pressure where needed to secure both immediate and long-term gains for the Arab region. This approach has enabled improved economic relations without having to align with one axis against GCC countries engage in negotiations and mediation on complex issues, but they firmly refuse to be a party to any armed conflict, directly or indirectly. They will not allow any party to use their territory, airspace, or waters to launch aggression against another country, while reserving the right to self-defence and the protection of their lands, people, infrastructure and economic assets from any form of balanced position of the GCC countries, which is rooted in respect for sovereignty and a desire to calm conflicts and wars in the Middle East, is built on clear criteria for stability. It reflects a form of active neutrality, rejecting engagement in conflict and favouring diplomatic solutions. In addition to that, Gulf countries recognise the urgency of diversifying energy export routes to reduce risks, strengthening their domestic front, maintaining strategic balance with wisdom, and deepening joint Gulf coordination until a comprehensive regional and security cooperation framework for the Middle East is established. Source: Aletihad - Abu Dhabi


Gulf Today
5 hours ago
- Gulf Today
California can fix Donald Trump's EV mistake
Mike Murphy, Tribune News Service When he signed his budget bill into law on July 4, President Donald Trump dealt a heavy blow to America's electric vehicle industry, ending most federal support for US electric vehicle manufacturing and hobbling automakers' $100 billion effort to catch up with China, the world's new automotive manufacturing superpower. Now California alone has the size and market power to fill the void left by Washington's surrender. Our leaders in Sacramento must step up. The gutting of EV support never got the national debate it deserved. Americans, including many in Congress, fail to see the real EV issue: China. As the world moves toward a future auto market dominated by electric vehicles — a reality no global auto executive doubts — China has seized the opportunity. It's China, not the United States, the European Union or Japan, that now rules global automotive manufacturing. For every car, SUV or pickup built in America, China builds about three, and the Chinese have the manufacturing muscle to build five. Detroit understands this. Along with their European and Asian peers, US automakers have invested tens of billions in North American factories to build the next generation of EVs and compete in global markets. This month at the Aspen Ideas Festival, Ford Chief Executive Jim Farley put it bluntly: 'If we lose this (the race for EVs), we do not have a future Ford.' Unfortunately, the Trump administration is forcing free-world automakers to race against China at a disadvantage. Chinese automakers, awash in government help and subsidies, now manufacture 70% of the world's EVs. Their advanced, low-priced cars are quickly taking market share in Australia, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East. Mexico is a sobering example. In 2017, 1% of Mexican cars came from China. Last year that number was 20%. Despite China's success, have no doubt that US, European, South Korean and Japanese automakers can compete. Much of the EV technology that the Chinese have exploited was first developed in the United States. Although China has more than 100 EV brands, only a handful are profitable; many will fade away. For America and its allies to compete in this race, carmakers must succeed in their anchor American market. (Remember, most foreign car companies — Hyundai, Kia, BMW, Volkswagen and Mercedes — build EVs in the United States, employing thousands of Americans.) What makes California so important? First, it's America's EV leader; over a third of all US EV sales are here; 1 in 4 cars sold in California is electric. Second, California is on the front line of the US auto industry's research and development battle with China. Lucid developed its world-class power train technology in Orange County. Rivian, in Irvine, licensed its world-class software and electrical architecture to Volkswagen for billions. Tesla has two large factories and several labs here, employing more than 40,000 workers. Ford, the pride of Detroit, has bet the company's future on a California skunkworks, where hundreds of engineers are working on a new, affordable EV platform designed to compete worldwide. What can California do to fill the massive void in EV support left by Washington? Plenty. Here are three priorities: Until Sept. 30, buying or leasing a new EV still qualifies for a $7,500 federal credit. When that ends, California should replace it with a $3,500 state credit to lower most lease payments by nearly $100 a month (as any auto salesman knows, consumers make their decisions based more on monthly payments, not total cost.) The $3,500 credit should also apply to used EV sales. The state has a tangle of consumer EV subsidies; this simple approach should replace them. To control costs to taxpayers, lawmakers could make these 'conquest' credits — that is, they would be limited to first-time EV buyers and leasers. This program should not have income limits. The more new EV drivers the better because data show that most consumers happily stick with EVs once they have leased or bought one. Income limits would simply limit sales volume. Many Californians in large metropolitan areas such as LA or San Francisco live in apartments or condos without the convenience and cost savings of overnight charging. Instead, they are often forced to wait in line at fast-charging stations, where electricity prices are usually higher than at home. This lack of apartment and condo chargers is a 'pinch point' in the EV market that California could take the lead in solving.


Gulf Today
5 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Ryanair's profit more than doubled in April
Ryanair's net profit more than doubled in its April-June quarter on higher-than-expected last-minute fares and the timing of the Easter holidays, while bookings for rest of the summer are 'robust', Europe's largest low-cost carrier said on Monday. The Irish airline, Europe's largest by passenger numbers, said it was not seeing a negative trend of later-than-normal bookings reported by some rivals. 'Across the piece, bookings are good,' Chief Financial Officer Neil Sorahan said, describing consumer confidence as 'very strong.' Shares in the airline were up 6.5 per cent at 24.58 euros at 0725 GMT, just below the all-time high of 24.98 recorded on July 8. Ryanair reported a net profit of 820 million euros ($953 million) for its first quarter, which ended on June 30, up from 360 million euros in the same period last year when Easter was in March - and up from 663 million in the same period of 2023, the last time Easter was in April. A Ryanair poll of analysts had expected 716 million euros. Average fares rose 21% in the quarter, more than recovering the 15% fall recorded in the period last year. In the July-September quarter, when European airlines make most of their profit, Ryanair expects to recover 'almost all' of the 7 per cent fare decline seen last year, when it was hit by weak consumer sentiment and a dispute with some online travel agents. In June, Ryanair forecast that 'some of' the 7 per cent would be recovered. Asked about recent commentary from British low-cost rivals EasyJet and Jet2 that customers were booking later, Sorahan said: 'We're not seeing those kind of trends at all.' Rivals are likely seeing a negative impact from the resolution of Ryanair's dispute with online travel agents, he said. Reuters