Child dies as measles cases surge at Liverpool hospital
The individual was being treated at Alder Hey Children's Hospital after becoming ill with measles and other health problems.
It comes as the NHS hospital said it is "concerned" about the increasing number of children and young people who are contracting the highly contagious virus.
It said it has treated 17 cases for effects and complications of measles since June.
"We are concerned about the increasing number of children and young people who are contracting measles. Measles is a highly contagious viral illness which can cause children to be seriously unwell, requiring hospital treatment, and in rare cases, death," the hospital said in a statement to Sky News.
In a separate open letter to parents and carers in Merseyside earlier this month, Alder Hey, along with the UK Health and Security Agency (UKHSA) and directors of Public Health for Liverpool, Sefton and Knowsley, warned the increase in in the region could be down to fewer people getting vaccinated.
The letter read: "We are seeing more cases of measles in our children and young people because fewer people are having the MMR vaccine, which protects against measles and two other viruses called mumps and rubella.
"Children in hospital, who are very poorly for another reason, are at higher risk of catching the virus."
It comes after a Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) report released earlier this month determined that uptake of vaccines in the UK has stalled over the last decade and is, in many cases, declining.
It said none of the routine childhood vaccinations have met the 95% coverage target since 2021, putting youngsters at risk of measles, meningitis and whooping cough.
The MMR vaccine has been available through the NHS for years. Two doses gives lifelong protection against measles, mumps and rubella.
According to the , Liverpool was one of the cities outside London with the lowest uptake of the MMR vaccination in 2023-2024.
By the time children were five years old, 86.5% had been give one dose, decreasing to 73.4% for a second dose.
'Lack of access' behind declining vaccine uptake
Helen Bedford, a professor of children's health at the UCL Great Ormond Street Institute, told Sky News a combination of things may be stopping parents from getting their children vaccinated.
"It is mainly due to lack of access," Professor Bedford said.
"People may not know when vaccines are due, how to make an appointment, then there's actually getting to the appointment.
"For some parents who are suffering the impact of poverty, paying a bus fare to get your child to a GP surgery may be a step too far, even though they understand vaccination is very important."
Professor Bedford added since the COVID pandemic, more parents are asking questions about vaccinations, which can lead to them searching the internet for answers.
"We want parents to ask questions but unfortunately due to lack of personnel and health visitors, they can't always get answers or even an opportunity to have a discussion," she said.
"That's when they turn to other sources of information, like social media or the internet, where we know there is a lot of disinformation."
Professor Bedford said she was "very concerned" about the lack of vaccine uptake, but stressed the figures can be reversed.
Read more from Sky News:
Similar concerns in US
In the US, measles cases are at their highest in more than three decades.
Cases reached 1,288 on Wednesday this week, according to the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, with 14 states battling active outbreaks.
The largest outbreak started five months ago in communities in West Texas, where vaccination uptake is low. Since then, three people have died - including two children in Texas and an adult in New Mexico - with dozens more in hospital.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Burnout: It's A Systemic Signal And A Call To Lead Differently
Dr. Sunil Kumar, Lifestyle Medicine Physician, Executive Health Coach & Burnout Reset Expert. Creator of the PREP™ Protocol. Burnout is often misunderstood as a personal weakness. It's a predictable response to sustained, unmanaged stress in environments that deplete more than they replenish. It is not a sign of incompetence, but a signal, a flashing warning light on the dashboard of modern professional life. As a physician, executive health coach and founder of the PREP Protocol, I've witnessed the toll burnout takes on brilliant, committed individuals. From hospital corridors to corporate boardrooms, high achievers are quietly burning out while systems mistake performance for well-being, until it's too late. The solution is not just resilience training or time off. It's a shift in how we define health, leadership and productivity. It starts with recognizing burnout for what it is: a systemic issue, not a personal flaw. The Scale Of The Problem The World Health Organization defines burnout as an occupational phenomenon, marked by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and reduced professional efficacy. It's not just a healthcare problem. Gallup research from 2020 shows that 76% of employees experience burnout at least sometimes, with 28% reporting it 'very often' or 'always.' In the U.K.'s National Health Service (NHS), burnout is a leading cause of long-term sickness absence, with stress-related leave costing billions annually. Globally, it's linked to rising turnover, lower engagement and increased medical errors. Yet despite the data, most responses remain surface-level: wellness webinars, gym discounts or mindfulness apps—all useful but insufficient when the root cause lies deeper. The Burnout Fallacy: Blaming The Individual Too often, burnout is framed as an individual failure: a time-management issue, a lack of gratitude or poor emotional regulation. The truth? People aren't burning out because they're weak—they're burning out because they're doing too much, with too little recovery, in systems that reward overextension. We don't need to fix the people. We need to fix the culture. That means addressing the deeper drivers: • Chronic overwork and poor boundaries • Lack of autonomy and misaligned values • Toxic leadership and unspoken expectations • Emotional suppression and disconnection from purpose A New Model: The PREP Protocol In response, I created the PREP Protocol—a four-phase system designed to prevent, navigate and recover from burnout. It integrates the science of lifestyle medicine, behavioral psychology, neuroscience and coaching. This phase is about early detection and proactive resilience. We use validated tools to assess energy levels, stress response and signs of overload. Micro-habits such as sleep hygiene, circadian rhythm alignment, breathwork and digital boundaries are introduced to build a personal "energy bank." Burnout affects the nervous system, not just the mind. In this phase, we address maladaptive coping mechanisms (like overworking, emotional detachment or addictive behaviours) and introduce cognitive restructuring, somatic regulation and trauma-informed strategies. Tools like heart rate variability tracking and polyvagal practices support nervous system healing. This phase focuses on rediscovering purpose, meaning and identity. Often, burnout disconnects us from why we started. We use coaching techniques to realign personal values, strengthen emotional intelligence and rebuild healthy relationships. Reflection, storytelling and journaling tools help clients reconnect with their deeper 'why.' Burnout recovery isn't just about rest—it's about redesign. This final phase is about creating rhythms that support long-term, sustainable performance. Techniques include energy mapping, time-blocking and redefining success beyond metrics. Clients learn to live and lead in alignment with their values, not just their to-do lists. The Science Behind It The PREP model is rooted in evidence. For example: • Sleep And Stress: Chronic sleep deprivation is linked to hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation, a key factor in burnout. • Purpose And Longevity: Studies show that having a strong sense of purpose is associated with a lower risk of stroke, depression and mortality. • Autonomic Recovery: Somatic practices like diaphragmatic breathing, grounding and heart-focused meditation have been shown to restore vagal tone and reduce cortisol levels. The integration of lifestyle medicine principles such as nutrition, movement, social connection, stress mastery and restorative sleep is no longer optional. It's essential to recovering health and sustaining performance. Leadership's Role: Culture Is The Cure Leaders often ask: What can I do to prevent burnout on my team? Start here: • Model Boundaries: Don't glorify overwork. Celebrate recovery. • Encourage Psychological Safety: Create space for difficult conversations. • Align Work With Values: People need meaning, not just tasks. • Prioritize Well-Being Infrastructure: Build it into the workflow, not after-hours. Burnout-proofing isn't a luxury. It's a strategic imperative for retention, creativity and trust. From Burnout To Balance: A New Definition Of Success We need to move from hustle to health. From output to impact. From burnout to balance. True success isn't constant productivity—it's aligned contribution. It's when your work sustains you instead of draining you. When your calendar reflects your values and your energy matches your mission. That's the future we're building, one professional, one organization, one reset at a time. Final Thoughts If you're burned out, know this: You are not broken. You are responding intelligently to a system that was never designed for your well-being. Burnout is not your identity. It's your feedback. And feedback is the beginning of change. Let's stop asking people to be more resilient in toxic systems. Let's create systems that no longer make people sick. Forbes Coaches Council is an invitation-only community for leading business and career coaches. Do I qualify?


Vogue
an hour ago
- Vogue
Why 'Blue Space' Might Be the Secret to Health and Happiness
It's 3 p.m. and I am lying on my belly in the powder-soft sand on East Runton beach in Norfolk, England. A few steps away lie the rock pools—clusters of stone slick with neon-green seaweed, translucent shrimp darting between oily bladder wrack and ice-clear water reflecting the sun. Beyond that is the main event: the big blue sea, which is making great crunching sounds as the waves stretch and yawn. Later, I submerge myself, the water lukewarm and aqua-colored, salt and magnesium clinging to my skin. Wait, maybe this is how I should be living, I think dozily, just like every other Londoner as soon as they experience the good life for a fraction of a second. Maybe I've been getting it all wrong? It's no secret that the sea—being in it, by it, near it—has long been considered beneficial for our overall health. There's a reason that, in the 18th century, before things like SSRIs and therapy, women suffering from 'hysteria', a catch-all phrase for 'feeling bad', would be sent to coastal locales as a remedy. And we also just know anecdotally, don't we? After my recent weekend by the sea, I felt happier and healthier than I had done in months. My cortisol levels lowered, my skin cleared up, and I actually caught up on sleep without bolting awake at 7 a.m. with an unspecific feeling of unease. But why is the sea so healthy for us? And what does it say about how we should be living? The mental health benefits of being by water are well-documented. One extensive 2013 study on the effects of nature on happiness found that those living on the coast, or near bodies of water, otherwise known as 'blue spaces', were the happiest of all. Another 2016 study found that living near blue spaces lowered psychological distress. A more recent 2019 study found that, among low-earning households, those living in close proximity to the coast experienced better mental health than those who didn't. In fact, every study on the subject has pointed to the idea that even just seeing water—that brilliant blue, spread out and glistening—can make us feel less stressed. Sometimes even less stressed than green spaces—forests, etc—alone. The actual why is a little more complicated and multi-layered. One 2013 study found that the sound of waves relaxed people more than soothing music, so perhaps that is what's having an effect. On the flip-side, the World Health Organization cites traffic noise such as road, rail and air traffic as the second most important cause of ill health in western Europe behind air pollution. So it would make sense that the reverse—the absence of traffic noise—would have a favorable impact. And let's not forget that something as simple as fresh air, naturally high in oxygen and in abundance by the sea, has long been linked to better mental health more generally.


Medscape
2 hours ago
- Medscape
ILD Survival Differs Despite Similar CT Patterns
TOPLINE: Despite patients sharing a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on lung CT scans, patients with connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) demonstrated a slower decline in lung function and longer transplant-free survival than those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, varying results were reported for those with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP). METHODOLOGY: Researchers assessed whether the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) and transplant-free survival differ among patients with any major subtype of ILD despite sharing a similar UIP pattern on CT. They analyzed data of 860 patients (median follow-up duration, 18.6 months) from a PF registry and 1578 patients (median follow-up duration, 17.9 months) patients from a meta-cohort of ILD research studies; the patients were primarily from the US and UK who were diagnosed with either IPF, FHP, or CTD-ILD. CT was performed and based on the fibrotic pattern, patients were categorized into five groups: IPF (reference), FHP without a UIP pattern, FHP with a UIP pattern, CTD without a UIP pattern, and CTD with a UIP pattern. The annual rate of decline in FVC and 5-year transplant-free survival were determined. TAKEAWAY: Patients with CTD-ILD with a UIP CT pattern showed a significantly slower rate of decline in FVC than those with IPF in both the registry cohort (-34.4 vs -158.4 mL/y; P = .008) and meta-cohort (-53.1 vs -185.9 mL/y; P < .0001). In the registry cohort, patients with CTD-ILD with (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29-0.85) and without (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17-0.45) a UIP CT pattern had a lower risk for 5-year transplant-free mortality than those with IPF. This finding was also true for the meta-cohort. In both cohorts, the rate of decline in FVC in patients with FHP with a UIP CT pattern did not significantly differ from that in patients with IPF. However, those with FHP without a UIP CT pattern showed a slower rate of decline in FVC in the meta-cohort. Patients with FHP without a UIP CT pattern demonstrated a significantly better rate of transplant-free survival than those with IPF in both cohorts, while those with a UIP pattern showed improved survival only in the meta-cohort. IN PRACTICE: 'Our findings may have important clinical implications and argue against extrapolating clinical outcomes of IPF to other ILDs with a UIP CT pattern, particularly when estimating prognosis or devising management plans,' the authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by John S. Kim, MD, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia. It was published online on June 8, 2025 in Thorax. LIMITATIONS: The PFF-PR cohort had a considerably smaller FHP-UIP subgroup, potentially limiting the statistical power for FHP analyses. The research cohorts had uneven proportions of patients with ILD subtypes, potentially affecting the replication of the findings. Most participants self-identified as White and were from the US, introducing potential selection bias and limiting generalizability. DISCLOSURES: The study did not receive any specific funding. The lead author was supported by grants from the National Institute of Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Multiple authors disclosed receiving consulting fees, speaker honoraria, personal fees, grants, and research support from and having other ties with various pharmaceutical companies, including Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche/Genentech, and others. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.