Countries should act unilaterally in recognizing Palestine
In the tangled web of geopolitics and moral responsibility, recognition of Palestine stands today not merely as a diplomatic choice, but as a litmus test of integrity, courage, and commitment to global justice. As the world watches yet another cycle of suffering unfold, it is time to call out the procrastinators, praise the bold, and demand that the international community act unilaterally in embracing the two-state solution — starting with the immediate recognition of Palestine.
The UK's recent stance — threatening to recognize Palestine if Israel fails to meet certain conditions — encapsulates the paradox of delayed justice. 'Too little, too late' is apt for a nation that played a pivotal role in creating the current geopolitical landscape. Yet, 'better late than never' is equally valid if London finally chooses to right historical wrongs. Former colonial powers such as Britain and France share a legacy of deep entanglement in the Middle East, and the latter's courageous move to recognize Palestine deserves both praise and emulation.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warns that recognition of Palestine equates to rewarding Hamas — a curious argument, given that his government's long-term policies over more than 16 years have emboldened the very group he now seeks to vilify. Netanyahu's devious support for Hamas is well-documented. 'For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it's blown up in our faces,' read a headline in The Times of Israel in the immediate aftermath of the horrible Oct. 7 attacks. In 2019, the Israeli leader reportedly said: 'Those who want to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state should support the strengthening of Hamas.'
Peace, prosperity, and progress are within reach.
Faisal J. Abbas | Editor-in-Chief
Recognition is not about legitimizing terrorism. It is about affirming the rights of millions of Palestinians who have nothing to do with Hamas, and have endured statelessness, displacement, and daily suffering. It is about offering a framework for peace that includes Israelis, who also deserve security and stability. Not to mention ending the illegal occupation of Palestinian lands, as stipulated by the UN — an organization Israel is a member of but does not seem to respect.
Whether Netanyahu and his coalition of far-right nationalists accept it or not, the two-state solution remains Israel's safest path forward — both in terms of regional normalization and long-term peace. Saudi Arabia has repeatedly signaled that full normalization is contingent upon the creation of a Palestinian state. The Arab and Muslim worlds are prepared to integrate Israel into a region brimming with economic potential and strategic value. Peace, prosperity, and progress are within reach — if only the leadership dares grasp it.
Sadly, many in Israel's current ruling elite remain ideologically opposed to any peaceful settlement. These are individuals who have overseen West Bank annexations, weaponized hunger, and now face accusations of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Their worldview is not anchored in coexistence; it thrives on perpetual conflict and expansionism. For them, any compromise — even one that could save lives — is tantamount to betrayal.
Let us not forget that these are elected officials who have, without remorse, described the people of Gaza as 'human animals,' called for nuclear strikes, and openly encouraged mass displacement. When such rhetoric becomes policy, and cruelty is cloaked in nationalism, the moral compass of governance is not just broken — it is weaponized.
This is no longer about diplomacy — it is about justice.
Faisal J. Abbas | Editor-in-Chief
That is why the global community, especially nations untainted by historical baggage, must act. A coalition spearheaded by Saudi Arabia and France, embracing the two-state solution through unilateral recognition of Palestine, is the only viable path forward. Waiting for consensus or negotiating around extremists only prolongs the suffering. This is no longer about diplomacy — it is about justice.
Now, more than ever, the stars seem aligned. Hamas and Hezbollah are weakened. Iran is notably quiet. We have a US president who is focused on negotiating peace deals between Ukraine and Russia, India and Pakistan, and Thailand and Cambodia. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman happens to be leading Saudi Arabia and has emerged as a pragmatic regional leader with transformative ambitions. This is a historic window to reimagine the Middle East not as a perennial battleground, but as the next Europe — a region of stability, trade, cooperation, and cultural exchange.
In the end, recognition of Palestine is not an act of defiance; it is a pledge to uphold human dignity. It is a call to end decades of suffering, and a step toward a future where Israelis and Palestinians can live not just side by side, but as equal partners in peace.
History won't wait. Neither should we.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
24 minutes ago
- Arab News
GHF aid system in Gaza is a ‘scandal, and shameful' says French foreign minister
NICOSIA: France's foreign minister said on Thursday a US and Israel-backed aid distribution system in Gaza had generated a 'bloodbath' and had to cease activity. 'I want to call for the cessation of the activities of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the militarised distribution of humanitarian aid that has generated a bloodbath in distribution lines in Gaza, which is a scandal, which is shameful, and has to stop,' Foreign and European Affairs Minister Jean-Noel Barrot told reporters after meeting his Cyprus counterpart in Nicosia. A global hunger monitor said on Tuesday that a famine scenario was unfolding in the Gaza Strip, with malnutrition soaring, children under five dying of hunger-related causes and humanitarian access severely restricted. The UN estimates that Israeli forces have killed more than 1,000 people seeking food since May, most near militarised distribution sites of the GHF, which employs a US logistics firm run by a former CIA officer and armed US veterans. The GHF denies that there have been deadly incidents at its sites, and says the deadliest have been near other aid convoys. The Israeli military has acknowledged that civilians have been harmed by its gunfire near distribution centers, and says its forces have now received better instructions. Israel accuses Hamas fighters of stealing aid — which the militants deny — and the UN of failing to prevent it. The UN says it has not seen evidence of Hamas diverting much aid. Hamas accuses Israel of causing starvation and using aid as a weapon. Barrot said France would carry out four humanitarian flights carrying 10 tons each of aid from Friday into Gaza in cooperation with Jordan. Cyprus was briefly a staging point for about 22,000 tons of pre-screened aid sent to Gaza by sea in 2024 via a short-lived US-built landing jetty. Some 1,200 tons of aid is still on the island, awaiting delivery when conditions allow, Cypriot Foreign Minister Constantinos Kombos said.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Syria's top diplomat expected to meet Russia's Putin: Sources
Syria's Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani is expected to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday, according to Al Arabiya sources. Al-Shaibani is on an official visit to Moscow, the first by the new government following the toppling of longtime Russian ally Bashar al-Assad in December. Al-Shaibani earlier on Thursday met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. Lavrov said Moscow hoped that Syria's new President Ahmed al-Sharaa would attend a summit between Russia and Arab League member states in Moscow in October.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Global push for Palestinian statehood renews debate over two-state solution
A growing number of countries announcing plans to recognize a Palestinian state has stirred once again the debate over a two-state solution to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. An independent Palestinian state living in peace side by side with Israel is the only way to end the decades-long conflict and the ongoing Israel-Hamas war, a Two-State Solution Conference held in New York, said in a statement. This is the idea of bringing peace through the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel in territory Israel captured in the 1967 six-day war. But it has long faced obstacles which have only grown with time. These include increasing Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank, primary issues including borders, the fate of Palestinian refugees and the status of Jerusalem. What is a two-state solution? The two-state solution, proposed by the Oslo Accords, was born out of a series of historical events. After the fall of the Ottoman Empire, Jews – seeking refuge from European antisemitism and claiming biblical ties to the land – and local Arab population, both claimed the right to self-determination in historical Palestine. When conflict broke out between the two groups, the UN proposed partitioning the territory into separate Jewish and Arab states. Jerusalem would remain under international control according to the proposition. Jewish leaders accepted the plan, which gave them 56 percent of the land. The Arab League rejected it. On May 14, 1948, Israel declared independence. The next day, five Arab nations launched an attack with forces from Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. By the end of the war, Israel took control of 77 percent of the territory. The war until today is remembered as 'the Nakba' meaning catastrophe because of the mass displacement of Palestinians and many becoming refugees in neighboring countries and Palestinian territories. Then in the 1967 six-day war, Israel seized the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, from Jordan and Gaza from Egypt. Today, 3.5 million Palestinians live as refugees in the region, 5.5 million reside in territories occupied by Israel since 1967, and 2 million are Israeli citizens. Despite recognition from 147 UN member states, Palestine is not a full UN member, leaving most Palestinians without recognized statehood. What would Palestine look like under the two-state solution? Advocates of the two-state solution have proposed establishing a Palestinian state comprising the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, connected by a land corridor running through Israel. About 20 years ago, former Israeli and Palestinian negotiators outlined a detailed plan known as the Geneva Accord. The proposal included mutual recognition of West Jerusalem's Jewish areas as Israel's capital and East Jerusalem's Arab areas as the capital of Palestine. It also envisioned a demilitarized Palestinian state. Under the plan, Israel would formally annex major settlement blocs while exchanging other land, and Israeli settlers living in areas designated as part of the future Palestinian state would be relocated. What does recognizing an independent Palestinian state mean? Recognition of a state is only symbolic, but it sends a clear message about the international community's standing on the Israeli Palestinian conflict. The world recognizing a Palestinian state would mean that a 'rising proportion of the international community wants to see commitment to a national future for the Palestinians, and that even Israel's closest allies believe that is more in Israel's own interests than a future of war on all sides,' writes Bronwen Maddox, Director and Chief Executive of UK think tank Chatham House. While dozens of countries have recognized a Palestinians' right to statehood and major western powers such as France and Canada announced plans to do so at the UN General Assembly in September, its impact remains to be seen. Meanwhile, the UK has said it will do so in September unless Israel takes steps to ease the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and commit to a peace process. Even so, their recognition would mark a significant accomplishment for the Palestinians, who believe it confers international legitimacy on their struggle. Although 147 of the 193 UN member states already recognize Palestine as a state, it is not itself a UN member, meaning most Palestinians are not recognized by the world body as citizens of any state. The UN General Assembly approved the de facto recognition of a sovereign state of Palestine in November 2012 by upgrading the Palestinians' observer status at the world body to 'non-member state' from 'entity.' Is a two-state solution possible? Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu leads the most right-wing government in the country's history, which includes religious nationalist factions backed by settler communities. One of its key figures, far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, has openly denied the existence of a Palestinian people. On July 7, Netanyahu stated he seeks peace with the Palestinians but argued that an independent Palestinian state could threaten Israel's security, insisting that Israel must retain overall security control. Israel also condemned France, UK and Canada for announcing their intentions to recognize a Palestinian state soon. The country's foreign ministry said in a post on X: 'The shift in the British Government's position at this time, following the French move and internal political pressures, constitutes a reward for Hamas and harms efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza and a framework for the release of hostages.' Netanyahu has strongly condemned France, saying recognizing a Palestinian state now would be a 'launch pad to annihilate Israel – not to live in peace beside it.' The United States, Israel's closest ally, has brushed off the European push on Palestinian recognition. President Donald Trump's administration boycotted the Two-State Conference. Meanwhile, there are several criteria under the Montevideo Convention of 1933 before Palestine can be recognized as a sovereign state under international law. The process requires a state to have a permanent population, a clearly defined geographical region with established boundaries, a functioning government capable of enforcing laws, and the capacity to establish diplomatic ties and uphold international relations with other sovereign states.
