Did America's Bunker-Busting Bombs Really Fail At Iran's Fordow? Tapped Iranian Calls Reveal A Different Story
This was not the first red flag. A classified report circulating within the Pentagon had already raised doubts. The preliminary assessment, leaked to select intelligence insiders, warned that the attacks may have only delayed Iran's nuclear capabilities by months. Not destroyed them. Not dismantled. Just delayed.
The intercepted Iranian chatter, now verified by four sources familiar with U.S. intelligence briefings, paints a chilling picture. Iranian officials, speaking in private, reportedly claimed the actual impact of the U.S. airstrikes was far less than expected. They said Fordow withstood the shock. They said the core of the programme might still be intact.
But that claim raises a question – are the Iranians bluffing? Or are they exposing a truth the United States is not ready to admit?
A U.S. intelligence official, speaking to The Washington Post on background, warned against taking the Iranian chatter at face value. Signal intelligence, he said, often shows only fragments. 'It is not the full picture,' the publication has quoted the source as saying.
This discussion has now spilled into political corridors. President Donald Trump doubled down and insisted the Iranian nuclear programme was 'totally obliterated'. His claims became rallying cries for his supporters. But within military circles, there is caution. Some top officers even admitted that it may take weeks and months to assess what really did take damage, which is buried under hundreds of feet of reinforced concrete.
His words have become a rallying cry for his supporters. Yet inside military circles, caution remains. Some top officials admit that assessing damage buried under hundreds of feet of reinforced concrete may take weeks, if not months.
The White House, meanwhile, issued a rebuttal to the story. Press Secretary Carolyn dismissed the report as 'nonsense'. 'How would anonymous Iranian officials know what is buried beneath hundreds of feet of rubble? Their nuclear programme is finished. Period,' she said.
And yet, the lingering uncertainty remains. If Fordow survived, even partially, it would raise questions for both U.S. intelligence credibility and the effectiveness of its most advanced bunker-busting weapons.
One thing is clear that something did not go as planned. And the world may not know the whole truth for a long time.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Russia-Ukraine war: Donald Trump pauses key weapons shipments to Kyiv; says 'decision made to put America's interests first'
US President Donald Trump - File Image The US on Tuesday announced that it would suspend certain crucial arms deliveries to Ukraine, previously pledged under President Biden's administration, potentially impacting Kyiv's defence against Russian aggression. "This decision was made to put America's interests first following a DOD (department of defense) review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries across the globe," White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said in a statement, AFP reported. The Biden administration's previous commitments of munitions to Ukraine have been paused under President Donald Trump's leadership, following defence department assessments of US stockpiles and shifting priorities. This follows Trump's recent directive for US missile strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. A US official, speaking anonymously, revealed that Pentagon reviews found insufficient stocks of certain promised weapons, leading to the cancellation of some planned deliveries. The specific weapons affected remain undisclosed. Spokesman Sean Parnell emphasised US military readiness, noting that pending legislation would enhance defence capabilities against contemporary threats. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo This suspension of US weapons support impacts Ukraine during intensified Russian aerial attacks, complicating Trump-backed peace initiatives. Diplomatic discussions have ceased. The US has delivered over $66 billion in military support to Ukraine since Russia's February 2022 invasion. At the Nato summit, Trump discussed potential Patriot air defence missile system deliveries with President Zelenskyy, acknowledging their effectiveness: "They do want to have the antimissile missiles, OK, as they call them, the Patriots," Trump said then. "And we're going to see if we can make some available. We need them, too. We're supplying them to Israel, and they're very effective, 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective. They do want that more than any other thing.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"Will Have Deal For Much Less Tariffs If...": Trump On US-India Trade Talks
Washington DC: US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (local time) reaffirmed that India-US will soon strike a trade deal with "much less tariffs", allowing both countries to compete. "I think we are going to have a deal with India. And that is going to be a different kind of a deal. It is going to be a deal where we are able to go in and compete. Right now, India does not accept anybody in. I think India is going to do that, and if they do that, we are going to have a deal for much less tariffs," Donald Trump said. India and the US have been negotiating over a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) before the critical July 9 deadline of the 90-day pause on tariff escalations. Meanwhile, India has adopted a firmer stance on agricultural matters as high-stakes trade negotiations with the United States reach a pivotal moment, government sources said on Monday. The Indian delegation, led by Chief Negotiator Rajesh Agrawal, has extended its stay in Washington, as reported by ANI earlier. The two negotiations were scheduled on Thursday and Friday, but have been extended as both nations work urgently to finalise an interim trade agreement before a crucial July 9 deadline. The extended negotiations come as both countries face the looming return of suspended 26% reciprocal tariffs. These punitive measures, imposed initially during the Trump administration on April 2, were temporarily suspended for 90 days but will automatically resume if no agreement is reached. "The failure of these trade discussions would trigger the immediate reimplementation of the 26% tariff structure," warned a senior official. India's hardened position reflects the politically sensitive nature of its agricultural sector. The country's farming landscape is dominated by small-scale subsistence farmers with limited land holdings, making agricultural concessions particularly challenging from both economic and political perspectives. Notably, India has never opened its dairy sector to foreign competition in any previous free trade agreement -- a precedent it appears reluctant to break even under US pressure. The United States is pushing for reduced duties on agricultural products, including apples, tree nuts, and genetically modified crops. Meanwhile, India seeks preferential access for its labour-intensive exports, such as textiles and garments, Gems and jewellery, Leather goods, and agricultural products like shrimp, oilseeds, grapes, and bananas. Beyond the immediate interim agreement, both nations are working toward a comprehensive bilateral trade agreement (BTA) with the first phase targeted for completion by fall 2024. The ultimate goal is ambitious: more than doubling bilateral trade from the current $191 billion to $500 billion by 2030.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
U.S. Halts Key Weapons for Ukraine in New Sign of Weakening Support for Kyiv
WASHINGTON—The U.S. has stopped the delivery of air-defense interceptors and other weapons intended for Ukraine and is using them instead to beef up Pentagon stocks, a Trump administration official and two congressional aides said Tuesday. The U.S. move to withhold arms deliveries earmarked for Ukraine reflects the Trump administration's slackening commitment to aiding Kyiv in its defense against Russia. Administration officials have stressed the need to focus more on the longer-term threats from China and, more immediately, military needs in the Middle East. Anna Kelly, a White House spokeswoman, said 'this decision was made to put America's interests first' following a Pentagon review of U.S. military assistance. The shipments were in Poland when they were being halted and included Patriot air-defense interceptors, air-to-air missiles, Hellfire air-to-ground missiles and surface-to-surface rockets, artillery rounds, and Stinger surface-to-air missiles. Elbridge Colby, the undersecretary of defense for policy at the Pentagon, didn't address the decision to halt weapons shipments to Ukraine, but said the Defense Department would provide President Trump with options to continue military aid to Ukraine that are 'consistent with his goal of bringing this tragic war to an end.' 'The department is rigorously examining and adapting its approach to achieving this objective while also preserving U.S. forces' readiness for administration defense priorities,' he said. Ukrainian servicemen walk past a Patriot air-defense system at an undisclosed area. The White House move puzzled some analysts, who noted that Trump had said at the NATO summit last week that he would consider selling Patriot air-defense weapons to Kyiv. 'They do want to have the antimissile missiles, as they call the Patriots, and we're going to see if we can make some available,' Trump said in response to a question from a Ukrainian reporter. 'They are very hard to get.' Ukraine's political and military leadership have lauded the Patriot system for its ability to counter the threat from Russian ballistic missiles and are appealing for more of the interceptors. This is the second time that the Trump administration has redirected weapons intended for Ukraine to U.S. forces. The Wall Street Journal reported last month that the Pentagon had quietly notified the Congress that special fuzes for rockets that Ukraine uses to shoot down Russian drones were being allocated to U.S. Air Force units in the Middle East. Congress has appropriated funds for that system so they could be provided to Ukraine. But the Pentagon said it has the authority to keep them for its own use under a provision of an emergency military spending bill passed last year. The delay in the new shipments, earlier reported by Politico, comes as Moscow has kept up its punishing air attacks against Ukraine. A Ukrainian serviceman holds a Stinger anti-aircraft missile. In recent weeks, Trump has called for Russia to rejoin the G-7 and pushed against a congressional measure that would impose sanctions and tariffs on Moscow and its supporters for not ending the war. However, Trump last week during the NATO press conference said Russian President Vladimir Putin was the 'more difficult' partner in reaching a peace deal after previously blaming Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for the continuing conflict. The Trump administration inherited the authority to send Ukraine as much as $3.85 billion in weapons from the Pentagon's stocks but has held back from doing so. It also hasn't asked Congress for more funding for a separate program, called the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, under which money is appropriated so Kyiv can buy weapons from U.S. defense contractors. Democratic lawmakers blasted the decision to halt the shipments. 'The Pentagon is significantly weakening Ukraine's defense against aerial attacks even as Russia pounds Ukrainian cities night after night, with numerous civilians dead and wounded,' said Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D., N.H.), the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The move has also fueled the broader debate over U.S. policy toward Kyiv. 'The Ukrainians are defending themselves, the rest of Europe and U.S. security interests from an aggressive Russia,' said William Taylor, the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. 'Denying them Patriot missiles will cost civilian and military lives.' Dan Caldwell, a former Pentagon official under Trump who is skeptical of continued support for Ukraine, praised the decision to halt the shipments. 'President Trump and Secretary Hegseth are making the right decision to prioritize to our own readiness and force protection over supplying Ukraine in a war where there are no vital American interests at stake,' he said. Write to Michael R. Gordon at and Alexander Ward at
